Into Darkness: Where The Fed Is Leading Us

As you may know, I was one of the very first voices publicly reporting on Covid-19, issuing an alert that the virus was a significant pandemic event on Jan 23rd, 2020.

This was long before most media outlets even managed to write their first “It’s just the flu, bro!” article.

Using the same logic and scientific methodology I was trained in as a PhD, I was able to “predict” things well in advance of nearly every official or mainstream news source.

I’m using quotation marks around the word “predict” because it’s not really a prediction when you’re just extrapolating trends that are already underway.

Just as it’s not really a “prediction” to estimate where a thrown pitch will travel, it wasn’t much of a prediction to state that a novel virus with an R-Naught (R0) of well over 3 would be extremely difficult to contain once it arrived in a country. Note that I didn’t say impossible – South Korea, Australia, New Zealand, Thailand, Taiwan and Vietnam all get high marks for containment – but certainly difficult.

The US and the UK proved this in spades, as they’re both led by below-average ‘managers’ rather than leaders.

Leaders make tough decisions based on imperfect information. Managers dither and hedge and only make up their minds after the facts are already in and events well underway. Naturally, the US/UK managers were simply no match for the exponential rate that the Honey Badger Virus (aka Covid-19) spreads at.

I call it the Honey Badger virus because of its incredible ability to evade quarantine, as eagerly and easily as Stoffle, as seen in this short enjoyable video:

Such a determined foe as Covid-19 cannot be reasoned with, halted by decree or – much to the puzzlement of the central banks – resolved by printing more thin-air money.

It simply operates by natural laws and rules. Which, by the way, makes it rather easy to predict.

Much more difficult to predict, though, is when we humans will truly wake up to our true plight and begin making better decisions. And I’m not just talking about the coronavirus here. I’m talking about the dangerous levels of social inequity that the Federal Reserve is responsible for creating, both pre- and post-covid-19.

Given the enormous difficulty in getting whole swaths of the managerial and retail classes to grasp such simple and obvious logic as “Everyone should wear a mask!”, it seems thoroughly unrealistic to expect these same folks to thoughtfully tackle the hazards of runaway monetary and fiscal policy.

But they really need to.


Because the current monetary and fiscal trajectory society is on has been well-trod throughout history. We know where it ends – no place we want to be.

Commerce gets destroyed. Households fail. Government and social order fall apart. Fairness and freedoms are lost as it becomes difficult to distinguish between official policies and overt looting.

Real leaders know this history and would both think and act differently in order to avoid the worst risks. But managers? They just keep operating from the same manual, mindlessly repeating the same steps while hoping for a different result.

The Fed’s Dangerous Gamble

I've referred to the Federal Reserve as a bunch of psychopaths engaging in cultural vandalism. This is unfair to both psychopaths and vandals.

After all, the most ambitious of them don’t victimize more than several dozen in their lifetime. Maybe a few hundred, tops.

But the Fed? It’s ruining hundreds of millions of lives and livelihoods – both today and in the future.

Sadly, the Federal Reserve has been doing this – unchecked – for a very long time. Here’s a snippet I wrote for 6 years ago. Every word remains as true today as it was then:

The academic name for the Fed’s current policy is financial repression. But a more apt name would be “Throw granny under the bus,” because the program boils down to taking from savers and fixed-income recipients and transferring that purchasing power to other entities.

The cornerstone element of financial repression is negative real interest rates, of which the Federal Reserve is the prime architect and owner.

From the start of the Fed’s post-crisis intervention through 2013, the total cost of these negative real interest rates was over $750 billion just to savers alone. The loss of income to fixed-income investments (such as bonds held in pensions and money markets) was even larger.

But here’s the rub. That loss of income and purchasing power didn’t just vanish. It was transferred from pocket A to pocket B.

It magically appeared again in record Wall Street banking bonuses, in shrinking government deficits (due to lower than normal interest rates), in rising corporate profits (mainly benefiting the already rich), in record stock buybacks (ditto), and in rising wealth inequality.

More directly, when the Fed buys financial assets with printed money and — by definition — drives up the price of those assets, it cannot then act mystified why the main owners of financial assets have grown wealthier. Doing so simply insults our intelligence.

(Source – MarketWatch)

Federal Reserve Chair Alan Greenspan, then Ben Bernanke, then Janet Yellen, and now Jay Powell have all operated as mere managers (not leaders) choosing predictably safe plays from the Federal Reserve cookbook. It prescribes a gruel-thin routine of actions the main ingredient of which is printing currency out of thin air.

Each Fed Chairman has dutifully cooked up unhealthy dishes seasoned with hefty amounts of social corrosion, structural unfairness, elitism, and without even a whiff of historical context.

With no leadership on display and cheered on by a compliant press unable to formulate a single critical question, the Fed is now too deep into its cookbook to do anything besides see the process out to its inevitable conclusion.

The Fed has long pretended to be mystified by the rising inequality its policies are obviously causing. Jerome Powell recently and (in)famously declared during Q&A after a speech that the Fed “absolutely does not” contribute to inequality. That bold-faced lie is infuriating to those who realize just how socially and culturally unfair and damaging the Fed’s actions really are.

When things become too unfair, people stop participating. If laws are too one-sided and rigged, people stop following them. If new hires receive a higher salary for equivalent work, the veteran employees stop working as hard. If students know that their classmates are cheating and getting good grades, they’ll begin to cheat, too.

It’s just how we’re wired. An aversion to unfairness is in our social DNA.

Peak Prosperity readers know I’m a huge fan of this short video. It explains everything about the rising tide of social rebellion in America (and features cute monkeys, to boot!):

By unfairly accelerating the wealth gap between the top 1% and everyone else, the Fed is playing with fire. Seemingly with the same level of ignorance to the consequences as a chimpanzee with a magnifying glass on a tinder-dry savanna.

Money is our social contract.

When that contract is broken, that’s when things really go south for a nation. Zimbabwe, the Wiemar Republic, Venezuela and Argentina are all past (and some current again, sadly) examples of just how badly the standard of living can plummet when a nation’s money system breaks down.

The Inevitable

I cannot predict when all this breaks down as easily as I can predict that it will break down. A balance must always be maintained between money, which is a claim on things, and the things themselves. Too many claims and we get inflation. Too few and we get deflation.

The Fed and the other world central banks have always (always!) erred on the side of “too many claims” in this story. When in doubt, they print more currency.

And that process is now on hyperdrive. The post-Covid economy is in a very bad state, and so the money printing at the heart of the “rescue” efforts by the central banks is the biggest ever in history. By a long shot.

So claims go up and up and up, while the economy shrinks. Leaving us with a LOT more money chasing a LOT less “stuff”.

This also applies to financial assets, like stocks and bonds. Printing makes the markets go higher in price and makes investors increasingly dependent on more money printing to support these prices. Eventually, like the era we’re in now, the Fed must keep injecting liquidity on a permanent basis or else the markets will immediately crash.

So, the money printing just keeps happening.

And as a side benefit, those closest to the Fed get stupendously rich from all that fresh money flooding into the world. These are the same Wall Street firms who hire Fed staffers at the end of their tenure there, thanking them with plush jobs that have little responsibility and huge salary.

But, out in real America, there are hundreds of millions of us angry monkeys watching the Fed stuff grapes into the already full bellies of the elites. Eventually wide-scale pushback against the Fed’s injustice will erupt. Protests will increase in size and become more violent. The police will realize that they’re protecting the wrong people and switch sides. Then things will get really messy.

My strong preference in life is to avoid unnecessary pain and suffering. Why wait for the Fed to ruin everything for us? I’d prefer we get pro-active here to avoid a full-blown crisis. If don’t we’ll be forced to repeat history, whether we want to or not.

Sadly, repeating history and preserving the status quo is exactly what the national managers in the US are intent on doing. Most of the public still thinks of the Fed as the hero in this story instead of the villain it truly is, and so too much of the populace cheers the Fed along. The EU and the UK are more or less in the same boat.

All of which means that, just as I warned people to prepare for the Covid-19 pandemic before it hit with full force, you need to prepare now for the coming Fed-created economic/social crisis.

In Part 2: Into The Light: 8 Steps For Surviving What’s Coming, in attempt to be as informative as possible, I share a tremendous volume of the critical data points I’m currently closely monitoring to determine where we are on the timeline to crisis and what’s most likely to happen next. I then provide my eight recommended steps for protecting your wealth, loved ones, and property through the challenges to come.

Click here to read Part 2 of this report (free executive summary, enrollment required for full access).

This is a companion discussion topic for the original entry at

I’m eager to read more on this from Chris but I get an error page when using the link.
Thanks for all your hard work on behalf of others, Chris and Adam!

Argh – broken link is fixed now.

Many thanks for flagging!



I just saw this article called Coronavirus caught us off guard. Here’s what disaster preppers say we needed to do all along .

But a variety of people who prioritize preparedness say that most people can and should have supplies and plans to get them through several days. It’s doable without entertaining conspiracy theories or spending a fortune on special tools and supplies.
I hope people read this and begin to create some resilience for themselves while there is still some time.
But here’s the rub. That loss of income and purchasing power didn’t just vanish. It was transferred from pocket A to pocket B.
The obvious solution is not to shake one's fist at the rain. Rather, it's to invest in stocks and tag along.
...the Fed must keep injecting liquidity on a permanent basis or else the markets will immediately crash. So...printing just keeps happening.
This means that it will become harder and harder for the Fed to stop pimping stocks. And since jobs will at least theoretically hit if stock prices go down, the Fed feels morally justified in pimping stocks...forever. The only question: how long can it go on before either collapse or political unrest? It's lasted 13 years so far. With UBI, I think we have decades to go. If we run short of oil, as US has the largest proven coal reserves, plus a fair amount of recoverable uranium. Barring political unrest, I'm betting we can keep this crony capitalism going for a long time. 20 years more? 50 years? I think the greatest risk to the game is serious political unrest due to our unchecked immigration policy. But again, this again feeds the stock market in the next decade: Will it really be possible during political unrest to stop flooding the economy with cash? I sure don't think so. Fear is infectious, and raw fear will eventually reach our overlords in the gated communities.

Cheri –
No, you’re not being singled out.
Our anti-spam software will often rate limit accounts that post several comments within a short period of time, as that’s typically what bots do.
Rate limiting simply prevents your account from commenting for a short period of time. So if it happens to you, just wait 15 minutes and try posting again.
We understand this can be frustrating when it occurs, but it doesn’t happen that much to real people. And without this defense in place, the site gets quickly overwhelmed by spambots, usually within just a few minutes. So it’s the best option we have at the current time.

Interruptions in supply chain spread

Having read “The Creature from Jekyll Island” and knowing you have as well, I find it surprising that you are still “shaking your fist at the rain” as MKI says. The fed has been in operation for over 100 years. It was formed by private bankers to benefit private bankers. It really is untethered from the government. It answers to no one and its constituency is the banks.
My questions are;
What is the point of these articles? What is the proposed solution? Well that is probably in pt 2 Since most people are completely unaware of what the fed does where is your premise that “out in America hundreds of millions of Americans are watching the fed stuff grapes into the mouths of fat monkeys” coming from?
Why not promote competing currencies such as cryptos?
I tend to agree with MKI. It is far better to figure out what the market is than to create a market. I agree with you that there is a lot of discontent but it is hardly directed at the fed. People are in the streets protesting racial injustice not fed money printing. There is also a big difference between the US and Zimbabwe and the Weimar. They were not the worlds reserve currency. The US has the ability to ship inflation all over the world. Doom was predicted here and elsewhere in 08. It didn’t happen. Stocks went on the biggest runup in history while gold fell from a high of over $1900 to less than $1100 where it languished for years.
So my final question is what is the point why spend energy on something we can’t do anything about?

When Money Dies "The overall economy takes a hit immediately after a hurricane, but in the two years that follow, these disasters are a major stimulus. All the cleanup and rebuilding, all the recovery spending and one-time consumption, is a boon for the economy. If we worried about the national economy and didn’t care about what it meant for cities, local businesses, or families, we’d just pick a few random cities to destroy each year and reap the economic benefits of rebuilding. If we worried about our local economies, we’d obsess about real wealth creation, not growth."

Is the real problem that we are out of cheap energy? The only thing keeping the system propped up is debt. Our ability to borrow from the future so we can extract expensive energy today. Once the debt bubble pops there is no going back because we can not afford to extract expensive energy without borrowing.
So even though the rich are getting richer, people are not starving (yet).

Awareness serves a much bigger purpose than ine might think. It is the first step. Individual maturity and clear vision with knowledge is the way forward. The old system will then tumble by its own weight and yes, we have to be prepared.

Darkness, Darkness indeed. Well, seeing as how Charlie Daniels died yesterday, and he played the haunting intro for the Youngbloods best song, I thought I’d post, for your reflection…Aloha, Steve