Lanci: “The Silver Short Squeeze Hasn’t Even Begun”

Originally published at: https://peakprosperity.com/lanci-the-silver-short-squeeze-hasnt-even-begun/

In this bonus Finance U podcast, I speak with Vince Lanci, veteran silver trader and all-around precious metals expert.

Shockingly, he claims that silver’s meteoric doubling in price during 2025 isn’t actually a short squeeze. That’s coming, and you’ll know it because of the fat green price candles you’ll see during a very short number of days or even hours.

Vice helped me understand how such a colossal short interest in silver developed over the decades (the largest by far of any commodity when compared to yearly mine output), and why that regime is ending.

He agreed with my long-running assessment that the midnight price slams were not consistent with legitimate price discovery or portfolio management, but were instead designed to create lower prices. In other words, not price discovery but price manipulation.

But those slams have been working less and less well over the past few months. Welcome to the future; it’s a new world.

And this is against a backdrop of De-Dollarization by the BRICS, who have now fielded a non-dollar payment settlement system using something called the “unit” as the currency and using the blockchain-based M-Bridge piping to move it around. Of particular note, the Unit is backed 40% with gold, marking the first official remonetization of gold for cross-border settlement since, well, August 15th 1971.

Vince doesn’t like giving price targets, but if recently reported portfolio allocation suggestions to gold come to pass (e.g., Morgan Stanley’s 20% recommendation), he could see gold reaching $6,500–$12,000. Along similar lines, silver may hit $144–$244 long-term as a critical mineral, with structural shortfalls continuing to drive prices.

Most importantly, Vince does not think that silver will be made illegal for US citizens to own. But the government may well have to try and shake some silver loose from investors’ hands.

Vince’s policy recommendation for that would be to remove capital gains taxes on silver (and gold, too, hey, why not?), which could potentially free up 600 million ounces domestically. Given that long-term cap gains taxes on silver are at about 32% all-in, that would be like an immediate 32% increase in the price of silver, from an investor’s after-tax standpoint. You know what? That could work. For a while…

But what do we do with the idea that structurally silver is what appears to be a sustained supply deficit relative even to industrial demand alone?

Tune in to hear it all.


FINANCIAL DISCLAIMER. PEAK PROSPERITY, LLC, AND PEAK FINANCIAL INVESTING ARE NOT ENGAGED IN RENDERING LEGAL, TAX, OR FINANCIAL ADVICE OR SERVICES VIA THIS WEBSITE. NEITHER PEAK PROSPERITY, LLC NOR PEAK FINANCIAL INVESTING ARE FINANCIAL PLANNERS, BROKERS, OR TAX ADVISORS. Their websites are intended only to assist you in your financial education. Your personal financial situation is unique, and any information and advice obtained through this website may not be appropriate for your situation. Accordingly, before making any final decisions or implementing any financial strategy, you should consider obtaining additional information and advice from your accountant or other financial advisers who are fully aware of your individual circumstances.

11 Likes

I just thought this was interesting
(Luke Gromen mentioned him in his interview)
.
.



6 Likes

I wonder, what happened to all his wealth? Did his kids squander it? Lost to lawyers in probate proceedings?
I forget that Grok knows everything:
Jacob Fugger (also known as Jakob Fugger the Rich, 1459–1525) was a German merchant, banker, and mining entrepreneur often regarded as one of the wealthiest individuals in history, with his fortune estimated at around 2% of Europe’s GDP at the time (equivalent to hundreds of billions in modern terms).

He died childless on December 30, 1525, and bequeathed his vast company assets—totaling over 2 million guilders—to his nephews, primarily Anton Fugger (who became the main successor) and Raymund Fugger. Anton expanded the fortune significantly, peaking it at over 7 million guilders by the mid-16th century through continued banking, mining (especially in Tyrol and Hungary), and loans to the Habsburg emperors.

The family’s wealth began to decline in the late 16th century due to:

  • Heavy exposure to loans for Habsburg wars.
  • Multiple Spanish state bankruptcies (1557, 1575, 1596, 1607), which wiped out large debts owed to the Fuggers.
  • Shifting economic conditions.
  • Later generations showing less interest in commerce.

By the mid-17th century (around 1658), the Fugger trading and banking firm was dissolved after returning mining leases and settling debts. The family pivoted to a landed aristocratic lifestyle, focusing on estates purchased earlier (e.g., Babenhausen, Kirchheim, Glött).

A portion of the original wealth was preserved through these land holdings and philanthropic foundations. The Fugger family transitioned from merchant-bankers to nobility, with branches elevated to counts and princes in the Holy Roman Empire.

Today, aristocratic branches of the Fugger family still exist (e.g., Fugger-Babenhausen, Fugger von Glött, Fugger-Kirchberg), owning castles, estates, and managing historic foundations. Their most famous enduring legacy is the Fuggerei in Augsburg—the world’s oldest social housing complex, founded by Jacob in 1521—which continues to provide low-rent housing (symbolically 1 guilder/~€0.88 per year) to needy Catholic residents, funded by family trusts.

In summary, Jacob’s immense personal fortune passed to his nephews and fueled the family’s peak, but risky lending and changing times eroded most of the liquid wealth over generations. What survived was transformed into noble estates and charitable endowments that persist to this day.
Interesting.

9 Likes

That was a meaty podcast. Absolutely worth the listen, so much ground covered.

I would love to hear more from Vince as the quickening quickens to the point that it quits.

I’m left wondering where the heck Australia sits in this new world when we export produce, education and natural resources to china, but send all our money to America via military and banking systems (inclusive of insurance and superannuation/401K accounts).. it’s like we are the money launder/go between of the two big guys?!

Are we good enough to play both sides or are we just getting blown about in whichever way the prevailing winds go?

I’ll hedge my bet toward being consumed from both ends to eat the losses twice.

Only good thing is Precious Metals are mildly popular here in part due to our historical links to prosepeting gold, asian whale tourism for our casinos and among those disenfranchised after convid.. so we have a few nice looking bullion shops in all major cities.

I recently showed my MIL the relative value between 100g of gold to 5kg in Silver. We talked about the value of Golds mobility, Silvers industrial shortfall and what inflation actually means to her savings account. Very fruitful conversation, one that PP helped me in understanding in more depth to the point of educating my boomer family members.

It feels good to be at a point where I can share PM information, come knowledge, with others. But im still a long way off understanding our (Australias) geo-political role in the NWO.

4 Likes

Vince was a terrific guest. I appreciated his take on what the right play is for the US Government. Meaning, don’t outlaw or confiscate gold, but remove all capital gains taxes for one-year. This would have the effect of flooding the market with gold and silver. So, rather than have the metals leave the US for China and India, the metals would stay stateside with this tax holiday.

Which is precisely why this won’t happen. Whenever “they” have a choice between two options, one which benefits either the people or the nation, they 100% of the time choose the option that hurts us the most. That’s just how they roll.

15 Likes

Very interesting, he said one thing that just stuck in my mind, fiat currencies were designed to be devalued!!!

7 Likes

Vince is such a fountain of information and real world experience. Anyone on youtube can write “Silver to $500!!! She’s about to blow!”, but Vince is one of the few who can quickly level-set near and short term expectations using evidence rather than hyperbole.

Not that I don’t also enjoy the people who says silver will be higher than gold when this is all over. Those people seem nice too.

But give Vince the “active listen” he deserves and you’ll probably do a lot better in the long run

6 Likes

I always struggle with math, so take this with a grain of salt. Lanci said the .gov might try to coax silver into the market by offering to suspend capital gains taxes on the sale of silver for one year. After that the taxes come back. It depends on what happens when, but look at this hypothetical.

Let’s say in April 2026 silver is $70 and a capital gains holiday is announced for one year. Do you sell and ring the register? Well assuming the tax would’ve been 28% of $50 (because you bought the silver at $20) you’d save $14 in unpaid capital gains taxes. You netted$56. But let’s say you wait 18 months when silver is $220/oz. You pay 28% tax on $200 ($56) and take home $144. It all depends!

12 Likes

I would not sell unless / until there are assets that are exceptionally undervalued. Like land and real estate if there is a big correction in real estate prices.

10 Likes

That may be a low estimate given that silver is at 64.60 at this moment!

6 Likes

Ok, January 2026. But I meant well! :grin::innocent:

7 Likes

What a great way to move money - hire a Fugger branch to take your donation, skim some for themselves, and off it goes to do social work and maybe hire some other incidental firms for professional services and the like.

2 Likes

I really don’t expect TPTB will let this run without a fight. Someone will have to eat some huge losses. Todays runup might be because of the December delivery day which I think Dave said was the 10th or 11th.
The big question for a future date will be when to sell!

2 Likes

Or rotate into more compact gold, or real estate, or stocks.

3 Likes

YES!! The last thing I would want to trade it in for is more worthless fiat. I almost purchased a scissor lift at auction yesterday. I bailed at the last minute due to unknown battery life but I usually keep an eye out for things that will help an old codger maintain stuff!

8 Likes



5 Likes

I think Vince has too much faith in govt. doing the right “correct” thing.

2 Likes

Selling PMs for fiat? Highly unlikely here unless Dinki Di is on sale and I’m starving.
Some good memes today over at WSS. Of course one was The Beatles “When I’m Sixty Four”.

6 Likes

Given governments can finance SOME of their budget by money printing, theres no reason they cant finance ALL of it that way, thus taxes are un-necessary. They retain them only to give them leverage over our behaviour (tax ciggies, tax alcohol, deductions for green schemes etc).

I think the ‘no CGT to lure the silver out’ idea has merit and the ‘but but but the lost revenue’ argument is irrelevant due to the above.

What I WOULD NOT DO is be lured into ‘disclosing’ my PM holdings on the promise of concessional future CGT treatment on its sale (as Italy is considering) - thats just asking for a knock at the door after the rules change in the next ‘emergency’.

6 Likes

1913 saw both the creation of the Fed and of a federal income tax. No coincidence. The tax is legally required to be paid in dollars (as I understand it; I’m not a lawyer) which provides a large foundation for demand of fiat dollars. It forces people to get dollars so they can pay taxes.

I think that’s half the reason for the tax. The other is social engineering/ manipulation through a complex tax code with all of its incentives.

4 Likes