Firings Continuing Following Charlie Kirk Assassination, Online Platforms Come Under Scrutiny

Originally published at: https://peakprosperity.com/daily-digest/firings-continuing-following-charlie-kirk-assassination-online-platforms-come-under-scrutiny/

US Politics

Erika Kirk has filed a $40 million defamation lawsuit against ABC and hosts of The View, claiming their remarks about her late husband were defamatory. Meanwhile, ABC has indefinitely suspended Jimmy Kimmel’s late-night show following comments about Kirk’s death, with the network reportedly facing pressure from affiliates and FCC officials over the statements. ABC also plans to air a special tribute to Kirk in Kimmel’s former timeslot this Friday. Separately, the Washington Post dismissed columnist Karen Attiah over online statements related to the assassination, part of a wider trend of terminations across industries for individuals publicly expressing support for Kirk’s death. Notably, Vice President JD Vance has encouraged employers to terminate employees who express support for the assassination, citing a need for civility amid rising tensions. Critics, including civil liberties advocates, have raised concerns that such firings could infringe on free speech, arguing that while the comments may be controversial, they do not necessarily justify employment termination.

In official policy response, Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced that the U.S. will revoke visas for foreign nationals who publicly support Kirk’s death, stating this reflects a stance against endorsing political violence. Opponents of the visa revocation policy, including the ACLU, have cautioned that it could be seen as an overreach, potentially impacting free expression among non-citizens.

On the investigative side, details about the shooting remain unclear. Tyler Robinson, the alleged shooter, faces capital aggravated murder charges, with the Utah County Attorney seeking the death penalty. Discrepancies in suspect descriptions, incident footage, and recovered evidence have led to public skepticism and speculation about the shooter’s identity and possible accomplices.

The FBI is investigating potential links to the group Armed Queers Salt Lake City, while Rep. Anna Paulina Luna has called for the Treasury to freeze assets of a China-linked billionaire allegedly funding extremist NGOs tied to the case. Federal agents are also reviewing online platforms, with CEOs of Discord, Steam, Twitch, and Reddit summoned to a House Oversight Committee hearing on October 8 to discuss online radicalization related to the incident. However, some tech platforms, including Discord, have denied being breeding grounds for violence, asserting their cooperation with law enforcement and commitment to removing harmful content.

Geopolitics

In Timor-Leste, the government has canceled a plan to provide free cars to lawmakers after significant public protests in Dili. Thousands protested, with some burning tires and a government vehicle, leading to police use of tear gas. Despite the policy reversal, demonstrations continue with demands to end lifetime pensions for retired lawmakers. The unrest reflects public frustration over inequality, as lawmakers earn far more than the national average in one of South East Asia’s poorest countries. Similar discontent has been observed in recent protests against political elites in Nepal and Indonesia. Some government officials have defended the initial car plan as necessary for official duties, suggesting the reversal was more about public appeasement than fiscal responsibility.

Energy

Venezuela’s extensive hydrocarbon reserves are drawing attention amid discussions of a potential U.S. strategic focus on the Western Hemisphere. Analysts note increased criticism of the Maduro regime and a U.S. military presence in the Caribbean, suggesting a possible intent to secure resources for American companies such as Exxon and Chevron. Some observers have raised concerns about potential geopolitical tensions, including with Brazil, a key BRICS member in the region. However, Brazilian officials have publicly stated that their relationship with BRICS remains stable, downplaying the likelihood of conflict with the U.S. over Venezuela.

In California, Governor Gavin Newsom has approved domestic oil drilling in the Central Valley through a bipartisan bill certifying a long-disputed environmental impact report. This temporary exemption from environmental reviews aims to address an energy crisis involving refinery closures and limited pipeline capacity, though it has faced criticism from environmental groups and some Democrats over reduced protections. Environmental organizations, such as Greenpeace USA, have called the move a setback for California’s climate goals, arguing it prioritizes industry over vulnerable communities.

Sources

Erika Kirk Files $40 Million Defamation Lawsuit Against ABC and The View Hosts

Erika Kirk has drawn the line.

Source

Unraveling the Charlie Kirk Shooting: Questions, Conspiracies, and Contradictions

And for me, everything just shouts, “Does all of this really make sense to the average person?”

Source | Submitted by Daz K

Timor-Leste Axes Free Cars for MPs Amid Protests Over Inequality

“People don’t have access to good education, water and sanitation… we have a lack of facilities, but they’re still creating so many laws to benefit themselves.”

Source | Submitted by Shplad

Venezuela: The Opening Act in a Larger Western Hemisphere Power Play?

I wonder if this, uh, you know, what was traded was in Venezuela.

Source | Submitted by rhollenb

ABC Suspends Jimmy Kimmel’s Show Indefinitely Over Controversial Charlie Kirk Remarks

many in MAGA land are working very hard to capitalize on the murder of Charlie Kirk

Source | Submitted by richcabot

Newsom Reverses Course, Approves Domestic Oil Drilling in California Amid Energy Crisis

“After months of hard work with the Legislature, we have agreed to historic reforms that will save money on your electric bills, stabilize gas supply, and slash toxic air pollution—all while fast-tracking California’s transition to a clean, green job-creating economy,” Newsom said in a statement.

Source

Tech CEOs Called to Washington Over Online Radicalization in Wake of Kirk Assassination

“The politically motivated assassination of Charlie Kirk claimed the life of a husband, father, and American patriot.”

Source

Washington Post Columnist Fired Over Controversial Comments on Charlie Kirk Assassination

In reality, violent bloodlust is a feature of the political left, not an anomaly.

Source

Rubio Announces Visa Revocations for Foreign Nationals Celebrating Charlie Kirk’s Assassination

America will not host foreigners who celebrate the death of our fellow citizens.

Source

FBI Probe into ‘Armed Queers’ Sparks Calls to Freeze China-Linked Billionaire’s NGO Network

The revolution against the West spans thousands of organizations that may not be formally linked but are marching in unison toward the revolution.

Source

ABC to Pay Tribute to Charlie Kirk in Jimmy Kimmel’s Old Timeslot

Source

In addition to sources submitted by community members, the following were also used in the creation of this report: Media Matters for America, ACLU, Discord, Dili Times, Brazilian Government Official, Greenpeace USA.

5 Likes

2 Likes

Gotta clamp down on free speech across the board… For you safety of course. That is the end game.

At the end of the day, it really doesn’t take but boosting a relative few (institutional) chaos agents on the internet and MSM stool pigeons to make it appear as if 99% of “non-conservatives” have “hateful” and violent views.

5 Likes

I think this sums it up well:

https://x.com/TONYxTWO/status/1968475534976815215

Some folks may have contracts that affect the ability to terminate an employee, but most people are considered at-will.

6 Likes

Why does employment termination need to be justified? In the absence of a contract (or an employee in a “protected class” grrr), an employee can be fired at any time. And that doesn’t infringe free speech.

There is a large number of people who, perhaps even unthinkingly, feel that having a job is a civil right.

2 Likes

It is bi-partisan. It is a bi-partisan war on you and me.

5 Likes

Getting blowback from what one says is a double edged sword. If we allow the destruction of a persons livelihood based on their opinions, this will come back to cut “our side” also in the next round.

The covid dissidents found this out the hard way too. For or against, we shouldn’t threaten, fire etc based on their views.

We each have the power to choose which TV shows we watch, which doctors we go to, and what blogs we read. Exercise “the power fo the scroll bar” to skip past stuff that you don’t want to hear.

In another development in The Control of the Discourse, TikTok which posted hundreds and thousands of pictures of the destruction of Gaza, has been taken over by Zionists. This is not at all about China.

Two Jewish businessmen will take over 80 percent of TikTok US and TikToks cybersecurity is already run by a former IDF soldier

This is their way to change the narrative and suppress every pro Palestinian voice on TikTok

They know they are loosing the PR war , badly

https://x.com/ggreenwald/status/1968127613463040481

https://x.com/georgegalloway/status/1968363300019937381

6 Likes

Legally, that is correct.

But as social policy it is dysfunctional. If we need anything now it is now open discourse.

Had I been running a big corporation I would not have fired these people, even though their rejoicing over Kirk’s murder disgusts me.

3 Likes

“Hate speech” does not exist as a separate legal category of speech.

https://x.com/BretWeinstein/status/1968450621809557964

And remember, “hate speech” has most frequently been used as “hate-speech-and-antisemitism,” --all one word.

By convincing the public that “hate-speech-and-anti-Semitism” is a separate carve-out for the first amendment, Zionist censors seek to shut down discussion of Israel and the Jewish Lobby.

https://x.com/BretWeinstein/status/1968695021520978011

5 Likes

But the owner of a company of any size, even more than the manager of a large one, has also to consider not only his personal feelings, but the feelings of his customers toward his actions, whichever side they fall on.

4 Likes

“Hate speech,” (along with “misinformation”) is just the latest excuse for censorship. Anyone who buys into it is buying into totalitarianism.

Censors who decry “hate speech” and “disinformation” know what they are doing and it has nothing to do with public welfare. It has everything to do with acquiring more power and control. And if the “elitists” get more power and more control, it will not go well for you and me.

7 Likes

Another brief example: hate and Semitism being conflated.

https://x.com/NYGovCuomo/status/1397999446131187717

3 Likes

And that is where the owners of companies have to make a decision. Do they put profit over the public welfare? If they do, they have failed as human beings.

1 Like

Completely disagree. It may be protected free speech that someone says, “Hey I think child brides are perfectly okay!” However, vile worldviews are a dealbreaker for trusting and working with someone.

It’s VERY different from someone saying, “I don’t want medical treatment I don’t think I need.”

2 Likes

Everyone can exercise choice about who they want to work with and who they want to listen too. And I would not choose to work with some people.

As unpleasant as it may be, forcing others to only say things that we LIKE and AGREE WITH is a bad bad approach that will come back to be USED AGAINST US in the next inning.

5 Likes

Short version of this is that the correct response to “hate speech” is more speech. And if you think someone is vile you can always shut them off or in the case of t.v. tell the advertisers you won’t do business with them.

6 Likes

Saw this and couldn’t help but re-post:

https://x.com/ksorbs/status/1968380183750287443

11 Likes

People get fired for their opinion all the time. “Not a good fit” comes to mind. The first amendment prevents Congress from passing laws against free speech. Effectively, the government cannot stop you from speaking your mind, particularly when it comes to protesting the government. This doesn’t mean you can go around saying whatever you want without any consequences. Calling a woman ugly in front her husband is likely to get me punched in the face (just illustrating a point, not saying I would ever do that!). Speech comes with responsibility. The Founders sought to protect us against government, not ourselves. If this weren’t the case, then where would we draw the line? Which opinions would be fire-able and which ones wouldn’t be? Who decides? Government?

10 Likes

If I were head of a major corporation and some nitwit employee posted some celebratory trash on social media about this murder I would post something like this:

Charlie Kirk’s murder left his wife a widow and his two young children fatherless. Life has taught me that sometimes people never recover from losses of that magnitude. My heart goes out to them. My prayers pray for their recovery.

Those “celebrating” this tragedy are contemptible. They do not speak for my company. They do not speak for me. They speak only for pettiness, hatred and dishonor.

10 Likes

Publicly traded corporations have a legal duty to maximize shareholder profits. Further, these big companies are downstream of, and heavily dependent on, Too Big To Fail banks who are in turn reliant of the Federal Reserve to wipe away their bad debts. So, the private central banks make decisions for companies reliant on commercial credit - regardless of more obvious forms ofshareholder value, actually, because the Federal Reserve can backstop a lot of business losses.

1 Like