That video from the news helicopter was recorded after the video i posted and others so with officers on the roof. I don’t see on that video any of them running through the fences so that’s useless video for assumption of covering something up, We miss any video showing the scene just straight after the shoots from that direction
And my thoughts on the water tower is this without going into detail. The water tower was perfect for Overwatch to protect Crooks before the shooting began especially his blind side from the back and an East side approach.
The water tower would have been useful for multiple fatal shot opportunities, but basic Forensics 101 made it unacceptable. Even the most uneducated understand angles especially entry and exit wounds. Blatantly obvious the bullet trajectory from a flat roof with slight elevation compared to the extreme downward angle from the water tower. Would be impossible to explain away the difference.
SS conveniently failed to attend the morning meeting with local LE. Intentional for comms break down and AORs.
First night briefing, the PA State Police Chief couldn’t stopped smirking. So I dug deep into research on them. Created by the Gov and under this authority. And in this case, Shapiro like Fetterman seemed installed. Don’t know which state is more corrupt in Election fraud between PA and MI. But anyway, PA State Police is the largest such organization in the US yet not one was seen around the AGR or Crooks before shooting. The only time I saw the PA State Police in action was after the shooting and in the stands with the wounded. How convenient as they seem to suddenly be prepared and come to the rescue.
So much wrong about this shooting that it is impossible to have so many things happen in PA that day from CNN finally broadcasting LIVE to Jill Biden just happening to be in Pittsburgh and taking from Trump’s SS security. Not a coincidence…like so much more.
Yes, looks like standard .223 caliber/5.56 NATO fired weapons, but the FBI was running this operation and knew the ammo Crooks was firing. Likely even gave him and why the news leak that he had purchased 50 rounds of ammo was just more disinformation. Crooks had several magazines already. FBI provided his ammo on day of shooting, I would bet the Farm and Ranch on. So they also would have casings.
If Crooks was a Lone Wolf, SS Agents would have been shot, because he wouldn’t have cared.
Or someone else can try to explain how not one SS agent was hit. My theory I gave earlier.
And I went back to listen to Congressman Bishop ask Wray “how many shots did Crooks get off?”
I don’t know the right adjective to dsscribe how bad his response is.
Wray, “We recovered 8 cartridges.”
First, not cartridges and second recovered is such a blanket term that one could drive a bus through it. Its like oops let me count this casing that just fell out of my pocket, it must be recovered.
Americans deserve so much better.
1 Like
This is mostly for entertainment value.
Believe it or not I knew a guy that got shot in the head with a 30-30 and lived. I didn’t see this first hand. At a rodeo years ago an old saddle bronc rider failed to mark his horse out, so the judge/stock contractor disqualified him. The rider argued he was fouled on the chute, and wanted a re-ride. He didn’t get one. Much later that evening, after alot of beer behind the chutes. The bronc rider decided he was gonna thump on the judge a little to at least get his entry monies worth. Well that old judge pulled his dirty thirty out of his pickup, and touched one off at the guys head. Some how the bullet just went under the skin at his forehead, followed the cranium, and came out the back. Knocked him out of course, and everyone thought he was dead. But after it was all said and done he just had one heck of a scar.
On the other hand I have a fair bit of experience shooting things in the head with a 30-30. Usually with 150 grain jacketed soft points. I could Believe the picture of the guys head if he was shot with that. The .300 mag is on a different level. Alot of added velocity, and bullet options.
2 Likes
Have you seen… from John Cullen who figured out the Las Vegas shooting. He has slow mo footage of the back row of the right hand bleachers that looks like the first shot went past them. Then the second shot which hit Trump and also hit the bleacher railing. - this is clearly visible. The first shot, Cullen speculates, was from the forest and intended to take out the SS snipers because they step back at this precise millisecond.
I think either Crooks took the 2nd and 3rd shots or, more likely, Some of 5 - 8
maybe we will get some testimony and hard evidence of the caliber bullet the counter sniper team was using. 30/30, maybe. 300 Winmag, hard to believe the remains can be in the identifiable state they are.
I keep wondering if it was a pistol caliber or .223 that killed Crooks. That would be a twist.
1 Like
I’ll give you my take on it - based on what I observed from the “second release” of video webcam footage (the footage that starred the ESU medic, Michelle). The Trump assassination attempt occurred at approximately 6:11pm EST. It took the Beaver County ESU team 20 minutes to access the roof (which they did at approximately 6:31pm EST - based on the clock shown in the webcam footage). On their way to access the roof, they stopped to converse with other officers who were inside the AGR office building, where they were told “ladders are on the way”. When they (immediately) left the building and headed north to the spot where the shorter ladder was already positioned on the loading dock - they stopped directly in front of the location where the larger ladder is shown in the helicopter video. They actually (sort of) pointed in that direction and called out “can we use this ladder?” But then their arm gestures pointed to the shorter ladder on the loading dock - and they went there. When Michelle, the medic of the team and the first of that “first responder” group to access the roof, exited the ladder, she discovered that there were already two other officers up there - one being the federal agent with the black suit and red tie that is shown in the first webcam video that was released. The webcam video then continues for about 30 minutes - and towards the end of it you see a tall black officer, who conducted himself as a supervisor, approach the spot where the shooter was lying, from the direction of the shorter ladder location that led up to the roof of the adjacent building (he came across the breezeway from the other building). To me, this confirms there was only one ladder for use at that time. And, even though the webcam video doesn’t focus on the exact spot where the larger ladder was placed against the breezeway - there is some footage of that area - and the top of a larger ladder, as shown in the helicopter video, is not visible in that footage!
So here is my point, we know that the time period for which there was nobody else on the roof except for the deceased shooter is less than twenty minutes. How much less is an unkown, as we don’t know when the Federal agent(s) made it to the roof. We also know that after the agents accessed the roof, the deceased shooter was surrounded by officers (who “secured” the scene). Since the video taken by the Sky News helicopter doesn’t show anyone else on the roof except for the deceased shooter, this video had to have been taken shortly after the would-be assassin was killed (within 10 to 15 minutes) and before any agents arrived on scene. AND THIS HELICOPTER VIDEO SHOWS A LARGE STEP LADDER LEANED UP AGAINST THE EAST SIDE OF THE BREEZEWAY. Why did that ladder magically disappear? And why is it that, that ladder is the ladder anyone with half a brain would use to access the shooter location if they didn’t want to be seen crawling across the roof (it provided the most direct access from the ground to the shooter’s location).
And there’s more to my story: The helicopter video shows a black SUV parked in front of the ACR office building (right in front of the location of the larger ladder) that isn’t in the webcam video from the first responders. I assume this SUV was used for transportation by the federal secret service. Why did this SUV leave the scene of the crime when all other agencies were responding to the scene of the crime? Could it be this SUV was tasked with removing the larger ladder from the crime scene? Just sayin’!
I just looked again on that ABC News helicopter video and again it doesnt make sense that this video would be taken before swat and other law enforcement climbed on the roof from 2 reasons:
The black ladder is already there and as we heard from one officer on the last ABC News video, he said the ladder is already there.
Nothing proove that this helicopter video has been made after the ABC News video, unless I’m wrong, I would like to see any kind of evidence.
I also spotted the moment when one of the guy stopped just straigh ahead tree and pointing this place but we were unable to see ladder there but again, that guy in black uniform stopped at this place and pointed on something, if there would be no ladder then I don’t see any reasonable explanation why did he stopped and pointed on that part of the building and asking for something (I couldn’t understand as my language is not native english so hope you can help)
And again - if the helicopter video was made before anyone climbed on the roof - how is that possible that riffle is far away from Crooks body? I have asked this question couple hours ago and I got answer that this is typical procedure that on crime scene, any weapons are moved to safe position to get access to the victim or suspect. If that’s the case, who came into the roof before them… and why we don’t see that?
And if the helicopter video was made first - it’s quite suspisious that black SUV dissapear from the crime scene.
Hey Chris,
Thanks for all you do. I started following you in December of 2019 for Covid. You kept us informed with truth in a tough time.
Regarding the Trump assassination plot: I am a lifelong hunter and a retired Army infantry soldier and retired municipal police where I was a firearms instructor. During my military and police careers, I have discharged hundreds of thousands of rounds of ammunition from pretty much any firearm available from M60 machine guns to 6.5 Itallian Carcanos. I’m going to share with you what I think and why I think it.
In one of your recent videos, you shared the audio file where you can hear 3 rounds being fired from what appears to be a different weapon/location from several subsequent rounds. It sounded like the first 3 rounds were muffled as if they may have been from the inside of a building and the rest of the rounds sounded like they were consistent with the echoing from a rooftop.
Another piece that makes me think there may have been a different shooter is the accuracy. If my information is correct, Crooks did not have a scope, he was using iron sites. I remember basic rifle marksmanship in the Army had a field of pop up targets from 50 meters to 300 meters. The shorter range targets were pretty easy, point and shoot. Anything over 100 meters took a second to adjust to be able to hit in the required time. It was difficult enough to shoot at center mass and hit the target, I couldn’t imagine having to do a head shot with just a few seconds to take aim, as well as the adrenaline he must have had pumping through him after having been confronted by law enforcement on the roof just seconds earlier. 135 meters is a hell of a head shot for iron sights that quickly, or even at all. The first shot appeared to be a hands down kill shot. The shooter had a perfect head shot, pulled the trigger and sent the bullet down range, THEN Trump moved his head out of the bullets trajectory. That is a fairly easy shot with a scope at 135 meters, especially if the shooter is inside a building far enough to hide the flash, well protected but seems impossibly lucky if actually taken by Crooks.
It looks to me like there was a shooter inside the building or at the very least, at a different location that took the first 3 shots. From the photo I saw of the actual bullet flying past his head, it looks like one of the buildings Crooks was near or the one he was on. I do not know how this involved Crooks as being the shooter of the remaining rounds. Was he contacted by the first shooter and told “When you hear the first shots, just start lighting up the stage” ? So much of this doesn’t make sense and I can no longer trust the 3 letter agencies to give accurate information and not cover things up (Hunters Laptop etc).
I shot with the President’s Hundred once in Ft Drum NY. We used Remington model 700 .308 with a Browning scope. We fired 5 rounds, reloaded and shot another 5 at 10 different 300 meter targets from one position which made some of the shots farther than 300 meters. With a scope, the 300 meter full size torso target was about the size of trumps head at 135 meters. The best of the best of the best (President’s Hundred) had difficulty with that. The standard was to hit all 10 targets within 10 seconds including the reload (bolt action). This is a very difficult task only the very best can perform properly and these were the best. There are very few people that could do that with iron sights, if any. This 20 year old kid did it? Had the kill shot at 135 m with iron sights after being confronted by police seconds earlier? Nope. There is more to this…
Thanks again for everything.
2 Likes
Hello. I’m not from your country, I’m from southern Europe and I watch your videos at a different time… But I’m following all your videos of this case. I have no patriotic interest in solving this enigma, but I have a great interest in the mystery of this attack, and I think it is clear that there are many things that do not fit… And I’m sure that with the videos of 15000 people attending the event, a lot of things will be covered.
I’ve been recording audio Outdoors , all types of audio, and in very different outdoor locations for over 30 years, And I wanted to tell you something about the audio analytics that you’re doing, just in the interest of helping.
To situate ourselves, let’s say you’re working with various audio sources, which come from different cameras located on the ground.
One next to the building, another near a metal fence, etc. And you have another audio source that you call “Trump’s microphone.”
Well, although it may seem obvious, but I would like to point out that that audio called “Trump’s microphone” does not come from Trump’s microphone.
That audio comes from the microphone of a TV camera, located at a certain height, on a high tower, from where the event is broadcast on TV. It is located at an appropriate distance in front of the stage, well centered, and picking up the sound coming out of the stage speakers, which are emitting the sound picked up by Trump’s microphone, amplified by a power system.
I know this is obvious, but it will be important later…
This audio from Trump’s microphone will be sent to a power system, probably in the tower, next to the TV camera, where the sound will be amplified, and a sound technician will equalize so that everything sounds loud and clear on the speakers.
I have to say that the sound is quite good, with power, good volume and well balanced so that 15,000 people can hear one person speaking outdoors. Trump’s voice is heard loud and clear from any location. We can even hear the secret service agents whispering clearly… "Move Move… Enemy down, I want my shoes… Etc
Well, let’s start at the beginning… 3 shots rang out.
I’ve seen that in many videos on the internet, they say that the first bullet grazes Trump’s ear, injures a spectator in the stands, comes out from behind the stands (you can see a little smoke coming out from behind the stands), and then ends up hitting the cable of an hydraulic crane. Well, THIS IS NOT TRUE.
The first bullet DOES NOT HIT the hydraulic crane. This can be verified with a simple analysis of the audio. There is a video where you can see the hydraulic crane perfectly, and the pressurized liquid coming out with great force from the cable of the Hydraulic crane, emitting a sharp sound of water coming out under pressure. Sounds like “fsssssssssh. You can hear it perfectly.”
In the video we cannot see at what moment that jet of water begins to come out, because the camera focuses on the hydraulic crane when the water is already coming out… But that is not a problem, the sound of the water coming out is very characteristic, (fssssssss), and we can hear in the general audio at what exact moment the water from the hydraulic crane begins to come out. It sounds perfect.
Pressurized water begins to flow out of the hydraulic crane exactly with the bullet 3.
The third shot hits the hydraulic crane and the liquid comes out.
That’s a fact. The audio proves it. The shot rings, and the water comes out.
At the same moment that bullet 3 hits the crane, the water comes out, and the huge speakers that hang from the top of the hydraulic crane, descend drastically and fall to the ground. Well, they don’t fall all the way, they hang down very close to the ground.
In addition to falling from the top of the crane, and stopping close to the ground, the entire speaker array rotates a little outwards, directing the sound a little out of the enclosure. It looks as if all the speakers are hanging inside a huge fishing net, and as it falls, the net with the speakers turns a little outwards.
They are very large speakers, with robust and very deep cabinets. I’m not sure if I counted 8 speakers. With enough power for an event of 15000 people. Half of the sound in the entire event has changed abruptly after the third shot.
This means that we hear 3 shots with an amplified and balanced stereo system for the event. And when all the next shots are fired, we have lost almost half of the sound we heard. Depending on where we are in the enclosure, the loss will be greater or less. In some places we will lose more than half of the audio we had when the 3 shots were fired.
After the first 3 shots, everything will sound different.
This will mainly affect all cameras that record sound from the ground.
The TV camera, which is located in an elevated and central location, is located in a prime location and unobstructed, and even if the right speakers have fallen, it will still pick up most of the sound.
Sound always travels upwards, which is why the Romans built their amphitheatres with the stage down and the stands up…
Therefore, the television camera will still be able to capture part of the sound from the right speakers that have fallen.
But the cameras that are on the ground will have lost almost all that sound source. Cameras that are close to the building will be much more affected by sound loss. In addition, they will now have 15000 people between the speakers and video cameras. 15000 people absorbing Sound of The speakers. All that sound we had during the first 3 shots, has now been lost. The next 5 shots will sound different. It is inevitable.
The modification in the sound is not simply that we have lost the speakers on one side, we have not only lost volume. When you lose the right speakers, the left speakers will no longer sound the same. The sound from the speakers had been balanced by the sound technician in the tower next to the TV camera. That EQ he had balanced for a stereo speaker system will no longer be good. The EQ was good, but the left speakers will sound poorly balanced, Because they have lost half of the sound with which they were balanced.
Anywhere on the ground, the first 3 shots will sound different than the next 5 shots.
In the sound of the TV camera, overhead, the 8 shots will sound very similar. Almost the same, just maybe a very slight difference. But on the ground, the difference will be great.
Near the Crooks building, the difference will be greater. Perhaps you might think that being too far away from the speakers, the loss of volume won’t affect much. But it is quite the opposite.
Near the building, we are close to the real origin of the sound of the gunshots. We will hear the real sound of the shot louder, and we’ll also hear a little bit of the sound from the speakers, and the sound from the speakers will be a more fake sound, full of echoes and rebounds.
That is, near the building we will hear the shots very well, but the sound of the speakers will spoil the sound quality. We could say that with the sound of the close shot we have a clean sound, and the sound that comes to us from the speakers is a dirty sound with echoes and bounces. A dirty sound.
By losing half of the speakers, therefore, we will have removed dirt. And the shots will sound better, clearer and louder.
That’s why in the camera near the building, the 5 shots sound louder than the first 3. Because when the speakers fall we have removed dirt.
Well. There are many more details that will infuse you… But I don’t want to bore you with more explanations
In short. The conclusion…
The point is not that the 8 shots are the same and made by the same weapon.
The question is not whether the first 3 shots resemble the next 5 shots.
The thing is, we can’t compare the first 3 shots with the next five. Because audio conditions have changed.
We cannot compare two things if the conditions are not the same.
In my opinion, all 8 shots have been fired with the same weapon. In the audio of the TV camera, the 8 shots are almost the same. Only a slight difference because in that place We have lost little audio. The first 8 shots have an almost equal sound footprint
There is also a simple explanation to explain why you find that the first shot sounds different, or drier than the next two. That’s completely correct. The first one should sound drier. But I can explain that to you another day if you want. It’s simple but now I don’t have any more time.
Shots 9 and 10, if they seem very strange to me. Completely different.
Good job with all the research. I hope I have helped. Greetings.
Johnny . Spain. (Madrid)
1 Like
You conclude that the time laps between the ultrasonic pitch and the gun-powder boom is ~0.22 sec for the first three shots and ~0.2125 for the subsequent 5. Correct me if I’m wrong but, doesen’t that although slight time difference of ~0.0075 sec place the first shooter approximately 5 meters closer to Trump than the second shooter? If so, and as the building from which Crooks suposedly fired is about 20 meters wide, each roof slope being approximately 10 meters wide, wouldn’t it suggest that the first shooter fired from inside a room somewhere below Crooks through an opening in the wall, and without protruding his gun barrel out of the window?
A friend found this online, checked it using Mike Adam’s formula from here (at 8:30 of Brighteon Broadcast News, July 14, 2024 - EMERGENCY BRIGHTEON ALERT: Trump shot at rally, rifle round pierces ear, full forensic audio analysis confirms shooting was REAL), fixed sign issue.
D = report_delay / ( 1/speed_of_sound – 1/speed_of_bullet )
Thought this might be of interest as its assumptions seem to work pretty well.
1 Like
How convenient.
I’m a bit flabbergasted with all the on in a million coincidences like Trump turning his head, Doug Mills photo of a bullet in the air and now the speakers turning and making all the audio is almost useless for analysis.
Youtube Channel Niscee.Social posted the following video 10 days ago.
Interesting that she points out 3 locations for snipers … one not being talked about - the Butler County Gymnastics Club. The gymnastics club is 488 yards in direct line of sight with the AGR building and the water tower. She hasn’t posted a follow up. The Gymnastics club is closed for the summer, how convenient. Your video was the first video that talked about a sniper being 500 yards from Trump.
I have seen others talk about audio showing a shooter at 500 yards, but no one talking about the Gymnasium.
I would like to know if anyone can confirm the location of the white van in comparison to the Gymnastics club. Was it in that direction ?
It makes sense to post someone at the gymnasium to take the shot and shoot Crooks after he took his shots. They claim Crooks was shot in the face (with a million to one shot) … does that line up with pictures?
One item she mentions is 3 letter agencies. Yearick was arrested on numerous occasions and IMHO without help from a 3 letter agency should have been in jail. I suspect these 3 letter agencies worked with BLM and Antifa (Yearick was a known Antifa operative) to create chaos and destruction - fact: Kamala raised money to pay their bail.
1 Like
I wouldn’t make too about Wray saying Cartridges. His 1st position with the FBI is as the Director. Before that he was US Attorney, different levels of US DOJ AG, and a lawyer in private practice. I don’t see anything in his background to know much about firearms. He probably learned most of his firearms knowledge from TV & movies.
1 Like
THE SHOOTER INSIDE THE BUILDING.
https://x.com/HealthRanger/status/1817644653551755739
1 Like
I agree with you, It seems as if the planets have aligned so that a lot of impossible things have happened. A 20-year-old boy with a gun can walk around the rooftops for an hour if they see him…, the secret service, security experts behave like rookies… Two state snipers leave their post to look for a suspect, at the worst time to leave their post…, security does not carry drones and the child does fly a drone… It’s all absurdly inexplicable
1 Like
Video of suspected gun glass from FIRST FLOOR window
This video appears to me to show more than one muzzle flash TIMED SIMULTANEOUSLY with more than one rifle report. Please analyze and report findings.