So It's Back To First Principles (Part 1)

The secret service agent is on the outside of the railing taking the shot not on the inside Other agents were walking along the back of bleachers top part.

I am having problems with videos and saving links to them. I will do a screenshot of the video, and you might recognise it.

That guy in white stood in the corner, He was there, witnessed the secret service firing the shot at Corey. Immediately after it happened, the guy in white suddenly turned round looked over the side of the bleachers. What have i just seen here, unbelieable! The guy in green, i don`t know who he is, and has never come up in any of my investigations.

Very nice work, NT! I’m not sure how you do the running transcript alongside everything, but it is a very cool feature! And having this animated overview while watching the bodycam is fantastic! A while ago I had been interested in tracking Collins’ movements before heading to AGR based on what we see from his bodycam, I didn’t get very far along in the process before putting it on the backburner, but you’ve hit it out of the park with this!

2 Likes

I don’t follow… please explain how he would be outside the railing where you have circled the man in green?

In the distorted image, i can make out a distorted face, Circled it in blue. The face does not match any of the faces on my database. I will bear it in mind for now.

Rob… what even is this? How are you taking anything away from a picture that looks like that? How does this even show anything?

1 Like

I thought “Tough old bird” was shot twice in the arm and where the sun does not shine. Ok, same bullitt it is. What about the 2 witnesses that saw smoke in the trees/field?

A while back. i did some research regarding Audio shot 1 and the supressed shot that hit the railing from the northeast, which was shot first. The supressed shot hit the railing first before the audio shot 1. It will be about 1/4 of a second.

I know the pixulated picture is not perfect. There is enough there to show someone there in a black short sleeved shirt. white arms in a fireing position. Do you see any rally attendees dressed like that?

I have zoomed in and out of the video and it is as clear as day a secret service agent on the bleachers stand, after taking the shot, goes behind the stand and disappears. Behind the bleachers there were platforms there to stand on.

It is this video. Look in the area circled in yellow.

18 Feb

Did you include the round that hit the railing by my buddy? Hitting him with shrapnel in the elbow, hand and buttocks."

You have lost me here, who is my buddy?

That’s funny! :joy: It’s interesting, I’ve turned to chatting with ai more frequently, chatgpt most often actually, and it is quite hit and miss. It is able to draw conclusions, but I have come across many times where it was wrong or didn’t consider something, and in pointing it out was able to further it’s analysis somewhat. It really depends. I’ve even seem some videos addressing creating prompts for ai that are quite in depth and by crafting the input in certain ways you can improve the output tremendously.

Sometimes though we simply see what we want to see! :see_no_evil::hear_no_evil::speak_no_evil:
“BUSHES OF LOVE” – Extended Lyric Video

2 Likes

I’m sorry my post was confusing.
David Dutch, in his 18 Feb X post, said that the corner guy in the darkblue Tough Old Bird T Shirt is his ‘buddy’. You can find Dutch’s posts on X, but he has many posts and reposts.
I found Dutch’s 18 Feb post by searching his account and including “buttocks”, without the quote marks, in the search widget!

1 Like

I think that Tough Old Bird wasn’t shot at all.
He just got sprayed with shrapnel, lead fragments, etc, that bounced up and off of the rail, and onto his elbow, arm, and butt.

1 Like

But I don’t trust it.

I think in 2002 my boss pushed a book into my hands to read. It was about ways of thinking and the rationality of irrational thinking. The author is a chess player master.
Scientist use the formal logic. But in our lives it is not always possible, usually we don’t have all necessary information for the decision. So there are different strategies to deal with the lack of information.
Most of people are right handed, the left hemisphere of their brain can speak and may use a step-by-step inference. Right hemispere is different, there come the ideas from. Also it cannot speak, so we cannot aks why it thinks someting. It is fast - but not reliable. So - as an example of chess players - the author stated: it is easy to figure out what the next step would be, but they spend much more time to check it by left hemispere.

Conclusion: whatever the AI tells you - must be checked. The better twice than not once either.

(By the way, there is an open question since Newton created his mechanics - based on the calculus he invented. And later it was complicated with the inevitable underlaying randomness. Is there free will, or we’re just machines who follow the Newtonian mechanics or controlled by the ultimate randomness?)

Decades ago - there wasn’t youtube - I watched television. A physicist said: objects of the world ‘like’ to be between the total order and the total chaos. About 20 years later I got another piece of the puzzle. We learnt entropy in the school, but now we understand the complexity. A perfect crystal is boring, and the oposite like a gas is boring too. But between the low and high entropy there might be interesting things.

Oh, I wanted to find a citation of a famous astronommer. But my brain missed his name. And also it took some time when I realized: Steven Segal is not an astronomer - but my brain recalled that name again again. Interesting. Then finally I managed to get the right name: Carl Sagan. (He said somethong about louder drums and faster runners.)

1 Like

It looks like - he has no ingress shotwound. But the trajectory of the projectile hit the railing would be interesting.

1 Like

And that’s ok, I really don’t trust it fully either, though I do see the potential for it to be able to sift through vast amounts of data very quickly, or perform various equations iterated much easier than by hand, amongst other applications. Any result must absolutely be vetted, but I still see a potential benefit even in rough calculations.

1 Like

It was behind the corner guy’s back, and his ‘front’ blocked shots from AGR.
Cullen said it had “6 million views on X when he showed it on 20 July”, so others considered it interesting 8 months ago.

Some of our commercial media, selling soap, phones, and pharmaceuticals, should try to find those residents who saw smoke from the trees. There was certainly more than 1 shooter out there.