US Strikes Iran, Unofficially Declares War Without Congress

Originally published at: https://peakprosperity.com/daily-digest/us-strikes-iran-unofficially-declares-war-without-congress/

Geopolitics

The United States has launched airstrikes on Iranian nuclear facilities, joining Israel in what has been described as a preemptive strike to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons. President Trump announced the strikes on his Truth Social platform, targeting Fordow, Natanz, and Esfahan. Iranian sources have confirmed that the Fordow facility remains intact, with only surface-level damage reported. Furthermore, Iran’s Atomic Energy Organization confirmed no increase in radiation from the strikes, questioning their effectiveness. That said, other reports, such as Sean Hannity on Fox News, suggest Fordow was completely destroyed.

Iran has condemned these actions as violations of international law, with Foreign Minister Seyed Abbas Araghchi stating that Iran reserves all options to defend its sovereignty. Iranian state media has declared all Americans in the region as targets, and a direct threat was issued against President Trump. Yemen’s Houthis have also threatened to strike American vessels in the Red Sea, adding complexity to the regional dynamics. This situation has led to an increase in oil tankers exiting the Strait of Hormuz, fearing its closure due to the heightened tensions.

The involvement of the U.S. in these strikes has sparked discussions on the global stage. Former CIA hacker Dr. Eric Cole has warned of a potential massive Iranian cyberattack on U.S. nuclear facilities within the next 30 days, highlighting Iran’s advanced cyber capabilities. However, cybersecurity experts argue that while the threat is real, the U.S. has robust systems in place to detect and mitigate such attacks, with ongoing collaborations with private sector companies to enhance national cybersecurity.

Furthermore, analysts suggest that Israel’s strategic position might be weakening, potentially leading to a shift towards the influence of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), which could have implications for Western interests in the region. Some geopolitical analysts argue that the SCO’s growing influence could indeed shift the balance of power, potentially leading to a reconfiguration of alliances and control over key strategic areas.

The U.S. has reassured Iran that these strikes were a “one-off attack,” not the beginning of a broader conflict. The operation involved strategic deception, with B-2 bombers initially appearing to head towards Guam before striking Iran.

US Politics

President Trump’s decision to order strikes on Iran has stirred significant domestic political debate. Critics argue that the move was aimed at responding to Iran’s lack of reaction to previous provocations. Trump’s announcement of the strikes as a “spectacular success” has been met with skepticism, especially given reports from Iran suggesting minimal damage to the targeted facilities. Rep. Thomas Massie (R-KY) criticized the strikes as unconstitutional, and the unilateral nature of Trump’s decision has led to calls for a War Powers Act vote, with Democratic Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer among those pushing for Congress to have a say in military actions. This reflects a broader concern over the executive’s authority to engage in military actions without legislative approval.

The strikes have been interpreted by some analysts as an attempt by Trump to save face amidst rising tensions.

As the situation unfolds, the U.S. remains on high alert for potential retaliatory actions from Iran, which could include cyberattacks or activation of Hezbollah sleeper cells within the U.S., as warned by intelligence sources. The State Department has alerted Congress about Iranian spy teams attempting to assassinate former Trump officials, and a former CIA officer has warned of 1,000 Al-Qaeda fighters in the U.S. for potential attacks. The next 72 hours are seen as critical, with expectations of non-traditional warfare tactics.

Sources

Ex-CIA Hacker Warns of Imminent Massive Iranian Cyberattack on U.S. Nuclear Facilities

“I believe that within the next 30 days, you’re going to see a massive cyberattack.”

Source | Submitted by Acorn Endeavors

Trump Announces US Strikes on Iranian Nuclear Facilities, Urges Peace Talks

“We have completed our very successful attack on the three Nuclear sites in Iran, including Fordow, Natanz, and Esfahan.”

Source | Submitted by Mike from Jersey

Iran Vows Retaliation After US Joins Israeli Airstrikes on Nuclear Sites

Iran reserves all options to defend its sovereignty, interests, and people.

Source

Iranian State Media Declares All Americans in Region as Targets

Iranian State Media says every American citizen or military in the region is now a target.

Source | Submitted by George Hung

Iran Threatens Retaliation Against Trump: “You Started It, We Will End It”

“You started it, we will end it.”

Source | Submitted by George Hung

Oil Tankers Rush to Exit Strait of Hormuz Amid Closure Fears

BREAKING: CURRENTLY ADOUND 50 LARGE OIL TANKERS ARE TRYING TO EXIT THE STRAIT OF HORMUZ IN ANTICIPATION OF ITS CLOSURE SOON

Source | Submitted by George Hung

Trump’s Theatrical Strike: Bombing Iran to Save Face

An act of theater.

Source | Submitted by Suds

Nick Fuentes Predicts Iran’s Retaliation After US Airstrikes

Iran will retaliate.

Source | Submitted by George Hung

Yemen Threatens to Strike American Vessels in Red Sea Amidst Regional Tensions

Yemen ready to attack all American ships and warships in the Red Sea.

Source | Submitted by westcoastjan

Trump’s Unilateral Strike on Iran Sparks Global Conflict

Trump bombed Iran. We are at war.

Source | Submitted by ChrisFreeman

Trump Orders Strikes on Iran, Claims “Spectacular Success” Amid Rising Tensions

“A Spectacular Military Success” – Trump Says ‘Bully’ Iran’s Nuclear Facilities Have Been “Completely & Totally Obliterated”

Source

Israel’s Strategic Blunder: A Shift Towards SCO Influence

“Israel’s instigation of this war likely will go down in history — if anyone is still writing history — as one of the greatest ‘blunders’ in all history.”

Source

Iranian Sources Confirm Fordow Nuclear Facility Survives Attack Intact

Iranian sources now confirm Fordow is intact.

Source

Hezbollah Sleeper Cells and Cyber Attacks: U.S. Braces for Non-Traditional Warfare in Next 72 Hours

I think they want to create some shock, awe, and terror in Americans’ minds to turn the public against the President.

Source

In addition to sources submitted by community members, the following were also used in the creation of this report: CNN, Fox, Former CIA Officer, Iran’s Atomic Energy Organization, Rep. Thomas Massie (R-KY), State Department, The Geopolitical Analyst, U.S. Navy.

4 Likes

The superiority of the North Korean approach regarding nukes becomes visible.
Anyhow: If Iran wants to buy nukes then the Pakistanis will be glad to open up the free trade zone for nukes in Asia.
Perhaps even an open source model regarding knowlegde about nukes could become possible.
Open Pandoras box and experience new surprises.
This becomes the mantra of the day.

4 Likes

Iran’s STATED goal has never been to build a nuclear warhead. They have clearly STATED the goal of killing all Jews, destroying Israel, and destroying the United States. (This is irrefutable fact).
The nuclear issue is a side show.

5 Likes

Except for the little detail that w/o nuclear, they can’t achieve their goals.

2 Likes

We are about to see now. They have lot of missiles and seem to plan on using proxies(pepe escobars tweet of new plan of Iran).

Unless they have millions of missles that can reach mainland US, they’re not going to get to their goal.

1 Like

That was not stated goal. It is to hit US bases in gulf area(one threat), thus reducing US influence there and hopes of increasing Iran’s influence regionally.

Unless they can work with China and convince everyone to get vaxxed.

1 Like

Next stop Greenland

Is it REALLY clear what their stated goal is ? I was replying to Oliveoilguy, and he didn’t qualify the stated goal as you did.
So who knows, but “destroying the US” vs. “destroying US bases” is a huge difference. And fundamentally, Islam wants to eradicate non-believers, not just non-believer military bases.

1 Like

I’m afraid to travel now. This is messing up some plans. This is world we are living in.

Not a good look for Trump…

3 Likes

Iran doesn’t need to hit the US with their missiles - they’ve got Russia and China itching to do it for them.

China has implemented a 40 year goal of destroying us. Iran is their distraction (proxy).
China has taken over most of our infrastructure. A war with China sooner rather than later could be realized. Trump is running out their clock.

China has “cards” but not all of them…

2 Likes

Neither country wants direct confrontation. Russia is more on our side than China. China has been at war with us for 40+ years (long war= strategic).
-Tsu

Massie and Rand Paul, are not Republicans, They are Libertarians. They are America first, but they will not play “ball” with Trump if their “principles” are violated.
(which the Dems and RINO do ALL the time).

I live in Kentucky and supported these guys in past. But they need to be replaced. Otherwise MAGA agenda will be blocked.

I have wrote a letter to Paul. But his “principle” arguments (which are valid) would sink the conservative agenda. (i.e. compromise to get things done- until you REALLY control both houses).

my opinion

Rep. Greg Steube Torches Thomas Massie: Trump Had Full Authority to Strike Iran — ‘Glad We Have a Commander-in-Chief Who Eliminates Terrorists, Not Panders to Them, Like You Do’ | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hᴏft

Rep. Greg Steube (R-FL) came out swinging on Sunday to defend President Trump’s decisive military strike on Iran—obliterating Rep. Thomas Massie’s (R-KY) assertion that the operation was unconstitutional.
“The War Powers Resolution of 1973 allows a 60-day window, plus a 30-day withdrawal period, as long as Congress is notified within 48 hours. Claims that his actions were unconstitutional are simply false.”

[partial article quoted]

That’s BS.

80% of MAGA does NOT support foreign wars.

Take your gaslighting somewhere else.

3 Likes

No its not,
Rand Paul votes against OBBB. His reason is clear.
80% MAGA trusts Trumps decisions, so should you.!!

Gaslighting??? the only gas-lighting comes from my backside- in your general direction.

:slight_smile:

Trump lashes out at Sen. Rand Paul over opposition to big tax bill

The president targeted Paul on Truth Social just minutes after the GOP senator discussed his opposition in a morning appearance on Fox Business

Trump lashes out at Sen. Rand Paul over opposition to tax bill