More than two months after the first assassination attempt against trump we still don’t know the answers to shockingly basic questions.
We don’t even know who the site agents in charge that day were because the Secret Service (SS) won’t officially name them, even though we’re pretty sure we’ve known the names for ~two months.
We don’t know who made specific key decisions that led to a novice being able to blunder his way to a completely obvious and mysteriously unprotected roof position.
We haven’t seen a single SS agent or local sniper who could clear up a lot of vital issues ever be called to the stand. Oddly, only non-vital people get called forth by Congress to testify.
So, all in all, the whole thing smells exactly like a cover-up, which is precisely what it is.
And when people or institutions cover things up, the reason is always the same. There’s something that is incriminating (or highly embarrassing) that they’d rather not have get out into the light of day.
It’s a terrible place for a country to be, but here we are.
The agent with specific responsibility for security the rally site, including line of sight concerns, was known to be incompetent.
This kills me. Seriously, if the agent was known to be incompetent, why hadn’t he or she been fired already? Why would an agency tasked with guarding the former President of the United States keep an incompetent agent on the payroll? It boggles the mind.
Haven’t watched the new video yet, but here are some archived versions of related articles obtained using the Wayback Machine. Probably a prelude to what we’ll learn when the Secret Service releases the report of their investigation.
Things are about to get crazy? I submit they already ARE crazy!
Second assassination attempt.
Third assassination attempt? Bomb dog training? Uh huh.
Ever notice that a “training exercise” excuse is used whenever there is a need for chaos in some kind of governmental operation? I give you Operations Northern Vigilance, Global Guardian, and Vigilant Guardian. all three designed to divert military resources and sow chaos on 9-11.
Out of a range of scenarios being run on September 11, 2001, one was a “traditional” simulated hijacking. How convenient for the real hijackers, if there were any. If you have the stomach for it, you might watch Acting Director Rowe’s “news” conference about the 1st assassination attempt. I promise it will be exactly what you expect from that idiot. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a7B1LrBR7oU
It’s time for that lady to be outed and grilled by various congressional members of both committees (the Senate’s and the House’s). I imagine they know the names of the Hercules 1 team as well.
I just want to update people here on my activities off-site. My thinking is that while it’s good if we continue to refine our reports and track down more leads, our combined efforts have already exceeded what a group of homicide detectives would do before bringing people in for questioning.
The purpose of all the zooming and enhancing is to understand the situation and to develop a list of people who can answer the questions we can’t find out by studying evidence. Our main problem is that, now that we’ve developed a short list of critical witnesses to interview, we have no power to actually bring them in.
So I’ve been doing a lot more outreach. Every time I see some new article about the first assassination attempt, I try to contact the reporter and tell them there’s much more critical stuff they could be covering, and that I’d be happy to explain. Usually, they express interest, and then I explain the main leads, and they fall silent.
I’m not sure why this is, but I get the feeling that most modern “journalists” are afraid of actual investigations, i.e., finding out something that somebody doesn’t want other people to know, something they’re trying to hide. In this case they may find it especially scary because it’s police and government trying to hide stuff.
If you run across anyone who seems like a good reporter but they’re barking up the wrong tree, maybe write to them, or @ me on here and I’ll do it. Thanks.
Why don’t I believe a word Rowe says?
He has the intelligence of a block of wood.
Some shots were fired, things happened. some bullets were involved. That’s all we know after two months.
The only “paradigm shift” I want is this guy’s resignation.
That’s my “red line”.
Two local reporters who have already posted stories that advanced public knowledge of the July 13 assassination attempt:
WPXI Channel 11’s Nicole Ford first reported Thomas Crooks was spotted several times prior to opening fire, with LEO cell phone pictures and text messages about his presence.
about the moe-saad)
