[quote=JAG][quote=ao]
Also, a key thing to remember is that virtually all pain (except that of psychogenic origin) is secondary to one of only two factors, chemical irritation or mechanical deformation. Pain of chemical origin is best treated chemically and pain of mechanical origin is best treated mechanically.
[/quote]
ao,
I’m afraid you lost me on this statement. The mechanism by which trigger points create referred pain is distinctly a chemical process, yet their treatment is best achieved by mechanical means. In fact, there is no drug or nutraceutical that has shown any effectiveness in the resolution of trigger points (at least not in a double-blind, placebo controlled study). Even the injection of trigger points with a local anesthesia must be classified as a mechanical treatment method, because trigger point injection with a saline solution works equally as well.
Perhaps by “mechanical pain” you were implying nerve compression, in which case removing the mechanical compression would be warranted, and probably best done by mechanical means. But I know of one case of nerve compression that was effectively addressed by chemical means. My father came to me with a complaint of sciatica-type pain. I knew from X-rays that I had taken of my father when I was in Chiropractic College in the late 80’s, that he had a spondylolisthesis, so I suspected that his symptoms were secondary to nerve trunk compression in his lumbar spine. I told him surgery would probably be needed at some point. My father, who was at the time being treated for lymphoma at M.D. Anderson Cancer Institute, mentioned his sciatica symptoms to one of his doctors there, who then referred him to another doctor in the M.D. Anderson ecosystem. This doctor suggested that my father try a treatment protocol involving the drug Neurontin, before committing to a surgical option. To my amazement, the neurotin actually worked for my father. It took about 6 weeks for all his symptoms to subside, but he has been off the drug for several years now and is still pain-free.
I realize that discussing alternative healthcare topics is a bit like discussing politics or economics, as many professionals in the field hold deep-seated beliefs about the efficacy of their particular approach, myself included. I think it’s important to remain open to other approaches, but to always have a foundation of good medical research to base your work on. To this end, no alternative treatment to pain has more medical research supporting it than Trigger Point Therapy, which is why I felt comfortable recommending it here.
Thanks to everyone for their comments on this thread…Jeff
[/quote]
Jeff,
Good points. That statement about chemical and mechanical pain comes from Barry Wyke, the eminent British neurologist. Sorry for my omission and not clarifying that certain problems can have pain of mixed origin (i.e. both chemical and mechanical) while with other problems, one form or the other dominates. Also, I excluded pain of psychogenic origin since I didn’t want to go there.
Let’s look at trigger points as defined by Travell. In general, some type of mechanical deformation will generate them (even though sometimes the mechanism could be neurological). Mechanical deformation is inclusive of but goes far beyond just nerve compression (if by nerve compression, you mean nerve root compression). It can involve any type of compressive, tensile, shear, or other force to virtually any tissue in the body.
Getting back to the chemical pain, if you recall from Travell’s Vol. 1 Chapter 4 on Perpetuating Factors, there are a whole range of nutritional deficiencies (i.e. a chemical problem), for example, which can act to perpetuate trigger points. You can spray and stretch or inject until the cows come home and the problems will tend to come back because the underlying nutritional deficiency has not been addressed. Mechanical deformation will obviously create some level of chemical irritation (the extent depending upon the extent and rate of mechanical deformation, among other factors) since pain is ultimately dependent upon nerve signalling which is an electrochemical process.
Neurontin can definitely be effective since it deals with a chemical component of pain. If there is nerve root compression, there is a mechanical problem to begin with but as the nerve root becomes inflamed and swollen and the patient becomes increasingly symptomatic, the symptoms will become increasingly of chemical origin. It’d be better to correct the spondylolisthesis (which can often be performed with ventral technique) or train in postural and movement strategies to minimize or alleviate spondylo sourced deformation AND also treat the chemical component of pain, but if the nerve root swelling subsides, the pain will generally subside and allow the patient to recover.
The point I was making was that if a patient has a mechanical problem like a derangement syndrome (let’s say a bulging disc or a meniscal displacement), the best approach is a mechanical approach to reduce the derangement rather than a chemical approach of prescribing NSAIDs, analgesics, or muscle relaxants to decrease inflammation, pain, or muscle spasm, respectively.
On the other hand, if a patient has a chemical problem such as an acute rheumatioid arthritic flare-up, the best approach is chemical such as medication and/or an appropriate diet to quiet down the inflammation.
A problem such as an adhesive capsulitis (i.e. frozen shoulder) will have mixed origins. The capsular restriction is definitely mechanical and requires mobilization (i.e. mechanical treatment). But the inflammation of the anterior inferior capsule is chemical and will benefit from anti-flammatory medication and normalizing estradiol levels (i.e. chemical treatment). That’s a gross oversimplification but you get the point.
Hope that makes it clearer.
FWIW, I consider trigger point therapy more of a mainstream than an alternative approach. I don’t know if you ever met Janet Travell but she was a very smart lady and knew the science behind what she did very well. Being an MD, her work progressively gained credibility with the mainstream (possibly faster than if one were a non-MD) and is pretty well accepted in most medical circles. Feldenkrais, on the other hand, is definitely an alternative therapy but again, Feldenkrais was an absolute genius who understood the physics, neurophysiology, etc. behind human movement better than most licensed healthcare professionals.
Also, with regards to the perusal of the library comment, if there are any old or out of print books you’re interested in and can’t find, drop me a line. I just did an inventory of my library and in checking the prices of some of the reference books I have that I haven’t used in a while, I found that many of them are rare and worth $200, $300, $400, or more online. I’m probably going to be selling off those I rarely use in anticipation of getting a better price for them now than I will post Crash when I retire. I’m sure if we met in person, we could have some great discussions. I’ve always valued and learned from your input here.