There are lots of things ‘they would never do’…like:
-
Kill a US President on a sunny day in full view of hundreds of people
-
Knock down 3 towers with 2 planes by exploding them right in front of everyone, and then troll all the engineers and other rational people by producing a NIST model for one of the buildings that doesn’t even slightly match the copious videos of the event and declaring it ‘case closed!’
-
Totally make up a bunch of lies about the imminent use of weapons of mass destruction by a country that hadn’t even threatened the US, attack that country, kill a million of their citizens, and then give everyone involved promotions and bonuses
-
Print up trillions of dollars to hand to Wall Street because it had made some seriously ill-advised bets and might have, you know, suffered some loss of profits, and then sit back and watch as the very next reporting period Wall Street handed itself record bonuses while Main Street got clocked and millions lost their savings playing the housing game
I could go on and on.
I believe that anybody who has been paying even the slightest bit of attention knows that there’s literally nothing that ‘they wouldn’t dare’ do.
If none of the above even resulted in more than a few street protests, then on what basis does anybody propose the idea of “widespread revolts?”