This is where I have landed… he’s involved… not the main character, and it didn’t go as he planned.
2 Likes
Also a bit of an asshole… wow.
I can’t imagine sitting in an actual room with that guy and not wanting to slap him in the face with his own tongue. 
1 Like
Candace take today…: and for those that aren’t a fan I would encourage you not to write her off. She’s motivated, she’s mad. She was a true friend of Charlie. 5.3 million people think she’s onto something and I would have to agree she seems to be one of the few willing to hold the feds feet to the fire on this cluster of an investigation.
-
claims Charlie definitively shot from the front but with a smaller caliber bullet. Not sure how this accounts for T2-6 injury unless bullet hits then ricochets down the neck almost like throwing a weight against a wall but those physics still confuse me.
-
guy holding the mic for the speakers in the crowd is a volunteer from another state: coincidentally the same person seen pushing the guy who is trying to give an interview of what happened that day. The next two days “mic holder” goes on a fox tour telling his story of the day.
-
caldera engineering remember them- they have a paid actor on staff. Nothing sells complicated valve systems quite like Hollywood.
-
she’s digging into the mystery planes. She and George Webb really seem to think there is something to that story. One makes an unexpected landing but now won’t disclose anything.
At what point do the American people loose all faith in the system? These were supposed to be the people to usher in a new dawn of transparency. I predict any momentum gained by this assassination from the right will be lost tenfold if “Charlie’s people” learn the people he put in office covered up his murder.
Et tu Brute?
3 Likes
Crowd Reaction Times: A Polite Disagreement with Dr. Martenson.
Apologies but my account is too new here to upload images. I have concluded that we need to add a 2-3 second buffer before the beginning of the Hall of Flags video. My evidence for this is based on locating a member of the crowd in two videos. Please see my analysis in the link above. Please feel free to criticize.
6 Likes
Interesting to listen to Dave Collum talk about how difficult it is to find any information about Charlie Kirk’s early life: New Podcast with Dave Collum and Matt Smith - start at 1:36:00, though the whole episode is good.
None of Charlie or Erika’s family were at the memorial service. And their children are basically ghosts. (Granted I fully support famous parents shielding their kids from the public eye, but you’d think something would slip through…) Spoiler alert: Collum throws out the suggestion that Charlie and Erika are MK-Ultra products. I’m not sure what I think of this myself, but it is interesting to consider…
1 Like
This is disturbing if factual. I think the searches are a real smoking gun to a larger plot.
What does hollow point projectile means? Bullet tip is thin and weak? Deformation of the tip consumes most of the energy? Not necessarily break bones?
Deformation and energy consumption:
Yes, the deformation of the hollow point upon impact does help to dissipate energy. When the bullet hits a target, the soft metal at the tip begins to spread out or “mushroom,” increasing the bullet’s surface area. This spreading increases the bullet’s resistance to penetration, which helps to transfer more of its kinetic energy to the target, rather than passing through without significant damage.
In most cases, hollow points are designed to incapacitate by causing massive tissue damage rather than breaking bones, though bone trauma can still occur, especially if the bullet strikes larger or denser bones.
Bumper tip projectile?
Good question — interesting and a little tricky. Short answer up front: yes, there are projectile designs that are intended to dump most of their kinetic energy quickly (rather than over‑penetrate), and when such a bullet hits bone (especially several cervical vertebrae) the result can be severe fracturing plus the projectile stopping and lodging rather than passing cleanly through. But you can’t conclude “special bumper” from that alone — the same pattern can result from many ordinary expanding or fragmenting bullets striking bone at particular angles and velocities.
1 Like
I try to process these audio files:
Back Left 40m.wav
Back Right 7m.wav
Front right 12m.wav
Front Right 45m.wav
Left 15m.wav
guess the velocity: Back Left 40m - Back Right 7m.wav
However, their distance is not exactly known. But the intersection with boundary is somewhere between 450 m/s and 600 m/s.
1 Like
(Not sure what the ‘well poisoning’ has referred to, but that it was faked is in fact the most viable theory and the only theory that fully harmonizes the dozens and dozens of oddities and irregularities we’ve seen. As for what has been called a cavitation event, Kirk’s body response could be caused by an external force, as well as electrical jolt of some kind or other non-lethal means, combined with acting.)
Post 1/2 (to include more links)
There were pyrotechnic sound effects on the Kirk stage - video proof and further corroborating evidence
A couple weeks ago I posted this video: Kirk Fake (?) Shooting HD Footage - Smoking Gun Proof of Pyrotechnics on Stage - Set to 1080p
See also this video (view in 1080p full screen only, and only on laptop or tablet screen, or it may be hard or impossible to see) on my Rumble channel, showing evidence of pyrotechnic sound effects on the Kirk stage: Was the Charlie Kirk shooting fake? Smoking gun evidence of pyrotechnics - all other theories debunked; watch in 1080p full-screen only
There were two sound effects milliseconds apart, one in/on the camera in front of Kirk, and the other inside a speaker cabinet to his left on the screen. In HD footage a smoke puff can be seen inside the cabinet, and a muzzle-like flash from the camera. The two effects would be used to mimic the sound of a long-range rifle, with both the rifle ‘report’ and sonic crack / after-echo accounted for. The effects were set off by ‘brown-shirt man’ after a chain of signals initiated by Charlie himself, who closed his eyes just before the sound effects and blood squib went off.
1 Like
Part 2/2
See also this shorter video at 2:19 (ignore misinfo about white-shirt in beginning): rumble dot com/v6zdc2a-charlie-kirk-new-compilation-of-hd-video-evidence-revealing-real-shooter-an.html?e9s=src_v1_cmd%2Csrc_v1_ucp_v
Fortunately, they did not consider the speed of sound (see below), which would have caused a very perceptible 0.25 second delay between the impact on Kirk’s body and the rifle sound.
The only explanations are that the shooting was faked (99% probability, IMO; it’s the only theory that harmonizes the enormous number of oddities we’ve seen), or that the sound effects were used to cover up ‘the real weapon.’
Two facts particularly corroborate the pyrotechnics:
-
An independent audio analysis that shows two distinct percussions, not one as would be expected: youtube dot com/watch?v=UoCApd1PhmY
-
A near-total absence of footage from the left side of the stage (see 43-minute mark) because the pyrotechnics were visible and the sound was louder from that side, contradicting the official account (obviously): youtube dot com/watch?v=2Riv3I7D0Yk
See these recent posts for more on how a faked assassination is the likeliest scenario:
Top 25 reasons the Charlie Kirk assassination was faked outright, not just staged:
reddit dot com/r/conspiracy/comments/1nqbsjz/top_25_reasons_the_charlie_kirk_shooting_was/
Here’s how and why I think they could have faked the Charlie Kirk assassination:
reddit dot com/r/conspiracy/comments/1no2oi9/heres_how_and_why_i_think_they_could_have_faked/
The official Kirk shooting story is scientifically impossible due to the speed of sound: reddit dot com/r/conspiracy/comments/1njv9r5/the_official_kirk_shooting_story_is/
1 Like
Awesome work! Nicely done.
I shall scrutinize for myself, of course, but this looks convincing.
3 Likes
Hollow points do two things, one, they increase the size of the wound track. Second, they help prevent the bullet from leaving the body and causing other collateral damage.
Generally hollow points are also more accurate. I compete with hollow points without the serrations on the end. When you get into long range shooting, the aerodynamics are different, and you won’t use hollow point
3 Likes
People, I think we need to get past the ballistics and the special ops guys and all that. There were in all likelihood zero bullets fired. The entire event seems to have been faked.
We don’t need more ballistics experts or firearms experts or hunters at this point. They debunked 30-06, OK, but many of us knew that in the first 5 minutes. We need general analysts who are able to overcome cognitive dissonance and harmonize the evidence.
I mean no offense here, but I’m just tired of seeing the 500th ballistics and firearms-expert take / commentary on ballistics. Which again, was somewhat valuable initially to derail the official story, but we need to move on. There are no ballistics at play here because there were no bullets.
The following needs to be fully explained in the context of a real assassination before ballistics or bullet paths or forensics are considered (and this isn’t even close to everything):
- No first aid rendered by anyone, including his close friends and regular security detail who were present
- Severe neck trauma and he is carried around like he’s about to be thrown in a pool.
- Members of his security team are relaxed and smiling while gathered around him on the ground
- No autopsy performed (we already heard that from super-core TPUSA personnel who would absolutely know, can’t go back and cook up an autopsy now), he is not taken to the nearest or best hospital (but rather, the hospital/doctor that agreed to participate in this immoral scheme)
- A number of clear plants in the vicinity: ‘sunglasses guy’ who takes down the camera, the cell phone woman by SUV, woman covering her mouth while speaking, etc
- Absurdly fake text messages from FBI and zero-credibility backstory
- Charlie closed his eyes right before the cue word (violence)
- Charlie himself initiated the chain of signals by touching his face in a pronounced way, then Turek’s hat brim, then black-shirt macarena, then brown-shirt activates the squib and sound effects. 4-part sequence can be seen plain as day in the video I linked above.
- ‘Bullethole’ literally moved from his right pec to left side of throat. Bulletholes don’t move.
- Bulky black pack/apparatus can be seen on Charlie’s right pec under his shirt (blood squib) as he leans forward while speaking. He tugs at repeatedly to adjust it / scratch itch.
- As noted above, pyrotechnic sound effects shockingly are visible on stage
- There is no blood staining his white t-shirt, there is no blood on the ground, there is no little to no blood on the hands of his security and responders, there is no blood dripping as he is carried to SUV, no blood on the white tarp behind him. Completely and totally unrealistic.
- The blood is the wrong color, too dark. Arterial blood in that area would be much redder and brighter.
- The surgeon’s report already said Charlie’s neck vertebrae were stronger than 1/2" steel. He already said the bullet was found just beneath the neck skin. There’s no revising that now to make the story less ridiculous and say it went deep into his body.
- I don’t know anyone in real life who takes payoffs from Bill Ackman to throw their son in prison for life or potentially put him to death. If the son didn’t exist, was an intel agent, or was about to embark on a new and permanent identity as a trans person, then the payoff makes total sense as a way to sweeten the deal for participating.
- I don’t know anyone who films with ‘casket cams’ and cries on camera while touching yellow plastic hands, no other footage from the viewing is available, even distant shots. Erika’s behavior insanely suspicious and off key.
- The FBI itself has obviously confiscated and/or taken down a vast amount of footage taken by people in crowd, especially from the left side where the pyrotechnics were.
- Both Kirk and his wife have flashed masonic gestures (hand diamond thing, devil horns, G ring), and the number 33 is encoded in the event repeatedly (33 hour manhunt, 33 on the three rows of hats in front of Kirk [4+7+4+7+4+7]
- Audio evidence corroborates the visual pyrotechnics evidence, as do multiple witness accounts saying the sound ‘wasn’t as loud as I expected’ [said no shooting witness ever] ‘not deep’ and sounded like a cherry bomb or firecracker; as does the near-total lack of footage from the left side.
- ‘David’ the ‘USA’ chanting spook said “I’m sick. I didn’t see Charlie die.” Revelation of the method anyone?
Again, no ballistics, no firearms expertise, no special forces operator background, no medical expertise needed to draw the clear conclusion from the above, which is that Charlie FAKED his death. Making this disturbing determination has nothing to do with ballistics, just moderate intelligence and the rare psychological fortitude to reconcile the above evidence.
1 Like
Correction:
But we don’t know the exact locations. Let’s consider the limit (maximum and minimum - limes superior vs limes inferior) difference of distances.
Therefore:
We can estimate the bullet speed between 500 m/s and 1800 m/s.
Of course the difference of distances depends on the shooter’s location.
1-Back Left 40m.wav - 3-Front right 12m.wav
Calculated distance difference is too big.
2-Back Right 7m.wav - 3-Front right 12m.wav
Calculated distance difference is too large.
1 Like
I’ve posted about this before (in relation to last year’s hurricane) but whenever all of the forces in Government and Media seem to be purposely showing us that they hate us I am reminded of the Rockefeller Report I’ve linked to below…
The gist is this; First a pandemic, then a “cure”, then it is revealed the cure is worse than the disease, then the masses are shown how corrupt/evil the rulers are, then chaos until we beg for the UN to come save our asses.
Its a quick read but something that is pretty continuously in the back of my mind during these times.
https://archive.org/details/scenarios-for-the-future-of-technology-and-international-development-rockefeller-foundation-2010/page/18/mode/2up
Muzzle distance D from observer should be valid.
I try to check the distance constrain: @sonjax6
public static double GetPerpendicularDistance( double x0, double y0, double thetaRadians ) { double distance = 0; // d double dx = Math.Cos( thetaRadians ); double dy = Math.Sin( thetaRadians ); // distance = Math.Abs( x0 * dy - y0 * dx ); // cross product // return distance; }
Frpm point P (x_0, y_0) and D and \theta and d.
(Grid iteration of M would need days.)
There is no inner streetview. I think the footage was made here:
I cannot see this feature on the top of the building. Maybe it is behind the tree, or just another building?
1 Like
We have a bunch of triangles here. From one hand, there is a geometrical constrain. From other hand - since two different speeds are involved - there is a temporal constrain.
What do those equations tell us? There is a relation between distance and bullet speed. But also…
apparently a single observer can estimate the direction.
This is Back Left 40m.wav result: somehow mindbogeling.
I won’t use that simplified textbook stuff.
Disprove me correct!
public static double GetMuzzleDistance( double xM, double yM, double x0, double y0, out double thetaRadians ) { double distance; double dx = xM - x0; double dy = yM - y0; double d2 = ( dx * dx ) + ( dy * dy ); distance = Math.Sqrt( d2 ); thetaRadians = Math.Atan2( yM, xM ); return distance; } // public static double GetPerpendicularDistance( double x0, double y0, double thetaRadians ) { double distance; double dx = Math.Cos( thetaRadians ); double dy = Math.Sin( thetaRadians ); distance = Math.Abs( x0 * dy - y0 * dx ); return distance; }
for ( yM = -range; yM <= range; yM += 2.0 ) { for ( xM = -range; xM <= range; xM += 2.0 ) { for ( int i = 0; i < observers.Count; ++i ) //foreach ( Observer o2 in observers ) { Observer o2 = observers[i]; double d; // trajectory distance from observer double D; // muzzle distance from observer double thetaRadians; // ,uzzle direction from origin (victim's location) // D = GetMuzzleDistance( xM, yM, o2.X, o2.Y, out thetaRadians ); d = GetPerpendicularDistance( o2.X, o2.Y, thetaRadians ); // bool found = false; for ( double v = 343.0; v <= 4500; v += 5.0 ) { double sinMu = c / v; if ( sinMu >= 1.0 ) continue; double mu = Math.Asin( sinMu ); double b = d / Math.Cos( mu ); double a = Math.Sqrt( ( D * D ) - ( b * b ) ) - b * sinMu; //for ( double a = 1; a <= 5000; a += 2.0 ) // geometric constrain { double D_squared = ( a * a ) + ( b * b ) + ( 2 * a * b * sinMu ); double D_calculated = Math.Sqrt( D_squared ); if ( Math.Abs( D - D_calculated ) < distanceTolerance ) { double deltaT = ( ( D - b ) / c ) - ( a / v ); double absDT = Math.Abs( deltaT - 0.001 * o2.DeltaT ); if ( absDT < timeTolerance ) { found = true; break; } } } if ( found ) break; } } } }
