I’m pretty sure this is the individual/chat referenced: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=35O6wBE3hrI&t=58s
…starting at ~1:35
and here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=knB9RVsO6tg
…starting at ~9:26
I’m pretty sure this is the individual/chat referenced: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=35O6wBE3hrI&t=58s
…starting at ~1:35
and here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=knB9RVsO6tg
…starting at ~9:26
If nefarious actors are involved (CIA) what we see is what we will get. You can only imagine what Erika is going through and she might not have the skepticism that her husband seemed to be developing when it came to the reach of our government. I think she’s just too shell shocked. Other TPUSA leaders are trying to get the movement going again in the face of the loss of it’s leaders and demand for 65K plus new chapters.
Great video. Looking forward to more episodes as this story unfolds. I’m rather appalled that more people are not outraged at this obvious conspiracy and coverup. The FBI is ALL IN on it. It may as well be called the Federal Bureau of Conspiracy.
Americans have now been dragged back out of their collective comfort zone. After Trump got elected, they though all these psy-ops and outrages against the nation would come to an end. They were obviously wrong. The question is: What can people do now that they find themselves hostages to rogue institutions and groups? Institutions which not only wage illegal wars outside the country but illegal psy-ops and wars within the country against the very people they’re supposed to represent.
This is gruesome and hurts my heart. One minute he is alive and active, then something takes his life in an instant. So many details being shown in this analysis and hard to watch. Yes, we are not getting the full story. Rest in peace, Charlie.
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/2D949-_q1Ec This is the best angle of Charlie being put into the SUV that I have seen. This is what cleared up the body armour theory for me.
Chris, if you’d seen this video please disregard.
I wanted to bring to your attention a new interview that has surfaced which may provide significant, albeit unofficial, corroboration for your core theory.
In a recent video, journalist Steven Gardner claims to have spoken with high-level sources within Turning Point USA who were privy to the initial medical findings. According to his report, the details of the wound are as follows:
As you can immediately recognize, these details align almost perfectly with your steep-angle hypothesis and offer a powerful solution to the “magic bullet” paradox:
This information, if true, provides a nearly complete forensic picture that validates your analysis from start to finish.
The video with the interview can be found at this link for your direct review:
Thank you again for your invaluable work and for providing a clear, scientific framework for understanding this complex event. Your dedication to the physical evidence has been essential in cutting through the noise.
Wishing you the best in your continued investigation
step-by-step i can rule out a large area - as a limit (not the fact)
The interviewed people felt the shock wave. So at least to that point we can draw the impact area of the Mach cone. The propagating cone is perpendicular to that line. And the theoretical maximum is 45 degree (c=v). When the actual bulet was way faster, we can exclude larger area. Therefore almost the entire right side of Charlie can be ruled out (maybe more).
And yet one thing: From this position I cannot see Charlie at all. So most possible we can exclude that area too.
Yes, bringing analysis into contemporary context. Occam’s razor would suggest analysis of the wall cam mounted elevated to the rear of Kirk, where distortions occur consistent with an ultra compression pneumatic discharge.
This is an interesting capture in that what we may be seeing is not a projectile (moving too fast to be recorded), but the thermal (cold) shimmering distortion and liquid/gaseous phase change following the discharge of a remotely operated camera/pneumatic weapon from behind. It’s a little difficult to believe that any high powered rifle round would be stopped reliably by a cervical facet joint. X-rays would go a long way. What do you think, Dr. Cris Martinsen?
He did not raise his arm, look close, his arm was raised by one of the security detail. Watch the video, dont look at the screen grab.
I can’t imagine the force on the shooter with a palm pistol exiting at 2000 fps and substantial bullet wt that created the wound cavitation seen in the video. I don’t even know if its possible to get 2000 fps out of a “palm” pistol. Barrel would be way to short to generate substantial velocity. Physics are not on your side with this claim.
I don’t know how to repost it on the thread on your website, but I have attached the photo to this email. Let me know if you get it. You can certainly post it to your website. I wish we knew the person who took the video! It was some Instagram handle “Truth Watch” but when I searched for that name, I came up with nothing.
Laura & Carl Pivonka
Chris, you need to look up frangible bullets. They explain everything. Why the entrance wound looks like an exit wound and why there is no exit wound. Dr. House would smile right here. They explode on impact then disintegrate - why there is no exit wound. The bullet itself is unbelievably violent on impact and would create the frontal wound. This also gives credence to the real shooter to the left of Charlie. Thank you for keeping up on this, and I suspect it will be buried same as everything else. That said, it all finally collects into a solid truth that we can finally show. Best as always.
I sent you an email reply with the photo. I see that I can upload here, so…this man threatened the person who took the video. I wish I had recorded the audio! It looks like he was possibly fleeing in the direction away from the spot where the murder might have taken place. Not sure, but if someone could identify this man, it would help a lot. He obviously is not a student. Look at the strap coming out of this pretty large backpack. It looks like a gun strap. Who wears a thin, leather glove on one hand?
Michael Jackson?
That guy is the most obvious looking spook I’ve ever seen…but maybe in Utah that passes for normal.
This aligns with what George Webb has been reporting …
Also - (92) Charlie Kirk Assassination: Part 6 (Antifa and Armed Queers)
But I think this casts too wide a net … Tierney says, "By designating Antifa as a terrorist organization - that means all the resistance front groups that they associate with (Communist, Jihadi, Transgender and Queer) will also be likely labeled terror organizations and investigated as such:
ANTIFA, CAIR, BLM, BLAC BLOC, DSA, ARMED QUEERS OF UTAH, ARABS OF UTAH, NNOC, CODE PINK, PINK PISTOLS, CPUSA, PCUSA, RCA, GAY LIBERATION FRONT, MATTACHINE, ACT UP, QUEER NATION, FRSO, RCP, JOHN BROWN GUN CLUB, TRN, YLF, OCCUPY, ANSWER, TPF and on and on and…"
This could ensnare people whose only crimes are being against wars, maybe disrupting Congress, wisely or unwisely … I used to know some people in Code Pink, not closely, but I think conflating everyone in Code Pink or the too-big-to-characterize Occupy with the hardest of Antifa / Trantifa gun-wielding psychopaths is a stretch that will come back around when Dems are in power and go even farther, because of course they will, and conflate actual Nazis with Young Republican Clubs …
Just thoughts from a former lefty …
And interesting about Iranian trans connections. Ermiya sure “passes” better than one would think a trans person would(!) In Iran it’s considered a crime to be homosexual (at least when I last looked into it a few years ago), yet transgender surgeries are encouraged. A testament to how pushing trans medicalization is a form of gay conversion therapy and the opposite of acceptance and affirmation … as everything is the opposite of what it claims these days …
There are 3 problems:
By these blurry images I’m not convinced that we can see the same person. But maybe they collected all surveillance videos and tracked down the person running away. Maybe.
The 3rd problem is the rifle. Probably it can be concealed inside pants, but still it should be visible. How the rifle came onto the roof? (Even it was there at all?)
But maybe the rifle was handed over. They exchanged - the backpack for the rifle?
This links to a video stating it's a forensic audio examination of the incident.
He said he used several videos, with timestamp, to estimate the location of the suspect. As of now it has less than 3k views. Hope this helps. I appreciate your videos, thanks for making them.