The bullet that hit Charlie caused an immediate cavitation in his body that expanded the chest and neck, but the bullet did not exit. If the report I mentioned above is correct, the bullet hit the spinal column and fragmented, which suggests some type of frangible round.
Here is a video where you can see the cavitation effect when a deer is hit by a bullet:
I do not know what rifle and ammunition was used to kill Charlie Kirk… But it certainly was not a .30-06 round fired by Tyler Robinson. The video evidence demands a real investigation, not the clown show being put out by Kash Patel.
No, I don’t think this is possible, the expansion only lasts for a tiny fraction of a second. Also, I can’t see respirating one’s neck to a much larger diameter
Hmmm. Worth considering…I wonder what a total activation of the arm nerves would look like?
This is totally a ‘feature’ now of anything where the Deep State has an interest in controlling the narrative, itself a euphemism for ‘covering up one of its crimes.’ I’m always alert to the rapid propagation of B.S.
I haven’t seen it. The autopsy report will confirm if his heart was mechanically destroyed or not. I will say, somewhat grusomely, that after I’ve professionally put down one of our farm animals with a complete brain stem pistol shot ‘pithing’ (in which they immediately go completely limp) followed by exsanguination about 20 to 30 seconds after they go through kicking and tremors as the muscles lose oxygen.
That pose is a different process; it’s due to heat shrinking the tendons.
Everything makes sense except 1 thing. When we’re talking about the angle of not the drop but his neck/body. The 10° may be possible if his body is turned. He had the mic in his left hand. That would slightly rotate his body to his left meaning the bullet COULD possibly do what they’re saying it did. I don’t know what angle he’s pointing in relation to that rooftop. May be worth checking. IF that is correct, would the bullet be able to stop on his spine like they’re saying???
His body shows no appreciable rotation at all. Looks pretty square to the rear tent surface from every angle I’ve got.
The above image is one frame before the shot.
I don’t think too much should be read into the pugilists positioning as it can be generic to (head and neck) trauma, or almost any sudden injury, (think reflex knee jerk to a patellar tendon tap ), and the pressure effects of cavitation from a high velocity bullet would qualify
I’ve given this some thought and while I don’t believe it was Mossad/Israel and certainly not some Nick Fuentes “groyper” led effort I do think it was CIA. Whether Robinson was the shooter, or one of the shooters, who knows.
Kirk in last 6-9 months was becoming more antiestablishment. He was speaking out against corporations. About the banks. About the hidden unemployment problem, particularly how it impacted young people. How young people that went and borrowed money to get the so called “valuable” STEM degrees were finding no jobs. The through line that the same groups that pushed the COVID scam that push the “transing” of the children scam are the same groups creating a population of vast unemployment-hello UBI aka Welfare. UBI will make 80%+ of this country one big ghetto.
Krik’s awakening was troubling to the cabal. What happens if the youth of America really do wake up? It might not be pretty. So take care of the issue as they’ve done for decades.
I shared a video with you on X of a group of FBI and others on the rooftop of what looks like could be the Losee building, but they look like they are on a lower level looking at something rather interesting to them. I thought you might be interested in it if you haven’t already seen it.
Not related to the Kirk assassination…
A comment on the JFK assassination from 1975 (the comment is from 1975)
CAF has said something similar about the Charlie Kirk shooting and the public spectacle that seems to be mocking the intelligence of the world.
I see that also. The more Charlie Kirk would be turned to his right would increase the likelihood of a bullet hitting the spine and terminate inside, fragment or turn downward but he looks pretty square on to the tent. Is the tent sitting square to the landscaping? I saw an overhead shot of the tent where it would actually make more evidence supporting Dr M’s hypothesis because the tent is canted to Charlie’s left.
I seriously doubt a 30-06 was used or anything at that massive speed and of that caliber.
I do use 30-06 handloaded to 125 gr Nosler Ballistic Tip Hunting bullets (minimizing recoil) while hunting deer up north. I have witnessed heart shots completely locking up all movement on more than one occasion. The J.Giles Band’s song “Freeze Frame” comes to mind when my memory replays those shots. The only movement is what momentum and gravity allows. Weird to see. So that is something to consider when seeing the pugilist pose.
Something that also comes to mind about all of this releasing of minimal evidence is Brett Weinstein saying “Cartesian Crisis.” Is the FBI, etc. misdirecting the public because they don’t have the shooter yet and they want “him” to relax while they dig? Remember the DC Sniper in 2002 where they said they were looking for a white Chevy Astro van but in reality they were trying to hunt down the Chevy Caprice car they modified to fire from the trunk?
Anyhow, have a good day everybody. I got to stop typing and go get some work done.
Great quote! That quote would lead me to focusing on who are “the forces” behind the assassination, not so much the details of the actual shooting, cause of death and autopsy, etc. OTOH we might need the investigation into the details of the shooting to discover who “the forces” are behind it.
But it is essential that we progress to the next reasonable step in the process. What do we do if we can’t definitively prove who “the forces” are behind the assassination? Nothing? Dig and wait for more evidence before we act? After all, we haven’t PROVEN who “the forces” were behind either of the attempts on Trump’s life, the Las Vegas mass shooting, or the RFK, MLK or JFK assassinations, just to name a few possible candidates for discovery. And I seriously doubt this people’s investigation, or that of the government, will identify “the forces” either.
Here’s the problem embedded in that quote by Salandria: the assassinations were a clear message from “the forces” that our own government is powerless before “them.” Is there anything we can do about THAT FACT that doesn’t have to wait until we can definitively unmask “the forces” in court and secure convictions? We all know beyond a reasonable doubt or can vaguely sense that this is true, that our government is secretly ruled over by invisible “forces” that disregard the will and welfare of “the people.” Is there anything we can and should do about that NOW in the absence of definitive proof regarding the identities of the individuals who comprise “the forces?”
I say there is something the people caught in that vice can and should do INSTEAD of waiting? I think there is and Thomas Jefferson said it best of all:
“ We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.–That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.”
We need a do-over. Clear the game board and start over.
You have no idea how happy I am that you are taking this on Dr. Martenson. Your analysis could be the difference in life or death - literally. If this Tyler guy wasn’t involved, it could save him from being “Epsteined” or dying from the death penalty and will help bring the true killer(s) to justice. No one is believing the BS that they are trying to get us to accept. Keep up the excellent work! You were born for this type of work.
IF I WERE THE DEEP STATE…
just some thoughts, not to put a hopeless spin, but trying to look at it from another angle…
Hypothesis: If I were the deep state and this was a pre-planned op… I’d have my comprised “3 letters” conveniently on site before it happened to immediately take custody of all university video and TPUSA video… I’d use the same tracking on phones at J6 for everybody that could have taken additional phone videos and have messages or agents visit them to take custody of it or warn em not to share…or better yet use my influence at Apple and Android to simply delete all videos at that time and that GPS location from the cloud…
While I hope there is more out there forth coming…given the # of people and phones at the event, and the “freedom” mind set of the crowd… we should have 100’s of videos on the web…and we don’t …feels way off… no?
If there is a non-zero chance of this scenario, The deep state could put out whatever doctored clips or narrative they wanted and there would be no smoking guns left to unravel it…
But I’m not the deep state, nor do I have any experience in anything relevant…and if I can come up with that strategy…and everything I suggested is not only possible, its been done before… then certainly professionals can…
We know Centralist’s are are command and control, uncreative and going to use the same playbook over and over. Maybe another angle that could shed some light to this is …what are the similarities in the most likely playbooks on JFK, MLK, Butler?.. I’m feeling many parallels… if X happened in JFK, MLK, Butler odds are it happened here as well…clearly if this is a non zero chance scenario they would employ the magicians trick of look here… while they are doing something over here… where is it they DON’T want us to look? not sure this helps any… but wanted to look at it sideways to see if there is anything that comes to light.
Reasonable and plausible explanation of the sequence of events on the roof. I have not yet checked the roof video to see if he picks the “rifle” that was laid in the gutter.
The walking demonstration in both videos makes traversing stairs difficult since the leg with the stock can’t be fully bent. We need to see the stair video.
Since when are gums floppy???
Watching you on alex jones right now! They have the wrong person or he was a distraction as the butler shooting was.
Per the latest Candace the guy that turned Tyler in was an undercover law enforcement specializing in online minor sex crimes (George Zinn anyone)… also some really weird stuff with Lyman and two people that seem to be from Europe tied to his nephew (or maybe cousin their story keeps changing) one that looks like Tyler. The whole thing continues to be weird.
The actions of those first on the scene are very suspicious.
First three videos here:
https://x.com/Lalei63/status/1971035478364389609
It does really seem like this guy is taking a photo or filming with his sunglasses. He certainly isn’t using his hand for helping Charlie.
My take is that he was shot and died on camera so we have that. As far as who, the really “they” who, well, that does not concern me as much.
At this point it does not matter to me, because I don’t have faith in any of the who options. It was a satanically inspired killing regardless, more details won’t change that.
It would be good if Chris looked into the possibility of an air gun in the camera mounted behind Charlie.
There’s a four-part video post just a small ways down this post:
https://x.com/InquisitorFren/status/1969521532428042729
Watch the first, second and fourth videos, and slow them down to .25 as well. You will see something, like a projectile, go in front of the “M” of the .com behind Charlie. And you do see a white streak in between Charlie’s knees in the fourth video. This would be a very slow, whisper quiet, low caliber round, which perhaps could be captured on cameras with not a great frame rate, such as the cell phone videos we see here. A small enough round could make an exit wound that small, so small that anyone with any sense will claim that’s an entrance wound based on the claim they’re making that a large rifle caliber was used. There would have had to be an entrance wound in the back of the neck under this scenario, though it would have been very very small if a slow and small caliber bullet was used.
Here’s a close up of the same video:
https://x.com/WoistdieKuh17/status/1969833614859771973
You can see the projectile even more clearly here. Repeat it enough times, and does it not seem like you can also see the projectile leaving the black camera housing? I see something coming out of the camera before it crosses over the black M. It’s hard to get a sense of the exact angle of trajectory, but if you imagine a trajectory from the camera to his neck and down between his knees, then you can trace the same white projectile leaving the gun, crossing the black M, and going in between his knees. The timing of them is sequential and adequatlely fits together in time and space.
I think Chris properly demonstrated that the seeming “explosion” of his shirt came from the cavity caused by the bullet in his neck. As part of this, Chris demonstrates that the first part of the shirt to whip up is on the back of his neck and left of center. I didn’t think he gave a satisfacotry answer as to why this is. According to what I’m proposing here, however, if the bullet entered the neck from behind and left of center, then that entry point would be where the cavitation would have started, thus whipping up the shirt at that place first.
The actions of those first on the scene are very suspicious. I wonder if the tough-looking guy standing in front who puts his hand over his upper arm with the rolled up sleeve might have somehow been the catalyst for activating the camera gun via a sonic trigger from the rifle? Perhaps he needed to be in close range of the mounted camera firing the projectile. This would have covered up the shot from behind Charlie with the rifle crack from a roof behind the audience, as we hear it and as would be needed to set up a patsy.
I wonder if the weapon was a single barrel shotgun using a slug, which would explain the thumbprint-sized entry hole. I’m not sure of the distance between your suggested perch and Kirk but I assume it’s about 60-70 yards. Would the energy released into the torso by a slug still cause the same cavitation effect? I am impressed by the demonstration of an Italian shotgun at 230 yards, giving a consistent grouping. At a much shorter range, presumably it could be fired even more accurately. See here https://youtu.be/nNTyCcip-ks?si=WAcZhzYDRlKQ2wFu
By the way, is the flash seen in the window to Kirk’s right a reflection of the fatal shot fired from your proposed perch on his left?

