@cmartenson Here is your open window on the ground floor half a second before the 1st shot (right side). The photoshop artifacts are bleeding obvious. The left side shows the same slightly open window a few seconds earlier (just after the curtain came up) where you can make out the inward opening mechanism. This is the 3rd window from right that lines up with shot direction and audio.
5 Likes
Besides the topic… Just wondering do you know any Czech member of the tribe…?
He just said that the acoustic data is consistent with a single gunman, it’s just an artifact of where the ejection port is pointing. If there’s no second gunman, then this whole “citizens investigation” is nothing more than Dan Bongino kibitzing about all of the USSS screwups. It’s pointless.
1 Like
We still dont definitively know that there wasnt a second shooter. I see it aa unlikely that there is a second shooter and was not convinced by the analysis at the time. However i think the analysis was worthwhile and seems to be more than the FBI and the SS themselves are doing. All possibilities and theories need to be openly investigated and explored given the information battlefield.
I believe there was only a single shooter and that he was coached by the government to do this job and enabled by the same ESU and SS to take the first shots. There is a massive coverup going on.
5 Likes
I love the Czech Republic. I spent a few years in Prague and Pisek in South Bohemia. I always feel welcome in the CR, my first wife I met in CR. I dont know any particular members here that live in the CR but the member finder at the top should help.
4 Likes
This is a weird bit he keeps calling out. And then he ASSumes the speed of the bullets which are an unknown variable so he can make the rest of his calculations fit his narrative. It’s not how this works.
First, the distance by Google maps is 453 feet +/- 3
Second, we have crack/thump pairs for every bullet (except the mystery thump on Trump’s mic between 9 & 10), including especially the first one that pings off the railing.
It’s not a silenced round. It coincides with the first shot fired.
To posit there’s a subsonic suppressed round in there is a tall order. It’s right up there with “trust me bro.”
There are lots of audio artifacts that may look like shots but they aren’t. It’s people bumping their camera into something, or dropping it, or tripping. I can point out many such examples on the audio files I’ve analyzed.
And, no, people flinching isn’t evidence of anything.
For example, Cullen made a big deal out of this guy appearing to get gut shot and keeling over:
I thought, “Well that would be huge!” and immediately went and found a wide view of the audience that included this stand and watched as this guy got up, sat himself back down while keeping low, and looked around as any normal non-gut-shot person might do. And he wasn’t carted out later and doesn’t show up on any injured lists. Mr. Cullen never retracted or changed his assessment despite these facts.
It turns out the guy in white wearing the red hat reacted exactly like a person who knows exactly what TF he’s hearing would. My guess is this isn’t the first time this guy has been on the wrong end of gunfire. A vet who saw action would be my first guess.
But the final straw for me is that Cullen comes with a lot of bots and trolls and what appear to be professional story muddlers. They feed his ego but trot off with wrong information and spread it far and wide. Whether Cullen is in on that action or merely useful to these actors, it’s unmistakable to me.
16 Likes
This I feel confident I can answer, and some people won’t like it.
Trump absolutely sucks at picking good people to place around him.
At least if his four years as President serves as any sort of useful guide.
And I’m not sure he even has a handle on exactly what went down or how to ensure it won’t happen again. There’s nothing in his public statements since that gives me any hope he’s got a handle on it.
He’s thanked SS twice for protecting him that day. I haven’t heard a single condemnation for their “failures” that day.
But, to be fair, I bet it’s tough when your SS detail lead hands you a folder with pictures of your entire family with a note reading “All photos taken within the last hour, we won’t miss next time” Obviously I made that part up, but I of all the things that might surprise me, this wouldn’t be one of them.
Bottom line: I assess that Trump is terrible at picking the right people to surround himself with.
21 Likes
He may not have been nervous. He was probably also on some supplied drugs to keep him calm. He was basically permitted through too many coincidences to consider anything but… he was positioned in the ideal spot for his shot and given a window of time to operate and complete his mission. He knew that he would die for his services. He probably accepted this job with all that knowledge. He was calm and ready to do what he thought was best. He also had extensive training at the rifle range, the same rifle range that coincidentally Secret Service member train at.
He probably took that same shot using that same rifle at the shooting range thousands of times and was good enough to know that he wouldnt miss his target. 999 times out of 1000 shots.
I am sure he didnt expect to fail in his attempt, just as I’m sure the gathered media are disappointed that he wasny successful. It was a miracle that Donald Trump survived.
6 Likes
I’m just not seeing what you’re seeing. To my eye there is no “maroon blind” but instead a reflection that includes the red shirt that the cameraman was wearing that day.
It was a Sheetz gas station shirt, which is where Dave works.
I’m going to have to wait for Dave to share his highest quality raw files from this part of the tale before I (might) change my view of what I see.
I see reflections. I see closed windows.
Maybe it has all been digitally altered by the FBI, that’s possible, but I won’t be able to tell that from these shots.
4 Likes
Wrong.
I said it’s possible. That makes it a competing claim.
So both single and two-shooter scenarios are in play. I said this quite clearly and even provided you with a slide to cement the (quite simple) point.
I’m not sure why you are purposely misinterpreting what I said, but it’s not a good fit for this place.
As I made clear in both words and in the image, my evidence is still MORE consistent with two shooters, but that could change, again depending on evidence.
If this approach is too complex for you to absorb there’s always CNN.
20 Likes
From the Google New Feed:
The FBI has found a social media account featuring antisemitic and anti-immigration comments that investigators believe to be associated with the gunman who tried to assassinate former President Donald Trump, a senior bureau official said Tuesday.
FBI Deputy Director Paul Abbate told members of Congress that the account could be linked to the shooter, Thomas Crooks, but he cautioned that officials are still working to verify the account’s authenticity.
FBI says possible social media account tied to Trump shooter : NPR
If this is true, that would negate any motive that Crooks would have had to shoot Donald Trump.
Things get stranger and stranger.
2 Likes
Yeah - that’s complete Bullshit according to Andrew Torba, CEO of Gab
I really like how Andrew plays the game and knows how to avoid deep-state goonery. He did it by artfully dodging the same scheme that took down Parler, which was led by not quite as bright of a CEO.
Here he is totally dismantling the FBI’s narrative machinery in real-time:
9 Likes
What’s your point?
It’s an investigation towards the truth, which has been mentioned countless times and as the evidence comes forth (or not), the direction changes
What is the issue with that?
Well someone said X and know they say y therefore they are now discredited?
I don’t understand that mentality, but I’d appreciate it if you can explain it to me what’s so wrong with it
1 Like
Your work has had the focus of a range finder and your “citizen’s investigation” has brought forward images and eyewitness testimony that might otherwise have been overlooked. The USSS thought this incident would die in the minds of average Americans….die in subsequent news cycles ….but you and others have kept this front and center……We may actually approach the truth on this one.
Pray for the Truth. This is a spiritual battle and if God can change the heart of one or two more witnesses this evil will be fully revealed.
Thanks for your days of tireless investigation.
13 Likes
Consistent and possible are synonyms here. Get off your high horse, stop insulting people, and admit your mistake.
I had an insight on the photo of the bullet and realized we can improve our understanding.
Here is a print from video of trump after the first shooting on the above and the photo of the bullet below.
https://youtu.be/aVA7aXOH1pk?t=19
The bullet in the photo is the second and not the first one. Look at Trump’s hand already up!
Look at the video of the shooting, before the first bullet fire Trump’s hand is down. In the second fire (viewed in the photo) his hand is going up to the ear shot and his mouth muscles contract as a reaction to the hit.
It is not the third bullet also because he is already ducking this time.
The photographer triggers the bust photos after the first fire and catches the second bullet.The position where the bullet hit the ear (in other photos) is above 1 to 2 inches from this perspective of the photo, also proving this is not the first bullet.
With the timing of the sound of the bullet and timing of the frame of the video it is possible to crosscheck and prove that the bullet from the photo is the second bullet.
Here is a link to the photographer interview with more photos:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CYnP_6dqNFY
7 Likes
This scenario requires the complicity of a photo editor at the NY Times (to add the bullet trail in that photo), as well as the photographer himself (who’d know it doesn’t match what’s in his camera).
1 Like
Someone between Trump and the shooter got shot in the head
Your lack of self awareness is hilarious!
Are you like this in real life with family and friends?
You have almost no responses and likes to your posts, you come here and insult the ‘leader’ essentially
Please keep going it’s very entertaining lmao!
2 Likes