So It's Back To First Principles (Part 1)

19:30 But after Thomas receives that gun from his father, he goes and purchases 50 rounds of 5.56 ammunition at a local gun
19:38 store between 147 and 155 p.m. But that’s a big problem because later that
19:45 day when the police search his dead body on the roof of AGR, there’s no wallet or
19:51 ID. Thomas Crooks had to have ID when he bought ammo at 147. So, who took his ID?
20:01 Hell, who took his wallet? He had to have credit cards or cash because they
20:06 don’t hand out ammunition for free in Pennsylvania. That’s three more pieces of hard
20:12 evidence that indicate Crooks probably had help. And there’s a cover up.

Well, I haven’t seen any report about that. Did he pay by cash or card? Neither reported wether his ID was found in his car.

As you can see in my previous post, Crooks did not have a line of sight to shoot James Copenhaver; in fact, his line of fire actually collides with the left side of the bleachers:

The fact that Copenhaver was hit twice, and the acoustic signatures of shots 4 to 8 seem to come from the same gun, suggests that these shots were fired from AGR 2 (the right window) or AGR 4.

Frankly speaking, I did not spend much time analyzing shot 9, so you probably have much better knowledge about it. In the video you sent me — the one with the court case — the doctor confirmed that shot 9 and shot 10 could not have entered the same spot. Therefore, I assumed Crooks was only hit once and assigned the last bullet (shot 9) to him. However, if you say it definitely came from Zaliponi, I’ll update my shot attribution accordingly. This would mean Crooks did not fire at all.

I would recommend trying FreeCAD, as it supports importing 3D STEP files. I’d be happy to share our simulation CAD data in STEP format so you can import it into FreeCAD. Maybe I’ll try importing it myself first and let you know how it works.

Here is therefore my latest updated version:

1 Like

23:39 is, you guessed it, explosive drones. Oh, and by the way, the president of
23:45 Ukraine, Vladimir Zelinsky, really did not want Trump to be the president. So
23:51 much so that Zelinsky actually went to Pennsylvania in September 2024 and
23:56 campaigned against Trump. And then a month later, in October 2024, a Ukraine
24:03 war sympathizer tries to assassinate President Trump in Florida.

chatGPT:

Volodymyr Zelenskyy’s full name is Volodymyr Oleksandrovych Zelenskyy.

The name “Volodymyr” is the Ukrainian version of the more Russian-sounding “Vladimir.” In fact, Vladimir is a common Slavic name used both in Russia and Ukraine, but in Ukraine, “Volodymyr” is the more typical form.

Some people might have the impression that Zelenskyy changed his name to reflect a more “Ukrainian” identity, but in fact, it’s just the standard Ukrainian form of the name.

I saw no hard evidence that Zaliponi’s bullet ever hit him or his rifle.
Anyway, it is confusing. Zaliponi’s 11 o’clock direction would have hit him from his left. So I don’t know who he shot at.

But they do not prevent
27:31 Trump from taking the stage at 6:05 p.m. So seeing Crooks with a rangefinder is
27:36 crucial because it shows that he’s a threat, not just a spectator. But
27:42 incredibly, as far as we know, Crook’s rangefinder, a crucial piece of evidence
27:48 that proves he intended to shoot Trump, has never been found. Not in his car,
27:54 not in his pockets, not in his backpack. So, the question is, who took the
28:00 rangefinder? And speaking about Crook’s backpack, there’s something very suspicious about

Again, I saw no hard evidence of the rangefinder.
Greg didn’t photographe it. Not found on the roof.
There was no report weher it was found in his car.

Between his right arm and his torso.

But there are no videos or photos showing Crooks when shots 4 to 8 were fired. Maybe he was no longer lying on the roof, but kneeling. This would have made his rifle higher.

Or can you rule that out?

I analyzed Comperatore’s video and there’s something odd.

I looked at the timeline of the shots and the first three are consistent. We find the same delays between the shots and a difference of about 180 ms between the crack and the boom, consistent with the distance between Corey and Crooks.

But the time between the crack of shot 3 and the crack of shot 4 is about 2.3 seconds instead of 2.8 seconds on the other recordings.

So I’m guessing there’s a gap in the video of about 0.5 seconds between 1 minute 20.4 seconds and 1 minute 22.5 seconds.

2 Likes

outer edge of Copenhaver’s upper left arm.
How much is the DeepState paying you?

No.
ToughOldBird reacted when silent Shot 25 landed behind his back on top of galvanized steel rail, but he jumped when Shot 26 bounced off Copenhaver’s left arm, and then smacked the black vinyl Jumbotron cover less than 2 meters northeast of TOB.

@vegaspatriot

Final report

Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee

Good observation!

2.8 seconds was the gap I measure between Shot3 and Shot4.
Maybe Corey’s phone ‘heard’ the never-reported 3 suppressed shots between the ‘3 shots’ and the ‘5 shots’:
(and the TV producer wanted to hide those 3 mystery shots)

2 Likes

We’ve heard a lot of audio from a lot of sources. If the shots are softer than we would expect on Mr. Comperatore’s phone, I would expect the audio was manipulated or swapped. Nevertheless I will look into blanks.

Why do you say the key is his drone?

1 Like

That’s a very large difference. We see video, but the phone is moving quickly, so I guess they could just manipulate the speed at which it’s being “panned”.

That would also tie in with voices of nearby people apparently being silenced.

2 Likes

I think you’re really onto something.

You can hear shot 3 and see many frames after that before he actually goes down, but there is no oil leaking from the hydraulic piston that was punched. With the audio delay, you would even expect to see oil coming out of the piston before you hear shot 3.

Looking at another angle provided by @daniel59, it is clearly visible that the piston was hit by shot 3:

So as you said, it seems the video is actually slower than the sound.

1 Like

most plausible, see above
(usually I say: with both palm we stepped into the middle of trouble) :upside_down_face:

I believe the drone is only a cover story. When we can prove there was no drone at all, he was well informed instead.

1 Like

I think we can rule that out just by looking at @kincses-zsolt’s excellent animation.

As you can see, Crooks has not changed his position after the shots.

I played the two footages simultaneously (at the beginning). Then the shot 4 was off-sync. There are two possobilities. They manipulated the footage, or the shooter came closer. Much closer. Actually 187 yards closer. Uhm.

speed of sound = 374 yards / second

Hypothetically speaking.
There is no visual evidence that Corey was shot dead from inches.

(But be careful. When I was joking, the more stupid the more true it used to be.)

But wait, I compared it to Dave’s video, and hypothetically he was at closest ever to the alleged shooter.

That part was concealed, but give me a second.

ezgif.com-animated-gif-maker

1 Like

He was right, it is now only 45.

2 Likes

Behind the blue door - there is light inside.

Anyone can recognize this part of the building?

2 Likes