Whoa!! False Flag in London?
Alex Krainer interview is either tin foil wrapped black helicopter wack-a-doodle or has a bag of truth in it. Enjoy:
Whoa!! False Flag in London?
Alex Krainer interview is either tin foil wrapped black helicopter wack-a-doodle or has a bag of truth in it. Enjoy:
With the Health Care rather than Sick Care paradigm + an aging population, there needs to be a good deal of resources put into preventative medicine, Iâd say
Typical of posts by me, of late, but I think we need to embrace and encourage all the wins we get from the Trump administration, while holding in our minds the possibility that these are just crumbs/bait to draw us in to Unipartyâs plan.
The Geopolitics and Empire guy (sorry, mate! I can never remember your name!) talks a lot about âtechnocracyâ and his Christianity (personally, I donât believe in God, but I can see that different religions have a good deal of useful wisdom and philosophies, and that religious people often [but by no means always!] have admirable moral traits). I found one of his guests â Alex Kriel â particularly convincing in a lot of what he said about the plans and ways, means and machinations of the controlling elites. For me, his explanations seemed to fill a lot of the holes in my imagined model of the controlling eliteâs plans, ways of asserting their will and motivations. In the middle he talks about the Trump âTrojan horseâ (actually, I think that term was the hostâs summing up of what Kriel says on this, btw).
I highly recommend the video:
Good suggestion.
Remarks by Putin yesterday on the subject were quite interesting.
Yeah, thatâs not a âdummyâ anything.
A kg of TNT has about 4.2 MJ to release. The same kg of anything at Mach 10 has 5.9 MJ kinetic energy. The individual sub-munitions are probably about 100 kg each. So like a 250-pound bomb, denotating in the lowest basement of whatever it strikes.
Agree the breadth of the Covid deception is breathtaking as are all the various related tenacles that have been exposed like the defamation and stripping of medical licenses for truth-telling doctors who took Hippocratic Oath seriously, de-banking, censorship industrial complex, corruption and coverups of governmental and NGOs scheming, e.g., on migrants and child trafficking â none of which are we allowed to talk about. I believe underneath this all is evil.
I agree with Chris and others that this needs to be exposed and rooted out completely, lest it return, and in an open and transparent way for all to see. Like Nuremberg? Watergate?
Zec 7:9-10 (NIV) âThis is what the LORD Almighty said: âAdminister true justice; show mercy and compassion to one another. Do not oppress the widow or the fatherless, the foreigner or the poor. Do not plot evil against each other.â
Something that occurred to me.
If aliens are real, and if âtheyâ (the evil humans - not aliens) have re-engineered crashed alien spacecraft, and thus âtheyâ have some âinterestingâ tech that âtheyâ dare not let out (because it would give us little people too much agency - which would be the death of their dreams) âŠ
What kind of âspace weaponsâ might be operational?
Perhaps these weapons make nukes look like playthings. âRods from Godâ are the smallest thing I can imagine. Putin just kinda deployed one of them. And allegedly, âthe USâ has nothing like it.
Another simple weapon: powering up and steering an asteroid.
Incredibly destructive. No radioactivity. Therefore - no âbad PRâ for using the weapon. âIt wasnât a nuke!â
And if we assume the âstupid neoconsâ know about these weapons, and so does Putin , perhaps they are indirectly acknowledging that thereâs a lot more âoff board artilleryâ than we are aware of, and nukes really are just the pawns in this new game - so thatâs why they arenât worried.
Either that or the neocons are vaxxed-and-8x-boosted and theyâve seen a 50-point IQ drop. Or maybe both.
Itâs also worth listening to the SNP podcast with Alex and Tom Luongo.
TLDH: ALL of the CCTV cameras in London have been deactivated since Sept 3rd, possible false flag explosives being planted to pull off a 911 type event to be blamed on Russia, with media scripts now being written. Tom seeing clues to a Christmas coup is now being planned to remove Biden and install Harris. And for what itâs worth, my son whoâs an extremely gifted remote viewer has seen future imagery of a despairing Trump with his head in his hands on the first day of winter (Dec, 21st)
With one additional factor to consider. When a kg of TNT goes off, it goes off in all directions. If itâs shaped you can concentrate that somewhat.
With something traveling at Mach 10 all of the energy is traveling along a single vector, so itâs highly concentrated.
As it disintegrates along that path, it energizes other mass along that same trajectory spreading out in a conical shape, Iâd imagine.
My point is, 250 kg placed upon the earth and exploded will have vastly less influence on the stuff beneath it because it will mostly take the path of least resistance, which is upwards.
This is why sea mines blow a column of water nearly straight into the airâŠthe path of least resistance is to the air straight above it.
Conversely, the kinetic weapon is specifically transferring its energy to whatever it strikes.
I havenât got much more of a sense of it than that at present, so I couldnât guess as to the âeffective TNT equivalentâ that kg of whatever is traveling at Mach 10 might represent to the things located beneath it.
Ah, sounds like new variation of ~1913 Christmas day when new taxation was introduced.
Ive seen various other remote viewing scenes said in similar vain projecting economic crash and that scene of Trump. Although timing was in january. Remains to be seen who is best in this skill.
How I understood modern tank killer ammunition animations and explanations, they work like that⊠molten metal that speeds through metal and explodes in a cavity. Bunker buster is pretty close just different mediator substances and bunker is the cavity (void space) with valuable things to destroy. As Ive seen what very high velocity things in space can do (10km/s + speeds ) penetration ability is tremendous⊠well similar vein as bullet tests happen in videos. Destructive power is more taking oxygen(chemical reaction) and creating void in that space than conventional ways. That makes it so devastating once it reaches destination.
Interesting although not surprised by what Marc Andreessen said. Nothing was done since the Snowden mass surveillance revelations more than 10 years ago. The use of AI to control us was to be expected. The writing is on the wall. Western governments are becoming more authoritarian and Iâm not talking about the ârightâ.
I facepalm every time someone suggests the real problem with AI is that it may become conscious.
I have to say, I remember reading something Andreessen said or twitted recently that was incredibly stupid -canât remember what- but what he said on Rogan seems credible.
Well holy crap, I found that guy on Linkedin!
Maybe itâs my age.
Maybe itâs the new âwokeâ rebrand.
Maybe itâs the fact it has Daily Mail readers and GB News viewers frothing at the mouth.
Maybe itâs that Andrew Tate has confirmed he will ânever own a Jag.â
But for the first time in my life, Iâd consider buying a JaGUar .
I worked in a major corporation which copied General Electric and implemented a policy like this. For a few years, it was worthwhile. All the rats ran a little faster on the treadmill and managers had to be honest about who they rated very high or very low. Eventually it poisoned the culture: Only the âvery highâ employees were happy and everyone else thought they should be rated higher. No one wanted to help anyone if they couldnât get credit and collaboration disappeared. Why do whatâs best for the company if you will lose your job? The policy lasted about 10 years.
Well, thereâs yet another easy way to identify them in addition to shaved green hair, blue heart tatoo on hand, blue wrist band, mask wearer in Walmart, and a No Sex With Men t-shirt.
We owe Mr. Vasco a debt of gratitude.
That reminds me of high school. If you couldnât naturally excel academically, you got ahead by being attractive or charismatic. Those who actually had to work to be more than a disappointment at any of these qualities were never as good as the suck ups and naturals. They were condemned to the anonymity of the mediocre; now weâre desperate for anyone who learned how to work. (But weâll still refer to them as ânon-essentialâ.)
What does the PP tribe think about this vid
It is about NC and the So called FEMA camps and the Ukraine and land grab. I am really perplexed by the homes are sound proof.
He has some good information and interesting ideas, but â like a lot of non-mainstream pundits out there â he seems to want to contort the whole Trump thing to make out that Trump is some great 3D chess-playing saviour whoâs fighting the globalists and is hated by them, especially because he keeps outwitting them.
I donât follow Trump avidly like some do, but I havenât seen an instance where he talks off the cuff â unaided by teleprompters or other guides to tell him what to say (even Biden was sometimes able to pull that off! ) â and shows that he has a nuanced grasp of specifics of whatâs going on (all he seems to be able to do is talk about things very generally, and to preen in his narcissistic way and say how wonderfully things will run/are running under him). Iâve never seen him talk off the cuff like Putin. So Iâm not convinced heâs running the show.
If the controlling powers have such broad-spectrum leverage over the media (which they seem to have) and were trying to stop Trump in his tracks, they would have simply made him disappear from the media and censor him on all the major online/social media platforms. They did this with Tulsi when she was running for president. My brother (who lives in the States and tends to support the Democrats) hadnât even heard of Tulsi, so there was no danger that any significant number of people like him were gonna vote for her. [Yes, sheâs been nominated to be in the government now, but this could confirm my theory that people like her are now bait to reel in non-mainstream people like âusâ to the Trump Deep State Uniparty Bandwagon.]
Instead the media âwent afterâ him, splashing him across front pages everywhere (Iâve argued before that Trump didnât have to know that there was gonna be an attempt on his life, and that I guess those that did it were ready to use the event whether he was killed or not).
All publicity is good publicity.
[P.S. I still have an open mind on this, but so far no-one has convinced me]
I still hold the belief that in 2016 the mainstream media picked Trump to be the GOP nominee figuring he would be the easiest for Hillary to beat. So they hyped him up and then figured theyâd be able to take him out with some of the less than flattering footage they already had.
Well, it looks like the BBC are already doing this again with Tulsi (maybe they know âthe planâ that Tulsiâs not gonna get in, and donât want to draw peopleâs attention to her too much, lest peopleâs curiosity is piqued and they dig too deep and start finding interesting nuggets that start contradicting the narrative). They have to contort themselves to avoid mentioning Tulsi Gabbardâs name at all in the title (itâs too difficult to avoid it in the actual article), but still manage to squeeze in 2 swipes at her to smear her while maintaining the narrative (Syria, Russia bad). Hereâs the title:
âTrumpâs top spy pick faces fresh scrutiny over Syria visit and Russia commentsâ
Letâs see if Tulsi does actually get in. I kind of doubt it, I must say.