Too cool
I’m a wild catter from a long way back and have won many benchrest competitions.
1 Like
The strangest thing to me about the rooftop security camera video isn’t the shadow or the floppy “gun”…it’s the pedestrian who vanishes as they walk behind a tree. Still the item that makes me the most suspicious that the video is manipulated and the one I haven’t heard as much discussion about.
3 Likes
Agree that the actions of the first guys to leap up on the stage are very unexplained to me. Who the hell were they? What were they doing?
They looked like they were primed ahead of time to respond–like people who anticipated the event and leapt in to play a role.
Chris more info on the roof shadows and possible discrepancies -
2 Likes
https://x.com/realgeorgewebb1/status/1969001213208469879?s=46
He is hypothesizing the DQ photo was a diversion. The real meet up was another DQ which was closed down about a week ago and stripped of cameras etc. The closed one makes the plane getaway doable.
This is a common AI error, especially if made with the likes of a diffusion model. The diffusion model starts with random crap and bit by bit adds consistency. The challenge is that long distance connections are a mess. Every frame is locally consistent; it takes knowledge of object persistence and connection through time to have an issue with it.
It’s the same issue with fingers or any of the other photo glitches - they’re always locally consistent and nonsense when you analyse from afar.
To give the devil his due, the person could have stopped to lean against the tree, then the video ended. It’s super improbable, but only like 1 in 1000.
3 Likes
I understand what you’re saying. The only thing that makes me take this angle seriously, is that we don’t actually see the projectile in the videos I posted, we just see a miniscule area that the bullet covers up behind it from our view as it passes by. Isn’t that something we could pick up with a cell phone camera? If the lettering weren’t black, or the mounted camera weren’t black, we wouldn’t be able to see even that. We only see the projectile, streaked, when it’s between his knees, where it would be going significantly slower at that point having passed through the neck. It wouldn’t have been a very fast bullet to begin with. Did you actually see what I was pointing out? That there was something that passes by and covers a tiny spot on the M, as well as something seemingly being ejected from the mounted camera? And the two in proper sequence? How do we account for that? It doesn’t seem to me to be a digital artifact. Something is truly there that needs to be accounted for.
1 Like
Chris, what do you think of George Webb’s take on this? (https://georgewebb.substack.com/)
How Tyler Robinson Trained Armed Queers To Kill Charlie Kirk -
Some links here to his other articles since Charlie Kirk’s assassination. Apparently he had an Uncle Mikey with Ukraine connections … George Webb says Ukraine / Azov is behind this, Michael Yon says Zionists. (Perhaps they overlap?) George Webb has done a lot of on the ground investigations, he says people are overly focused on the site of the shooting when it’s a large team behind it …
Love to know what you think of George Webb’s take on this …
Grateful for all the rooted, authentic info you share …
By the way, have you seen decapitated chicken? Rural people say: the chicken sometimes is able to run away after its head was cut.
Thanks. My formula gives 50+ meters fir that delay.
But why the sound of the video is so off sync? I tried to watch their lips, but (looks like mumbling).
(We checked Trump’s lips in Butler - however, that is studio footage and the sound was adjusted by studio guys.)
Cullen released this result. (But didn’t show the data and the formula.)
(I try to be fully transparent, you can check my equation.)
dunno what it is
I can rule out shots from Charlie’s right - when life-is-driving footage was not tampered. There is an acoustic “blind spot” behind the target. (But probably you cannot find this in standard textbooks. They discuss only an infinite/eternal Mach cone.)
It is his smartphone, not a rifle stock.
Usually his smartphone is in right pocket; his wallet is in his left pocket.
** https://youtu.be/adHijHVyxGY?t=64
** https://youtu.be/adHijHVyxGY?t=342
BTW:
Electricians often keep their left hand in their pocket to avoid creating a path through the heart if they accidentally touch a live wire. A shock through the right hand is generally less dangerous because it’s less likely to pass through the heart. Electricians are trained to use one hand (usually the right) and keep the other—often the left—away or in their pocket to reduce the risk of current passing through the heart.
4 Likes
I’m sure there are many people that appreciate the detail you go in to disprove seemingly flippant observations.
We expect you to be that information scout, but most of us havent the right skill set/knowledge/time/inclination to really think through our opinions, and so, we also need you to be our biology/physics/maths and sometimes spiritual teacher.
Disproving the ‘easily’ disproved is worth your time for the more modest of minds in the tribe. Please keep investing your time in doing so.
5 Likes
Gday mate, on the 2nd video regarding Charlie Kirk shooter…
Skip through to the 42:45 minute mark.
Notice its at 02:14 frames i think. Theres a guy in red shirt pointing. If you can figure out if he is pointing after tyler has run out of view at this point, over the horizen of the roof. Red shirt guy seems to be possibly pointing to the other roof.
Chris,
Just signed up and watched your two Charlie Kirk videos. Very insightful analysis. I like your style. I agree with lots of what you say.
But - I want to say you dismiss the PALM PISTOL guy / angle too easily.
You really should visit RENSE dot com and see the analysis there.
Also your concerns about velocity of bullet and cavitation wound/shockwave can be solved by a custom PALM PISTOL GUN - either 3D printed or maybe even custom metal engineering - which Mossad / CIA, etc…can do. A gun made to fire ONE bullet, not multiple. Using a specially designed bullet.
I used Gemini - but you can use GPT or Grok I imagine.
Final Q: so custom 3d printed palm pistol (for example) or custom metal engineered. With single shot, max distance of 20-25 feet could then cause cavitation
Final A: A firearm system custom-engineered for a single-shot, 20−25 foot range could absolutely be optimized to cause significant hydrostatic shock and temporary cavitation, even from a palm-sized platform.
The optimization focuses on achieving a hyper-velocity projectile that remains stable for a very short distance, then transfers all its kinetic energy instantly upon impact.
Because the target is so close, over-penetration is a major concern. The frangible/fragmenting design solves this:
-
The bullet strikes the target at 3,000 fps and dumps nearly all its energy into the resulting large temporary cavitation.
-
The projectile immediately disintegrates into fine dust or small fragments.
-
The remaining small fragments lack the mass to continue penetrating far beyond the initial target, preventing exit wounds and ensuring the vast majority of kinetic energy is delivered within the target.
In short, a custom palm pistol optimized for that short distance could be designed as a miniaturized rifle-caliber system that sacrifices long-range stability for extreme close-range speed and destructive fragmentation.
–
earlier questions, skipping some:
-
Do different 22 caliber bullets have different shockwave properties upon entering human body
-
which of these would be used in a palm pistol
-
maximum caviation would be WMR hollow point?
-
show me table of palm pistols made with column showing which calibers it used
-
could a new design be made that has more cavitation?
-
“enormous powder charge?” what if a custom palm pistol was made with ONE bullet
-
can you have more cavitation with smaller bullet - higher fps?
-
so palm pistol could use smaller bullet
-
$$ is not a limiting factor. Unlimited engineering
-
if the target was always within 25 feet. optimized for that. maybe 20 feet
1 Like
https://x.com/blakebednarz/status/1970965673200451896?s=46&t=8YpUB_N0q4BtUZw5lMMfdw
That’s the video at the 3 minute mark you see a hand pointing up.
There was a slow motion video after Charlie got shot and the security jumped on him. In that video it looks like his hand raises up and he points a finger to the sky. I wish I could find the link. You wouldn’t be able to that and be posturing.
Candace was also talking about all of this in her show today. The head of armed queers there is now in Cuba I believe…
1 Like
I find this to be highly relevant
2 Likes
Saw one today where the fence behind Charlie’s arm had the fence showing through, and the presenter is saying he was a hologram, likely photoshopped,
Where does it all end. Was Charlie even born, does he have a birth certificate and mother.
3 Likes
What I see is someone moving Charlie’s arm to a new position.
Thank you for providing the video, that clears that up.
2 Likes
