Did I read this correctly? Canada are offering euthanasia to the sick, disabled, and poor? “So, you’re three months behind on your rent? Don’t worry, we’ve got something for this…” This can’t be right…
3 Likes
I’m reading a book about euthanasia, but it puts me to sleep.
4 Likes
Then read a book about the youth of the nation.
Part of the problem here is one of definitions. I don’t know what ‘capitalism’ means any more. I personally define it as ‘mostly-free financial competition’, which began dying a death of a thousand cuts since even before 1913 in the US. The general usage seems to be becoming more and more ‘whatever megacorporations say’.
I don’t blindly support even my definition, because there are things besides finances to care about - tradition, family, culture, ecology, religion. But ‘free competition’ capitalism hasn’t failed so much as smothered to death in its sleep with a pillow - knowingly, by fabian socialists. And as for democracy? I’m not exactly pro or anti democracy, but the powers that be seem to have machines in place that create the illusion of choice whereas the populace is not really given control over important decisions. This substitution of real democracy for illusory democracy has also been going on for a long time.
On another note, Doc Martenson was talking about ‘accelerationism’. I’m pretty familiar with the term since about 2 BC (Before Covid), and the cultish grooming phenomenon appears to have nothing to do with accelerationism as I understand it. Yes, it’s about hastening societal collapse, but only because the accelerationists view it as necessary to rebuild.
Practically speaking, accelerationists would be in favor of voting Labor over Tories in the UK because it’s “better” to have open communists ruling rather than closet communists. If there is a primary presidential choice between AOC (lunatic leftist) versus a moderate democrat, the accelerationists would rather the lunatic leftist run. Not explicitly part of the idea, but related, is to ‘conserve the right and accelerate the left’. I am not an accelerationist, but I do subscribe partially to the Benedict Option, which is the ‘preserve what you can and don’t worry so much about the collapse’
It’s difficult for me to get rid of the right/left language, and if someone wishes, I could probably rephrase it better. But this grooming phenomenon does not appear to have anything to do with accelerationism - my money is either on a satanic cult or a fed operation. Which I say sadly without any exaggeration - the Epstein affair appeared to have fed fingerprints, either in the execution or the coverup. And hey, maybe with the loss of the Epstein agent, they need new avenues for their blackmail program.
A book about youth in Asia in particular?
2 Likes
Ok, a more neutral definition of accelerationism: to make the water boil faster so the frog will jump out of the pot before it’s cooked.
Fabian social engineers rely on slow change so that their changes can get institutionalised and accepted. The accelerationist wants them to overplay their hand.
Gov. DeSantis was using the accelerationist playbook when he bussed a bunch of illegals to Martha’s Vineyard. All of a sudden the people who demanded diversity got it right in their backyard. Which was funny for optics, but I don’t think it changed anyone’s minds… which again is why I’m not an accelerationist.
1 Like
In 2009 Dr. Ezekiel Emanuel published an article in Lancet titled “Principles for Allocation of Scarce Medical Interventions.” The authors propose a framework to guide the distribution of limited medical resources during times of scarcity, by integrating multiple ethical principles to balance fairness, utility, and “Social Value”
One of the features is a “priority curve” where individuals aged approximately 15 to 40 receive the highest priority, while the very young and the elderly receive lower priority. This approach reflects the idea that those who have not yet lived a complete life should be given the opportunity to do so. The authors argue that this method is more ethically justifiable than approaches based solely on maximizing life-years or treating everyone equally without considering life stages.
I wonder how much this played a role in Canada’s MAID system?
1 Like
Why not? seems to follow a clear pattern Georgia Guidestones, say we need to get to 500 million people … we have 7.5 billion people… math is clear…They already tried to get a needle in every arm on the planet… with plans to be jabbed 10 times with arteria clogging Spike, Cancer causing SV40, and HIV inserts for the immune system… and that plan went off the rails… they need to have some back up plan to get rid of 7 billion useless eaters… they simply can’t build enough 15 minute cities and produce enough cricket paste for everybody…
How about the die before 75 no estate tax… Carbon tax is here in some places… water tax is now in the works …just wait for the breathing tax… and give em enough time they will come up with the time credits just like the sci fi movie… can’t pay…time to die 
1 Like
Further re organ harvesting - must read thread from a guy I really admire for his integrity and truth speaking.
Wow Jan, that’s nuts! This goes back a long time, so disheartening.
1 Like
I believe that we do not even know a fraction of the unethical and immoral things that go on in hospitals around the world. And worst still, how many people who have taken oaths to protect the public in one way or another, look away, do nothing, say nothing. One more reason to avoid the medical system as much as possible. Yes, so disheartening! 
2 Likes