WTC 7 Is the Smoking Gun

I remember seeing the Dr. Judi Woods stiff years back. I cannot say I see it all her way, but she pointed out something I cannot un-see.

There was powder jetting away from the falling debris. It was jetting upwards while the object was falling.

2 Likes

My thoughts exactly!

2 Likes

I agree completely. My thought is that these people are basically like membets of a cult. They have been convinced that they are doing dark work for some greater good. The wake up call is going to crush them.

1 Like

This.

The nuclear weapon and directed energy weapon theories were put forth by government stooges to distract from the real evidence.

There’s no way any explosive or energy weapon could have brought down any of the towers.

Controlled demolition is a very difficult and exacting technology. If you get something wrong the building falls down to one side and severely damages something else nearby. It requires carefully placing charges on every critical support beam and they must be triggered in a precise sequence so that each floor is disconnected from the structure as they reach the bottom. The charges are set diagonally across the beams so that the weight forces the upper part of the severed beam to move inward, away from the stump below it. If the beams are cut horizontally there is the risk that the two pieces continue to sit on each other and the load doesn’t drop. In practice this would still lead to failure of the building but in a highly uncontrolled maner.

The beams were cut using Thermite wrapped around them in the diagonal manner referenced above. The Feds blocked access to the rubble and did not allow photographs but a few people managed to take some. There are photographs showing the diagonal cuts in the beams. That’s why the metal was shipped off to China as scrap and investigators were never allowed to access it. One look at the neatly sliced edges and you know it wasn’t done by fire or by compressive failure.

6 Likes

Multiple threads coalesce on 9-11:

More artistic and moody than Chris’s show on Building 7:

What a big wire control system that needed…unless done by radio.

That theory is my own. The only part of my theory that is hard to believe is that they could hit hundreds of small targets at the same time with that level of precision.

One of the problems with placing explosives is that it requires a crew to be onsite for many hours and not be detected or asked what they are up to. Is that possible, sure. Building 7 was a CIA headquarters. Are the building security teams really that incompetent? Maybe, or maybe we should check the building security staffing details for the months before. They had to be in on it.

If I was running an operation like that, I would have multiple teams working on the same objectives through different means. Each team would have different handlers and not know about the other teams. If a team was discovered they would be sacrificed and the blast radius would be contained. I think we can cleanly tell by all of the evidence that not everything went as planned that day. Thus, what if many options were used that day?

-Travis

2 Likes

Yes, it took months to set it up.

The work was done by a company called ACE elevator. The business was shut down after they completed elevator work on the WTC. As far as I knew when I dropped out of the 9/11 truth movement in 2010 or so was that the employee records of ACE Elevator were unavailable.

It was made easier by a couple things:

  • Many floors of both towers were unoccupied. (The low occupancy rate is one reason Larry Silverstein was able to buy it so cheaply). People working in the towers reported hearing noises coming from the unoccupied floors (which were shut off from elevator access).
  • Both towers were closed for an entire weekend. People were told that major electrical work was going to be done and for safety reasons no-one was going to be allowed in.

Co-ordinating all the charges does require a very complex control system. This is standard for controlled demolition jobs.

You couldn’t have multiple teams working on it. Controlled demolition requires precise timing of all weakening of the structure. If one part gives way too early (or late) and the building rubble doesn’t end up in its own footprint.

5 Likes

This has always been the Rosetta Stone. I divide the population into two categories: those who understand WTF is going on, and the people who still believe the 911 official story. I can divide the second group into two additional categories: those who believe and defend the official narrative and those who haven’t thought about it at all. This is how I know we’re toast.

Rector

8 Likes

G Edward Griffin is running a series of pages about 9/11. I’ve watched several of the embedded videos before.

https://needtoknow.news/2026/09/9-11-tricked-into-war-journalist-christopher-bollyn-reveals-9-11-ties-to-israel/

https://needtoknow.news/2026/09/james-corbett-on-9-11-what-really-happened-with-the-missing-trillions/

https://needtoknow.news/2026/09/9-11-review-by-james-li-richard-gage-and-ben-swann-with-focus-on-israel-howard-lutnick-and-building-7/

https://needtoknow.news/2026/09/9-11-was-an-epstein-job-the-hidden-ties-epsteins-circle-has-to-the-9-11-attacks/

4 Likes

I have always struggled with why WT7 was destroyed. Didnt know if its to give the “conspiracy theorists” something to say, “see this is why its an inside job.” While the general populance has no idea what they are talking about. Or to Travis’ earlier post, a weapon we dont know much about that could have gone awry and hit more than it was supposed to.

But to your point, it makes alot of sense that WT7 was supposed to be hit too. We most likely will never know the truth. But we do know we have been lied to.

3 Likes

It was the control center from which the whole operation was run. There were also some important records stored there which were conveniently destroyed when it came down. I don’t recall specifics, it’s been too long.

4 Likes

Right, we know those details. But building 7? The CIA is supposed to be a little more alert to contractors sneaking into the building.

The problem with contractors planting explosives over months is there is a lot that can go wrong.

Wait a second, so you are saying WT7 was the control center and basically the CIA or a sub group was running the operation? That would make sense they would want to completely bury their tracts, literally. So a small problem with that theory, the operation was still on going and required coordination for many more months. Maybe they moved operations? I was thinking maybe the counter operation was in WT7, aka the good guys.

I’m at the 9/11 conference…it’s solid. Ive learned some new wrinkles about that day.

We saw a newly produced video that’s quite good and powerful.

These are truth seekers these folks.

8 Likes

What time is your presentation tomorrow? Trying to finagle my schedule to see if i can drive down.

1 Like

7:30 to 8 pm

Its also being livestreamed on Redacted

7 Likes

Agree 100%.
The errant Pennsylvania plane was bound for WTC 7.
BIG PROBLEM, pull it was the only solution.
If you need to convince normies or non-believers just refer to them to James Corrbetts brilliant animated 5 minute slam dunk.

4 Likes

Admin,
Just wondering if you have read Judy Wood’s book “Where did the Towers Go?” Excellent addition to the confusion!