Thanks for sharing pictures of your system. I was a bit worried that it would scare people as well, that’s why I pointed out that the systems are scalable to any size house. Our house is large and not designed with energy efficiency in mind when it was built (we didn’t build it). If you have a smaller house, or are building and design with energy issues in mind you can definitely get by with a much smaller and less expensive system but the basics of how it works should be about the same.
The systems needed to support a house will be roughtly proportional to the size of the house. For example, for heating, you have 1800 sq. ft with I’m guessing 8’ ceilngs based on the picture for a total heated volume of 14,400 cubic feet, we are heating roughtly 5 times the volume with our system. On the radiant floor heat, our house was designed with a convential boiler, so the radiant floor doesn’t work well with water less than about 140. As you said, if you have a well insulated slab, proper radiant piping (even, fairly close runs, and close to the surface of the concrete and well balanced zones), you can get away with lower temperatures. Our house has actually been a bit of a problem child for the controls folks because of the radiant floor was not designed with lower temperature solar in mind. The radaint floor/indirect water heater are pretty much identical to what you would find in many houses without solar. The solar simply adds another heat source. If you happen to try to do dual fuel (electric, gas, wood) heat sources you would probably have a very similar setup.
I’m guessing with your PV, wind, and being off grid, your PV setup may actually be more complicated than our system.
[quote=Christine Baker]There are MANY ways to build solar water and air heaters for less than $100.
The complexity of this system is scary, how are you going to FIX it?[/quote]
There are always ways do do things on the cheap as a DIY. However, in the case of cheap hot water systems and air systems they have their limitations. With air systems, you only get hot air during the day, and little to no heating at night unless you are using hot air to heat a mass. However, if you are trying to do that, a thermal hydronic solution is much more efficient and will require less collector surface area. Cheap water heating systems are easy to build in climates without freezing temperatures, but once you get freezing it complicates things a bit. You either have to drain water out of collectors or use a separate loop filled with antifreeze (glycol) and a heat exhanger (exactly what our system does).
The system is not very complex and I feel I could easily work on any of the components with basic plumbing skills.
We could, but I don’t want too. It would seriously impact the aesthetics of the house.
It’s kind of like why do you want windows in a house - without any you can really cut down on your heating bills - but would it be as pleasant to live in? On the LED lights, they have become better and cheaper recently. There are now some recessed can replacement lights by Cree that have the same light quality as a traditional halogen 75W bulb and work well with conventional dimmers The problem is they are still very expensive ($75/bulb). I tried CFLs in some areas and they are not near as pleasant a light source so I’m waiting a bit to see if the price will come down and I will look at replacing the halogen lights we now have. Then we will have excess power for an electric car/motorcyle. I’m also much less worried about excess generating capacity from the PV. In an energy crisis, having excess power to use or sell will be a nice problem to have.
I actually anticipate very little maintenance. Clean off the panels and collectors once in a while and change the thermal glycol every 5 years or so. That should be all the maintenance. The thermal system is really not any more complex than our old radiant floor/DHW system.
[quote=DamnTheMatrix]
I do this for a living. We are talking at cross purposes here. I wasn’t saying that building a bigger system won’t save you money (or even make you money), I’m saying it’s ALWAYS cheaper to find ways to reduce electricity consumption than to generate your wastage by any means, whether coal fired or PVs, but especially PVs.
…
The result is that we will make ~$2000 a year profi out of this, which is MORE than what you will make out of your system which is three times the size of ours. Now tell me energy efficiency doesn’t pay?
[/quote]
Cheaper - but not better financially. As shown, you could save money by conserving, however, if you have money that is sitting in a bank account, you would be better off spending on a larger solar system and making more money than you would keeping it in the bank. Also, depending on the incentives rules, it looks like that would be even more true in Australia. With the dollar at parity, your electric rates are 2.5 times more than ours and your incentive is 3.5 times more. With incentives like that I would be building as big a system as I could! After all, if I can invest 6000 and have it paid off in only 3.4 years and the rest of the 25 year life is income, why wouldn’t you do so?
[quote=DamnTheMatrix]The result is that we will make ~$2000 a year profi out of this, which is MORE than what you will make out of your system which is three times the size of ours. Now tell me energy efficiency doesn’t pay?[/quote] Actually our system has a net return of about $4,350/year. Savings on power purchases is $1,800 of that, the rest is REC credit incentive.
[quote=DamnTheMatrix]3Es or no 3Es… there’s no excuse for building the crap housing stock currently going up all over the world. I’ve known about building truly amazing houses for twenty years, so why doesn’t anyone build them…? Sigh…[/quote]
Same reason very few people know about the 3Es or fiat currencies. The way I see it, the houses are built, it does no good complaining about how crappy they are or how it would have been better … It’s now a situation we have to live with and you make do with what you have and hope to influence better designs going forward. While that house in the Swiss country side is nice looking, built into the side of the hill, as far as a sustainable option I suspect the house we_are_toast built is much more sustainable/realistic for the future. Although with a mostly underground house you can start to work with seasonal thermal stores.
DamnTheMatrix, we_are_toast and Christine Baker - you should definitely work on posting the solutions you have developed and show costs and labor involved. I’m sure many of the readers here would like to see the performance and cost information on your systems.