Chris, you really are an investigative journalist even though you may not have all the credentials.
We know Grouchy Fauci refuses to allow any outpatient therapeutic for COVID, but did you know he refused therapy for HIV patients back in the 80’s too?
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/whitewashing-aids-history_b_4762295
Whitewashing AIDS History
Dr. Anthony Fauci is rewriting history. He is doing so to disguise his shameful role in delaying promotion of an AIDS treatment that would have prevented tens of thousands of deaths in the first years of the epidemic.
In my book, Body Counts, A Memoir of Politics, Sex, AIDS, and Survival, I recount how slow the federal government was in publicizing the use of Bactrim and other sulfa drugs to prevent PCP (the pneumonia that was then the leading killer of people with AIDS) in addition to its long-time and well-known use to treat PCP.
In 1987, pioneering AIDS activist Michael Callen begged Fauci for help in promoting the use of Bactrim as PCP prophylaxis and issuing interim guidelines urging physicians to prophylax those patients deemed at high risk for PCP.
Fauci: “So what actually happened is that Michael came to me and said you know there is this preliminary activity and some small trials that Bactrim works,” Fauci said. “Would you come out and make a guideline to say it should be used by everybody. And I said ‘Michael I can’t do that but what I can do is help design and make sure that the grantees that we fund do a clinical trial in Bactrim to prove or not that it was safe and effective,’” he said. “But I didn’t blow him off and say I don’t want to issue guidelines. The fact is that’s neither within my purview nor within the responsibility or authority I have to issue guidelines.”
He could easily have advocated awareness of the preventive treatment, as the de facto federal AIDS Czar, his influence was and is enormous.
Had Fauci listened to people with AIDS and the clinicians treating them, and responded accordingly, he would have saved thousands of lives. In the two years between 1987, when Callen met with Fauci and 1989, when the guidelines were ultimately issued, nearly 17,000 people with AIDS suffocated from PCP. Most of these people might have lived had Fauci responded appropriately.
Fauci refused to acknowledge the evidence and, according to one account, even encouraged people with AIDS to stop taking treatments, like Bactrim, that weren’t specifically approved for use in people with AIDS. Longtime treatment activist Richard Jefferys wrote in 2001 that Fauci “went as far as telling activists attending a 1987 meeting that there was no data to suggest PCP prophylaxis was beneficial and that it may, in fact be dangerous.” Fauci’s close colleague, Dr. Samuel Broder, who was head of the National Cancer Institute, even suggested — in the absence of any evidence at all — that the newly introduced antiretroviral, AZT, would make prophylaxis against PCP redundant!
Heroin, cannabis, magic mushrooms, and opium are all manufactured. Growing poppies, weed, or mushrooms is manufacturing a controlled substance. There are people all across America (Incarceration Nation) in prison for manufacturing substances to make people feel good, or at worst to stop them from feeling bad, as in drugs like opiates that are truly addictive. Gain of Function, specifically with what Fauci was doing, i.e., weaponizing pathogens under the color of whatever do-good fantasy people are dumb enough to believe, is a horse of another color. Prosecution and execution = accountability. Think about it. What they were, and almost certainly still are doing is madness on a scale that exceeds the Third Reich. The character of these madmen is self evident. To ignore the reality is madness on a societal level. I think about the Reign of Terror during the French Revolution more and more these days. That’s where America is heading, except the efficiency of the Guillotine is so antiquated it’s almost quaint in comparison to the black hole America is descending in to.
You should send a copy of that German article to Senator Rand Paul. I’d love to see what he’d do with it. LOL
Your post with link to control of the Covid narrative is very worthwhile. Thanks for posting this. People need to know the truth. Have shared this with family and friends. https://www.listennotes.com/podcasts/rfk-jr-the/faucis-smoking-gun-with-dr-XiecUw3nxfY/
Thank you Andrew! Who ever wrote that script was a genius. Thanks for lightening up my day.
If what this guy says is true, I now understand why all other predator animals steer clear of the humble honey badger!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dXTbUzwPR_8
Andrew, that was great.
I was going to say that I am surprised that they allowed that on YouTube, but recently I have seen more freedom there.
A lot of posts being allowed on Ivermectin. And those posts are getting huge numbers of hits.
The peer review of the research was rushed and financially conlficted as well.
The paper, “Detection of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) by real-time RT-PCR,” appeared in Eurosurveillance. It was received on January 21 and accepted on January 22, a remarkably quick turnaround
See my comment below for more details:
https://peakprosperity.com/forum-topic/nuremberg-2-0/page/4/#post-628267
I would love to see more information come out on why this group was so heavily involved with Fauci. Also interesting to see their research on trust in medical professionals, science and vaccines in their 2018 world survey, published in June of 2019. Good timing!
https://wellcome.org/reports/wellcome-global-monitor/2018
I read the Wellcome Trust dictated the protocols for the WHO Recovery & Solidarity HCQ trials (sorry no source/link).
No treatment till patients were hospitalized/critically ill, then massive doses (2-2.4 grams first 24 hours) that insured cardiac side effects would occur.
Both trials sabotaged two different ways. Hard to believe doctors running the trial wouldn’t recognize and expose this, but they didn’t. The final nail in the coffin for HCQ, as the press gleefully reported. Wellcome has earned our enmity. Never forget!
This situation is so hard for biz owners. At carports sunshine coast we are doing our best to tackle these situations.
https://www.timescolonist.com/news/local/greater-victoria-doctors-take-to-social-media-to-tackle-vaccine-hesitancy-1.24328500
Not one f’ing word about prevention or treatment with all the methods we all know to be effective. Despicable…
...Guftason said people concerned about rare vaccine-induced blood clots related to AstraZeneca can choose a messenger RNA vaccine, such as Pfizer or Moderna for their second shot. There are no well-identified risk factors for the rare side effect, said Guftason. Family physician Dr. Benjamin How of the Victoria Division of Family Practice said because the new vaccines were developed so quickly, “some people wonder if all the necessary steps were taken to test them.” How said that while the process was accelerated by unprecedented funding, the clinical trials and safety reviews “actually took about the same amount of time as for other vaccines.” Family physician Dr. Kathy Dabrus said for those on the fence, “there is no benefit in waiting.” The COVID virus will be around for years and waiting to be vaccinated only increases a person’s risk of exposure, said Dabrus. “The risks of the virus are significant and far outweigh the possibility of serious side-effects from any COVID vaccine. Your risk of dying from COVID is greatly reduced after the vaccination and your risk of transmission goes down 90 per cent.”...
Repulsive statement. The same amount of time for the studies? 6 weeks really? Zero animal studies, zero long-term studies. New science. Manufacturers are aware of ADE and admitted to being "mindful" of the potential, and have not seen it ( but did not look or test for it either ) And to final note about reduction of likely hood of death by 90% ? really based on what science or study? that is absolute lie? baseless claim. In fact, we just need to refer back to pfizer's own study. Obviously, they brought attention to that there were less people in the vaccine group than the control group that got sick with COVID. However, since there were no clear methods used for this statement as to how they tested and why?, was it based on symptoms or random testing? Where there any difference in exposure contacts, etc? They did not do a controlled challenge to the study participants so the statement of reduction is clearly moot. However, there is one thing they did not mention, and I posted and cited previously, is that of those who did get sick in each group, that had severe illness , more died in the vaccine group. SO, yes, those who had severe illness, a higher percentage died in the vaccine group. They did not tell you this, this is what we call selective conclusions. They cherry picked the results based on bias. So to say that these vaccines received the same time of study as all other vaccines, and then to say that risk reduction is worth it , without any real evidence to that is just criminal. If anything , you may be able to make argument of reasonable safety for those over 75 vs the risk.. However, for a 19 year old or even reasonably healthy 45 year old , its just insane, egregiously irresponsible and reckless....Guftason said people concerned about rare vaccine-induced blood clots related to AstraZeneca can choose a messenger RNA vaccine, such as Pfizer or Moderna for their second shot. There are no well-identified risk factors for the rare side effect, said Guftason. Family physician Dr. Benjamin How of the Victoria Division of Family Practice said because the new vaccines were developed so quickly, “some people wonder if all the necessary steps were taken to test them.” How said that while the process was accelerated by unprecedented funding, the clinical trials and safety reviews “actually took about the same amount of time as for other vaccines.” Family physician Dr. Kathy Dabrus said for those on the fence, “there is no benefit in waiting.” The COVID virus will be around for years and waiting to be vaccinated only increases a person’s risk of exposure, said Dabrus. “The risks of the virus are significant and far outweigh the possibility of serious side-effects from any COVID vaccine. Your risk of dying from COVID is greatly reduced after the vaccination and your risk of transmission goes down 90 per cent.”...
LOL
Family physician Dr. Benjamin How of the Victoria Division of Family Practice said because the new vaccines were developed so quickly, “some people wonder if all the necessary steps were taken to test them.” How said that while the process was accelerated by unprecedented funding, the clinical trials and safety reviews “actually took about the same amount of time as for other vaccines.”"Carrying on, Dr. How also revealed that applying this same line of thinking - using additional resources top accelerate timelines - he can't see any reason why nine women shouldn't be able to produce a baby in one month." relatedly, when people object "But Chris, you're not a real doctor" I usually think to myself "and that's mostly a good thing" because apparently most "real doctors" stopped learning back in medical indoctrination camp and/or lack the time in their lives to research or think about things properly.
1 Like
From the blog of Meryl Nass, MD;
Jeremy Farrar, director of the Wellcome Trust and his co-conspirators with a Vietnam connection (Peter Horby and Rick Bright) Before Sir Dr. Jeremy Farrar got the plum job of CEO of the wealthiest foundation in the UK and one of the wealthiest in the world, he did research for Oxford University in Vietnam for 18 years. It seems curious how one job led to the other. Will (as is said to happen in Las Vegas) what happened in Vietnam stay in Vietnam? Or will internet sleuths tell us how Farrar was groomed in Vietnam for his current role? ..... When Dr. Martin Landray approached Jeremy Farrar about starting a large multicenter clinical trial in the UK, Farrar told him to talk to Horby. Landray did so, and Horby and Landray became the Principal Investigators for the Recovery trial. Landray was not in on the scheme to overdose patients with hydroxychloroquine, because when he was interviewed by FranceSoir, an online newspaper, he made several mistakes discussing the dose of hydroxychloroquine used. He simply had no idea about the overdoses. (FranceSoir knew.) Landray had been too busy to look up the dose, apparently, that he was responsible for giving to 1600 human guinea pigs. Dr. Horby then attempted to give Landray cover in some tweets I read last May or June. Horby said France Soir did not transcribe what Landray said accurately. But France Soir had the recording, so that excuse didn't fly. I blogged about this at the time. FranceSoir further revealed how the two Recovery Principal Investigators went back and made changes to the trial documents to cover themselves. Neither Landray nor Horby has so much as apologized for using borderline fatal doses in their subjects. Were the subjects' families ever told? Probably not. This happened in the days when there was no visitation allowed in hospitals, and relatives of hospital patients usually had no idea about their treatments. Horby is currently on the UK's SAGE committee and is chairman of the NERVTAG committee in the UK, where he continues to exert major influence over the conduct of the pandemic response. Guess what? Two co-conspirators with Fauci/Farrar/Collins on those early February calls included Sir Patrick Vallance and Professor Michael Ferguson, who both serve on SAGE along with Peter Horby, keeping the UK locked down as well as covered up. When the news about the Recovery trial's fatal doses came out (I learned it from others on twitter) the hydroxychloroquine arm of the trial quickly ended, and Landray and Horby simply said the drug didn't work. They acknowledged that there were about 10-20% more deaths in the hydroxychloroquine arm than in the placebo ("usual care," a.k.a. no drug treatment arm) but have never acknowledged any mistakes, let alone wrongdoing. Using the published Recovery trial statistics, there were about 60 excess deaths over placebo in the HCQ arm (of 400 total) that we can say were likely secondary to an HCQ overdose, and perhaps more if the HCQ benefited some of those who survived the high doses.
Will someone pls assist in giving me the pages within the FOIA Fauci’s emails where I can find Fauci’s correspondences Chris was talking about?
The whole document is 3000 pages long and I tried looking up and down for them, but still cannot find them.
I want to show my disbelieving friends Fauci’s true colors so it is impt I am able to locate the places I can find the emails Chris was talking about.
Thanks for your help!