Energy Shortfalls, AI Emergence, Vaccine Secrets

Speaking of C-19 spike protein shedding, this powerful testimony of a woman who describers herself as a ‘toxicity meter’ should be watched. Anyone that took the mRNA vax and hasn’t detoxed from it, is a walking bioweapon.

https://x.com/toobaffled/status/1930525568656966128

5 Likes

My kids have a friend who was pregnant when the shots came out. Her mother talked her into getting them. She miscarried late term- the baby had hydrops. She and her husband had 1 successful pregnancy before and 1 after. They wonder if the shot had anything to do with it.

3 Likes

Can’t stress this enough. Stay away from the Medical Industrial Complex. They are task with carrying the weight for the “great die off.” Part of implementing AI will be significantly reducing the population as AI means less need for human beings. You want to be a survivor in all of this. What that looks like remains unclear but there’s no shortage of people in the Western world one jab away from lights out. They are already moving on, or more specifically moving down by six feet.

6 Likes

Exactly the +/- points per trait are pretty disgusting

1 Like

Sure, population growth can drive a search for more energy which, if available, drives GDP growth. However, if hard limits on energy have been reached, no amount of population growth will increase GDP.

2 Likes

Only if the energy is available to be used.

2 Likes

Hi Chris,
I met you in Atlanta at IMA in May. Would you consider interviewing someone from my group at Pandemic Investigation Project regarding the 2 deaths that were not reported that my group found and published about. We need as much attention on this as possible. Please email me at spohadams@protonmail.com if you are interested in an interview with a doctor from my team.
Thank you.

4 Likes

It didn’t dawn on me until now, friend I know had at least two shots, had afib and underwent ablation.

3 Likes

Our entire society is subsidized by free / cheap energy and thats what makes survival possible. If you don’t have the energy to move products into a city fast enough for people to consume them, then either the people starve or are forced to move. The calories in our food are heavily subsidized by the energy input from oil and other sources. Without energy, you don’t have people. At least not living like most us do now!

3 Likes

It’s a wrap. Agent Orange is willingly selling America out. Welcome Skynet

2 Likes

The “Peak Oil Chat” just put out a new awesome informative video!!!

4 Likes

The AI drone wars has started

1 Like

I think I’ve mutated from jaded skeptic to hard core cynic. How do we know the machines have not been programmed with this apparent “emergent” behavior? How do we know the people reporting this apparent “emergent” behavior are not lying? I’m not buying it, not yet; I know the WEF wants us to believe they are the new God in the clouds. It sounds like this new threat is just what the WEF ordered. I think they’re instilling fear, again - it’s a constant barrage!

Most everyone here knows where I stand on the vaccine issue. I stopped vaccinating my children about 3.5 years into motherhood (1983) and NEVER regretted it. I have, however, regretted VERY much not stopping sooner. Most people do not know that it’s the vaccines that are making their kids sick, and now modern day health policy is to vaccinate pregnant women! So there is even less chance parents will connect the dots between the shots and the decline of their child’s health.

Jeff Childers of Coffee and Covid has a pragmatic take on the slow walking off the market of the mRNA vaccines. He says Kennedy is walking a tight rope, which we know is true; he promised he would not take away vaccines from parents who want them, but he is giving parents the choice to opt out - at least in regard to the covid shots. I’ll take that as a win.

The attitude that, at this point, it’s a survival of the fittest/Darwin situation is not really true. Parents are not parenting on a level playing field, the deck is stacked and rigged against them. I see it much more as advanced depopulation agenda deployed. It’s right in line with the policies Dr. Day forewarned that group of pediatricians way back in 1968 re: depopulation and population controls. He warned it would be really hard to be healthy in the future. Remember that?

Chris, maybe you can dig up that link? I would like to listen to those recollections again. I’m sure there are other people who may not be aware of these revelations from 1968.

Our U.S. childhood vaccine schedule is just what the Eugenicists ordered. While willing, gullible parents bring in their kids for the health de-stabilizing shots, literally playing Russian Roulette with their child’s health and sometimes life, in complete ignorance. And all the kids are sick these days, so a sick kid looks normal.

It’s a crime of mind boggling proportion.

Speaking of crime, here’s a link to a great film, “Vaccine Nation” by Dr. Gary Null. It’s about a father of a newborn charged with killing his infant son by way of “shaken baby syndrome.” Can no longer find it on bubetube but here’s a link at odysee. It’s a sobering film.

My sister in law found out she had A-Fib and had to have that ablation surgery about 2.5 years ago after having 3 shots. She was 59 at the time.

Palantir. I like Jeff Childer’s take on it. He says ‘don’t panic yet.’

I absolutely hate civil asset forfeiture laws. I represented two clients who were subject to civil asset forfeiture. In one case, a client lost his two souped up cars when his uncle, driving one of the cars, was found to have drugs in his sock. It was a truly rubber stamped hearing where the State only had to prove the case by preponderance of the evidence (51%).

The second case was with the Feds who took $19,000 out of my client’s bank account because he was reported under suspicion of “structuring” his deposits. “Structuring” is defined as withdrawing or depositing cash in a way to keep those transactions under the 7 or 10 thousand dollar reporting trigger. Every time a civilian moves more than 7 or 10 thousand dollars it’s reported to some agency (it started out at $10k transactions but may have changed to $7k transactions). If you are suspected of trying to avoid being reported, it’s called “structuring” your transactions and rises to the level of arresting your money, which is labeled as guilty until proven innocent. We only got back about $5000 of his money, while the Feds kept the rest. He sold used cars and had cash sales in the mornings and afternoons. He would sometimes make 2 deposits a day - not wanting to hold onto the cash all day. He made an off hand comment about the reporting triggers and a bank teller reported him to the Feds.

Great conversation!

6 Likes

Great points Preppy and Quercus. They confirm to me that population growth is driving gdp growth and increasing energy use. Chris omits population growth from his thesis.

Oh man, that statement just rings with the truth, GN.

Indeed but with all three, energy is linked to GDP

Don’t feel like the Lone Ranger. I was put in X jail for a week for using an obvious illustration. X said I wanted people to commit suicide. So I just quit because I live too much on that keen razor’s edge of danger. Happened about six months ago. I do miss the fake hot AI chicks though who wanted this 70 year old bitchin, heavy hunk of burnin’ funk Adonis like myself to be their sugar daddy. Those divas made up almost all of my 53 followers. It’s weird though, I’m a sex machine to the fake AI hotties who obviously know awesome when I made the ones and zeroes on X’s servers go nuts but I get the feeling the EKG tech is scarred for life whenever I take my shirt off for the chest probe stickies at the six month heart doc appointments. I was so wanted by those 50 bot chicks. Not so much in Realville. Oh how I miss it.

4 Likes

Found that article pretty insightful. It actually acknowledged the actual on the ground reality that the Ukrainians have gone all in with drone warfare out of necessity due to manpower shortage, and some of their capabilities.

Hard to put it exactly into words, but the kind of sneering condescension implied with the “unquestionable” assumption that there’s just no way the Ukrainians could pull this operation off without the assistance or the knowledge of the US/UK. It’s absolutely a possibility, but not a given.

They’ve been the ones doing the actual fighting after all. “American” C4 means nothing, I’m sure the place is swimming in it and wouldn’t be hard to quietly divert. Same with the smuggling part. If it’s really the most corrupt country in the world, both of those tasks should be in their wheelhouse. Not the sole purview of first world spooks.

How about another possibility? Demonstrating the capability to critically damage infrastructure thousands of kilometers from your border stealthily and on a budget sure would be helpful if an “ally” also thousands of kilometers away started to get cold feet and was ready to withdraw support. Pulling it all off without their knowledge would kind of drive the point home such capabilities aren’t limited to be directed the country they’re currently in a hot war with. I have literally no information supporting this notion. Just a base skepticism of the supposed omniscience of puppeteers.

7 Likes

“AI means less need for human beings.”

That idea does not ring true to me. Since when have couples who are about to have sex stopped to consider whether some unknown entity will ‘need’ the child they might create in a few minutes, and then having carefully reconsidered, only then proceed to have sex if they think the child is needed?

I don’t think humans exist because something needs them, most of the time. I think humans exist because sex feels good or a couple is in love and wants a baby. Same is true for deer in the forest, fish in the sea, or grass on the prairie. They don’t exist because they are needed by something. They exist because sex is a natural part of their biological programming.

Am i being dense and don’t understand? Maybe y’all are saying AI will kill whatever it doesn’t need. But that makes little sense to me, because killing stuff takes energy. If energy is a very important thing to AI, and i think it is, it only makes sense to me that AI would expend energy to kill humans who are getting in the way of it getting the energy it needs. Expending extra energy to kill humans who are not an impediment to it would be a negative return on energy use.

Or maybe I’m missing the point entirely?

2 Likes

Fun fact: Moderna’s NASDAQ ticker symbol is MRNA…

3 Likes