…much more detail then Gemini. Making custom things - not hard. Just like with PAGER-Hezbollah attack. Many “test subjects” available in Israeli prisons, one could imagine…
With this now…everything fits (Though please poke holes with your analysis style / ethic).
Brown shirt man is also part of the security team (Shaffer - sp?) He or other person could have planted the .30-.06 bullet while in SUV or maybe behind stage. Then when Kirk’s body arrived to hospital - that’s what the doctors saw. So TPUSA comment on Kirk being a “man of steel” is not lying, it’s what they saw. And in a “rush to conclusion” - that’s what they say.
This gun design may have been engineered / made long ago - just for a situation like this. Who knows. Or maybe just in last year or two with advent of AI. Or maybe it’s already been used in the field - non-high profile hits. Fragmenting bullet, minimal evidence trail. That’s what people who thrive on trickery and hiding in the shadows would want.
Must think out of the box…in all dimensions (Or in war parlance - Multi-domain warfare) …much more trickery to be revealed in other fields as well (Not just this Kirk thing). Already on it.
Building has direct access from middle of roof not easily visible
3 known Military drones (for targeting why else are they there?)( Secret Drones Over Charlie Kirk Shooting — What New Video Evidence Suggests | Redacted 118K views 6 days ago )
Precision of the shot
Pugilist pose is a mid brain hit
Rangedaybro shows:
He was hit in his head on the his right side before hole is visible on his neck making it an exit wound (also a white possible bone fragment seen going down between his legs
Sound research lines up with placement on that roof top
Muzzle flash reflection in window lines up with that roof top and time of shot
Visible as exit wound lines up with trajectory from roof to his right
Initial impact causes head to move down ( Peak Prosperity - Chris Martenson)
Statements about camera equipment going down at the moment of shot. Similar use on the flotilla? As seen in thorough investigation of drone footage investigator interviewed in this video ( Secret Drones Over Charlie Kirk Shooting — What New Video Evidence Suggests | Redacted)
Phoney person making a distraction also at other events
Video REVEALATION by Ian Carrol showing a person or object that is there on THAT roof at time of shot and gone/not there after ->NEEDS THOROUGH INVESTIGATION<-
Video of “something dark” moving across building attached to this building directly after shooting ->NEEDS THOROUGH INVESTIGATION<-
VERY IMPORTANT (IAN IS THERE IN UTAH YOU COULD ASK HIM) We need close up of the top of those buildings before and after best in person second best drone footage
= need evidence of change; what “changed” about any of those “pipes” on the roof during that period of time. (before and after)
Possibility the turret was left on roof as a camouflaged decoy “pipe”
Get aerial picks of that roof top or better yet in person from the past and present and compare.
===
The turret tech that may have been used to take the precision shot is a modified version that is currently used jet powered tanks .
Look into the targeting system used in jet powered tanks (similar engine as a jet plane) they are capable of hitting their target while literally going over a jump while still accurately hitting targets miles away. [Most shots need a firm stationary placement; NOT necessary with this tech]
In this case they are using a common object as a ‘turret’ using the same tech.
The tank tech exists and is well known. The 3 documented superfast drones that were in videos may be also apart of the targeting system. Doesn’t have to be a drone just needs anything with line of site capable of 3d mapping.
To be clear with this well known tech that was largely instituted in the first Iraq war and now altered/upgraded using 18billion to create “no working prototype” and can be used on a small, possible handheld scale; you just need a “turret” possibly handheld and a guidance system. This is not a missile it is a projectile. You do not need to look through a site/scope to accurately hit a target with this system.
===
Aerial tomography allows for 3D mapping for targeting
Here is a description of remote tomography and other remote 3D targeting that could be used in precision turret style attack:
Wikipedia - Passive methods of 3D reconstruction do not interfere with the reconstructed object; they only use a sensor to measure the radiance reflected or emitted by the object’s surface to infer its 3D structure through image understanding. Typically, the sensor is an image sensor in a camera sensitive to visible light and the input to the method is a set of digital images (one, two or more) or video. In this case we talk about image-based reconstruction and the output is a 3D model. By comparison to active methods, passive methods can be applied to a wider range of situations.
The research of 3D reconstruction has always been a difficult goal. By Using 3D reconstruction one can determine any object’s 3D profile, as well as knowing the 3D coordinate of any point on the profile.
Stereo vision obtains the 3-dimensional geometric information of an object from multiple images based on the research of human visual system. The results are presented in form of depth maps. Images of an object acquired by two cameras simultaneously in different viewing angles, or by one single camera at different time in different viewing angles, are used to restore its 3D geometric information and reconstruct its 3D profile and location. This is more direct than Monocular methods such as shape-from-shading
3D Reconstruction of medical images
Clinical routine of diagnosis, patient follow-up, computer assisted surgery, surgical planning etc. are facilitated by accurate 3D models of the desired part of human anatomy. Main motivation behind 3D reconstruction includes
Improved accuracy due to multi view aggregation.
Detailed surface estimates.
Can be used to plan, simulate, guide, or otherwise assist a surgeon in performing a medical procedure.
--------->The precise position and orientation of the patient’s anatomy can be determined.<----------
Helps in a number of clinical areas, such as radiotherapy planning and treatment verification, spinal surgery, hip replacement, neurointerventions and aortic stenting.
===
TOF Time-of-flight cameras Advantages Simplicity (FOR REMOTE TARGETING)
In contrast to stereo vision or triangulation systems, the whole system is very compact: the illumination is placed just next to the lens, whereas the other systems need a certain minimum base line. In contrast to laser scanning systems, no mechanical moving parts are needed.
Efficient distance algorithm
It is a direct process to extract the distance information out of the output signals of the TOF sensor. As a result, this task uses only a small amount of processing power, again in contrast to stereo vision, where complex correlation algorithms are implemented. After the distance data has been extracted, object detection, for example, is also a straightforward process to carry out because the algorithms are not disturbed by patterns on the object. The accuracy is usually estimated at 1% of the measured distance.
Speed
Time-of-flight cameras are able to measure the distances within a complete scene with a single shot. As the cameras reach up to 160 frames per second, they are ideally suited to be used in real-time applications.
As time-of-flight cameras provide distance images in real time, it is easy to track movements of humans. This allows new interactions with consumer devices such as televisions. Another topic is to use this type of cameras to interact with games on video game consoles.
Smartphone cameras
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra features three rear-facing camera lenses and a ToF camera.
Several smartphones include time-of-flight cameras. These are mainly used to improve the quality of photos by providing the camera software with information about foreground and background.
The first mobile phone released with such technology was the LG G3, from early 2014. The BlackBerry Passport and the LG G Flex 2 were also launched with a ToF sensor.
George Webb argues in a well worth watching 9 min video about just how unusual the booking for Tyler went… lots of delays in booking (2 hours) negotiated surrender, accommodations made for a capital murder suspect that would never happen in a typical case.
Problem. There would be no “crack-boom” heard on all the various mics scattered across the area.
The “crack-boom” of a close-by super pistol would be indistinguishable from each other as they would fall in the same millisecond or two.
11.42 feet = one millisecond of sound travel. So if the super-duper pistol were 34 feet away, it would be only 3 ms between the crack and the boom…assuming your microphone was colinear and directly on the far side.
No audio recordings support this hypothesis.
Interesting concept though. Stored for some possible future event…
I would imagine something really bad will happen to Tyler Robinson in prison. He was a patsy and we will never know his real role. Kirk was moving away from the globalist, corporatist, Military Industrial Complex paradigm and he would have taken young men with him. He wasn’t for socialism but wanted to reform institutions that have gone from somewhat rotten to pure evil.
Thanks for your perspective on that, I learn a little more about AI with clear descriptions like the one you give there.
On the walker (who disappears) I’m leaning towards AI glitch on that - just judging by the walkers gait, it looks like they intended to keep going, something the AI engine might not pick up.
Also the overhead view doesn’t show any paths going away from the tree that the walker might have taken.
It has the smell of an edited and doctored up scene to me.
Actually, worse than that, most microphones wouldn’t experience a crack at all. The width of the area experiencing the crack is only (slightly more than) the length of the flight of the bullet, as per the illustrations of @kincses-zsolt
That whole part of the campus looks to be oriented about 25 degrees off of N/S, so walking along the arrow would be 335 degrees. On a solar calculator, it looks like the sun was at about 165 degrees az at this time on 09/10, so it would throw shadows at 345 degrees, i.e., 10 degrees clockwise from the red arrow. I can believe that for the poles in front of the green car and blue truck.
Couldn’t the gun have already been in the roof, planted there days before? Reports right after the shooting were that someone noticed a person on that roof, jumping down, days before, and contacted the FBI who apparently did nothing.
If you go to lymanforutah.com and scroll down to the bottom of the page there are some endorsements you can click the right arrow scroll through and see for yourself. This is actually still there. WOW!!! I just did it.
Multiple witnesses describe the sound as “close.” Interestingly they are in what would be described as a greek amphitheater which by definition is “designed to amplify and direct sound towards the audience.” It would not do that with a sound that occured from over 100 yards away on top of a building outside the amphitheater. It highly suggests that the shot came from within the amphitheater or close as the witnesses all describe, and as their body language individually and as a crowd demonstrates. Some witnesses describe that it was so loud that “their ears rang.”
2 things----I worked in a Coroner’s Office for eleven years, and when the FBI are involved in a high-profile case, you simply CANNOT TRUST any autopsy they release. Erika needed to have two independent autopsies done for credibility, but she hasn’t & didn’t. IDK, and I don’t understand why she, of all people, isn’t questioning things. She didn’t appear to be upset while on the TPUSA podcast.
We also need to identify the man who was seen running from the scene of the crime. This man was captured on video on INSTAGRAM but I couldn’t forward the video. Instagram stopped me from doing this. So I took a photo of him in the video and sent it to Chris. This man looked VERY SUSPICIOUS with a thin leather glove on his right hand and a huge long bag with what looked like a gun strap hanging out of his bag. He threatened the person taking the video, too. He threatened a lawsuit. It was weird.
Chris, please post this photo of that man. We must identify him.
EDIT: The creation time on his video doesn’t make any sense. (I’m on east coast time). But Charlie was shot around 23 minutes into the hour, not 34 minutes. 1148 seconds into the video is exactly when the gunshot happens.
Yikes that doesn’t make sense- maybe Stephen Gardner can help with info on where he got the C2-C6 info. He referenced you several times on his video if you haven’t had time to watch it. I’m sure he would be willing to talk.
