The original observation made by rtson1 did not dispute the notion that the Fed’s actions have been detrimental to savers and the lower classes. The objection was to your conclusion that these actions are inherently racist and meant to specifically affect the Black segment of the U.S. population. As Sofistek also observed from the chart you showed us, Asians have significantly higher median net worth and stock investments than Whites.
A quick check on the U.S. Census website, where the Wealth and Asset Ownership chart came from which supported your conclusion, gives us the following additional information:
As of 2018, population (one race) as a percentage of total population:
White – 236.173,020 = 72.19 %
Black or African American – 41,617,764 = 12.72 %
American Indian and Alaska Native – 2,801,587 = 0.86 %
Asian alone – 18,415,198 = 5.63 %
Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander – 626,054 = 0.19 %
Some other race – 16,253,785 = 4.97 %
Note – Mixed race population (those having 2 or more races), comprises 3.45 % of the population and was not included in this part of the chart.
https://data.census.gov/cedsci/table?q=race%20and%20wealth&hidePreview=false&tid=ACSDT1Y2018.C02003&vintage=2018
As of 2019:
Race and Hispanic origin: Non-Hispanic white and Asian householders had more household wealth than black and Hispanic householders. Non-Hispanic whites had a median household wealth of $139,300, compared with $12,780 for black householders and $19,990 for Hispanic householders. Asians had a median household wealth of $156,300, which is not statistically different from the estimate for non-Hispanic whites.https://www.census.gov/library/stories/2019/08/gaps-in-wealth-americans-by-household-type.html Observations: Both White and Asian households have the highest household wealth (from the chart in the video and from the Census article above). Asians comprise a smaller percentage of the total population than either Whites or Blacks, and although it is not known what percentage of these households are in the top 10% (or 1%), it can be assumed that at least some are. However, for the sake of argument, let us assume the entire top 10% of wealth is comprised only of White households and that 0% are Asian, Black, or other races. Using simple math, we can calculate that at least 62.19% of individuals being negatively impacted by the Fed’s actions are White, and approximately 12.72% are Black. If we choose to look only at the top 1% on the wealth continuum, then the percentages above remain largely unchanged, so I have taken a more conservative view. Looking at raw numbers, since there are over 236 million White people and 41.6 million Black people, we can conclude that the majority of people affected by the Fed’s actions are White individuals, of which a subset may be as poor as the Black population. It is of course possible that every Black individual is poorer than any White person, however, the point is that White people are also being affected in large numbers. Since Asians are among those with the highest Net Worth and Stock ownership, and a huge number of Whites are negatively affected by the Fed’s actions in addition to other races, it does not seem reasonable to conclude that these actions are racist and specifically targeted at Blacks. It may be more accurate to conclude that the lower classes are particularly affected.