OK, tell me some of the ‘lot’ about me.
Starting to see a lot of chatter and uniform messaging around the “pneumonic plague” out of a Russian biolab. Messaging includes “getting antibiotics into your system within 24 hours” as key along with our best allies busy making a new mRNA vaccine for this bacterial pathogen.
Guess the tanks are getting low on diesel.
If I were an evil DWBE (devil worshipping baby eater) billionaire and wanted to initiate covid style lockdowns in advance of certain (s)elections, this is just the sort of air cover I’d use while delivering the second half of a two phase bioweapon - a phase two (trigger) viral pathogen (with phase 1 being the covid vaxx “primer”).
Have people focus on a bacteriological threat (wrong vector, lose precious response time).
2 cents? Hedge for both. YLMMV.
7 Likes
SBOH is picking an interesting time to ditch C19 test/reporting requirements… possibly to keep people from catching on? https://sboh.wa.gov/sites/default/files/2026-10/2620102notifiableconditionsC19CR102combined.pdf
2 Likes
Is it too late? Could the country be saved? No laws of physics need to be broken, but it’s hard to imagine. Will the NYT publish a 21-day full-page series on what Chris and Madhava were talking about? No. Will the DoJ suddenly take an interest in holding people accountable? That’s their stated function, but no. Will universities, corporations, and schools suddenly revert back to objective tests and measures? They used them for decades/centuries, but at this point, no. All of this is easy, no money necessary, the solution is right there…but it won’t happen. The definition of tragedy.
The big list of civilizational cycles missed the Fourth Turning!
Didn’t Chris interview Joseph Tainter, way Back In The Day? I have a memory of hearing an interview with him. Oh well, as they say, those who fail to learn from history are doomed to repeat it. And those who do learn from history are doomed to watch those who don’t learn from history repeat the same mistakes over and over and over (that’s how I feel at work).
Another reason why successful people “can’t see” the evidence is because they thrived and made it to the very top in The System. If you are showing evidence that The System is fake and gay, they will have a hard time seeing it, because they know that it means that they got to the top of a Fake and Gay System instead of a Serious and Important System. If they built their identity and sense of self-worth on how high they rose within The System, you might not be able to ever get them to see it. Anyone read The Mandibles? Remember the Keynesian economist that was still furiously writing letters to the editor even after the entire economy had collapsed? He never got it.
7 Likes
Another trophy that I cant find on my shelves… I wonder who I lent it to…
5 Likes
“The media is cahoots with the people that planted the explosives.”
This is a very perceptive observation and POINTS TO THE identity of the perpetrators. Please notice!
The visual images produced by the NIST model of WTC7 collapse are here:
https://tsapps.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=861612
NIST NCSTAR 1-9A
Starting on page 159 - 166 (Page numbering in the pdf reader.)
Starts on page 113 in the document itself
4 Likes
The computer images do not remotely resemble the videos of what actually happened.
7 Likes
Great read.
I remember we did a case study on the Titanic build in our MBA class as manager failure… apparently the Titanic was originally designed to be unsinkable…… however “ management “ came in and saw all the bracing, safety hull and said it was unglamorous for such a prestigious ship and had all the “ unsinkable “ safety designs intentionally removed for appearance…… I forgot if that was in the schematics or in the yard being built….. and I’m sure you could tie it other Rockefeller conspiracies….. but the point it is the design “correction “ was historically legitimate enough for it to be part of MBA course work….. incompetence or intentionally redesigned to fail, you could apply the same ? To our current society
2 Likes
Not to be an arsehole, but…and I say this light heartedly…
But schools also teach kids stuff about Coca Cola inventing the red colour of Santa’s suit. I’ve been told it by kids doing A-Levels (exams for 16-18 years old)
Plus being able to see the Great Wall of China from space.
That’s before we get into all the stuff that is taught in schools that we say is false. Science stuff (vaccines and viruses), history stuff (causes of the world wars) etc etc
So I’m not sure that including something in a school or MBA syllabus is any backup for its historical (or other) legitimacy. Instead, it might be a datapoint to say that it is something that some powerful entity would like us to think. The truthfulness of it might be a completely separate matter though!
I agree in fact there is even more we can do…. Anti-vaxers made up what 20% of the population and that was enough to topple the boost and lockdowns plans in perpetuity so they had to resort to plan B “energy and food” …. Getting the fact we are actually under attack and how deep that runs inside our own country into common knowledge of a similar % might have some chance of turning this around.. and sure Chris can reach thousands at a time. But if each of us can reach 2 people and each of those can reach two more and that replicates 30 times in a row that means your initial outreach could wake up a million + after 30 iterations . And we don’t know which individual will be the tipping point like the person in the crowd of the Romanian president or the little girl in the emperor’s need clothes. Maybe someone unknown would start the string that eventually starts the spark to common knowledge? That eventually starts to turn this thing around.
4 Likes
Sure we should be careful not to trust but verify anything taught but our institutions… and no I don’t know personally it 100% happened or it wasn’t a narrative. It’s just yet another data point explaining human behavior….. note it doesn’t link at all back to the conspiracy theory Rockefeller and the Future FED tricked their competition to get all on the titanic and then intentionally sunk it get rid of them
but with all due respect ,I’m not sure I get your point? Everything in school and books is automatically BS? And without looking at at least what data is there historically and trying to filter likely vs unlikely. We automatically dismiss it out right? Nothing they tell us is true and If everything is 100% false , Then what do start with as a basis for anything? The only way to know the truth is to ignore everything?
The Coca Cola case for Santa is also well documented vs tribal lore -What is your source of truth for Santa’s red suit instead of coca cola? Can you explain your real fact vs that bs? Why is this such a ha ha a ridiculous point for you ? …
do you know at least the the basis of “ fake” data points for this argument? Or just heard it and concluded it’s silly?
It’s also a marketing case study on cultural influence…aside form the dates market ing campaigns yourself you can do some research yourself and find old pictures of Santa in many colors “ I did”
Could it also be some mass information campaign like Covid by the elites to create a false truth… I guess but really why?
And what is more likely. I guess they could have faked the records that Coca Cola spent millions on a Christmas campaign … but you can find old ads on eBay showing data ONLY in cokes colors in red and white and then after that other displays and marketing copied it and Santa in other colors disappeared… so that’s quite an effort to create all those “ fake” ads Was Coca Cola the actual reason? That would likely be hard to prove? How would you get in the heads of people around ~70 years ago? It is fake history by the elites to dumb the population but sourcing a fake history of santas suit? To what end? Who would care? Was it an intentional conspiracy by coke?
Unlikely….but it’s a reasonable hypothesis with enough data to make it plausible as least.,it could easily have been a mass marketing campaign putting Santa in cokes colors in every grocery store in the country that kicked off unintentional mass psychosis that shifted the old baseline to a new definition of reality….. it not 100% impossible we don’t have to look very hard or very far back to see real world examples we all lived ourselves not unlike what is a woman, how many genders , or masks or not needed at restaurants when sit down unjabbed are dirty scum , firery but mostly peaceful, the straight of Hormuz is open etc…
. I’m not saying I know for 100% true, or because someone printed it in. A book it has to be true, I wasn’t old enough to live it and see with my own eyes.
That’s not what I said at all. You’ve massively exaggerated.
I likely says similar about me. I was aware only slightly of TPUSA because their campus presence was an annoyance to my daughter who was at a University at the time. Her discussions about them were centered around a young woman she was popular due to her connection with them. It seemed they would take over the areas reserved by other students groups, and were known for blocking up a sidewalk area that was needed by Wheelchair bound students.
Seeing the Maga crowd not life a finger while trans and gay kids carried wheel chairs around the blockade made sure my kid will never vote red.
If you had asked me who Charlie Kirk was I would have answered that he was a YouTuber or an independent news guy of some kind. It was not until after he was killed that I looked into him.
I have since learned that there was a before and after nature to his organization. Seems it took a big turn around 18-19 when he met his wife and got involved with a Mega Church pastor. He went from being a somewhat libertarian conservative to being a Christian Nationalist with a Zionistic cherry on top.
The changes in the board at his org and the amount of money they took in and the sources of some of that money is very telling.
More interesting are the other nonprofs that were formed with similar names and the large life insurance policies they took out and how many layers down it was nested to hide it.
3 Likes
I am sharing my notes from this lecture and series.
This was a nice surprise. I wasn’t expecting a physician scientist because we have Chris but Dr. Setty was great. His combination of an MIT-trained engineer, a Baylor-trained physician, and a former aerospace/defense professional AND his Independent thinking is rare. His timing on quitting his job and working the last day of normal medical conditions before COVID to set out to write a book including 911 is uncanny and I would mark that as a personal spiritual cairn.
The Epistemology of Knowing vs. Believing
Setty’s opening was great:
- Knowing something means nobody can talk you out of it.
- Believing something means you’d change your mind if a trusted third party changed theirs.
By this standard, we know almost nothing. We believe almost everything else. This exposes how much of what we call “knowledge” is inherited belief.
The 9/11 Science That Cannot Be Ignored
The NIST Simulation: NIST built a computer model of Building 7. The model did not match the building. In real science, that falsifies the hypothesis. Instead, NIST said the results were “within acceptable limits of accuracy.” That’s not science.
The University of Alaska Fairbanks Study: Researchers worked backwards, what is the minimum damage required to get the model to match the building? Answer: every column had to fail simultaneously, within seconds of each other. That’s not fire. Fire is ruled out. And the proper conclusion is not “controlled demolition”, it’s “fire did not cause this.” I respect that and it shows they are loathe to over reach.
The “Who Has the Most to Lose” Heuristic: Setty offers a test any layperson can apply. When experts disagree, ask: who risks their license by saying this? The doctor who said “wait” risked everything. The doctor who said “get the shot” risked nothing.
Why It’s Hard to Move People
This is the hardest part of the challenge, and Setty names it clearly:
1. Fear turns off discernment. When people are scared, they default to authority. The amygdala overrides the cortex. Fear is the most powerful compliance tool ever devised.
2. Educated people are harder to move, not easier. Their identity is tied to their credentials and their institutional affiliations. Admitting they were wrong means admitting their entire worldview is wrong.
3. Livelihood dependence. Doctors, academics, civil servants—they can’t bite the hand that feeds them. Upton Sinclair: “It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends on his not understanding it.”
4. Ego and the need to be right. Once someone has publicly defended a position, changing their mind means admitting they were wrong. That’s psychologically costly. Most people would rather stay wrong than lose face.
5. Isolation. People are afraid of being alone. If the entire room believes one thing, speaking up means standing alone. Most won’t do it.
6. The “operatives” and the ridicule. Some people will mock you, make you feel stupid for asking questions. That’s not disagreement—it’s a tactic. It’s designed to silence.
7. Intellectuals vs. pseudo-intellectuals. Real intelligence comes with humility. Pseudo-intelligence claims certainty. The pseudo-intellectuals are the hardest to crack.
8. Western blue vs. red identity. In the West, people need to pick a side. Blue vs. red becomes the new tribal identity. It replaces the individual with the collective—the exact inversion of what the West is supposed to be about.
What Actually Works: The Working Proposal
Based on the interview and the previous discussions, here is the emerging strategy:
The Christian Frame: Why It Works for Individualists
Christianity is, at its heart, about the individual. Not the collective. Not the state. Not the party. Each person stands accountable to God directly.
This is exactly what the collectivists cannot abide. Every totalitarian system destroys this first because if each individual answers to God, they can’t be herded.
For the coalition:
- The Christian frame is not a strategy. It’s a foundation. Coalitions based on shared grievance fracture. Coalitions based on shared faith hold.
- The individual is not the enemy of the community. The individual is the community’s building block. Strong individuals make strong communities.
- Hope is not optional. Despair is a weapon. Faith is the antidote.
The Wild Card: They’re on Their Back Foot
- Israel’s fall from grace is the canary. The narrative is collapsing.
- AI will make it clear that Building 7 could only come down with all columns taken out simultaneously. Once an AI can run that simulation in seconds, the “conspiracy theory” label dies.
- The scramble for AI regulation and cognitive control is a sign of weakness, not strength. They know the narrative is slipping.
More than one class in my MBA program, VERIFY. IF any of you become CEO, remember, everything told to you is a lie. A lot of discussions were held around that point… coming back to learning to understand who and what you could trust.