It’s weird that some observers continue to claim a ‘lone gunman’, again, after 61 years of that claim.
The railtop corner bullet was 1/4 second ‘early’, 45 degrees offcourse(northeast) of AGR, and it’s path to the corner was blocked by the substantial upper body of the ToughOldBird man in blue.
2 Likes
The timestamp discrepancy does not prove that it is ‘fake’. @vegaspatriot touches on this issue in his Pre-AGR Timeline Analysis:
What possible previous Trump rally at the Butler Farm Show grounds would you even be talking about? And further, if it were a former rally, how would it possibly match the RSBN footage along the vendor alley on July 13th? If you don’t think the tree lines match, please provide an example. I’m not seeing any evidence to this.
A. Coincidences occur. It happens. That doesn’t make it fake.
B. Malis filmed Crooks near where his vehicle was found, not in it, and what was released of his footage was didn’t even feature his vehicle.
C. Clearly there were many people in that same area, why would that be evidence of a fake video that he recorded the shooter on the roof?
If it’s on X, how about a link to what you are talking about?
Again, how about a link?
I have watched the bodycam videos repeatedly and have found nothing corroborating your claims that they are AI manipulated. Redactions have been implemented, but from what I can tell they are used to obscure gore in the case of the patsy, and to obscure the faces of civilian witnesses, likely for a form of protection.
This story doesn’t provide any evidence to support that the bodycam videos were ‘faked’.
Firstly, Pearson was not the one parked in front of AGR showing Nicol walk out. Second, what evidence do you have that this particular video is ‘ai manipulated’?
All videos start and stop at ‘certain points’, invariably in order to have a video exist at all, it must have a certain start and end point. I do wish we were privy to moments leading up to or following videos, but the fact that they do in fact start and end at the times they do does not inherently mean that they are ‘fake’.
2 Likes
I was watching this:
tweeting birds
#https://youtu.be/nt0_lEkYKdA?t=1517
and found a possible reference to the deceased person.
Always verify the evidence!
Assuming he changed his pants, did they find them around the venue?
Has he an assistant to take them away perhaps?
Or just left it somewhere - hoped some arbitrary person taken them away?
But there was no further report about the alleged other clothes.
- Distance of Towers: Tracking is more accurate the closer the towers are. Some experts state, however, that towers too close can reduce accuracy.
(According to the training, I should have had answered the radio check like: I received your transmission with signal strength 4.)
This is actually the cell tower does. It receives the signal of the mobile phone and inform it to increase or decrease the transmission power. (Not only for saving battery power, but also the too strong transmission would be not decodable.) But these stenght level changes happen in steps - also depending on radio generation like 3G or 4G. So the signal level check is essential, but it has a limited accuracy - I don’t know the number of steps and levels.
The other factor is - you’re not alone on the same frequency. You got a time slice to transmit. So it is like 1 sec talk has to be compressed into 1/100 second (approx) and then let the others to transmit. However, the signaé propagates with the speed of the light, and therefore the delay depends on your distance. When you’re far away, the signal arrives later and might be shifted into other’s time window. I don’t know they use this delay to calculate the distance - but theoretically it is possible,
(So when you’re on a hill or airplane, you might access distant towers, but your transmission might disrupt other transmissions.)
1 Like
Then FBI Director Cheatle was asked point blank during her Congressional hearing if there was a rangefinder, to which she reluctantly replied, “Yes.” She seemed like she was trying to avoid answering the question.
The discovery of him and his rangefinder at the magnetometers, by the USSS, was an inconvenient fact for the USSS who was trying to blame the event on local LEO, in part for not informing the USSS of the rangefinder in time.
Pardon, she was not FBI.
Once again, why should anyone use a rangefinder within 100 yards? I guess it is a distance to shoot from wrist, even without the red dot.
My bias: from time to time we use security measures. For example, only authorised personell should be able to access (or change) cruicial information. Usually it is a little tricky, not obvious. (Like a hidden wallpaper door - for the king to escape.)
So it is rather a signal for someone.
Obviously he cannot just come over to say like “hi, tell the saic the extra staff has arrived”.
Of course, he could send a private message. But that information also should be distributed among the agents - not conspicuously.
But it as a “two in one” solution.
1 Like
The investigation found this drone flight was conducted approximately 200 yards from the site of the rally by reverse engineering the metadata associated with the subject’s drone. The ongoing analysis did not reveal any photos or video taken by the drone, as there was no memory card recovered inside the device when it and the controller were discovered in the subject’s vehicle. The FBI is still working to determine if the subject was viewing footage on the drone’s controller and whether that may have revealed further insights that day into the security posture at the location from which he ultimately carried out his attack.
So the drone is crucial. However, he was able to gather some information when he was walking around. With the drone he was able to check the actual vantage point.
In contrast, he dropped the ladder way before that. So it might be some trace - that the drone is just an alibi - and might be planted only after the shooting.
However, it is more likely that he parked somewhere closer to the intersection, such as AGR, the greenhouses, or Dollar General. If he parked near the AGR main entrance, it likely wasn’t the spot where his car was ultimately found, based on the next timestamp, 16:03:00, which states he drove around after flying his drone.
Apparently, the drone controller does document each flight in the metadata, including start and end times, and location of the drone, even if nothing is recorded during the flight. My question is, if the drone’s location was known, wouldn’t the entire flight path be obtainable from the metadata of the July 13th flight?
Per the electronic data FBI gathered, the controller had 13 flights logged in it. A “flight” would be logged into the drone’s system whenever the drone was activated or flown. The FBI noted that while eight flights and 20 unique images were pulled from Crooks’ drone, none of the images were from July 13. Crooks’ drone flight on July 13 was logged as Flight #17
For educational purposes…
Some 25 years ago we had similar problem. There was only a limited memory to store security events. (The data inflation means, no matter how much memory you have, it is always insufficient. Should we have more memory, we want to store more detailed data.)
When 13 were found (allegedly the user cannot delete them) and the last one is #17 - it means 4 flight’s data have been overwritten.
(So 25 years ago we had a debate, when the event log would exceed the memory - should we keep the first or the last ones. What would be the best memory occupation stratefy? My decison was: keep both the first and the last event and the event count. Between them might be overwritten log data.)
EDIT+
Why did none of the LEOs or other support personnel see it being flown? They knew to look for drones and were even directed what to do if they saw one.
“We know they lie. They know we know they lie. We know they know we know they lie.”
Hypothesis: Of course, the patsy had been informed they were going to watch drones. So he was told where to do it. But what if he forgot it or missed it? No matter, we still can say he did it.
++
The Vender Alley Sighting
I was not aware that @Vegaspatriot had done 7 slides on this subject. I will take another look at it. A twitter user i have been following for a long time has been providing credible evidence said this video was fake. He did mention how it was done but i did not know the technical details of it. This caused a big debate amongst Twitter users, was it fake, or not.
I have never blocked any person on any platform because i respect other people`s opinions. However, i had to with 1 Twitter user, the insulting bad language i received was unbeleiable. That person was BLOCKED.
Sorry, i have always had problems trying to save the links to youtube and Rumble videos, and i have the same problem with X.com as well. X.com keep wiping all their content. So i am unable any evidence of the documentary film maker contacting. This person only contacted me twice. The first time, wanted to see my evidence of the Butler Township videos being AI manipulated. Then he contacted me again, for a lawyer address. He, and i believe this lawyer is going to help him contact Butler Township about the the videos being AI manipulated and see what can be done about it. Even if they do release them all again without AI manipulation. What then? I can tell they have been AI manipulated, but can everyone else? There will be Ai manipulated ones and non AI manipulated ones?
I am not being rude here. There s no point in me giving answers to the rest of the questions regarding Jon Malis videos for the moment. Let`s see how i get on these fake images below.
The above picture is a still taken from one of the Butler Township bodycam videos. It has been AI manipulated. Whoever did this, has not done a very good job of it. For some reason, animal faces or Disney cartoon characters show up. I first noticed this problem when i saw a Camel`s head, and went from there. Every video shows different faces. Take a look at the still image below taken from another Butler township video. The one where it shows Greg Nicol walking out of the AGR builing door. Look very carefully, the AI manipulation is hard to spot. Around the two chairs, there are two faces of animals appear to be cows. If anyone has any difficulties seeing them, i can brighten them up
Take a look at the image below. I am sure you, and everyone else is aware of this famous image that went viral all around the world. However, it is a FAKE. It has not been AI manipulated, instead has been
Photoshopped. Can you spot all 6 clues it was faked?
In the top picture, ignore the little yellow spots. They are not there to represent anything just having problems putting the arrows in the picture.
What I first saw was the electric wires. It is weird!
Boy, that pole ought to be at the other side of the water tower. Now you can say GOTCHA!
I did not notice the wires were on the wrong side of the watertower, However, i did notice the wires appear falling downwards to the ground. In the USA, they might not do that. In my country, they do.
Here are Jon Malis Twitter tweets giving his side of the story. Sorry, i forgot to save the date. According to my saved images metadata, they are dated 21/02/2025.
1 Like
I do not know if you have the pictures below. Confirmation the guy that was stood in the corner with Dutch was hit on his left arm elbow area.
2 Likes
I got an idea…
It is winter here, but if you perhaps were in South-America or Australia - when not, we have to wait until summer comes. You should find some arbitrary forest and take footages - and check the alleged AI manipulation.
I cannot say there aren’t manipulated frames on the bodycam footages. And - as I previously mentioned the ABC murders - if they wanted to conceal one thing, they should do it with many arbitrary others. We cannot prove anything this way. Remember: they know we know they lie.
But I’m pretty sure they know the limits of smartphone videos, so most probably they didn’t have to do anything. Simply we cannot magnify those images enough - mostly they are only toys for adult kids.
It is just the “feature” of wide angle lens of bodycam - fish eye optics. Don’t worry about it.
Great find. Please keep going.
#Fire And Motion – Joel on Software
gist:
Sometimes I just can’t get anything done.
Sure, I come into the office, putter around, check my email every ten seconds, read the web, even do a few brainless tasks like paying the American Express bill. But getting back into the flow of writing code just doesn’t happen.
Once you get into flow it’s not too hard to keep going. Many of my days go like this: (1) get into work (2) check email, read the web, etc. (3) decide that I might as well have lunch before getting to work (4) get back from lunch (5) check email, read the web, etc. (6) finally decide that I’ve got to get started (7) check email, read the web, etc. (8) decide again that I really have to get started (9) launch the damn editor and (10) write code nonstop until I don’t realize that it’s already 7:30 pm.
When I was an Israeli paratrooper a general stopped by to give us a little speech about strategy. In infantry battles, he told us, there is only one strategy: Fire and Motion. You move towards the enemy while firing your weapon. The firing forces him to keep his head down so he can’t fire at you. (That’s what the soldiers mean when they shout “cover me.” It means, “fire at our enemy so he has to duck and can’t fire at me while I run across this street, here.” It works.) The motion allows you to conquer territory and get closer to your enemy, where your shots are much more likely to hit their target. If you’re not moving, the enemy gets to decide what happens, which is not a good thing. If you’re not firing, the enemy will fire at you, pinning you down.
2 Likes
I have had those 2 photographs for a long time regarding the guy in the corner of the bleachers in the red cap. People are sharing information with me, and like to share information back In the past, on Twitter, people were dabating if the bullitt actually hit him. It did.
Those Butler Township police department bodycam videos could be the talk of the town, and jokes. I am sure all the bodycam footage would have been taken off them, seized, and locked away maybe for a long time in the archives somewhere. What if there is a fault with them, and can be manipulated, it could cause problems solving and prosecuting people for crimes. I don`t know if Butler as a zoo. I can image attending a break in at the zoo. The culprits ran off, we have 2 suspects on our footage, 2 cows?