So It's Back To First Principles

Yep, I hear you brother. I have to admit, I’m new to X/Twitter, so I’ve just been noticing it lately. Thanks for the info.

The weirder all this shit gets, I have faith that the harder they will fall. It just takes faith, an open heart and mind, and a willingness to discern truth from fiction.

1 Like

Another first principle - focus on aftermath.

Where is the video and photos and timeline of the response to the shooting? How long did it take for the first responder to reach Crooks? Where is the video and photos of the dead Crooks on the roof and the video of the first responding officer getting there? Who was it and what did they do? Who joined him and what did they do? Where was the gun? Are there photos showing casings?

Why would people quit recording at that point? You’d think every camera would be rolling after the shooting.

They wouldn’t - so where is all that?

3 Likes

Chris,
GPS marks your location by reporting the time and locations of the satellites at a time hack. The GPS device does the math to calculate your position. This principle can be used to find the location of each shot. Using the time of each shot as recorded and the X,Y, and Z locations of each recording, each rifle location can be determined. Knowing each shot’s location will answer many questions and maybe open up others.

Like rubbernecks on the freeway going by an accident. You are correct. Where is it?
I want undoctored bodycam footage of officers responding to the white van. Was one of the other patsies shot inside to keep quiet? Bombs? What caused them to react?

I agree with many who think there can’t be a second (pro) shooter or he would be dead, but I would consider whatever sniper was left in that building as a candidate. We need second by second accounting of who left and why and what they were all doing this whole time. One man was apparently left there alone. Maybe he wasn’t a shooter but was there to create diversions and get the others to leave so they wouldn’t notice him? Just a theory.

I don’t think the microseconds involved in a bullet’s trajectory would give enough information but it’s worth pursuing.

A photograph of the likely shooter in a SS Police Uniform is posted in this video, “Multiple Shooters? John Cullen & Clay Martin” do a Rumble search on this title

Darin,
The velocity used in the analysis is the speed of sound, which is approximately 760 miles per hour and travels 13.5 inches in one millisecond. Nailing down the location within even a few feet can change the discussion profoundly.

Ed I’ve done a bit of surveying and use gps a lot for offshore navigation. With consumer grade GPS, what do you think the range of uncertainty is for a GPS location fix?

When talking about first principles, I can’t get over that back row down the bleachers.

Why do they all flinch in a row when nobody else acts that way?

If it’s just flinching at the sound, then why isn’t everyone else in other rows doing it too?

We definitely know a bullet is involved because of the railing.

https://x.com/I_Am_JohnCullen/status/1815005247376703873

That trajectory could never be from Crooks. Were there silenced shots??

1 Like

Totally agree.

The DA, Richard Goldinger, seems a bit more reliable than other sources- although this could be completely wrong- and he says that one person was left up there. Since the other one was apparently locked out of the building, the person left behind becomes the most obvious suspect. We at least need to know more about him and his story of what happened. If he was ‘on the way down to open the door’ when the shots were fired that seems very fishy.

(I mention Goldinger because other sources claim BOTH men left to find Crooks)

From the horse’s mouth: ~1 m. GPS.gov: GPS Accuracy

Thanks, I’ll check those out. I also heard that about the girl in the van. The guy with the beard wasn’t Hooper, Yearick’s accomplice. He was just a guy running his mouth at someone, there was an altercation and he got locked up. I think they traced the license plate of the van. No reason they would have Crooks’ DNA on file, so where does that come from? Amazing how many questions the media doesn’t ask. Their complicit in this just by journalistic malpractice.

1 Like

You have your opinion, I have mine.

This is not a matter of opinion.

I’m subject to being proven otherwise, but I don’t think 1m accuracy will cut it for calculating something moving as fast as a bullet or the sound of same. Even gross surveying of a football field can’t close within a few yards without multiple receivers correcting the error.

The biggest problem I’m having is if Crooks cased the area and was observing the sniper solutions, he would have known those windows were open with snipers inside the second building with a clear view of him. He was careful to keep down behind the ridge to avoid the far snipers but wasn’t concerned about his “6”? I just really can’t believe that (unless he had some comfort with the “and then there were none” scenario in that building at exactly the right time).

1 Like

It depends on how you define ‘precise’ and ‘accurate’. The AR-15 is a generic rifle produced by dozens of manufacturers. Some are much better than others. The quality and accuracy varies accordingly.
In my experience a ‘run-of-the-mill’ AR-15, with a magnifying 'scope, shooting M193 ammo, will shoot groups around 3 MOA. At 140 yards that means that the bullet impact can be over two inches from the point of aim.
Crooks’ rifle didn’t have a 'scope. Iron sights and red dots are inherently less accurate, so the margin of error was greater than 2 inches.
The fact that he missed kinda proves my point.

GPS is 1 meter, depending on the number of samples. More samples mean more accuracy. GPS uses clocks that are accurate to less than 1 ns. Time is distance for light, RF, and sound. 1 ns → 1 foot for light and RF. 1 ms → 13.5 inches for sound. More recording locations mean more accuracy. Keep in mind that the GPS satellites are in mid-earth orbit, approximately 12000 miles away from Earth, and we still get 1 m accuracy. These distances are less than a thousand feet.

1 Like

Watch the video I sent you of Lt Col. Tony Shaffer listen to what he almost said at 14:17 minutes in. He start to say (apparently that’s what the shoot ) then stops himself ???
He knows