Defying Gravity

And nobody in all of Oz
No Wizard that there is or was
Is ever gonna bring me down!
~ Wicked, "Defying Gravity"

Today's markets exist in an Oz-like, fantasy world. For 5 years now, stock and bond prices have risen like Dorothy's balloon, with hardly a puff of downdraft to spoil the fun.

Everybody likes higher prices, so let's have them always go up! Forever!

Whether that can indeed happen is a topic of hot debate, though few are yet willing to predict corrections have been permanently banished from the financial markets.

In this article, we investigate the rationale for prudent hedging in light of today's elevated prices. If, like most investors, your portfolio is positioned long-only (i.e., betting on a continuation of higher prices) and is mostly-to-fully invested in stocks and bonds, read on to learn why having insurance against a market correction is a wise move to consider at this time.

Too Much Of A Good Thing

Consider the price performance of the S&P 500 since it bottomed after the 2008 crisis. It has now enjoyed 34 straight months of upward movement without a correction of 10% (there have only been 2 longer correction-free stretches for the index in the past 25 years):

Furthermore, this half decade-long rally has been unusually strong. Since the end of 2012, the S&P has tested its 100-day DMA only 15 times (that's really infrequent), and traded below is 200-day DMA zero times (that's shocking). 

It's no wonder that investors, lulled (or bored, one might say) by the monotonous and volatility-free pleasant performance, have come to believe we're at a new permanently high plateau for asset prices. And so they expect more of the same in the future.

Many believe these higher prices are due to the US' status as the "cleanest shirt in the laundry hamper". That as long as economic conditions are relatively worse in Europe (which they indeed are) and in Asia (and China is definitely looking sicker by the week), and the world's central banks continue their easing policies (which they very likely will), then the huge pool of global capital will continue to slosh into US assets looking for better returns and/or safer haven.

And the parade of mainstream articles like the following (note the S&P 3,000 tease) certainly helps investor confidence in the party's continuation:

Stocks: Bull market alive for 2,000 days (CNN Money)

Too late to jump in? All of this has led some on Wall Street to fear the string of good luck could be nearing an end. Some even believe stocks are in the midst of a bubble that could pop in an ugly way soon.

But optimism is still the driving force in investment circles. More optimistic forecasters say it's not too late to jump into the market, even if you've missed the gigantic rally over the past five years.

"We don't see any prospect of a recession any time soon," said Bruce McCain, who helps oversee more than $20 billion as chief investment strategist at Key Private Bank.

While the size of the upcoming gains might be more muted, McCain said "you should be able to capitalize on overall earnings growth."

Amoroso echoed that sentiment, saying: "It's not too late but investors do need to realize that expectations of future returns have come down."

A few market watchers remain very bullish on stocks. Last week Morgan Stanley predicted the S&P 500 could surge to 3,000 by 2020 because the lackluster economic recovery doesn't appear nearing its end.


In fact, the ratio of bullish to bearish analysts is at all-time highs right now (underscored by Monday's news that David Bianco just upped his year-end S&P target by 200 points):


So, here we are. A 34-month long winning streak, with practically every analyst on the same side of the boat, confident that "things will go higher from here".

It's just like a fairy tale.

Warning Signs

We spill a lot of (digital) ink here at Peak Prosperity identifying the data and fundamentals-driven evidence that suggest not only is the current market rally unsustainable, but that much of it is based on accounting chicanery, faulty assumptions, intervention, manipulation and fraud. Here are recent examples from Chris, Charles Hugh Smith, Brian Pretti and myself (while writing this article, Charles directed me to an excellent recap of current market risks by John Hampson which can be read here).

But ignoring all of that for the moment, even if you choose to subscribe to the bullish case, there are still very compelling reasons you should consider holding some insurance here.

Historical Comparison

First off, occasional corrections are good for bull markets. They keep the uptrend from getting out ahead of itself too much, otherwise larger, more painful downdrafts will result when corrections do occur. Now ask yourself: Is a 5-year bull run ,with zero 10% corrections over the past 3 years, likely to be more or less painful when it does drop?

Answer: More. Likely a LOT more.

Technical Analysis

From the technical analysis side, there are lots of indicators that the current rally is 'long in the tooth'. From The Keystone Speculator:

The bears have the weekly chart on a silver platter. The prior top in July was an easy call based on neggie d and now the chart is set up again favorably for bears. The blue and red rising wedges, overbot stochastics and universal negative divergence across all indicators want to see a spank down and lower prices ahead. Price is extended well above the moving averages requiring a mean reversion lower. The candlestick from last week is a doji indicating that a trend change is on tap


The technicals are clearly flashing warning lights that stocks are in "overbought" territory.

Watching The Smart Money

It's always wise to watch what the successful players are doing. And in the current environment, they're taking a lot of their chips off the table. From Zero Hedge:

Icahn, Soros, Druckenmiller, And Now Zell: The Billionaires Are All Quietly Preparing For The Plunge

"The stock market is at an all-time, but economic activity is not at an all-time," explains billionaire investor Sam Zell to CNBC this morning, adding that, "every company that's missed has missed on the revenue side, which is a reflection that there's a demand issue; and when you got a demand issue it's hard to imagine the stock market at an all-time high." Zell said he is being very cautious adding to stocks and cutting some positions because "I don't remember any time in my career where there have been as many wildcards floating out there that have the potential to be very significant and alter people's thinking." Zell also discussed his view on Obama's Fed encouraging disparity and on tax inversions, but concludes, rather ominously, "this is the first time I ever remember where having cash isn't such a terrible thing." Zell's calls should not be shocking following George Soros. Stan Druckenmiller, and Carl Icahn's warnings that there is trouble ahead.

(read full article here)

These investors each amassed billions through decades of investing savvy. If your portfolio is still fully allocated to stocks and bonds, it's worth investigating: What do these guys see that I don't?

The Prudence of Hedging

Risk management is the bedrock of investing successfully over time. 

You always want to have protection in place and/or diversified holdings in case your main strategy doesn't pan out as intended. Remember, a 25% drop in your portfolio means it then has to gain 33% just to break even (and it's pretty easy to find credible predictions for a coming correction of 50% or more). 

You also want to have some liquidity held in reserve to take advantage of 'no brainer' opportunities when they come your way. Remember the old maxim: Buy low, sell high. Just about everything is priced at "high" today by traditional valuation metrics. Keep some cash on hand to deploy in the aftermath of a correction, when prices are more favorable.

Most investors only come to appreciate the wisdom of these lessons painfully, after a market downdraft has burned them. Wiser investors hedge.

"Hedging" is the practice of allocating a minority percentage of your investments to safer or inversely-correlated holdings relative to the majority of what's in your portfolio. Simply increasing the percentage of your portfolio held in cash -- particularly during times of apparent overvaluation, like now -- is an easy and practically risk-free hedging step that anyone can do.

In Part 2: How to Hedge Against A Market Correction, we explore the standard range of hedging techniques that are commonly used to offer portfolio protection and/or upside during a market downturn. These include stops, inverse and leveraged securities, shorting, options, and futures.

And for those who choose to forgo hedging, you might want to pick up a pair of ruby slippers. If you get caught by a market correction, click them together three times and pray like heck they return your nest egg to the value it was before...

Click here to access Part 2 of this report (free executive summary; enrollment required for full access)


This is a companion discussion topic for the original entry at

…will have to come from someone else, because I'm not smart and I don't have any money.
But I do have a question from the extreme other end of the spectrum:

If, as you note, the chief source of strength in this market is the easing policies of the central banks, wouldn't it be reasonable to conclude that the market strength will continue as long as the easing continues? At least until the whole thing redlines and throws a rod.

What would cause a market downturn in the face of continued easing short of a complete meltdown of the entire financial system?

[quote=earthwise]What would cause a market downturn in the face of continued easing short of a complete meltdown of the entire financial system?
A complete meltdown of the entire financial system.

Earthwise -One of the best summaries I've seen of current potential correction (not necessarily crash) triggers has been put together by John Hampson:
(I personally don't put a lot of stock in his Reason H "Natural Force Timing", but Reasons A-G alone should make your hair stand on end)

At the end of the rainbow lies a Right wing (whatever that is) backlash and Totalitarian rule.
Chris Hedges in fine form. From here, via JHK, if I remember correctly.

All of those potential triggers are dynamics that traditionally operate in a sane world that no longer exists. Now the entire economy of the entire world is dominated by central bank printing presses. The current status quo has overcome all of the market forces traditionally in play. If those forces described by Hampton had any traction, this balloon would have popped a long time ago. I'm probably wrong, but it's the way I see things.

When the Fed stopped its QE programs in the past, the markets have rolled over.  It happened the last two times. I'm betting it will happen this time as well.  QE Infinity should end in October. If the pattern holds, approximately 1 month after QE stops, the market will fall.  It could be sooner since the Fed tapered down the QE this time.

Zerohedge sums it up with nice graphs (somewhat old):

A newer graph but still about 9 months old:

The question I have is: will they start printing again when the market corrects? They always have in the past.


It might seem a reasonable strategy to hedge the market in the face of extreme doubt about its ability to continue to defy gravity. The problem with hedging is that you are not really taking a position but procrastinating. If the market goes down you protect a part of your position. The problem is that you have created another decision that will need to be made. That is the decision to close the position or increase it or sell out altogether. What usually happens is that the very large traders (the banks and financial institutions) create a short squeeze which leaves many hedged positions trapped (because they entered the hedge too late in the game). In the usual manner, procrastination/hope prevents many investors from cutting their losses promptly so they end up remaining short for longer than necessary and so cutting their gains on the long side even more.
This appears to be what has been happening over the last year or two - sharp falls of 100 points in the S&P500 every 6 months or so and more frequent falls of up to half that size in between. So even though the majority are long they are hardly making gains because of their hedging activities. This is especially noticeable amongst the majority of fund managers. 

 Fear of missing out is a more powerful driver of share markets than fear of loss. It keeps people from going into cash. Added to that is the reluctance of most people to leave the equity markets for the very poor yields in the money markets - thanks to QE. Gaining any sort of meaningful yield requires buying 10 year money or junk. For myself, the risk/reward here just does not make sense. The yield is too low but the risk of capital loss with rising rates is too high. 

For most people a hedging strategy is not a good idea because it requires immense skill and discipline to manage successfully. It is a form of insurance but like all insurance it does not pay unless the event you are insuring for happens. I completely understand insurance for catastrophic purposes. Insuring your house against fire is the classic example. You pay a small amount to cover a very small chance of a disaster happening.

We have to live in a house but we do not have to be in the share market. You can insure your portfolio using an option strategy but for most people who probably have their equity wealth inside a fund or an ETF, it is not an easy insurance policy to set up or manage. Most people tend to go into options when the premium asked has risen. Since share market crashes are comparatively rare events, the chance of anyone picking the exact right time to insure before option premiums have risen is unlikely. You insure for a fire every year so premiums are cheap because everyone is doing it which provides a deep pool. The option pool is not deep or cheap when you need it.

From my own point of view in which I would like to see the markets take their drubbing sooner rather than later for the obvious reason that poor economic performance will continue while these markets are artificially held up by insane levels of central bank debt. It is not creating wealth but encouraging the highest level of margin loans ever and widespread share buybacks which do nothing but boost the bonuses of senior executives.

The suggestion that there are inversely-correlated sectors is just nonsense. It is all one market now with the exception of the US dollar which will appreciate as dollar denominated assets implode.

if you have doubts about the real underlying strength of the market - and who wouldn't given the incredibly poor performance of the economy in Europe, the US and now everywhere else - why not have the courage of your convictions and either get out of equities or significantly lower your exposure. The best thing about cashing up, of course, is that the mental strain is removed and you are also in a position to take advantage of much lower prices.

The "insiders" or senior executives have been net sellers by a huge majority this year. These cynics have driven up their company share prices with buybacks and are now cashing in their bonus stock reward for raising the share price of their companies. Underlying earnings tell a different story of share market health. 

If you are wrong in the short term, you will not have provided "fuel" for the market as you would have if you had taken a short hedging strategy. You are out of the market and there is no need to buy back to close a position which would help drive the market back up again.