You give me far too little credit. It seems to me that you didn’t read the previous revision of the Door 9 & 13 Events analysis. If not, don’t bother, I’m in the process of doing a much deeper dive on Door 13, since my previous revision did not have the benefit of the radio transcripts and congressional investigation reports. I will return your cheekiness and suggest it might be above your reading level though.
If, after reading my new revision, you still have questions about my analysis and any associated inferences, I will gladly respond to your questions and comments. The one stipulation is that you must reference the specific slide and point you have questions or comments on, and if you want to refute it provide contradictory evidence. None of this surface level, assumption based, contradictory evidence-lacking criticism you typically provide. I will not respond to those anymore. It’s past time that we debate this at the same level of logic and reason.
Good day.