It would be extremely rare to have 4 HIV-1 Inserts- also asserted in above paper.
Bat RaTG13 and Pangolin have about 97.5% Homology
We must keep looking to find the animal with the SARSCoV-2 founder genome
Then Luc Montagnier and Perez take a deep dive into the remaining 2.5% of the genome- It has 12 partial sequences of HIV SIV . One is associated with prior research into a vaccine for HIV from Kenya 2008. https://osf.io/d9e5g/Luc Montagnier EIE Chart
Every minute seems to be rather important. Sure would like to settle the issues she brings up. Or we could discuss other things for a year or two after we get vaccinated. https://youtu.be/U9ti6isM-NY
Thank you Sandman for pointing this out. Videos, indeed are a slow and painful way to present persuasive argument.
This is why a peer-to-peer text based digital communication can serve us well. We can reference news articles and pdf web pages, and use text-typing to present arguments, as a way to continue a search for truth as the internet gets locked down.
In recent years, ham radio (“amateur radio”) has developed a number of powerful digital text techniques that allow two way text discussions about articles and pictures (which can be downloaded from the internet) long distances such that anyone can tune in in real time.
I look forward to working with people here who want to set up a weekly discussion group (text based) over news item....
If the people were advised by the media to take Vit C, Vit D and Zinc, and were allowed to have HCQ for a backup, we could have ended this months ago. She says life immunity is gained from infection. How does she know this? She wants herd immunity to happen fast. She says this virus doesn’t spread in air without droplets to ride in. Most important, she wants to form a group of advisors who have no financial interests in the industry, if that were even possible. Lots to talk about, in my opinion.
On the other hand, I agree with Gail Tverberg that the world is overpopulated and this is one way to deal with that. Maybe we should just “go along with it”.
Whitney Webb has a short read on the Last American Vagabond website called "As Moderna’s Covid-19 Vaccine Takes the Lead, It’s Chief Medical Officer’s Recent Promotion of “Gene Editing Vaccines” Comes to Light.
I tried to insert the link here but being censored again today… sigh. Poop!!
The key issue as many of you may already know is ‘they’ are monkeying around with permanent gene alteration via vaccines, with potentially disastrous effects! Some may recall the scandal with the anthrax vaccine and how it caused long term medical problems for countless people, many of whom were USA military personnel (another story well captured in Ms. Webb’s 3 part series called Engineering Contagion, also found on the Last American Vagabond).
A few excerpts - bold my emphasis:
...The summary of Zaks’ talk encapsulates his view as the following simple question: “If our cells are the hardware and our genetic material the operating system, what if we could change a few lines of code?” — seemingly suggesting that the permanent introduction of changes into the human genome is as simple as troubleshooting or programming a computer or phone application.Zaks’ statements are noteworthy and concerning for several reasons, including the fact that DARPA — Moderna’s “strategic ally” — is also openly funding research aimed at “reprogramming genes” and “manipulat[ing] genes or control[ling] gene expression to combat viruses and help human bodies withstand infection” caused by Covid-19. The DARPA-backed project would use a method that is known to cause severe genetic damage that has actually been shown to aggravate the conditions it was meant to cure.
The question is how do we raise more awareness and stop this from ever happening? The downside risk potential is huge. What can be done?!?
Jan
https://www.the-scientist.com/news-opinion/lab-made-coronavirus-triggers-debate-34502
From a 2015 article.
Ralph Baric, an infectious-disease researcher at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, last week (November 9) published a study on his team’s efforts to engineer a virus with the surface protein of the SHC014 coronavirus, found in horseshoe bats in China, and the backbone of one that causes human-like severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) in mice. The hybrid virus could infect human airway cells and caused disease in mice, according to the team’s results, which were published in Nature Medicine.
The results demonstrate the ability of the SHC014 surface protein to bind and infect human cells, validating concerns that this virus—or other coronaviruses found in bat species—may be capable of making the leap to people without first evolving in an intermediate host, Nature reported. They also reignite a debate about whether that information justifies the risk of such work, known as gain-of-function research. “If the [new] virus escaped, nobody could predict the trajectory,” Simon Wain-Hobson, a virologist at the Pasteur Institute in Paris, told Nature.
Let me try this again. https://www.the-scientist.com/news-opinion/lab-made-coronavirus-triggers-debate-34502
Ralph Baric, an infectious-disease researcher at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, last week (November 9) published a study on his team’s efforts to engineer a virus with the surface protein of the SHC014 coronavirus, found in horseshoe bats in China, and the backbone of one that causes human-like severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) in mice. The hybrid virus could infect human airway cells and caused disease in mice, according to the team’s results, which were published in Nature Medicine.
The results demonstrate the ability of the SHC014 surface protein to bind and infect human cells, validating concerns that this virus—or other coronaviruses found in bat species—may be capable of making the leap to people without first evolving in an intermediate host, Nature reported. They also reignite a debate about whether that information justifies the risk of such work, known as gain-of-function research. “If the [new] virus escaped, nobody could predict the trajectory,” Simon Wain-Hobson, a virologist at the Pasteur Institute in Paris, told Nature.
“[The results] move this virus from a candidate emerging pathogen to a clear and present danger,”