So It's Back To First Principles (Part 1)

Did the FBI reveal what the zero of his rifle was?

I think that would be very inappropriate, and could endanger a man’s life.

Also, fake images around the AGR building car park are doing the rounds.

1 Like

just to check this trooper’s injury

1 Like

Back in July, Dayve, in one of his posts, witnessed a lot more suppressed shots being fired. He did not give much detail only they were fired from the North area.

1 Like

NO KIDDING!
He even made cartoon-like ‘text balloons’ to emphasize those shots.
Then he left his X account, saying ‘this is hell’
and disappeared for 6 months.
Now he can’t remember hearing suppressed shots that he described with ‘cartoon text balloons!’

OK. what else can be done to get the authorities to act, and do something? The way things stand, this is another one heading for the history books that Crooks was shooter?

Tough question, especially if the authorities don’t want to investigate.
He isn’t a risk to public safety.
But the people who paid him could be a continuing risk to Trump’s safety.

1 Like

I think that Baldy also had a descending trajectory to Trump+Copenhaver, Dutch, and then Copenhaver again:

1 Like

I think it was back in August 2024, Dyve tweeted, he had to appear in court, and may get prison time. Nothing more was heard from him for months. I can also recall him saying he was getting a lot of hassle from other Twitter users. It was all peaceful at first, then became offensive.
Also not followed him for a long time or that he cannot remember anything about the shots. I discovered a few days ago, that he is back on Twitter again, replying to questions.

2 Likes

Yes, that’s a weird reflection of the barn (or maybe not that). We still don’t have an explanation how it was so distorted.

I think it is only pixelation problem of compressed images.

1 Like

Dayve said he would reveal something when Trump comes back to Butler. What was that?

Obviously. But they don’t have another rifle in custody.
We might, however, ask them what the zero was the rifle “found” on the rooftop.

@sgt-raven @vegaspatriot @cmartenson
Have you ever observed the Magnus effect when spinning bullet passes by an object, deflected horizontally?

chatGPT:

Yes, we can observe the Magnus effect in such a situation — when a spinning projectile passes near a vertical object and is deflected horizontally without touching or bouncing off it.

:arrows_counterclockwise: What is the Magnus Effect?

The Magnus effect is a phenomenon where a spinning object moving through a fluid (like air) experiences a sideways force due to differences in air pressure on either side of the object. This force causes the object to curve in its trajectory.

  • Think of a curveball in baseball or a spinning soccer ball bending around a wall in a free kick.

:compass: Your Scenario

  • Spinning projectile (like a spinning ball or bullet)
  • Passes close to a vertical object (e.g., a pole or wall)
  • Does not touch it
  • Appears to get horizontally deflected

:white_check_mark: Is It the Magnus Effect?

Yes — if the projectile’s path curves horizontally as it spins, that’s a classic Magnus effect.
This effect does not require any contact with other objects. It arises purely from the interaction between the spinning object and the air.

But here’s the subtlety:

  • The vertical object nearby is not the cause of the Magnus effect.
  • However, it can serve as a reference that makes the sideways deflection more noticeable.
  • If the projectile appears to “swerve” around the vertical object, it’s due to airflow asymmetry from the spin, not a repulsion or interaction with the object itself.

:white_check_mark: Conclusion

So to summarize:

  • Yes, you can observe the Magnus effect as horizontal deflection when a spinning projectile passes near a vertical object — even with no contact.
  • The proximity to the vertical object is coincidental, not causal.
  • The actual deflection comes from the projectile’s spin interacting with the air.

Let me know if you’d like a diagram or simulation example!

From other hand, Greg was wandering inside the building - as he testified. The flapper might have been partially open, and we could see some light (from the corridor) when he opened the door.

2 Likes

Maybe Trump was fake also!!!

1 Like

Trooper Graham has been identified?


“GRA” (Graham?)

handwittness









We cannot see his face yet.






cannot see his name


russhed into the building

Trooper Graham, referring to R. Eric Graham, was a Pennsylvania State Police Trooper. He was employed by the State of Pennsylvania and his 2019 pay was reported as $99,538. Another individual, Jermaine Graham, also appears in State of Pennsylvania records with employment in 2022 and 2023.
While the name “Trooper Graham” is associated with the Pennsylvania State Police, it is important to note that this could refer to either R. Eric Graham or Jermaine Graham, as both have records with the State of Pennsylvania.

Access blocked:
https://openpayrolls.com/employee/jermaine-graham-9565
https://openpayrolls.com/r-eric-graham-86138803

Pope Francis was dressed as DJT. :wink:

They must be lying about a 2nd rifle.
Crooks obviously had one, and so did ‘Max’.
And the video owner doesn’t seem to know that ‘Max’ is on his video, but I spent a few hours cropping ‘Max’ by hand, from 117 consecutive frames, like this:

1 Like