In this episode, I break down a very short window of time from Jan 31, 2020 to Feb 2 - 2020 when Fauci met with key representatives of the Wellcome Trust, WHO, NIH and senior private virologists. They presumably discussed prior and ongoing gain of function experiments on SARS CoV viruses as well as the lab leak origin theory that was worriedly gaining steam out in the public eye.
Hi Dr. Chris, super interesting run-through and context for this email thread today.
You focused so strongly on the gray boxes and the b.5 exemptions that I think you missed mentioning something glaringly obvious:
What was the attachment called on the first teleconference email where Dr. Fauci says “Kristen and Eddie have shared this and will talk through it on the call”? (28:00)
I assume “Kristen” is Kristian. Could the file name there tell us anything about what’s in the gray boxes?
Kristian Andersen is one of the virologists who will block anyone (on twitter) who says anything even remotely supporting the possibility of a lab leak. Guess how I know?
They don’t want anyone peaking behind the curtain. Wonder why…
Around min 6 you show and email with Drosten cc’d. I believe he is the scientist who developed the covid PCR test for the WHO and rushed it to approval based on a flawed study that was "peer-reviewed’ in a couple of days in Jan2020. And later challenged widely as unscientific and conflicted financially.
Currently there is NO mentioning of Faucigate in the German media… even R. Paul’s “inquisition” of Fauchi is already a handful of days in the past. But suddenly other articles appear… Translation by Google Drosten has a clear opinion on the origin of the corona virus
The Berlin virologist Christian Drosten sees the path via the fur industry as the most plausible among the various hypotheses on the origin of SARS-CoV-2. “I have no evidence for this, except for the clearly proven origin of SARS-1, and this is a virus of the same species. Viruses of the same species do the same things and often have the same origin,” Drosten told the Swiss online magazine “Republic”.
In 2002 and 2003, a wave of infections emanating from China resulted in around 800 deaths worldwide. The condition has been called Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS). The pathogen SARS-CoV-2, which was detected for the first time at the end of 2019, is very closely related to the virus of the time.
With the first SARS virus, the transitional hosts were raccoon dogs and crawling cats, said Drosten. “That is assured.” In China, raccoon dogs were still used extensively in the fur industry. Wild raccoon dogs that may have previously eaten bats - which are considered the most likely origin of SARS-CoV-2 - are repeatedly brought into the breeding farms. Transmission from animals to humans through aerosols
“Raccoon dogs and crawling cats are lively pulled over their ears,” explained the Charité virologist. They emit death screams and roar, whereas aerosols are created in the process. Humans can then become infected with the virus. "For him it was surprising that this breeding would even be considered as a possible starting point for a pandemic - until recently he lived “in the naive idea” that crawling cats and raccoon dogs, as known potential transitional hosts, are now being controlled. "For me it was a closed story. I thought that this kind of pet trade had been stopped and that it would never come back. And now Sars has come back."There are no concrete indications that the transition to humans took place via fur farms - there are no studies in this area at all, at least none have become public. It is therefore completely unclear whether raccoon dogs in Chinese farms or other carnivores in such breeds - such as minks - carry SARS-CoV-2. “In 2003 and 2004 there were large studies that were done in China that showed SARS-1 to be related to raccoon dogs and crawling cats.” This time - at least so far - that apparently did not happen. Coronavirus development in the laboratory is unlikely, according to Drosten
Now to take a closer look there might not make sense: "Of course, you have to realize that if you were to examine such stocks now, you might not find the virus that was there - possibly - a year and a half or two years ago. If was culled in between. Or if the virus died in another way. "Regarding the thesis that the virus was accidentally or deliberately created in a laboratory, Drosten said that, from a purely technical point of view, this is technically possible, but: "If someone had developed SARS-2 in this way, then I would say he made it pretty awkward. " With the first SARS virus as the basis, one would most likely have only changed very specific areas for research purposes - but SARS-CoV-2 is full of deviations from the first virus.“Let me explain it with a picture: To check, for example, whether adjustments make the virus more contagious, I would take an existing system, incorporate the change and then compare it with the old system,” the virologist explained. "If I want to know whether a new car radio improves the sound, I take an existing car and replace the radio there. Then I compare. I don’t build a completely new car for it. But that’s exactly how it was with SARS-2: The whole car is different. "That is why the idea of a research accident is “extremely unlikely” for him. To the idea of a malicious use of some secret service laboratory, one ultimately has to ask the secret services: “If anything, something like this would probably not come from the Wuhan Virology Institute. This is a reputable academic institute.” (dpa/lh)
So… Chris, Mike, Dave and all the PP community let you be educated about a novel virus transmission mechanism - the emission of death screams and roar, whereas aerosols are created -
And the unbeatable fact comes on the end “the Wuhan Virology Institute is a reputable academic institute…”
… and folks remember, Dr. Christian Drosten was the FIRST on CC in Fauchi’s fire control mail.
We know Grouchy Fauci refuses to allow any outpatient therapeutic for COVID, but did you know he refused therapy for HIV patients back in the 80’s too? https://www.huffpost.com/entry/whitewashing-aids-history_b_4762295 Whitewashing AIDS History
Dr. Anthony Fauci is rewriting history. He is doing so to disguise his shameful role in delaying promotion of an AIDS treatment that would have prevented tens of thousands of deaths in the first years of the epidemic.
In my book, Body Counts, A Memoir of Politics, Sex, AIDS, and Survival, I recount how slow the federal government was in publicizing the use of Bactrim and other sulfa drugs to prevent PCP (the pneumonia that was then the leading killer of people with AIDS) in addition to its long-time and well-known use to treat PCP.
In 1987, pioneering AIDS activist Michael Callen begged Fauci for help in promoting the use of Bactrim as PCP prophylaxis and issuing interim guidelines urging physicians to prophylax those patients deemed at high risk for PCP.
Fauci: “So what actually happened is that Michael came to me and said you know there is this preliminary activity and some small trials that Bactrim works,” Fauci said. “Would you come out and make a guideline to say it should be used by everybody. And I said ‘Michael I can’t do that but what I can do is help design and make sure that the grantees that we fund do a clinical trial in Bactrim to prove or not that it was safe and effective,’” he said. “But I didn’t blow him off and say I don’t want to issue guidelines. The fact is that’s neither within my purview nor within the responsibility or authority I have to issue guidelines.”
He could easily have advocated awareness of the preventive treatment, as the de facto federal AIDS Czar, his influence was and is enormous.
Had Fauci listened to people with AIDS and the clinicians treating them, and responded accordingly, he would have saved thousands of lives. In the two years between 1987, when Callen met with Fauci and 1989, when the guidelines were ultimately issued, nearly 17,000 people with AIDS suffocated from PCP. Most of these people might have lived had Fauci responded appropriately.
Fauci refused to acknowledge the evidence and, according to one account, even encouraged people with AIDS to stop taking treatments, like Bactrim, that weren’t specifically approved for use in people with AIDS. Longtime treatment activist Richard Jefferys wrote in 2001 that Fauci “went as far as telling activists attending a 1987 meeting that there was no data to suggest PCP prophylaxis was beneficial and that it may, in fact be dangerous.” Fauci’s close colleague, Dr. Samuel Broder, who was head of the National Cancer Institute, even suggested — in the absence of any evidence at all — that the newly introduced antiretroviral, AZT, would make prophylaxis against PCP redundant!
Heroin, cannabis, magic mushrooms, and opium are all manufactured. Growing poppies, weed, or mushrooms is manufacturing a controlled substance. There are people all across America (Incarceration Nation) in prison for manufacturing substances to make people feel good, or at worst to stop them from feeling bad, as in drugs like opiates that are truly addictive. Gain of Function, specifically with what Fauci was doing, i.e., weaponizing pathogens under the color of whatever do-good fantasy people are dumb enough to believe, is a horse of another color. Prosecution and execution = accountability. Think about it. What they were, and almost certainly still are doing is madness on a scale that exceeds the Third Reich. The character of these madmen is self evident. To ignore the reality is madness on a societal level. I think about the Reign of Terror during the French Revolution more and more these days. That’s where America is heading, except the efficiency of the Guillotine is so antiquated it’s almost quaint in comparison to the black hole America is descending in to.