Audio & Video of the Assassination Attempt

bigtim · August 2, 2024, 6:18pm

Given the totality of evidence, there was no shooter in the 1st floor AGR # 6.

No open or broken windows, before during or after the shooting. The windows are all obviously closed and intact. Officers immediately looked into these windows after the shooting and dozens of witnesses were standing before these windows. At least 2 videos recorded this site too.
No angle to shoot Mr. Trump, too many obstacles (people, bleachers, fences)
Zero witnesses or phone cameras show any shootings from 1st floor
No evidence (yet) of any other shots against any other targets and that would likely have been presented by now, but admittedly not necessarily given the slow-walk of information.

But you’re presenting a theory that another shooter/assassin (I do subscribe to the 2nd shooter theory, BTW), is shot (by who, and in what location), and takes the time to enter AGR #6, pop into the bathroom to wash out his wound?? I don’t see how that is reasonable, or even plausible. The building was surrounded on all sides by police immediately before and after the shooting. Someone bleeding that heavily from a gunshot, would leave a lot of blood trail. Where is the blood trail? How did he get into and out of the building housing and surrounded by all these police?

We have no evidence of any counter snipers shooting another person except 1 or 2 witnesses claiming a sniper on the water tower was shot.

Playing this out, if you’re in an elevated position (roof top elsewhere, tree, water tower, etc.) and shot, how and why would you go INTO building 6 to wash your injury? That seems 100% improbable and not feasible, and 100% tactically nonsensical. No, you’d get as far away as fast as possible while the LEOs focused on the fall guy, dead Mr. Crooks on the roof. You’d likely have a vehicle waiting nearby to escape, or alternate escape plan, or if you’re an insider you might just blend back into the fold. Are any other officers suffering from a gun shot wound? Could the officer with a hand injury, have suffered a high caliber GSW? Did any counter sniper shoot someone else other than Crooks? It’s an interesting question.

I have not seen a video of the officer being hoisted up. I’m speculating it occurred near the parking lot side of the building, where the ladder was ultimately placed, by the lowered breezeway catwalk behind the trees. That would make the most sense since there were a lot of officers on the parking lot side. But that’s a best guess. I trust it is accurate, since it would be hard to fabricate a hand injury and two officers would theoretically have to lie about it, and what would they have to gain about this innocuous fact unless I suppose they are hiding the fact that that officer was shot. But we have zero evidence supporting that at this time so I have to reject it and accept it at face value.

LOL. SS applied blood to him. Good grief.

Provably false.

If there were any evidence of this, the Dems, the FBI, the SS, would all 100% full throttle use this to accuse Trump, the Feds would use it to absolve themselves of embarrassing failures in security, and it would be used to maximum gain to indict him in conspiracy to commit murders, attempted murders, aggravated assaults, and a host of other crimes taht would destroy him and his political ambitions. It’s powerful evidence none of this is occurring, but the opposite. Every Dem, all FBI, and all SS acknowledge this was an actual attempted assassination attempt that caused murder/injuries including that Trump suffered a bullet wound.

False. That was disbanded this week, after heavy TRUMP criticism of it.

Yes, God forbid we restore America to some sanity, a great economy, stable world not on the verge of WW3 and nuclear wars with 3+ nations, etc.

Any more gross lies and mischaracterizations of information or is that enough for today?

That’s probably best. Seek professional mental help. Seriously. You suffer from deep emotional trauma and issues given your delusional beliefs wholly out of touch with reality by any measurable or objective metric.

silks · August 2, 2024, 6:20pm

All captured on video/audio by many people.

Nope. you saw him holding his ear (as rehearsed) after hearing the first shot. Then you see him fall to the floor and rather than carry him off stage, the SS huddle round him blocking the surrounding view so they could apply the blood. They took a very long time doing that. They also let him stand still, on stage, exactly where someone let off 8 shots, for a few seconds to have photos taken before walking to the car. In a real situation he’d be pulled off that stage in a heartbeat and bundled into the car which would rapidly drive off.

Seconds before the shooting SS were moving professional photographers away from the rear-stage.

Hundreds of witnesses.

Hundreds of braindead sycophant witnesses. The useful ones were the professional cameramen just behind the stage right next to Trump but videos show SS forcing them away conveniently just before the shots.

1 dead, 3 injured including Trump, all supported by piles of objective medical and forensic evidence.

With the stakes so high, government don’t care about collateral.

Trump didn’t even phone the dead guys wife lmao (Biden did instead, but she wanted Trump to call so said no.) Just yesterday Trump made them horrible remarks about his wife receiving all that money and how most women would rather have money instead of their husband.

Trump sees all of his supporters as expendable morons, and he’s not wrong.

Crooks dead with rifle and some evidence he did some shooting. What person would stand on a stage and let someone fire a rifle at his direction to “stage” an assassination attempt and cause murder/injuries to his supporters?

That’s irrelevant. Whether that’s true or not doesn’t change the fact it can be staged. I’m not saying fake bullets were used and nobody died or was injured lol. I’m saying it was orchestrated by the SS/FBI and Trump was in on it (probably either his or The Heritage Foundation’s idea.) Local law probably had a good idea something fishy was going all day with all their ignored comms etc. but I highly doubt they were involved in the planning.

The bullets were extremely far away from Trump, when aiming away by that much from 150yrds it won’t be much of a risk whatsoever.

Trump has immediate GSW to ear, blood smeared on face and clearly on his hand seen in photos.

What do you mean he had immediate gunshot wound to ear? Do you have a picture? All I saw was after he heard the gunshot he cupped his ear and fell to the ground, like planned, so the SS could apply the fake blood. They took a long time to stand him up so some of the fake blood would spread for a better picture. Before the bandage came off I assumed that one of the SS at least cut his ear so the bullet story could be more believable but they didn’t even do that lmao. He knows you’re all so gullible it doesn’t matter.

If this was staged the SS, FBI, and local law enforcement would be the LOUDEST advocates of this theory to absolve themselves of dereliction and make Trump appear like a foolish madman responsible for murder and injuries. The fact this has not occurred is a key piece of information that your TDS has blinded you to reality. To support this point, 2 days ago Senator Kennedy asked the FBI acting director this direction question. “Any doubt a bullet struck President Trump?” FBI answer was “There is no doubt.”

The Heritage Foundation want Trump to win in order to enact project 2025. Trump denies he doesn’t even know what the project is, hasn’t heard of it lol yet another patently obvious lie to the sane of us.

Trump is backed by big oil, the wealthiest conglomerate in the world. Trump made himself out to be a man of the people (which worked because he’s stupid and his supporters related to him) but he’s wealthy and makes money wherever he can at the expense of the taxpayer. If you still think the government, FBI and SS are working in the public’s favour I have some magic beans to sell you.

I theorise the elites have so much at stake for Trump to win, and it was too close at the time between Trump and Biden, they thought this stunt would work in Trumps favour. I don’t believe Crooks took the first 3 shots, and I don’t know about the others enough to comment, but as I said that doesn’t change it being staged either way.

Too many of your assumptions on this point are based on your belief the working and middle class aren’t looked down on by the elites, and you think they care about you. They want your votes, labour and tax money, nothing more. We’re seen as farm animals, we’re being farmed for our labour and data so that we can each, in turn, be more efficiently farmed. I’m not going to comment on this matter any more because it’s a fruitless endeavour.

You’re all willingly dumb. God forbid Trump gets into power and Project 2025 is enacted, you’ll realise just how dumb you were.

sonjax6 · August 2, 2024, 9:25pm

The explanation I’ve heard is that a police officer cut his hand trying to get on the roof, and the blood is from that officer.

I’m fairly certain that there was a second shooter in building 6, but he either escaped or was executed a few seconds after shot 8 was fired (you can see flashes of light and hear a silenced gunshot in the Stewart film at that point). No one would be sloppy enough to leave blood from a shooter in the bathroom.

sonjax6 · August 2, 2024, 9:32pm

The center window of building 6 most assuredly had a broken looking appearance 7 seconds before shooting started. It had a LOT of different appearances in the seconds before and after the shooting, as I and others have pointed out here.

Furthermore, the first bullet is documented to have nicked Trumps ear and then went on to hit David Dutch and the top of the railing of the right hand bleachers, both of which are higher than Trump’s ear. It was a rising bullet. Furthermore, a shooter in the window would have had a clear shot.
My substack of July 30 covers this.

And yes, self healing glass and polymers are real:

bigtim · August 2, 2024, 10:02pm

I’ve watched the video forward and backwards frame-by-frame several times. The ground floor AGR #6 windows never open and are not broken at any time before, during, or after. Furthermore, there’s perhaps a dozen or more people there who would have observed a window open or breaking and shots from those windows because all focus was on that building. Finally, at least 2 police officers walk up and inspect all windows and none reacted in a way to suggest they were opened or broken.

These windows show different light reflections based on up/down and side/side angles of videos. Different lighting characteristics, imperfections in the glass, etc. account for the darkness, the pink/red reflected barns, the light streaks in the windows, dark corners, etc. All due to angles and lighting and digital camera lenses.

I think it is safe to say, without clear evidence a window was opened, the speculation they were opened is debunked and it is clear none were broken.

I believe AGR #6 was in a depression, and there would have been obstacles in the path (people, bleachers, at least 1 chain link fence). The cell phone videos from the AGR #6 people between Trump and the building show at least a 7’ tall chain link fence. That would likely obstruct 100% or nearly 100% of the shooting lane. A chain link fence would be difficult to take accurate shots thru and would deflect the bullet sufficiently at that distance to entirely miss, so a assassin would not opt for that location.

For those not familiar, with optics or rifle shots, it would be really hard to thread a precision shot thru a chain link fence. You’d be threading a needle thru the fence, while also trying to make a clean shot. That would add a big layer of difficulty.

Furthermore, this picture shows that the windows and especially window 3 simply does not have a clear shot of Trump. In addition to a fence there are rows of spectators in the way.

It would have been a very very poor choice for a assassin due to easily being seen, reported, and stopped as well. We assume this shooter is the professional who intends to escape so that would be a really bad location for shooting and escaping because the building would be instantly surrounded, which it was. For those reasons I think we can shut the door on the 1st floor shooters.

However let’s assume that perhaps the angle is okay and there’s no obstacles. It’s a moot point. Since no windows were opened or broken this is a moot point. It’s clear no assassin was shooting from the first floor absent some hard evidence. We’d need to have an open window or a broken window, at minimum. It’s a non-starter without that and that didn’t occur.

I introduced the theory a few days ago and revisit it now about “self healing glass” and this being a glass manufacturer. First, seems pretty wild. Second, a gunshot would presumably blow glass out onto the ground that could not “heal” itself. That would be obvious. Third, I’d assume glass would need to heal over minutes? Days? For molecules to reform. The evidence in the videos is the windows change appearance in seconds. That is a reflection, nothing more.

jpeabody · August 2, 2024, 10:45pm

The audio signal “shifts” recorded for Shots 2, 3 and 4 in the audio tracks from Source 4 and Source 6 – in combination with using the Trump mic audio track and Shot 1 as references; and using a starting assumption that the location of Shot 1 (that hit Trumps ear) was taken from inside a room at window #1 (left most south window on second story of AGR BLD#3) – can then lead to hypothesizing a potential and preliminary unified theory – indicating the location and number of shooters for the failed plot to assassinate Trump (PTAT) of July 13th (see my reference graphic above).

My rough “spitball” 2D audio analysis suggests that:

Shot 1 = Shooter #1 => that hit Trump’s ear – and buzzed red hat/white shirt-pant guy who was seen to duck & trip & fall down in upper row of south bleacher.
Shot 2 = Shooter #2 => hit James Copenhaver in the left hand (flesh wound) who was standing in the upper (right side) row of the south bleacher.
Shot 3 = Shooter #3 => hit David Dutch in the right side of the chest who was standing in the upper row/right side of the south bleacher.
Shots 4 – 8 = Shooter #4 (Crooks/ “the patsy”) => James Copenhaver was hit a second time this time in the abdomen - with Shot 4 or 5; Shot 6 hit Corey Comperatore in the head who was standing on the left side of the north bleacher. May be one of the unaccounted Crooks shots hit the hydraulic line to the lift holding up the south speakers. Also, it is possible an unaccounted Crooks shot hit David Dutch a second time (not sure about this).

I am surmising that the PTAT plan was to use three (3) primary (snipers) shooters concealed in the second story of AGR BLD#3 - for the intended sequential “kill” Shots 1 to 3; and used Crooks as a follow-up patsy-distraction shooter (in the open) to take rapid fire (spray & pray) Shots 4 to 8 – who then could be blamed via a DS sponsored fake “lone-shooter” narrative. The PTAT presumably assumed (correctly) that Crooks would (after delay) be taken out by counter-snipers – and thereby tie-up a loose end.

Trump miraculously escaped death from the intended crossfire of Shots 1 to 3 by the slight leaning forward and turning his head to right and then immediately pulling back and turning his head back to the left in a fraction of a second.

I anticipate that some will question the above based on the bleacher-railing-strike video/audio evidence – I have an explanation for that but – that will have to wait – start first with looking in detail at the relative Shot signal time-shifts – follow the data . . . I think. Everything herein-above is speculative, subject to independent analysis and confirmation and is offered solely for discussion purposes – no express or implied representations are made here regarding the accuracy or precision of any of the information set forth above. Use or lose as you see fit.

Best of luck all,

pbd

truthisout · August 2, 2024, 11:11pm

Commentary on your “Stewart film” analysis - what’s clear when comparing sources:

Source 6: first 3 loud, last 5 muffled

Source 4: first 3 muffled, last 5 loud/direct;

iow. first three shots were closer, or in more direct line to Dave’s position.

So, can the potential leaning over the ridge account for that? - proffesional audio analysis;
if not, there appears to be only one other explanation (/place) - the hatch between 2nd and 3rd window.

Just heard Dave’s interrogation where cop tells him to “go down to the FBI building to pick up his stuff [some hours later]” so…
That’s plenty of time to edit anything they wanted.
Chris, you’ve talked to him, so probably know the exact details about his phone.
Also in the interrogation: Dave thought it’s the guy on the ground shooting at them/him; just to illustrate my point that you don’t necessarily see the shooter (- hatch), especially if you’re expecting a different location.

thebuff · August 2, 2024, 11:13pm

There’s not one video of a cop trying to get on the roof or Crooks pointing his gun at a cop

Yahoo Mail: Search, Organize, Conquer

bigtim · August 2, 2024, 11:21pm

Probably because it was on the side farthest from the bulk of the crowd, on the parking lot far corner with the lowered breezeway. I’d speculate that was the point where the officer was boosted up, where we later see a tall ladder. Why would fans there to see Trump, be on the far side where they can’t see him?

sgt-raven · August 2, 2024, 11:41pm

After watching 9 years of TDS, it is clear whom is the dummy.

kyle_yle · August 3, 2024, 1:13am

Maybe you can reach out to this guy who says he has first hand knowledge that they (the sniper team you see flinch) heard a “sonic crack” and thought they were being shot at… just wondering how close you have to be to hear that? were they close enough to the bullets that hit Trump and the crowd to hear that?.. if rounds were directly going in their direction this could support two shooters?..or maybe this can account for the different sounds from shots 123 and the other ones because crooks was firing at the sniper team and trump? (Ignore title of video)

sonjax6 · August 3, 2024, 1:42am

It’s really strange that the middle window is the only one that has weird “reflections”. Nothing like that happens with any of the other windows. As far as police going by, one goes by at about 3:21 in the Stewart video, 1:24 before shots start. At that point the only anomaly is red fabric covering the top third of the window. No police officer approaches that window again until shots are about to start. It looks like it’s the same officer, and as the shots start, he changes direction and heads toward the east side of the building towards an entrance.

One other possibility for a rifle location is that the small vent up and about six feet to the left (from the outside) from window 3 . I noticed it appears different in some of the screen grabs one second before shots start, and in a few soon afterwards. If that was the case, that middle window could have been used for spotting.

I do realize that what we are seeing could just be artifacts of the video rendering algorithm - but that bullet rising is a very powerful piece of evidence.

As for your picture which purportedly shows a person in the center window of building 6 not having a good line of sight, if you mentally move yourself more into a line with Trump and “window 3”, you will find that swings you away from the left bleachers. All that is in the way is the hydraulic lift that holds the speakers, and most of it is not that tall. Use one of Chris’ overhead photos and a straightedge.

Lastly, a chainlink fence would render maybe 20% of the shooting area unusable. That would be an annoyance, but since the fence in question is fairly close, I don’t think it would be a dealbreaker for a sniper.

sonjax6 · August 3, 2024, 1:44am

Have you read all 922 pages of project 2025? I’ve only read a little of it, some of the sections on the federal reserve and the FDA. What I read seems pretty reasonable. I don’t know who could be against ending regulatory capture at the FDA.

Some of it has got to be pretty boring. The are sections both pro and con regarding keeping the export-import bank, for example.

bigtim · August 3, 2024, 2:10am

That adds up because it’s in the middle where it is being filmed from the most different directions, left, straight on, to the right, crouched down, standing up filming, etc. The ones near the ends are generally filmed consistently from an angle so would have the least variance (same general angle).

I don’t think there’s a magical “red fabric.” Look again. It’s probably the reflection of the red barn. Again, glass can have imperfections and what you are seeing, with the different colors, angles, white stripe, appears to be reflections in the glass. This isn’t complex and is overwhelmingly the most plausible explanation.

Officers look at and pass by these windows repeatedly before, during, and after the shooting. Two officers with guns drawn immediately (within perhaps 1 minute) walk past, inspect, look in, each room/window. There are at least a dozen people standing there looking at the building. There is not 1 second of it being un-observed sufficient to open the window, take carefully timed and aimed 3 shots, and close the window. The shots alone take several seconds.

If not reflections we are looking at impossible explanations, since there was no time or ability to open/close windows, shoot thru them, without notice, damage etc.

And as I’ve stated above, there simply appears to be no good shot from window 3. Assassin would be firing from a highly visible ground floor room, where a cop could just walk up and stop him. His target would be obscured by people walking by, a 7’ chain link fence (very challenging to shoot thru with precision accuracy without bullet deflecting), and bleachers. I think we can safely eliminate this speculative 1st floor shooting position b/c there is literally no evidence for it, and all the evidence points against it.

I disagree. This picture shows clearly from the vantage of one of the victims. window 3 is not in line with Trump and the victims (but Crooks is), and window 3 is almost entirely, if not entirely, obscured. Would not be a location a pro would pick.

For the purpose of an assassin taking a precision shot, a chain link fence may as well be a solid wall. It would add a nearly impossible level of difficulty and randomness that professional snipers/shooters would not risk that shot. It introduces an unacceptable variable. To be clear, sure in a war or firefight people can shoot thru fences, and bullets will go thru. But a precision shooter would not opt for that shot. Anything, even a 5 mph wind, can throw off that bullet sufficiently from a “hit” to a “miss.” A tree twig, a wire fence, etc. could throw the bullet off significantly and would not be chosen.

raycoffin · August 3, 2024, 2:17am

There is a photo of blood on his middle two fingers as he pulls it away from his ear (I cannot post here, but would if I could). I posted it on Truth andI think GETTR as well. To date nobody has done forensic validation or debunking of this photo, perhaps by using AI Deep Fake Detection Software.

IMHO if that photo is real it would lend credibility to his ear actually being “nicked” as it would be incredibly difficult to fake that blood at that moment.

As far as the apparent lack of blood, compare the experience of Evander Holyfields having just lost a 2-3x bigger chunk of his ear to Tyson’s Teeth, very little blood, like Trump. Trump should never have said, “Covered in blood”, but Trump likes to exaggerate, one of the many things I do not like about him.

As far as the scar on his ear, go look at Holyfield’s ear, the missing tissue now is about 75% smaller than the original wound, same with Trump’s ear. This is normal.

What would Trump’s motive be to subject himself to live fire at such close proximity? Evidence abounds real bullets were flying and striking things like railing and hydraulic lines, people were reacting to live fire. Plus the people shot.

Sandy Hook, Uvalde and the Manson Slayings were all psy ops, staged without a doubt.

I think much is extremely sketchy about this assassination attempt. There is much disinformation, mal-information and covering up.

Like Joe Friday liked to say, “Just the facts please”.

raycoffin · August 3, 2024, 2:20am

You really must watch James Cullen and Clay Martin (Sniper Extraordinaire) break it all down for you with more data and better analysis. You can find it on Rumble.

mjx · August 3, 2024, 3:14am

Their hands are clean folks. It wasnt anybody’s fault. It was the system that was bad and unfortunately we cannot fire the system so we will readjust it for the next necessary failure. If anyone can be blamed for the incident, it would be President Trump for competing against the deep state cunts. What was he even thinking going against the mafia right?

So thats all from DC today, rest assured, we will not find anyone responsible who needs to be fired.

moonbeam13 · August 3, 2024, 4:40am

bigtim · August 3, 2024, 4:57am

Exactly. If this had been successful like with JFK, they’d stonewall, do a fake investigation, shrug shoulders, and move on with their devious plans, seal all documents for 100 years and nobody would be held accountable.

starsygn · August 3, 2024, 6:29am

We need to find the original video of this … This was on tiktok but is from Valuetainment and I’m not sure who the source is but it shows 2 ppl on the roof