Another take on this whole thing?
1 Like
Thank you for clearing that up for me, as that was a red flag (among ALL the other GLARING red flags) that I wasn’t hearing anyone mention about. I had seen helicopter footage of the roof with the weapon separated from him & there didn’t appear that there were officers on the roof with him yet. I could be wrong & just didn’t see them or the footage was later? 
Thank you again for answering my question.
Thank you for the explanation.
Yes, if they just plainly stated which counter sniper took the shot, then we can move from there. But they refuse to, even though they know, and testified they did their interviews with the sniper.
It would have easily been a piece of info released to the news if it fit their narrative. Just like any other piece of evidence that got released.
This man has a YT channel that focuses on firearms and he actually owned the same rifle that they claim was found beside Crooks.
His opinion is that particular rifle manufactured in 2013 is not very accurate at all.
If this is true, (and I have no reason to doubt this fellow), AND if Crooks’ mission as a lone gunman was to kill Trump at any distance with a non magnifying red dot optic, AND presumably he went to a range to practice and zero his rifle, well it just does not add up.
Surely Crooks would have noticed while practicing at the gun range that his chances of success with a rifle that inaccurate were not good at all.
The guy mentions at the end of the video that his groupings at 50 yards were huge whereas his Colt rifle was much better and had tighter groupings.
1 Like
Chris,
I positively LOVE your work. Three items:
-
At least 10 witnesses view someone on the water tower. I understand he may not have been a shooter, but appearance is nefarious: at the 3:47 mark https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MEbYs1CwQC8
-
Why is Crooks body sooo far back from the apex of the roof? I don’t see how he could have had a line of sight to Trump that far from the apex.
-
Gateway Pundit report posited a VERY good question. Why has there been no talk about the bullet hole at the BACK of Crooks’ neck? Was Crooks neutralized from behind before he could have even shot, but still made to look like the patsy? That would explain there being no blood splatter.
Keep up the fantastic work!!!
Best,
Chuck
2 Likes
I did a rudimentary analysis of Doug Mills’ photo of the 2nd shot passing by President Trump’s head. Take it with a huge grain of salt, but I feel like this photo is important.
3 Likes
Yes, I agree it is zoomed in. However the ending shot of the video is right next to the building Crooks fired from but on the other side of the fence. So its possible the guy was standing nearer the southern fence, but then ran up to the northern fence next to the building. But it’s weird that he would run towards the shots.
1 Like
Far right side of the photo?
Your analysis may be correct based on that photo, but is the photo legitimate?
I imagine that what is possible to alter and compose photos these days is way beyond photoshop.
This ‘world famous photographer’ who just happens to be the same guy that photographed Bush on 9-11 and was attending his first Trump rally, and he just happened to be at just the right place and just happened to have his camera focused on Trump to capture this photo at just the right shutter speed for super fast action etc. Well, that’s too many ‘just rights’ for me. I don’t trust that photo as being legitimate.
Try an analysis of a trajectory of bullets coming from the main floor windows of Building 6. The second from the parking lot and the third from the parking lot. We know that bullet 1 hits the bleachers guardrail. You have the estimate of the height of Trump’s ear. I have it at about 10 feet from ground level. Assume the shots could have been from anywhere along the height of the window.
I too did some rough estimates with what I have available which is mostly Google Earth desktop and the line tool that gives an elevations profile and I found that bullet 1 was on an ascending trajectory and clips Trump’s ear and goes on to hit the guardrail of the bleachers to his left.
The rifle Crooks had was a very inaccurate rifle according to a gun enthusiast that owned the exact same rifle. Crooks had a red dot, no scope. No way Crooks made the first 3 shots. Next five? Maybe.
This was a planned operation and there is no way the deep state would trust killing Trump to a lone shooter nutjob. There was way too much riding on this.
2 Likes
The bullet isn’t from the 2nd shot as the second shot can be heard as Trump has his hand on his ear which has traces of blood as Trump pulled it back from his ear (3rd photo from Doug Mills). So it can only be from the first shot however, during the first shot Trump still had his hand on the stand so this photo has been tampered with. This is evidence that a forensics supporting the official narrative (failed assassination attempt) had been faked hence the assassination attempt being staged is very likely.
Watch the video I posted and let me know what ur opinion of it is
1 Like
they get tips on where to be and what to expect on a regular basis.
What someone should do is to hack into every major newspaper and see who was busy preparing articles on Trumps death. I am dead sure few of them were all busy in their kitchen cooking up the articles and some editors in news media were already preparing their edits for next day.
Although most news media outlets have a lot of stock reports on politicians untimely death, this was suppose to end up as a successful assassination. Followed by RNC where they would have announced Nikki or Ron Or Christie or even Liz.
Remember it was only a surprise for those who didnt know. But few definitely knew and they were prepared for the scoop and the chaos and consequences that might have followed.
1 Like
Just bumping this piece of evidence as I think it is crucial.
ABC News has been proven to be a useful tool in the disinfo campaign. Here is ABC’s initial depiction of the shooter’s position (screenshot with my annotation)
Here we have undeniable evidence that Doug Mills photo had been tampered with. This is groundbreaking evidence that the assassination attempt was likely to be staged. This cannot be ignored and should direct future research efforts:
First supersonic shockwave (Trump’s hand on the stand):
Second supersonic shockwave (Trump’s hand on his ear):
Doug Mills bullet photo (hand in the air):
Team #2 was originally set (or setting) up to cover to the south. This makes sense as Team #1 covers the north and Team #2 covers the south.
At some point before the shooting started, they repositioned to face north as shown in your picture (below). This may have been in response to radio traffic about a threat to the north.
I heard one commentator (I don’t remember who) speculate that Crooks may have shot from the location where the rifle was found, then moved to the position he was shot at.
If that is true, it is possible that Team #2 did not have line of sight until Crooks moved after his shots. My analysis below (blue man is rifle location):
The massive audio signature of the last shot that you showed would be consistent with a shot closer to the microphone. from a very high powered rifle, like a .300 Winchester Magnum. The much louder and closer noise could easily explain the uncontrolled screaming of the woman in the audio from the microphone near the stage.
Regarding Brandon Herrera’s demonstration, he mentions they were using a ballistic tipped bullet (see his video @ ~14:00) which is a hollow point with a streamlined plastic tip filler. If the secret service was not using a hollow point, the result on Crooks might not have been as spectacular as that show in the video, but the lack of splatter is an interesting point.
In the post-mortem close up of Crooks, one commentator mentioned that the entry might have been through the mouth (it looks like teeth may be missing) and out the back of the neck at the base of the skull. I don’t know the credentials of the commentator, but he was introduced as someone with knowledge of the subject and said that the mouth is a common target for a frontal shot at a prone shooter as it disconnects the brain from everything.
“We know they’re lying,
they know they’re lying,
they know that we know they’re lying,
and we know that they know that we know they’re lying.
Yet, they STILL LIE.”
-
Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn
1 Like
The 2nd super sonic crack of bullet passing the mic, is right when his hand starts to lift, which is exactly what the picture shows. Watching original film in slowmo shows this.
1 Like
2nd super sonic crack of the bullet passing the mic is right when he starts to lift his hand. The report sound of that 2nd shot is heard at the time his hand reaches his ear. Slowmo watching of the original video shows this.
Anyone who check the video for themself will disagree with you on that.
This video does offer some video of footage of where the second sniper team was located and suggests that you are correct regarding the lack of carnage and blood spatter that should have been on the roof where the sniper/shooter was located.
Hope it helps.