Pfizer Hid SV40 From Regulators

Originally published at: https://peakprosperity.com/pfizer-hid-sv40-from-regulators/

Executive Summary

Dr. Chris Martenson interviews Kevin McKernan, Chief Scientific Officer of Medicinal Genomics, about the presence of DNA in mRNA COVID-19 vaccines. Kevin discusses his findings of DNA contamination in the vaccines, which were not disclosed by Pfizer to regulators. The conversation delves into the implications of this DNA presence, the potential for it to integrate into human cells, and the broader concerns about vaccine safety and regulatory oversight.

DNA Contamination in mRNA Vaccines

Kevin McKernan explains that his team found DNA contamination in mRNA COVID-19 vaccines from Pfizer and Moderna. This DNA, which should not be present, includes an SV40 enhancer, a sequence known for its role in gene therapy and potential to integrate into human cells. The presence of this DNA raises concerns about the safety and regulatory processes surrounding these vaccines.

Key Data

  • DNA contamination in vaccines exceeds regulatory limits by 100 to 500 times.
  • SV40 sequences, known for their role in gene therapy, were found in the Pfizer vaccine.

Implications

  • The presence of DNA in vaccines could lead to integration into human cells, potentially causing long-term health effects.
  • Regulatory oversight may have been insufficient, as key DNA sequences were not disclosed by Pfizer.

Recommendations

  • Individuals should be aware of the potential risks associated with mRNA vaccines and consider these when making vaccination decisions.
  • Pathologists should retain biopsy samples for future analysis, as they may provide insights into vaccine-related health effects.
20 Likes

It’s sick and it’s deliberate. Sick bastards, that’s all I can say.
Thank you Chris, for interviewing Kevin.

13 Likes

Wild interview. Glad to hear there are more people are out there going the distance on this stuff. Was really hoping to hear any insight on non-vaccinated symptoms too like the tinnitus that Chris has been experiencing. I am having the same experience along with some other issues that I am currently blaming on multiple covid infections until I learn differently.

3 Likes

Very nice. It is a very intelligent high level conversation. I know this stuff so well yet there is new knowledge I gained.

It would be nice to continue that polio vaccine cancer uptick chart with more years into the Covid-19 vaccine uptick. Then put “SV-40” in the title.

5 Likes

Jack Kruse covered this in a few different places over the last yesr, citing Kevin McKernan.
These are without question “people to follow”.
I learned A LOT from them lately.

Great land Chris!

-VE

7 Likes

One of the best interviews done to date. Kevin McKernan is brave as hell. It was a pleasure to hear two men of science speak freely: younger tribe members: this is what the world used to be and what we have lost.

I don’t see how it is possible to quantify a “dose” when self-replicating mRNA is part of the equation. Because it seems logical there would or could be great variation in each person’s individual response based on their genetics and medical history, and as McKernan noted, presence or absence of certain diseases. Probably medication as well. And if you don’t know the amount of replication that will occur, or where in the body it will be expressed, you can’t understand what a dose is. Flinging it out into the world, especially with the possibility of shedding and acquired transmissibility seems a stupendously bad idea…

I won’t lie: this scared me a great deal. We’re not even at the point where we know what it is we know and what we don’t yet know. A little humility and and a lot of caution are in order, but these virtues are in short supply.

17 Likes

Amazing interview Chris. Your in-depth, yet easily digestible data-driven presentations pertaining to Covid & the jab fiasco has been unrivaled these past few years.

I look forward to hearing any significant updates or further findings from Kevin’s (& other colleagues’) research as it progresses.

5 Likes

Kevin talks about the medical system being specialised and compartmentalised basically to particular organs. This is something that for a long time I’ve been critical of in science and academia in general – it’s not that I think there should be no specialisation; it’s that I think that as well as specialisation, there should be people who work more like generalists. It’s why over almost 20 years I’ve been fascinated by what Chris has to say, as he’s able to look across broadly different areas and relate them, but then also, when he needs to, he’s able to go very deeply into a specific area to examine the details (and then also question the true specialists to get further fine tuning).

I think this way of working with things should be a new paradigm, and people like Chris should get credit equal to that of the most highly esteemed specialists. [Incidentally, I think imagination should also be prized in this paradigm.] And peer review should become peer + non-peer [i.e. specialists of different subject areas] + ‘generalist’ review (since with peer review the whole thing ends up ‘up their own arses’, to use a crude expression).

9 Likes

terific in-depth interview.

I seem to recall from a few years ago that Covid and/or spike downregulated interferon production, perhaps in one of the long technical disussions by Britt Glausinger of Berkely before she went quiet on the subject.

This interview scared the $#!t out of me. Here in New England, we have a recurring issue of mosquito-borne Eastern Equine Encephalitis infecting both the animal, and human, population every single summer. Usually its caught early and treated with antibiotics – but how many of us have latent EEV lurking in our bodies, waiting to get “activated” by these self-replicating mRNA bioweapons?

2 Likes

Chris,

Your October 23, 2024, interview of Kevin McKernan was excellent – thank you.

The emergence of “turbo” cancers connected with the DS sponsored deployment of the Covid-shots seems to be much more than merely a difference in degree (prevalence) but is a difference in “kind”.

The drastic increase in the incidence of cancer and corresponding mortality post Covid-shot deployment – can be explained in part by dysregulation of the host immune system – both agonism and antagonism (overstimulation and suppression).

Covid-shot immune suppression compromises the ability of the human host immune system to fundamentally control and repress cancer – but it also compromises the host ability to fight infection – in particular reactivation of latent persistent viral infections - wherein the indicated viruses are oncogenic (cancer causing).

But the nature and scope of the emergent cancer signal post Covid-shot deployment – appears to be a new “animal” – aka a new type of disease - pathology and etiology that involves rapid emergence and progression of very aggressive lethal cancers – which I believe is potentially directly linked to SV40.

Wild-type SV40 is a simian (monkey origin) DNA polyomavirus that is a relatively small-sized virus – that came to fame because it was found to contaminate the polio virus (Salk and Sabine) that was deployed in the late 50’s and early 60’s and resulted in infection of humans and an apparent subsequent explosion of cancer rates.

SV40 is an oncogenic (cancer causing) virus – that is believed to integrate into the host cell genome and/or create latent persistent infection in human hosts. Note, human SV40 infection is not solely simply related to contaminated polio vaccines – and is known to cause human infection and human-to-human infection.

SV40 has very high DNA-code sequence homology with other well-known oncogenic polyomaviruses of human origin that include the BK (BKV) virus and JC virus (JCV).

An important but not publicized fact about SV40 is that there appear to be in existence non-wild-type SV40 strains created by government laboratories and government adjacent entities that have extreme gain-of-function - that are much more lethal from a cancer-causing perspective – and elements from the same appear to have been adopted and optimized for supposed “gene-therapy” applications by some in the private sector.

The emergent “turbo cancers” can potentially be explained in terms of reactivation and modification of latent persistent SV40 infection in human hosts – that is NOT via a typical reactivation that is induced by simple host immunosuppression.

SV40 virus has the ability to reactivate in an infected host via a “multiplicity reactivation” mechanism that when considered in conjunction with other latent persistent co-infections such as BKV or JCV that have high sequence homology AND THEN Covid-shots that contain certain Pfizer/Moderna gene-therapy elements – that is SV40 DNA – promotor, enhancer and origin-of-replication viral sequences - might explain the creation at the infected cellular level of new lethal highly active SV40 viral analogs that causes heretofore unknown “turbo cancer” disease.

A perhaps inadvertent consequence of Pfizer and Moderna including gene-therapy technology based on SV40 promoter, enhancer and/or origin-of-replication sequences in the bivalent-Covid-shots analyzed by Kevin McKernan – is that these sequences are introduced directly in active (undegraded) form via the lipid-nanoparticle technology into host cells such that these DNA sequences get used in a well-known SV40 multiplicity-reactivation process that results not in simply reactivated pathogenic SV40 virus – but rather results in creation of a gain-of-function highly active new SV40 virus strain that potentially causes the so-called emergent turbo-cancers.

The SV40 multiplicity-reactivation mechanism relates to a collection (multiplicity) of individually inactivated-degraded-attenuated SV40 virus elements (in a host) so as to reconstitute and recombine DNA sequences (in a host cell) so as to generate a live active pathogenic virus in an infected host. The multiplicity-reactivation mechanism is perhaps by some form of well-known in vivo homologous recombination mechanism or other mechanism – but the end result is the SV40 can reactivate by mixing and matching and collecting viral DNA sequence elements that co-exist in the infected host.

The speculation herein that perhaps is not considered generally yet – is that Covid-shots do two (2) important things – suppress the host immune system in hosts that may have latent persistent wild-type SV40 infection AND provide critically important new SV40 promoter, enhancer and core code sequences – that can result in the reactivation (endogenous creation) of a much more lethal modified pathogenic active highly oncogenic SV40 virus – via the multiplicity-reactivation mechanism.

It remains to be seen whether it will be ultimately shown that Covid-shot induced in vivo host gain-of-function by multiplicity-reactivation of latent-persistent SV40 infection to be the etiological agent causing some of the emergent turbo-cancers post-Covid-shot deployment.

A further factor to consider is whether latent-persistent co-infections in a host by other polyomaviruses that have very high sequence homology also contribute DNA code elements for a very lethal gain-of-function multiplicity-reactivation of SV40 in a host that has been given the Covid-shot(s).

The above is just my speculation about the potential link of SV40 to emergent turbo-cancers post Covid-shot deployment.

Again, thanks for your excellent interview.

pbd

5 Likes

I had a small reference to a substack written by Mr Nepetalactone (you try and spell it) in his substack. Its highly technical.

My quote from his article:

“I was always skeptical of the shedding literature…because I just couldn’t wrap my head around the dosage. Even if we do shed small amounts of spike-coated exosomes as suggested by Bansal et al, the dose of Spike to the recipient would be so minuscule, how could it create disease in a recipient? The dosage calculus completely changes if any of these exosomes contain self-replicating DNA or plasmids. Small amounts of shedded plasmids could expand in the recipient and perhaps explain this phenomenon.” [bold added]

Plasmids = factories. Self-replicating DNA = factories. They would be persistent. If the factories get shed, that means ongoing production of big spike doses wherever they land, not just a few evil spikes that your body might be able to get rid of using natto, fasting, or resveratrol.

7 Likes

This is such a super nasty way to “deal with overpopulation” too.

I mean at least with heart attacks you don’t suffer much and your family inherits your estate.

With cancer, most people will spend whatever they have to hold on as long as possible in agony which leaves the family with less/nothing besides losing dad/mom or whoever.

If you hated humanity, could you come up with a better plan to create mass suffering, kill large numbers of people while transferring little people assets upward all in one move?

5 Likes

ZymurgencyMan, this article might be of some value to you. How SARS-CoV-2 Fragments Fuel Long-Term Disease

Other Moriarty articles as well.

1 Like

This was awesome, listening to you two talk shop is amazing. :sunglasses:

1 Like

Thanks guys, for making it much easier to get text off the transcript by showing the time placement. I use clips for my own writing, of course I give PP credit.