Harvey Is A Major Still-Unfolding Disaster

Superstorm Harvey continues to wreak epic damage to Texas, particularly Houston.

But it’s not the wind, it’s the rain. Epic, record-breaking, unbelievable amounts of rain.

It’s entirely possible that the entire region will not get back ‘to normal’ for months, if not years.

Vice President Mike Pence noted that given the “magnitude of the flooding” that “it will be years coming back.” (Source)

Tens of thousands of homes are flood damaged, many of them total losses. Only one-in-six Houston residences is thought to have flood insurance.

FEMA Director Brock Long said 30,000 are in temporary shelters with 450,000 expected to seek assistance. That may well grow if Harvey cycles back for another hit, which is quite likely at this time (see below).

The entire city of Houston is deserted except for rescue vehicles. So a major American city is not at work today. Or tomorrow. Or....???

A significant portion of the nation’s energy infrastructure is directly impacted by Harvey’s biblical rains and current total shutdown. Crude oil will accumulate there as refineries are unable to process it into fuel products. The prices for those same fuel products has been rising and will continue to spike higher. If this goes on for long enough, actual shortages will result.

The only mitigating factors working against the accumulation of crude at storage farms is the shutdown of wells in the Gulf as well as possibly a few wells in Texas' Eagle Ford region, for which no back-up power exists at the well sites. I don’t have any information on how extensive that might be yet. I'm just guessing at this point.

Rivers in Houston are not expected to crest until Tuesday, at some 11 feet (!!) higher than their current “major flood” stage (forecast as of 2:15 a.m. August 28th, 2017).

There’s no historical parallel for this level of flooding, so we’ll just have to wait and see how this all plays out.

The good news is that the past 24 hours have seen relatively little rainfall (just under an inch).

The really bad news is that the latest models show Harvey heading back into the Gulf, picking up more moisture and power, possibly becoming a hurricane again, and then coming back ashore aimed straight for a second savaging of Houston:

That would be thoroughly cruel to those who's lives have already been upended by this storm. But nature can be rather remorseless that way.

As the WSJ put it this morning:

HOUSTON—Tropical Storm Harvey was poised to re-enter the Gulf of Mexico Monday and make another landfall closer to Houston roughly two days later, prolonging the slow-motion flooding disaster that already has crippled one of the nation’s largest metropolitan areas.

The storm, still over coastal Texas, is not expected to regain hurricane strength as its eye moves back over water, according to the National Hurricane Center. But its plodding, easterly track means as much as 20 more inches of rain could fall on the Houston area. The region has seen as much as 30 inches in recent days, turning roads into rivers, inundating homes and requiring rescues for thousands of stranded people.

The historic rains, already more than half of what Houston gets in a typical year, were forcing officials to make painful decisions to evacuate flooded areas—and to release water from reservoirs under strain, knowing that it would flow into nearby neighborhoods

20 more inches might fall. This is really without any precedent. It’s a very serious situation and people are mostly shocked and unable to process the enormity of this at the moment.

The last part in bold above is really concerning. The reservoirs in the region are all completely full, or in never-before-seen record territory. If you live downstream from one of these you really ought to consider evacuation.

Here’s one that has hit a new record:

That’s a brand new record high for the reservoir. Here’s some info on it.

The Addicks Reservoir and Addicks Dam in conjunction with the Barker Reservoir prevent downstream flooding of Buffalo Bayou in the City of Houston.

From 2008-2014, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Galveston District implemented $4.4 million in interim risk reduction measures (at Addicks and Barker dams) to address deficiencies until long-term solutions could be identified and executed.

In 2014, staff completed a Dam Safety Modification Study to evaluate long-term repairs and address issues associated with the dams. Staff presented this information during a public meeting Oct. 29 at Bear Creek Community Center in Houston to discuss these plans and gather feedback. Construction is scheduled to begin May 2015 with an estimated completion date of 2019.

(Source)

It’s too bad that the dam remediation efforts were still 2 years away from completion as that dam is now being severely tested. All people the Buffalo Bayou area are strongly advised to consider evacuation.

Here’s the reservoir mapped:

“Controlled” releases are already underway and people have been asked to voluntarily evacuate.

The Harris County Flood Control District announced on Sunday night that they will have to open the Addicks and Barker reservoirs to relievesome of the pressure on Monday morning. Because of these releases, voluntary evacuations are being issued for people who live near the two reservoirs.

(Source)

It remains to be seen if the releases can keep up with the rainfall. I don’t have any good information on that at present, but will keep researching.

Evacuating is a really big deal and not to be undertaken lightly. The main reason is that you aren't evacuating alone, but along with hundreds of thousands if not millions of other people.

Here’s an especially thoughtful post on the topic that I came across on Reddit early this morning:

I lived through several storms on the Gulf through the years and I can shed a bit of light on the topic.

For one thing, evacuating is expensive.

Factor in the weeks without work. Yes, weeks. Because even if you do manage to make it out of the path of the storm (which isn't a guarantee unless you travel hundreds of miles), there's no promise you'll be able to return home in a timely manner. Roads wash out, gas stations run out of gas and lose power, entire towns shut down.

The actual act of transporting yourself somewhere else is a challenge. Cars sit bumper to bumper, filling every highway and every lane. You've got to leave early enough to actually make progress, or else you'll be caught in the road when the storm hits. I was in Johnson Bayou days before Hurricane Gustav hit. I was driving from an EMT outpost to the corner store, a drive which normally took 20 minutes. It took me 8 hours, all because of evacuee traffic.

If you do decide to leave, there's no guarantee you'll still have a job to return to.

Then there's the sudden cost of a hotel room for weeks on end. Everywhere that's out of the direct path of the storm is full, I mean packed to the utter brim, no more rooms in Bethlehem and no more mangers either.

Everyone ELSE who's decided to evacuate is headed to the same spots, and these aren't luxurious destination locals. You go just far enough to get away, which sometimes puts you and your family in the middle of some podunk town that's totally not equipped to handle a massive influx of people.

So if you do find a room, which is tough, it's expensive.

If you go the shelter route, and you evacuate to a designated area, well buckle up. You're in for a few weeks of sharing cramped quarters with lord knows how many folks, all while you're unlikely to have access to things like showers or washing machines.

Then there's the drive itself. Timing an evacuation isn't just expensive, it's really tricky. Yes, for days and days we track the storm as it builds in the Atlantic and closes in on the shore. The people down south are probably more savvy at it than you realize, and for good reason! Their lives could depend on it every single summer.

But these storms are incredibly hard to predict with extreme accuracy.

The margin of land area that these storms could hit in storm projections is laughably huge at first. Then, as the week closes and the storm draws nearer, the land mass gradually narrows as possible outcomes are ruled out.

The last 4 days are where its most critical. You spend those days glued to your TV screen and your radio. Every waking minute you are on red alert, thinking about and prepping for this storm.

You have this small window of time in which you have to weigh the massive costs and stresses of evacuating against the actual level of threat posed to your life.

Actually getting on the road, if you do decide to evacuate, is STILL not a guarantee that you'll be out of danger. Once these storms make land fall, the amount of moisture they drop can cause severe flooding all the way up to Canada in the most extreme cases. So what if you run away, only to get caught in disaster somewhere else?

And then there's the tragic cases -- elderly folks too old to go through the arduous process if paving and leaving their homes in the face of a storm, and without a living relative to help them do it, or people who live hand to mouth, pay check to pay check, with not enough money to leave.

It's incredibly risky to stay, and incredibly difficult to run. And sometimes these storms come one year after another, so that if you end up evacuating one summer, you might not be in a position to do it the next, either because of finances or putting your job on the line. And then there's the ever-present worry that you're going through all this hassle for no reason; for a storm that'll just fizzle out in the Gulf and veer off to hit somewhere else at the last second, which makes you less inclined to listen to the next warning, and the next.

(Source)

Lights Out

The biggest problem for the modern lifestyle is just how hard it is to live life without electricity. For starters there’s the loss of utility power. Here’s the latest data:

The former Hurricane Harvey continues to trigger power outages across Texas. As of 7:25 a.m. CDT on Monday, August 28, there are more than 302,000 electricity outages across Texas, according to the Data Fusion Solutions power outage tracker map. That’s down by about 14,000 since Sunday, August 27.

(Source)

So a bit over 300,000 structures are without power. How many people are directly affected by that is probably close to a million, assuming 3-4 people per structure.

But even once the power gets turned back on, that’s not going to help many of the folks who own houses that are in areas like these:

The reason why is contained in another excellent Reddit post by an electrician:

Now, lets talk about the dangers of having power in a flooded house. These people are taking their lives into their own hands here. ANY electrical that's been exposed to water, especially breaker boxes is considered damaged beyond repair and MUST be replaced. Why? Corrosion. All these contacts, especially with active voltage and current in the lines, are corroding as we speak.

ALL wiring and components will have to be replaced, it is part of the restoration process to get your power restored to the house.

(Source)

Now imagine possibly tens of thousands of homes that all need to have their wiring replaced before the lights can go back on and you have a sense of the scale of the problem. It’s huge.

To the extent that any utility substations got water damaged, this same poster had this to say:

Next, we'll talk about what's happening to the grid in these areas. Power comes to your house via a substation, any of these substations that went underwater, whether these cables were buried or not, will have to most likely be ripped out and be replaced.

Oy. It could be a very, very long time before some areas and certain customers will see any power restored.

So the power outage factor is going to make Houston a very unlivable place for any and all affected customers for weeks to months to possibly years depending on circumstances.

Given that Houston is basically a hot, humid swamp with a mosquito problem most people will rightly conclude that it’s just not livable without power for any length of time.

Some Context

The worst storm on record for the area was tropical storm Alison in June of 2001. It was calculated at the time to be a 1-in-500 year event.

Well, that lasted 16 years and 2 months before being shattered.

Here are the rainfall totals from Alison:

Note that the purple and pick areas represent rainfall totals of over 10 (purple) and 13 (pink) inches.

Now, for comparison, here’s the Harvey totals through Sunday. I have helpfully circled in red the areas that had more than ten inches of rain. It’s practically the entire region!

There are a huge number of dots on the Harvey chart that are already over 15” and even 20”. That means that Alison, 1-in-500 year event that it was, is not even remotely comparable to Harvey.

Because Alison caused $9 billion in damage, we’re going to have to scale that up by some factor…let’s start with 10x? And that’s just to date. If Harvey cycles back out-and-around who knows just how much more serious this could all get?

At any rate, now that 1-in-500 year events are happening far more frequently than that, we now have to consider that past weather history is not a useful guide for us anymore.

One Out Of Six

A huge, looming, possibly fiscally-ruinous problem here is that very few Houstonians are actually insured for floods. The following article ran on our Daily Digest a few days ago:

How Hurricane Harvey Could Cause Long-Term Devastation

Aug 26, 2017

Beyond the Category 4 130 mile-an-hour winds, the devastating eye wall, and the storm surge hundreds of miles wide, the most destructive part of Hurricane Harvey as it bears down on the Texan Gulf Coast might be the rain.

The most likely outcome, unless the storm takes an unexpected turn, appears to be tragedy. The region is already inundated. Houston’s already seen abnormally high amounts of rain this August, and parts of Louisiana are still flooded after rain storms earlier this month, a situation that left parts of New Orleans under several feet of water after some of the city’s water pumps failed. For now, the best case scenario is to hope that most people have evacuated, and that the storm and flood’s ravages will come against property and not human lives. After all, houses can be rebuilt.

But this time, even that may not be true. Although Texas and Louisiana—owing to the constant threat of floods—are among some of the places in the United States where flood insurance is most prevalent, there are few places where even a quarter of all homes are covered. In Houston,just over 119,000 places are covered by flood insurance policies backed by the National Flood Insurance Program, which helps fund most flood insurance policies. There are just over 800,000 occupied housing units in the city, which means that somewhere under a sixth of all homes in the city have flood insurance. The situation is the same in Corpus Christi, where 19,183 buildings are insured of around 115,000 occupied housing units.

The dearth of flood insurance policies makes the result obvious: Most people who lose homes or have them damaged in Harvey won’t have money to replace or repair them.

(Source)

Merely one out of six homes being insured is a huge predicament. Said the other way, 5-out-of-6 homes *not* being insured means that a huge number of people will simply abandon their homes and wander away, never to return, exactly as happened after Katrina.

The economic impact to Houston is going to be severe. Few can appreciate just how serious at present.

When A 15% Haircut Can Really Hurt

Energy is a finely-tuned and sensitive business, especially the oil business. Keeping a narrow balance between oil and gasoline and diesel stockpiles is an art form.

Slight disturbances in either oil (the feedstock) or the products (gasoline and diesel) can really impact the prices for both.

In this case, oil is still being produced, the tank farms are already pretty full, and a whopping 15% of the nations refinery output is currently offline due to Harvey:

Energy Firms Brace for Harvey Fallout

Aug 27, 2017

Harvey knocked almost 15% of U.S. refinery capacity out of commission, which threatens to boost fuel prices across the country.

Energy markets could be in for a bumpy ride when they open Monday as investors try to gauge the impact of the disruption. After slamming into Texas on Friday and causing massive flooding in Houston over the weekend, the storm was moving east on Sunday toward a refining hub near the Louisiana border. That could shut down even more of the U.S. energy infrastructure.

(Source)

Already the US oil markets are getting hit pretty hard here early on Monday, down nearly -4%:

Gasoline has increased by a similar amount of +4%. If Harvey continues to create disruption, these price moves are just the beginning. Expect both to continue in their current trajectories, especially if any serious or lasting damage has been done to the electricity infrastructure supplying the refineries. (I don’t have any information on that at present.)

More to come…

Preparation Is Essential!

As always, preparing before a disaster is cheap and honorable. Afterwards it’s expensive (if not impossible) and irresponsible if it becomes a “me vs. them” hoarding operation.

It's a little eerie how quickly our advice from just last week, Better A Year Early Than A Day Too Late, has been validated by Harvey.

The basic preparations that Adam and I outlined in our book Prosper! would have served anyone and everyone well in the affected areas had they followed them before Harvey hit. Certainly, there might be some losses of carefully-manicured gardens and such because, hey flooding, but all the rest would have been net positives.

Being in shape, having stored food, back-up energy sources like solar, rechargeable batteries, and generators, and a supportive community network would each proved to be useful and -- in combination -- invaluable.

Like with Hurricane Sandy, there will be an enormous number of people interested in preparing for a couple of weeks after this disaster passes. Then the decay function will hit, and barely 2% to 3% will actually take any real concrete steps on their own behalf once the lights come back on.

I’m looking forward to hearing from our affected members. The good the bad and the ugly. What worked, and what didn’t?

Conclusion

This was a relatively hastily-compiled report; such is the nature of fast-moving events. I will be providing additional data, insights and comments in the comment areas below as we work to keep up with developments.

Harvey has dealt a serious blow to the Houston area and, by extension, the entire US. And the situation is still developing, meaning it could get a lot worse before it gets better if Harvey comes back around for another swipe.

The US, as well as the world, really has to begin to grapple with the idea that “once in 500 year” events are actually more like “once in a decade” events now.

How we can really plan and prepare for these events is an enormously tricky task. In many cases the answer is “you can’t.” For example, even if you were a star member of the Peak Prosperity preparers club, if your house is standing in 20 feet of water, you’re SOL like everyone else.

The only proper response to being in flood zones during this era of far-more-frequent mega storms is to not live there.

It’s really that blunt, sorry to say.

More to come.

~ Chris Martenson

This is a companion discussion topic for the original entry at https://peakprosperity.com/harvey-is-a-major-still-unfolding-disaster/

These are really hard to even wrap my mind around.


And this next one is a GIF, so if you click on it you will get to see the action of this water pouring into a basement near the TX medical facility.

Here’s some more information on the affected refineries:

REFINERIES
  • Roughly 2.2 million b/d of refining capacity has been shut. Houston-area refineries began shutting Sunday because of flooding. Refiners have not reported any damage so far.
  • ExxonMobil was shuttin its massive Baytown, Texas, refining and chemical complex due to flooding caused by Harvey, the company said Sunday. Baytown, at 560,500 b/d, is the second-largest refinery in the US.
  • Shell was shutting its 340,000 b/d refinery complex in Deer Park, Texas, due to flooding, the company said Sunday in a message on a community hotline.
  • Phillips 66 began shutting its 247,000 b/d refinery in Sweeny, Texas, due to fears of Harvey-related flooding in Brazoria County, the company said Sunday.
  • The Texas Gulf Coast is home to 4.944 million b/d of refining capacity, while the Louisiana Gulf Coast is home to 3.696 million b/d of capacity, according to the US Energy Information Administration.
(Source)
...and this image has the updated storm tack on it. Very handy.

Too many Texans hyper focussed on being overrun by Mexicans instead of water??

This image seems to capture the spirit of the moment:

Of course, with so much heavy industry and chemical plants and refineries, the flood waters of Houston are going to be toxic.
But there’s something being reported in the air too indicating that perhaps tanks have been breached or pipelines have ruptured.

There’s an “Unbearable” Chemical Smell Hovering Over Parts of Houston, and Experts Are Worried. Aug 28, 2017 As historic rainfall and flooding continue to pound America’s fourth-most populated city, residents of Houston’s industrial fence-line communities are reporting strong gas- and chemical-like smells coming from the many refineries and chemical plants nearby. “I’ve been smelling them all night and off and on this morning,” said Bryan Parras, an activist at the grassroots environmental justice group TEJAS. Parras, who lives and works in Houston’s East End, on Sunday said some residents are experiencing “headaches, sore throat, scratchy throat and itchy eyes.” Parras said there are chemical smells in the air all over the East End, but particularly in directly communities adjacent to Houston’s sweeping petrochemical industry. And residents can’t escape the smell, because flood waters have overtaken the city, and could reach over four feet in some spots. “Fenceline communities can’t leave or evacuate so they are literally getting gassed by these chemicals,” Parras said. Some Twitter users in Houston also reported concerns about air quality. Might seem like an afterthought but #Harvey is impacting air quality, too. Exxon, others shuttering refineries, releasing lots of pollution. — Kiah Collier (@KiahCollier) August 27, 2017 Rancid chemical smell near Houston @ValeroEnergy refinery. What's going on? Why all the flaring? Folks Can't Breathe #HurricaneHarvery — Raquel de Anda (@deAndaAnda) August 27, 2017 @DisasterPIO There is a widespread gas smell in Houston's East End. Any info? — RFH (@rfh02) August 27, 2017 There is a thick smell of oil in the air downtown #Houston — Rhonda Ragsdale (@profragsdale) August 27, 2017 It’s still unclear exactly where the smells are coming from, but Parras suspects the source is the many oil refineries, chemical plants, and gas facilities nearby. Several of these plants have shut down or are in the process of shutting down due to Harvey’s historic flooding, and shutdowns are a major cause of “abnormal” emission events, according to a 2012 report from the Environmental Integrity Project. Short-term impacts of these events can be “substantial,” because “upsets or sudden shutdowns can release large plumes of sulfur dioxide or toxic chemicals in just a few hours, exposing downwind communities to peak levels of pollution that are much more likely to trigger asthma attacks and other respiratory systems.” The communities closest to these sites in Houston are disproportionately low-income and minority. +++++++++
These sorts of reports are troubling in the immediate term for the residents. They also indicate some amount of damage to the plants themselves as these chemicals are not usually released so something, somewhere probably broke. Gasoline prices are likely to spike from here...that's one interpretation of these reports. I mean, nationally, not more than they already have, locally, in Texas.

Lots of rain still to come. Here’s the latest from the Weather Channel (it’s 5:00 pm Monday, 8/28).

I actually visited a refinery once. I’m not sure if it was one of the workers there, or my friend (a chemical engineer for Chevron), but I was told that once they build a refinery at a site, they can never permanently shut it down because if they did, it would become one of those EPA superfund sites immediately because of all the toxic crap that has spilled at the site over the years.
Not sure if that was just hyperbole, but presumably if you were to soak the site in 4 feet of water, the run-off presumably would be not so great for health.

On Democracy Now, it was said today that in the past some industries have used these types of flooding events to release stocks of chemicals while nobody is looking, avoiding this way the cost of disposal.
The cynicism of some people is just unbelievable…

Chris, thanks for helping us understand some of the “invisible” but enormous consequences of all this flooding we’re seeing in Houston. -Like the need to replace all the wiring and electrical components in all the homes where it has gotten wet from the flooding, before their electricity can be restored. And the fact that only 1 out of 6 homes has flood insurance (so chances are at least 5 of 6 places aren’t getting restored). It’s very sobering. It really brings home just how devastating an impact Harvey has had on Houston.

… and with good reason too, IMO.

Houston, you have a problem, and some of it of your own making

Which article are you referring to?Not the Bryan Parras interview?

Thank you, Chris. I always appreciate your observations on current events.
A lot of the media coverage that I’ve seen (in online versions of print newspapers, that is; I don’t watch television news) has shown everyday people helping their neighbors in a time of great suffering. That’s been a bit of a surprise to me, not because it happens, but because such everyday decency rarely makes headlines.

I’m referring to this interview with David Helvarg, here is the link and the section of the transcript about the release of toxic chemicals

https://www.democracynow.org/2017/8/28/this_is_the_new_normal_inside

AMY GOODMAN: David, just before we go, I hate to interrupt, but i wanted to ask you about this. Hurricane Harvey’s arrival came as Bloomberg News reported that the FEMAdirector, Brock Long, who just held a news conference, on Friday was pushing for an overhaul of disaster relief so that states, cities, and homeowners bear more of the cost. And I also wanted to ask you, very briefly, to explain how the petrochemical industry has exploited past natural disasters to its benefit. For example, releasing toxic chemicals that are otherwise too expensive to get rid of.

DAVID HELVARG: Yeah, unfortunately, there is a history—during storms and other disasters when people aren’t watching, industry has released hazardous waste into the floodwaters, essentially, to save money. This is just like offshore the shipping industry will release oily waste into the ocean to save money. And so you have to have really close monitoring at times like this.

Luckily, right now, the Coast Guard, along with having its SAR—search and rescue helicopters—in the air and Swift Boat rescue teams on the water, I am sure they also have the strike team out of Mobile, Alabama, that’s looking at the pollution. As we said earlier, the Houston Ship Channel is part of Cancer Alley. It is a huge complex of petrochemical facilities.

And it is bizarre that they had a voluntary shutdown. That should have been mandated. And there is a good chance that either accidentally or intentionally, you’re going to see a large-scale pollution release, because of where this is located. You’re certainly going to see a claim of disruption of production, and they’re going to jack up gasoline prices. That is just what they do.

AMY GOODMAN: Well, David Helvarg, we want to thank you for being with us. Executive director of Blue Frontier, an ocean conservation organization. He is speaking to us from San Diego, California. When we come back, we’re going to talk to people in Texas about what happens to undocumented immigrants in times like this. This is Democracy Now!. We’ll be back in a minute.

We live south of Corpus Christi and Harvey just missed our area. We began the usual fire drill of preparing for the hurricane, but it veered north just in time. Bizarrely the follow on weather was delightful - sunny, crisp, and breezy - while the rest of the gulf coast became an apocalyptic nightmare. As I watched the news I was painfully aware of how close we came to being flooded, displaced, and disrupted.
As a card carrying member of the Peak Prosperity Preparer’s Club - I came to the realization that Chris articulated - nothing can prepare you for this kind of Black Swan event. No matter what - losses will occur. My takeaways after being grazed by the Harvey bullet are (so far):

  1. Be prepared to accept refugees. Family members are on the way (I think). At this point they are without resources and fractured. Dad is a cop and cannot leave Houston. We are happy to accept them into our home - but it wasn’t exactly planned. In a wider emergency the same might happen and I will say yes then too. I need to expand my preparations for the likelihood of more people camping out with us. Turning everyone away outside of a pandemic scenario is not an option (really). What’s the point of all this anyway if you can’t help people?
  2. Being 5% prepared is WAY better than zero. As I watch people in Houston it has occurred to me that I need a boat. I live on a body of water which has flooded before and will flood again. I built my home well above the flood plain - but Harvey just made a joke out of that math. As I watch people wade in chest deep water while others float by in boats; I’m buying a boat. Today.
  3. Being prepared is great! I needed to do NOTHING to get ready for the hurricane at my home. Turns out that was really helpful because my time was spent getting other people and places prepared. All of my employees (save one) asked for the day off (to get their homes ready) leaving me alone in my preparations. Thankfully I didn’t have to waste time at the gas pump, ATM, or the grocery store.
  4. Evacuation plans are a real priority for me now. With four kids my mental default position has been to “hunker down”. “We don’t evacuate for hurricanes here” has been the attitude because we are prepared and have always done well. Harvey has demonstrated this is NOT ALWAYS POSSIBLE.
    I will now focus my considerable prepping energy to developing a viable evacuation strategy. Not an overland hike in ghilli suits - but a real strategy to get this group of people somewhere else quickly and safely. Routes in every direction. A list of destinations. Checklists for packing, securing, and evacuating. Documentation, asset relocation, etc. I am even going to develop a plan to go into Mexico. I had a day and a half between threat presentation and expected landfall. Some events may present even less time.
  5. I need to be able to execute a plan at less than 100%. As luck would have it, I pulled a muscle at CrossFit a week before and would have needed to do all the above while limping around in pain. I represent the lion’s share of muscle power for the family - but can they execute in my absence or incapacity? Hmm. . . not ready for that.
  6. It is possible for two bad things to happen at the same time. The financial crisis could begin, North Korea could strike, or any of the other crap I worry about could commence at any moment. WHILE LIVING IN A FEMA SHELTER because I hadn’t planned on evacuating. Am I ready to execute trades, etc. while in that shape? Hmm. . . not ready for that either.
    I am thankful that we were spared the apocalypse but it has (again) identified holes in my plan that are the result of false premises. Challenge yours because you just can’t make this stuff up.
    Rector

I am requoting your entire, thought-provoking, honest, and detailed comment below because it’s just that good.
You’ve exemplified the true value of this site - intelligent and curious people coming together to courageously face what is and what’s to come.
So we prepare, and then note where we are still falling short. We do this because we have the responsibility to others who are not gifted with either/both the capacity or the resources to face an uncertain future. We do this because we are prudent and because we care.
Thank you for sharing this.

Rector wrote:
We live south of Corpus Christi and Harvey just missed our area. We began the usual fire drill of preparing for the hurricane, but it veered north just in time. Bizarrely the follow on weather was delightful - sunny, crisp, and breezy - while the rest of the gulf coast became an apocalyptic nightmare. As I watched the news I was painfully aware of how close we came to being flooded, displaced, and disrupted. As a card carrying member of the Peak Prosperity Preparer's Club - I came to the realization that Chris articulated - nothing can prepare you for this kind of Black Swan event. No matter what - losses will occur. My takeaways after being grazed by the Harvey bullet are (so far): 1. Be prepared to accept refugees. Family members are on the way (I think). At this point they are without resources and fractured. Dad is a cop and cannot leave Houston. We are happy to accept them into our home - but it wasn't exactly planned. In a wider emergency the same might happen and I will say yes then too. I need to expand my preparations for the likelihood of more people camping out with us. Turning everyone away outside of a pandemic scenario is not an option (really). What's the point of all this anyway if you can't help people? 2. Being 5% prepared is WAY better than zero. As I watch people in Houston it has occurred to me that I need a boat. I live on a body of water which has flooded before and will flood again. I built my home well above the flood plain - but Harvey just made a joke out of that math. As I watch people wade in chest deep water while others float by in boats; I'm buying a boat. Today. 3. Being prepared is great! I needed to do NOTHING to get ready for the hurricane at my home. Turns out that was really helpful because my time was spent getting other people and places prepared. All of my employees (save one) asked for the day off (to get their homes ready) leaving me alone in my preparations. Thankfully I didn't have to waste time at the gas pump, ATM, or the grocery store. 4. Evacuation plans are a real priority for me now. With four kids my mental default position has been to "hunker down". "We don't evacuate for hurricanes here" has been the attitude because we are prepared and have always done well. Harvey has demonstrated this is NOT ALWAYS POSSIBLE. I will now focus my considerable prepping energy to developing a viable evacuation strategy. Not an overland hike in ghilli suits - but a real strategy to get this group of people somewhere else quickly and safely. Routes in every direction. A list of destinations. Checklists for packing, securing, and evacuating. Documentation, asset relocation, etc. I am even going to develop a plan to go into Mexico. I had a day and a half between threat presentation and expected landfall. Some events may present even less time. 5. I need to be able to execute a plan at less than 100%. As luck would have it, I pulled a muscle at CrossFit a week before and would have needed to do all the above while limping around in pain. I represent the lion's share of muscle power for the family - but can they execute in my absence or incapacity? Hmm. . . not ready for that. 6. It is possible for two bad things to happen at the same time. The financial crisis could begin, North Korea could strike, or any of the other crap I worry about could commence at any moment. WHILE LIVING IN A FEMA SHELTER because I hadn't planned on evacuating. Am I ready to execute trades, etc. while in that shape? Hmm. . . not ready for that either. I am thankful that we were spared the apocalypse but it has (again) identified holes in my plan that are the result of false premises. Challenge yours because you just can't make this stuff up. Rector

Whereas Rector is prepared and thinking of how he might better prepare, a Houston Redditor in the /r/preppers subreddit community posted this about the awful lack of intelligence in his fellow Houstonians…
https://www.reddit.com/r/preppers/comments/6wmgg5/my_takeaway_from_harvey_as_a_houston_native/
Poet

One of the dams around Houston has begun to overspill. If I understood Scott Cahill’s various posts correctly, the worst is still yet to come as water falling now won’t hit the reservoir for another day or two.

Rector, excellent post! It’s a great reminder that no matter the preparations we make, we can’t possibly cover everything, yet having zero preparation means you can’t cover anything that happens, so some is better than none. We at Chateau Snydeman need to keep that in mind, because no matter what we do, we constantly feel like we’re not doing as much as others are, or we need to be doing. Such is prepping.

Addicks Overspills and this is a dangerous new development.
While the overspilling was expected, the pace of recent water rises indicates that the situation could get worse, possibly leading to a breach of the aged, earthen dam.

Houston flood: Addicks dam begins overspill Aug 29, 2017 9:28 a.m. A major dam outside Houston has begun spilling over as Storm Harvey pushes the reservoir past capacity, a Texas official says. Engineers have tried to prevent nearby communities from being inundated by releasing some of the water held by the Addicks dam. But flood control official Jeff Lindner says water levels are now over the height of the reservoir edge. Harvey has brought huge floods to Texas and is starting to affect Louisiana. Unprecedented rainfall has forced thousands of people to flee their homes. At least nine people are reported to have died in the Houston area. While spillover would not cause the Addicks dam to fail, it would add more water to the Buffalo Bayou, the main river into the fourth largest city in the US.

This is major news. Addicks dam is one of the six worst dams in America. Overspilling most definitely could lead to dam failure, despite the very odd assertion made in that last sentence.
“While spillover would not cause the Addicks dam to fail…” Really? Who said that? Is this the opinion of the BBC reporter or an expert that they forgot to quote or cite?
This is a very strange and strong assertion to make.
For a more nuanced view, let’s turn to a different source.

The two earthen dams were built some 70 years ago in a then-rural part of Harris and Fort Bend Counties that has since seen explosive growth, allowing water to flow more freely over the paved landscape. The dams are now midway through a three-year, $75-million repair and restoration project. Because the reservoirs are typically empty or mostly empty, the dams have experienced a sequence of increasingly frequent on-and-off stresses due to increased development and more-extreme rainfall events in the Houston area. In 2009, the USACE rated the Addicks and Barker dams as being at “extremely high risk of catastrophic failure,” which put them among just six dams in the nation with that designation. It’s important to note that Addicks and Barker have not been considered at imminent risk of failure, according to USACE, who say the designation hinges in large part on the scope of the disaster if failure were to actually occur. As reported in the Houston Chronicle last year, “If the dams failed, half of Houston would be underwater. Under the worst scenario at Addicks, property damages could reach $22.7 billion and 6,928 people could die.” The Houston Press, which published a harrowing in-depth report on the state of the dams in 2012, filed an update on Sunday. (Source - Weather Underground)
So this is definitely a serious situation. Perhaps the dam is safe, perhaps not. But being in bad shape to begin with and facing an absolutely unprecedented strain does not give anyone much cause for comfort here…. If you live downslope from these dams, get out now.
cmartenson wrote:
Overspilling most definitely could lead to dam failure, despite the very odd assertion made in that last sentence. “While spillover would not cause the Addicks dam to fail…” Really? Who said that? Is this the opinion of the BBC reporter or an expert that they forgot to quote or cite? This is a very strange and strong assertion to make.

Yeah, I noticed that too. So desperately do we modern humans cling to normalcy at the expense of reasonable skepticism and preparation! I can’t tell you how many people on my Facebook feed are literally coming out and denying that these storms represent any kind of sign of climate change.

/facepalm

How many once-in-a-century storms hitting inside a single decade does it take for people to finally start putting the puzzle pieces together?