The election just proved that X (Twitter) is the signal, however with free speech comes the challenge of doing the work to find out what is true and what is noise. Chris does the work for you in this weekly live stream talking about topics that are critical to our future.
Today, we salute you Mister Jaguar Company Destroyer Guy
“Mister Jaguar company destroyer guy!”
You can screw up a cool car ad so much, we throw up in our mouths
“Pukin’ up some lunch now”
No one induces a "What the f**k was that? like an ad that has nothing to do with cars
“Why’s that dude in a DRESSSS!!!”
So crack open an ice cold Bud Lite you Jag destroying jackass because nothing says “Huh?” like one of your senseless ads that kill car sales faster than a drag queen’s sledge hammer.
In addition to the scientists perpetuating the official narrative, this NEVER could have been accomplished without the media being dedicated to the deception with equal commitment.
The breadth of the Covid deception is breathtaking.
And “The Blobs” censorship industrial complex.
The ownership classes of the banking houses.
A very broad range of individual are guilty of crimes against humanity.
Chris that 10% Cull of employees is very open to abuse when the criteria is set incorrectly. i.e. production numbers, Tom makes 700 widgets a month, while Bill makes 600. Only problem is Tom’s are defective rubbish.
Hey Chris,
I love the thinking of: Can we get out of this financial mess without crashing the system, with more productive leadership in place? I honestly don’t think that is likely, but at the same time, I can’t think of a more worthwhile thought experiment, creating a potential roadmap, if you will. However, another important subject is mapping out loosely what it may look like if the financial system does come down in a controlled or unintended consequences uncontrolled fashion, with the goal to help guide folks out of harms way… Thoughts? Thank you for your objective insights, and your open source approach. So needed at this time… ~ Lara Bergstrom
May I offer a suggestion for terms to be used so we’re all on the same accurate page. Instead of “dummy bomb/weapon” let’s call it by the more accurate phrase “non-explosive kinetic weapon.” A “dummy weapon” is used for training purposes and could do no more damage than having it dropped on your foot by accident. A “non-explosive kinetic weapon” is a very serious weapon that gets its destructive power from exploiting the energy in its mass times its velocity (Mach 10+). Oreshnik is clearly a very serious weapon and not a dummy weapon used for training purposes.
Governments are too big and clumsy to pull off control and/or censorship at the individual level. I’m pretty sure there’s a group of select elites above the government that is doing the picking and choosing of who gets censored, cancelled, and de-banked. Let’s just call them the owners of the FED for now until we know more. Happy Thanksgiving!
No, not using the same logic that got us into the mess. Beginning to fix this will require some truly out of the box thinking, novel approaches, and willingness to sacrifice sacred cows – everything’s on the table, and some belt tightening.
Chris’ idea of competing currencies is crazy yet there’s something there.
So-called entitlements have to be open to reforms:
MediCare in an inefficient federal bureaucracy - savings opportunities – + some huge chunk must go to Big Pharma — more savings — Sick Care rather than true Health care – more savings.
Social security - must be some efficiencies, maybe some portion for some higher income/more wealth individuals transfer obligation from government to some higher risk higher reward options, new entrepreneurial bonds for new American economy. There must be some patriotic Americans willing to take a little less while promoting a new America AND perhaps sharing in some of the benefits. I would - as is, my Social Security going out next 20 years looks increasingly insecure. Rather than War Bonds - we have the New America Bonds. Unleash the creative free spirit!
Defense - how about a defense budget - for defense, not offense, not regime change, not around the world empire. Budget - Transparent - no off the books, no missing money.
Turn Elon and Vivek loose. As a person of average (or a bit over I hope) intelligence, even I can see how a genius like Elon and smart entrepreneur like Vivek can be bold and say yes to 2 trillion. Any guy that can catch a rocket with tweezers. I have 0 confidence in the “experts” and don’t trust anything they tell me.
Convince Chris that if he wants to be on Truth and Justice commission he needs to first help create new currencies.
I’m not sure how things work at the big banks (Chase, BoA, Citi, WF, and the like), but for smaller banks we don’t decide on our own to “de-bank” people, especially not people as a group. We may “de-risk” on an individual basis, but when it comes to groups it’s usually federal regulations, or else fear of federal regulations (for example; marijuana related businesses, or MRBs, have been in a gray zone for a long time, and while they are technically illegal federally no banks have yet been prosecuted for banking them, so the choice on whether to bank MRBs depends on a particular bank’s risk appetite).
The “hard” de-banking described was probably be done through the various lists (OFAC SDN, OFAC Sanction, 314(a), DPL, and so on) generated by the various agencies/departments of the Treasury (FinCEN, OCC, FDIC, OFAC, etc.). In my limited experience, OFAC SDN & OFAC NON SDN are the two that could get your account frozen (other lists just get you quietly reported).
Failure to comply with the above lists gets the bank into huge trouble and would likely mean the end of most small and medium sized banks (for large “systemic” banks it seems to only be a slap on the wrist, however).
The FATF list is a weird one; I think they are an NGO and not something federal, but obviously there has to be regulatory pressure in regards to their list for the amount of trouble we put our customers through (in regards to the transactions to and from the countries on that list).
So from my limited experience, it’s mostly the federal government pulling the strings to make commercial banks act that way.
Now, payment processors on the other hand…