Election Fraud in Colorado and Pennsylvania; FDIC Seizes Bank

Originally published at: https://peakprosperity.com/daily-digest/election-fraud-in-colorado-and-pennsylvania-fdic-seizes-bank/

US Election

Election security remains a contentious issue, as illustrated by incidents in Colorado and Pennsylvania. In Mesa County, Colorado, at least 12 mail-in ballots were reportedly stolen, forged, and submitted, with three counted despite the fraud. This incident raises concerns about the security of mail-in voting, although Colorado’s signature verification process identified the discrepancies. Secretary of State Jena Griswold emphasized the integrity of the state’s election processes, despite the challenges. In Lancaster County, Pennsylvania, officials uncovered fraudulent voter registration applications linked to paid canvassing efforts. The investigation revealed false addresses and mismatched identification, prompting further scrutiny. The Department of State commended local officials for their vigilance, as the county manages a high volume of early voters and mail ballot requests ahead of the Nov. 5 election.

Economy

In the banking sector, the FDIC’s seizure of the First National Bank of Lindsay due to allegedly deceptive records highlights ongoing concerns about financial stability. The absence of reserve requirements since 2020 has allowed banks to lend extensively without holding equivalent reserves, leading to questions about the FDIC’s ability to protect depositors in a crisis. The expiration of the bank term funding program and Warren Buffett’s sale of Bank of America stock are viewed by some as indicators of potential instability. As banks face challenges with commercial real estate loans and declining property values, there may be a wave of consolidations and failures. The sector is expected to undergo transformation, influenced by digital banking and AI advancements, which could result in job cuts and shifts in real estate use.

The U.S. government’s proposal to tax unrealized capital gains as part of the Fiscal Year 2025 Budget represents a potential change in revenue collection strategies. This tax would require individuals and businesses to pay taxes on the increased value of unsold assets, such as financial holdings and intellectual property. Some analysts suggest the proposal could lead to changes in investment behavior, possibly discouraging long-term investments and innovation. The complexity of valuing privately owned businesses might require an expansion of the IRS’s powers, including enhanced appraisal capabilities and increased compliance costs. While the tax is presented as a means to reduce government debt, critics argue it could result in capital flight and tax avoidance, raising concerns about its broader economic impact.

Sources

Taxing the Untouched: Unrealized Gains Proposal Sparks Economic Debate

At its core, requiring taxes to be paid on unsold financial assets, ownership stakes, fixed investments, intellectual property, collectibles, and other forms of wealth would act as an economic earthquake, disrupting the capital markets that undergird innovation.

Source | Submitted by Shplad

Banking on the Brink: FDIC Seizes Oklahoma Bank Amid Looming Industry Shake-Up

There’s just no way it doesn’t happen.

Source | Submitted by Hladini

Colorado Ballot Theft Raises Eyebrows: Fraudulent Votes Slip Through Despite Security Measures

At Least A Dozen Colorado Ballots Stolen And Mailed In, Officials Say

Source | Submitted by AaronMcKeon

Lancaster County Probes Voter Registration Fraud Linked to Canvassing Efforts

“It appears to be an organized effort,” Adams said, noting that the investigation is ongoing.

Source | Submitted by AaronMcKeon

1 Like

A news station in Pennsylvania was forced to apologize for flashing up the US presidential election results in the state as part of a “test” that wasn’t supposed to be seen by viewers.

WNEP, an ABC affiliate, flashed up the results for Pennsylvania during its broadcast of the Formula 1 race in Mexico City and they were on screen for several minutes.

You’ll never guess who “won”.

Kamala Harris, of course, beating Trump by 52 per cent to 47 per cent of the vote.

Pennsylvania News Station Apologizes For Showing Presidential Election 'Results' | ZeroHedge

No, it is not rigged. And if you suggest that you are an “election denier.”