Inflation: What's Your Number?

Originally published at: https://peakprosperity.com/inflation-whats-your-number/

For the past 17 years, I’ve been running all over the place educating and warning everyone I could about inflation. Inflation is 100% the product of official policy. Heck, the Fed even has a minimum target for inflation, although they’ve never explained to anyone why they have any target at all let alone the specific rate of 2%.

Over the past 5 years, cumulative inflation is an eye-watering (because we’re all crying) 26.4%, which means if you were earning $100k in 2020 and are still earning $100k, you’ve experienced a $26,400 pay cut. Looked at another way, your taxes went by $26,400 because inflation is, indeed a tax. It operates exactly and precisely the same way as a tax.

In a proper tax regime, the government tells you how much it’s going to take, it takes it, and then spends it. In the illegitimate, and thoroughly immoral inflation-as-a-tacx regime, the government spends the money first, and then you pay for it with your money losing value.

Either way, it’s the same process; the government wants the money you earned by working hard for its own purposes and it takes it without you having any real say in the matter.


To book your free, no-obligation portfolio review and retirement planning session with Paul and his team, click here, fill out the simple form, and within 48 business hours, someone from Paul’s team will contact you to schedule a meeting.


For a variety of reasons ranging from Social Security COLA hikes to embarrassment at doing such a poor job, the government is incentivized to lie about the true rate of inflation. Each month is a new whopper from the BLS who supposedly tracks these things. These whoppers are wrapped up by the media and presented to us out here in the real world as if they were Gospel.

But anyone with any real-world experience at all can tell you immediately that the BLS lies are approaching some sort of escape velocity. Really? Groceries are up 1.8% over the past year?

Restaurants are up 3.6%? I need to bring this table down to our local eatery and ask them why fish and chips for two with a non-alcoholic drink is $70 when last year it was $45.

Or how about ‘medical care’ being up 3.4% when everybody’s health insurance premiums went up by double digits percentages while their deductibles wormed their way higher too?

Obviously, these are BLS fictions.

So mock them as we might, we still have to live out here in the real world and plan and save so that we can sail through retirement without inadvertently ending up as a Walmart Greeter for the last ten years of our life.

The math is dispiriting. If inflation averages 5%, as it has for the past 5 years things get wonky quickly. Let’s imagine someone has decided to retire at the age of 62, and that they need $100,000 of after-tax money to live on. Without inflation this calculation is easy; each year they need $100,000. With 5% inflation after just ten years, by the age of 72, to maintain the same living standard they will need $155,132.00 per year. Ouch!

By the age of 82, their savings and/or portfolio will need to be tapped for a cool $252,695 per year – just to have the same living standard as they had at 62!

This is why inflation is a stone-cold retirement killer. Most people don’t plan for the inflation they will actually experience. Compounding can work for or against you. Inflation is compounding working against you. It is the negative force that fights against your investment gains.

Editorially, all “gains” should be inflation-adjusted, because, if not, the government is double taxing the same money twice. First, there’s the inflation tax which has eaten away at our savings and investment’s purchasing power. Second, are the capital gains taxes when we sell the investments. The part of the increase in the dollar amount of our assets which was due to inflation represents government taking and spending that has already happened. After deducting the inflation portion, the remainder represents legitimate capital gains. This should apply to real estate, stocks, bitcoin, and bonds. For the government to double-tax its citizens is both immoral and unfair, especially since inflation stems from political weakness and policy failures.

My prediction is that inflation is headed higher, not lower, over the coming years. This is predicated upon this chart of locked-in government deficits:

Every red bar represents more inflation.

Coupled to that chart is my certainty that the Fed will print, and then print more because they lack any sense of obligation to the future and roll over every time Wall Street throws one of its patented hissy fits.

What level of inflation can your retirement savings survive? Do you know? Tune in to find out…


Peak Prosperity endorses and promotes Kiker Wealth Management’s financial services. To arrange a completely free, no-obligation discussion of your personal financial circumstances and goals with someone who speaks your language and thoroughly shares your outlook on the world, please click this link to go to Peak Financial Investing to begin the process.


FINANCIAL DISCLAIMER. PEAK PROSPERITY, LLC, AND PEAK FINANCIAL INVESTING ARE NOT ENGAGED IN RENDERING LEGAL, TAX, OR FINANCIAL ADVICE OR SERVICES VIA THIS WEBSITE. NEITHER PEAK PROSPERITY, LLC NOR PEAK FINANCIAL INVESTING ARE FINANCIAL PLANNERS, BROKERS, OR TAX ADVISORS. Their websites are intended only to assist you in your financial education. Your personal financial situation is unique, and any information and advice obtained through this website may not be appropriate for your situation. Accordingly, before making any final decisions or implementing any financial strategy, you should consider obtaining additional information and advice from your accountant or other financial advisers who are fully aware of your individual circumstances.

8 Likes

After covid, our young and growing family, have found the best investment for almost $1m was to buy 20 acres with a renovat-able home, upgraded solar and batteries, a decent caravan, some basic machinery for the hobby farm, resources to homeschool and a few heavy bricks for each of the children as inheritance.

At 32 and 33, that approach has been the best inoculation against the unpredictability of the future and the most liberating experience of our lives letting go our ‘promising’ careers and focus back on the foundations of life - animal husbandry, community, practical skills, clean air, water and sunshine.

Retirement plan? Do what we are doing now until the world fundamentally changes and build capital in our social value to our children and our neighbours so we are people others what to be around when we aren’t as physically capable.

If we had money on top of this to invest, I feel like we’d be playing a spicy amalgamation of Monopoly and Risk. Would be super fun as long as you aren’t invested in the outcome :grimacing:

Hopefully the inflation number remains largely irrelevant to us :saluting_face: See you on the other side!

8 Likes

Inflationary times can be looked at as a period to honestly value the things we actually own. We must realize that an owned asset is worth more every day when inflation rises. Real assets are and have always been the key to surviving inflation or hyper-inflationary times. This is looking more and more like a time when we need to consider protecting wealth and avoiding risk. I don’t think anyone can keep up the treadmill of 5-10% inflation; it’s impossible for very long. A crash is inevitable and it’s time to face that. Standard of living is going to drop but it doesn’t have to be catastrophic with a little planning.

2 Likes

If I were “them” and feeling particularly spiteful at Trump being elected, I would not see Americans as “the child caught in the middle of two parents going through divorce”, but rather as someone who betrayed someone who they should’ve loved above anyone else (narcissist parent) and seek to punish them too.

I think Mr. Kiker is right; they may try to go with a repeat of Hoover.
With all these seemingly insurmountable problems all coming due soon and the clear attempts at sabotaging the incoming administration, why not have saddle Trump with all of them to deal with and teach all his supporters a lesson? To cause maximum damage, why not force everyone into the markets by continuing to print before finally pulling the rug? There’s four years to do it, and the energy supply sabotage will take some time to unfold, why not wait a little. It’d even give a little bit of distance from the previous administration.
You’d be able to blame all those problems on Trump, bring in the prepared solutions (more surveillance to fight crime, CBDC to monitor and “distribute” wealth, etc.) and “have those deplorables voting Democratic for the next 200 years”, to paraphrase someone, possibly, allegedly.

If I were “them”. If I were a spiteful man.
With an infinite currency printer, by the time it burns out you could already own most things that currency could’ve bought (then seize what couldn’t be).

3 Likes

We buy meat from a local farm. In keeping with the inflation theme of today’s topic, I got this email yesterday, sent to all of their lamb customers:

I am emailing to update you on our cost/pound this year. We were anticipating a small increase in slaughter but to our surprise we have found the increase to be very significant. We have to up our price by $2/lb for custom and $3/lb for retail cuts. This means $10/lb hanging weight for your custom lamb. If we are unable to sell our lamb at these prices going forward, we will sadly have to stop raising sheep.

Our slaughter went from $130/lamb to $175/lamb. In our analysis of our meat and weight data, you will still be saving about $150 by buying your lamb custom. A [price] cut I am willing to take for the convenience this offers us, of cash flow and lots of meat I don’t have to store for a year.

Our average hanging weight is 59lbs, this means your custom lamb will cost somewhere around $590. Because our lambs are bigger (still 100%grass fed and certified organic on the hoof) there is a better meat to bone ratio, but this means your cost is likely much higher than you anticipated.

It is frustrating to have the cost and quality of slaughter completely out of our control. But the slaughterhouses in general find lamb to be an inefficient way to fill their time. They would much rather cut beef for the volume and money it brings in. Just to add to the frustration for the slaughterhouse, the rendering company that picks up all the offal does not want lamb offal. So they have to pay the rendering company to take the lamb waste, and it is costing us $30/lamb. (We asked to come get our own offal, but the owner will not allow us to do that.)

Sorry to ramble on about the cost, but we want you to understand the whole picture, and please feel free to ask any questions or let me know if you have any concerns about the cost of the lamb this year.

I am struck by the fact that this experienced farm couple were themselves surprised by how much their slaughter costs have risen, even expecting some increase.

And I found it interesting that the slaughterhouses are trying to discourage the smaller animal business in order to maximize earnings by filling up their teams’ time with the more profitable cows. It speaks to a squeeze facing that industry. Clearly their costs are ratcheting up, too, destroying the economics of butchering smaller animals.

This winter Willow and I have been talking about returning to our old practice of raising our own meat chickens this summer because this same farming couple quit the chicken business over a year ago - citing costs - and we have not been able to find another good grower willing to wholesale butchered chickens to us. It appears that the time/cost equation now requires organic, field-raised chicken growers to sell at full retail.

Notice that in her email, Hilary also hinted at the hit she and Ben feel from losing $150 per sheep they wholesale. There’s the evidence of an unspoken overall cost of living squeeze pinching my favorite young farming couple. They’ve now quit both pork and chicken, and lamb appears to be on the edge. Happily for them, they sell dairy products, reaping the value-add premium, including a high-quality butter that they sell only through an exclusive outlet in NYC. But that was an existing business they had to buy, and for which they built some expensive infrastructure 3 years ago. I’m sure they’re still paying for both. I expect the creamery is profitable, but I increasingly wonder and worry about their longer term business viability.

It will be interesting, maybe worrying, to see what happens to the price of the side of beef I have on order with them for next month delivery. In my opinion they have not been charging as much as they could and should - but I expect they know what their customer base can afford. Now they might not have a choice but to risk losing sales in order to stay in business. That’s a no-win scenario over the longer term.

I think this spring we’ll be investing in more automated equipment to increase our chicken processing. As I age I need to selectively decrease my hand labor. I’ll also need to invest in properly reclaiming a small field from the encroaching woods, and start building up the clayey soil to handle sustained chicken grazing. And maybe I’m just a year or two away from having to raise and butcher my own sheep if I don’t want to cut lamb from my diet.

9 Likes

This :arrow_up: is a hugely important consideration, especially for those who are homesteading or with otherwise high levels of self-sufficiency.

Inflation is more than just a financial concept. “Aging in place” has its own costs - the aging of the body and mind, the loss of productivity that comes with less activity. Aging often extracts a higher price physically and cognitively for that which we need/want to do. The body lets us know that we are not as strong & agile as before, the mind perhaps not as sharp for planning & problem solving. We might be willing, but the able is a tad slower to join the party…

Aging in place is a big consideration to incorporate into anyone’s long term resilience planning. As a former accessibility consultant, I have all kinds of statistics and facts that are eye-popping. This may be higher now, but a few years ago, the stats showed the average person in a 1st world western country will spend an average of 8 years of their life in some state if disability. This is a cumulative number. There are periods of disability that add up. It could be permanent or temporary, short term or long term. Disease or bodily failures, accidents or unplanned surgeries that take lots of recovery time… all things that can throw big wrenches into one’s way of living.

The point is, aging & disability are problems that need consideration in every resilience plan. When it comes time to getting things done, like getting a new field ready for foraging chickens, will the body say yes or no? If no, how will it get done? How much will it cost to get someone else to do it?

Aging is another, perhaps unorthodox, aspect of inflation to consider in planning.

10 Likes

like the mantra ‘there isn’t bad weather, just bad gear’. Having good gear/set up mitigates a host of eventualities. Aging in place has different design setup, and one’s physical maintenance takes more disciplined efforts. Like your old vehicle, care and maintenance, can extend its useful longevity/resilience (or so it seems).

3 Likes

TRUER STATS: see CPI graph at John Williams’ Shadow Government Statistics

2 Likes

Not sure how I missed this for so long but silver is above its 2011 highs in several countries (not necessarily above the 1980 Hunt brothers spike high…….yet).

Australia
Brazil
Canada
Czechia
India
Mexico
Norway
New Zealand
Pakistan
Russia
Sweden
South Africa

In Argentina in 2011 the price of silver per ounce was 165 Peso’s. Today it’s 31 600 Peso’s.
Now that’s inflation.

6 Likes
1 Like

Has the “smart money” cashed in the chips already?

I know Warren Buffett sold a lot of Apple stock, a discretionary, and has a large percentage of cash.

When I read “How inflation swindles the equity investor”, Buffett struck me as a brilliant person (I don’t assume intelligence just from multimillionare and upwards status) but I also remember him saying that stocks will be higher in 100 years and they will go up forever. Even he struggles with exponentials and economy as an energy system powered by finite fossil fuels…

3 Likes

Consider building community as one option for reducing labor in processing. By doing this instead of shouldering the price alone for more automated equipment you may be able to purchase equipment in a share or rent it instead of the exorbitant costs of owning equipment which may be used at most a few days each year.

Backstory: Several years ago I volunteered to help a woman and her husband process guinea fowl. At the time I was still a city girl trying to learn basic ‘homesteading skills’ and she was instructing small classes. We processed 80 guinea fowl in one day. The reward for my efforts was 6 fully processed guinea fowl to take home and put in my freezer. I was offered more but being it just myself the half-dozen was more than plenty. She had gone in with least one other ‘homesteader’ on the purchase of the Featherman brand de-feathering barrel/spinner. There were 5 of us total doing the killing/cleaning/bagging. The Featherman de-feathering barrel did its job faster than we could keep up.

1 Like

Welcome!

Inflation: What’s Your Number?

Lamb purchased from my farmer is up 14% US shekels in 2024.

1 Like