Recall Newsom; Bring Back the Freedom Convoy

Originally published at: https://peakprosperity.com/daily-digest/recall-newsom-bring-back-the-freedom-convoy/

Energy

The ongoing debate between energy realism and climate action continues to influence U.S. energy policy. Despite the Biden administration’s commitment to renewable energy, fossil fuels reportedly remain dominant, accounting for over 80% of energy consumption. The Inflation Reduction Act’s investment in renewables has not significantly altered this landscape. Chris Wright, nominated for Secretary of Energy, advocates for a balanced approach that includes fossil fuels, emphasizing energy cost and reliability. This perspective reportedly aligns with voter sentiments, particularly among working-class voters who prioritize economic growth and job creation. Democrats face the challenge of integrating climate policy with broader energy abundance goals to resonate with these voters. Recent polls indicate a significant portion of Americans support continued investment in fossil fuels alongside renewables, reflecting a pragmatic approach to energy policy.

Canadian Politics

Tom Marazzo has called for renewed protests and election demands in Canada, expressing dissatisfaction with government actions over the past three years. Marazzo emphasizes the need for Canadians to have a voice in their future and advocates for making their presence known at every NDP and Liberal riding office. He insists that the demand for an election is a fundamental right, regardless of the government’s willingness to listen. Marazzo’s call to action is set for January 22, 2025, as he seeks to amplify public discontent with the current federal administration. Local authorities are preparing for the event, with increased security measures in place, reflecting concerns about potential disruptions similar to those experienced during the 2022 Freedom Convoy.

US Politics

California’s leadership faces criticism over fire management as the state grapples with wildfires. Governor Gavin Newsom and Mayor Karen Bass are accused of mismanaging resources and neglecting preventative measures. Critics argue that budget cuts to fire prevention and water management have left the state ill-prepared to combat fires exacerbated by the Santa Ana winds. The focus on issues like climate change and homelessness is seen by some as a distraction from essential fire prevention efforts. The situation underscores the need for a balanced approach to environmental management that prioritizes immediate threats alongside broader policy goals. Governor Newsom has responded by highlighting a $1 billion investment in forest management and fire prevention over the last three years.

In a related political development, Silicon Valley billionaire Chamath Palihapitiya has called for the recall of Governor Gavin Newsom. This move reflects reported dissatisfaction with Newsom’s leadership, particularly in light of the state’s ongoing challenges with wildfires and other pressing issues. The call for a recall adds another layer of complexity to California’s political landscape as the state navigates its environmental and governance challenges. While Palihapitiya’s call has garnered attention, the recall process in California is complex and requires significant public support, as noted by political analysts.

In other news, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is under scrutiny following a Project Veritas report. An EPA advisor was reportedly caught on camera admitting to funneling billions of taxpayer dollars to climate organizations as a precaution against the incoming Trump administration. This move, described as an “insurance policy,” aims to secure funding for climate initiatives before potential budget cuts. The report has sparked criticism from figures like Sen. Mike Lee, who calls for a return to constitutional government. The EPA has clarified that these funds are part of previously allocated budgets under the Inflation Reduction Act, aimed at supporting climate initiatives.

Meanwhile, over 17,000 doctors have signed a letter urging the Senate to reject Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s nomination as Health Secretary. The letter, organized by the Committee to Protect Health Care, criticizes Kennedy’s stance on vaccines and questions his qualifications to lead the Department of Health and Human Services. The campaign against Kennedy’s nomination highlights concerns about his history of spreading misinformation about vaccines and his potential impact on public health policy. Conversely, some supporters argue that his environmental activism and critique of corporate influence in health policy could bring much-needed scrutiny to the pharmaceutical industry.

Sources

Energy Realism vs. Climate Catastrophism: A Political Power Shift?

Energy realism will beat it every time.

Source | Submitted by Barbara

Tom Marazzo Calls for Renewed Protests and Election Demands in Canada

I believe returning to Ottawa is the right move.

Source | Submitted by Barry Silverthorn

Chamath Palihapitiya Urges Recall of California Governor Gavin Newsom

Silicon Valley Billionaire, Chamath Palihapitiya calls for an immediate recall of Governor Gavin Newsom.

Source | Submitted by Chris Martenson

EPA Advisor Caught on Camera: Billions Funneled to Climate Groups as ‘Insurance’ Against Trump

We’re Throwing Gold Bars off the Titanic

Source | Submitted by bcoop

17,000 Doctors Urge Senate to Reject RFK Jr. as Health Secretary Over Vaccine Stance

Over 17,000 doctors are calling on the Senate to reject President-elect Donald Trump’s pick to lead the Department of Health and Human Services, Robert F. Kennedy Jr.

Source | Submitted by Chris Martenson

California’s Fiery Blame Game: Schellenberger Criticizes Newsom and Bass for Fire Mismanagement

Those will be lies. They could have prevented them.

Source | Submitted by Chris Martenson

In addition to sources submitted by community members, the following were also used in the creation of this report: The Hill, CBC News, EPA X account, Committee to Protect Health Care, California Governor’s Office on X, and The Sacramento Bee.

3 Likes

As someone having no local knowledge of the weather in California, I’m puzzled by the Fires happening in Winter. I’m familiar with a fire season, usually late Spring through to mid Autumn, were I am, but Winter is not really an issue. Any input from a local please.

It’s highly unsual, unless an arsonist is involved.

2 Likes

Is it that dry at this time of year though?

1 Like

Yes, it’s typically dry. One reason people pay the big bucks to live in So Cal. The type of wind, the Santa Ana, also contributes. It’s dry, warm and forceful. There is an ongoing thread discussing this fire with contributions from many LA locals.

https://tribe.peakprosperity.com/t/pacific-palisades-fire-another-land-grab/43499

1 Like

In the winter, dry air blasts down to the shore in a reverse of the typical on-shore flow of air from the ocean. The dry air does weird stuff - clouds of grit that are filled with static charge, blasting one way, then asting another.

Any fire during these wind conditions is going to get lots of fresh dry air, fed like the forge fires of a blacksmith by bellows.

It won’t start raining until February and in to spring if it rains at all.

The past two years have been wet winters. This is a dry year compared to 2022 and 2023.

Do you think all these MD’s rejecting RFK Jr has anything to do with them making money with each vaccination administered? My MD told me the last time I spoke to him “Looks like you need your flu shot and CV19 booster”. I didnt disrespect him by saying no but I wont be getting another CV19 booster thank you very much

2 Likes

When guy was caught in LA recently with blow torch he stated robotically “I cant stop I have to keep going”. I feel like something else may be in play here with these fires akin to Trump assassination attempts, Las Vegas bomb, New Orleans killings and fires. CIA giving mind control drugs to them to do their dirty work them burning body to hide the drugs.

“Cal Fire had a $5 million reduction in spending on fuel reduction teams, including funds used to pay for vegetation management work by the California National Guard”

This frustrates me to no end. California has a line item budget for clearing forest debris. Trump suggests they need to do more of it to prevent wildfires and it becomes a laughing stock for half of the country.

Sure he said it in his own Trumpy way, but what he was talking about is a time tested method for preventing exactly what happened. Now the very people who mocked him are facing the consequences.

Same with Trump and the “inject bleach” or “UV light”. Taken out of context it becomes a mockery, but there is actual science behind these things.

I thought I wanted a president who can talk to the country like a normal person, not a politician, but I guess we’re learning why political speak is necessary. Too easy to make you look a fool to the drive by media consumer.

2 Likes

Cheers guys. Completely the reverse of what we see here in South East Aus. We have the hot north winds in the warmer months, from time to time, all tempered buy the Antarctic blasts that happen also.

1 Like