So It's Back To First Principles (Part 1)

I’m saving screen shots. I’d be willing to pay him a nontrivial amount of money for a copy and limited rights.

I was just going over some of the stills and realized that there were serious compression upload issues around 4:55 and after (what a surprise!)

Whenever you see “blockiness” that is 8 by 8 pixels or some multiple of 8, that’s an upload compression artifact, I’m told.

There’s this mess:


(and others that are worse, Det. Collins just adds variety to the clusterf@#$).

And I came across this still and thought “woah, I’ve never seen THAT before!”



Like, What the hell?
I had come across it before, it just looked a lot different in a different download, somehow…

I screengrabbed that back on July 30 of last year. I don’t know if it was from X or what.

No, I don’t think “Crooks” fired the first three shots. They had a different echo from shots 4-8, for one thing. I just don’t know where they came from. Probably either the first floor of AGR 6 or the roof of the northern 2 story AGR building.

I think that’s part of your problem.
Do you remember when you told me that you’d never heard Trump say, “ohhh!”?
Can you hear “ohhh!” in this video?

1 Like

You may have missed my reply about Driscoll/McCullough…
I watched McCullough’s 16.7 seconds, thought it looked better, but the bald gunman seems to have been smoked away.
I can see him in Driscoll’s 60 frames/second, but not in McCullough’s 30 frames per second, and i think Baldy was erased…
Too late, I have the whole video, and all the frames…

Yes, now it’s time to discuss the origin of the shot that hit the hydraulic pipe from the telehander.

At first glance, if we draw a line from the impact point on the hydraulic pipe back toward Trump, the trajectory suggests, just like @sonjax6 mentions, a strange origin. However, we’re no longer at the beginning of this investigation. Much like a Sudoku puzzle, we’ve already filled in many key details through previous analyses, and we can now use that information to evaluate this shot more accurately.

So let’s attempt to solve the “Sudoku” of the bullet that struck the hydraulic pipe.

Thanks to the video provided by @daniel59, we can clearly see that Shot 3 is the one that impacts the hydraulic pipe.

According to @Sonja’s analysis, the bullet appears significantly larger (0.3") than the caliber used in Crooks’ AR-15, ruling out that weapon.

Additionally, Shot 3 doesn’t produce any echo, which could suggest a closer or more enclosed origin. Based on this, one possible explanation is that Shot 3 originated from a vent in ARG Building 6?.

That covers what we know from the impact side.

Now, turning to the origin side, we’ve recently identified that a shot captured on the official Butler police body cam corresponds to the same Shot 3, coming from Vent 1.

Theoretically, if we connect Vent 1 to the hydraulic pipe impact point, we should have the bullet’s trajectory. But as @sonjax6 points out, this trajectory doesn’t align with the evidence — it seems inconsistent. Does this mean something is already wrong with our evaluation? Maybe not.

Let’s take another more detailed look.

If we forward-trace the trajectory from Vent 1 in the direction of Trump, it actually aligns precisely with the position of Corey Comperatore at the time when Shot 3 was fired.


Reviewing the footage, we can confirm that unfortunatly Corey remained in that same position during shots 1 - 3, placing his head directly along the trajectory from Vent 1 to Trump. This implies the bullet was slightly deflected to the left — just enough to miss Trump — and instead passed through a newly discovered hole in the banner before striking the hydraulic pipe.

This theory remains open for discussion, but it fits all the available evidence and effectively “solves the Sudoku”: all the known data points support this proposed trajectory.

1 Like

…wedged against Copenhaver’s spine.
(WARNING: Elon labeled this as graphic content, because it shows James Copenhaver being shot in the abdomen)
Watch his EYE at the 5 second mark.
Watch the fluid filling his shirt with fluid, from the inside, where the bullet hit him.
(and Shot 1 hit his arm…)

Sorry, we discussed it several mounths ago.

Alas, things are not getting better in your head!

You should consider that the 3rd bullet could have been deflected towards the hydraulic pipe by the metal pipe behind the bullet hole in the banner.

This event clearly was staged. That
much is obvious. Am too busy with other massive matters to keep tracking minutiae. Similar on 07 October. Clearly staged. Very deadly, very staged.

1 Like

Ignore @flamecensor. His perception produces many false positives.

At some point we will have to ask you some questions about Doug Mills photo and suppressor technology.

IMG_9389.mov
I don’t know much about suppressors but I know a thing or two about combat photography

1 Like

Your reasoning is absolutely correct!

I forgot to mention this detail, and you’re right — the bullet appears to have struck the bar behind the banner, causing yet another change in trajectory, as you can see here.

If you look closely at the HD image, you can even spot debris from the impact, further confirming this trajectory.

1 Like

I must have missed it. Unfortunately these aren’t nicely threaded discussions, or even searchable. Can you point me to the exact place they were discussed, or give a brief summary of any conclusions?

If you have skills with Photoshop, or other graphics editors, could you refine Baldy’s head, by working on his nose, lips, and chin, and then colorize them all nicely?
I think his eyebrows, moustache and hair could be “medium brown”.

I don’t know of any video by the name “Driscoll”. What video is that?

And I didn’t expect you to take my request to go back to the first generation video seriously, but what does my not catching Trump saying “oh” have to do with anything?

I’m sorry, but the green just isn’t there in version that’s available on Dayve’s youtube channel currently. This is that frame, at 720 p resolution:

If by “staged” you mean set up by people that wanted Trump dead, I agree. I suspect you mean “Trump faked it” though.

I would challenge you to explain why the FBI went along with this fakery, when Biden’s FBI clearly wanted Trump in jail. The only resistance that was put up by the FBI was Wray saying they weren’t sure Trump was actually hit by a bullet or by shrapnel. Why didn’t the FBI investigate the fakery?

And why would the Secret Service go along with the fakery? Kim Cheatle had to resign! The Secret Service’s reputation is in tatters. Why?

Why has none of the mainstream news sniffed into this? If it’s clearly staged, one of the professional photographers working for mainstream news organizations that HATE Trump - like the NY Times - should have had evidence that it was staged, yes?

You’re a professional photographer. You know the signs of fakery. Go take your evidence to the nearest mainstream news outlet and sell it for a lot of money. We’re waiting.

1 Like

Sorry, short circuit in my brain.
I was surprised to see what I wrote.
I wanted to say it about the headlight reflection of police car in the window.
My mistake.

So if you watch the frames around this one, you might see it was headlight reflection.

However, now I heard the “ohhh!”

I must check some original footages now.

“Cam Driscoll” was a name told to me by an X poster who, I think, was a Chicago cop who’d threatened Dayve, and claimed to be “speaking for Dayve” in April, because Dayve “had PTSD and was on ‘meds’…”
And this 60f/s .mp4 was linked on THIS THREAD, I think by KINCES Zsolt…so I got it and named it ‘driscoll.mp4’.

driscoll.mp4