It’s worse than that Jim. We’re talking murder and attempted murder. Potential whistleblowers have to fear for their lives at the hands of the Deep State.
8 Likes
What if what you say is true, but also they went through with it? What could that possibly mean? What happened on 9/11? How many layers of disinformation were set up on that day?
2 Likes
My theory is the 1st round that hit the barrier sent a shock wave through the top row of the bleachers causing a disruption of everyones balance. However there were clearly shots fired at the snipers from the roof as they repositioned about 60 degrees to their right.
LOL! They just admitted they had snipers in the ground floor of the ACR building, trying to deflect blame from not being at their Post
1 Like
Meanwhile when are we going to address the elephant in the room, the fact the shooters gun was swapped. Which means the shooter probably isn’t crooks (who would have used his own gun) and the photos were probably taken buy “greg” on an earlier day and sent as a distraction with Crooks not actually present. (2nd story was overwatch for the operation, team “the dog ate my sniper rifle”) No wonder the FBI were bleaching the crime scene, that DNA could have ID the real shooter.
4 Likes
Looks like he came out of the 2nd story access point.
I think you can see capri guy and camo shorts guy on the west of the building in this video: https://youtu.be/7ezQWMJygLU?si=8I5Gxy_DUl2SW-EX. Around 42 seconds for tan capris, and around 55 seconds, you can see camo shorts start to head around the building. Would be interesting to sync the video with the Stewart video and see if that lines up with when camo shorts came around to the windows.
1 Like
Looks like…it’s getting crazier if that’s even possible.
"MAXWELL AND HIS FAMILY MANUFACTURE EXPLOSIVES AND ARMAMENTS, SELLING THEM TO GUERRILLA GROUPS IN PERU AND COLOMBIA WITH CIA FACILITATION” - CAclubindia.com
Or is this another red herring?
Nice try Fox! They try to use the photos of sniper locations posted with this marked up operation plan that shows those locations as the three windows in the corner of the second story building, as first floor windows.
He just said that the acoustic data is consistent with a single gunman
“Consistent” the key word there. Also consistent with two shooter hypothesis. More corroborating evidence needed.
Michael, your approach reminds me why there are so many miscarriages of justice. Police get onto a hypothesis early and then hold on like a dog with a bone. Only confirmation bias from then on. Throw in a little evidence tampering, because ‘that’s fine, we know he’s guilty anyway.’
I’m trying to remain as open as possible. As much as I distrust the deep state, I am still open to the possibility that FBI/DHS are being very coy because they are onto some foreign-funded terrorist plot and need time to uncover it. (Cui bono? Ukraine, China…) That goes against my instincts, but I am still willing to keep an open mind about it.
3 Likes
I’m not following this as closely as many of you so forgive me if this is obvious, but there seems a lot of very similar or identical roofs onsite- could Crooks have been shot on one roof and Yearick on another?
2 Likes
Maybe Hercules 1 & 2 were placed so that they would be able to take out Crooks when they needed to? It seems like a lot of ammunition and man-power was placed not to defend Trump, but to take down Crooks on building 6.
1 Like
The Secret Service did not simply have multiple (dozens probably) serious avoidable security failures. It consciously planned security failures. For instance, the SS PLANNED to
- have a Pacman SS perimeter with the void including the most dangerous roofs and let local LEO deal with those buildings
- not allow local LEOs to be on the AGR roofs (this was not a choice by local ESU) and have them buried inside narrow windows with limited visibility [I’m unsure of this one]
- limit local LEO to communicate to SS snipers only through a SS “Command” that was designed to relay messages to SS snipers by email
- put SS sniper team 1 behind trees blocking roof of AGR 6 and every AGR roof behind it
- not to put, and ask nobody local to put, a sniper on the water tower
- have Trump speak without any bullet-proof glass panels around his body
- not to meet with local LEOs that morning to go over action plans for the day
These failures were planned by Secret Service. Yes, they happened, yes SS elements may be sorry and embarrassed, but they were intentional with predictable consequences.
Who at SS planned these security failures? Timothy Burke of SS Pittsburgh Field Office is undoubtedly responsible for at least approving such planned security failures, if not actually designing these failures. I am sure that the SS sniper team leader is part of the problem; he at least as a yes-man accepted the ridiculous protocol for communication with local LEOs and accepted the defined areas of coverage for snipers.
At a minimum, we can ask our national representatives in the House and Senate to call Timothy Burke, SS sniper team leader on July 13 at Trump rally, and all “command” principals to submit under oath to be questioned. Further, the Congress having issued an order to SS to preserve and list all records relating to July 13, should have US Marshalls immediately start collecting and imaging these records, and offer $10 million plus forward pay and benefits till age 65, to any SS employee or contractor who documents the identity of any SS insider who submitted these security failures as part of a plan, $10 million for each documented failure. Also, Congress should appoint a special counsel - and not wait for DoJ to do so - to start prosecuting people at SS who planned these security failures, including for treason, with death by firing squad as penalty.
5 Likes
It could be that the collapsable stock has a bit of play in it compared to a fixed stock. I love the Magpul CTR stock because it has a friction locking feature. It will still have a small bit of play between the stock and the buffer tube.
I tested different configurations with different lowers using different length uppers. The tightest upper and lower configuration that I have is with the RRA NMA2. The other setups have a small amount of play between them.
I built a Bushmaster 450 upper using an Aero Precision Enhanced upper with different lowers and had better results with the fixed stock. The results were the same when I used my Sharps 25-45 upper.
One of my favorite setups is a CMMG MK47 Mutant. This uses a collapsable Magpul stock. I used this CMMG Mutant at an Appleseed event and it performed well. I was just a few points shy of hitting 210. The upper and lower are non-standard and thus I can’t test it on a fixed stock. The sight radius on the Mutant is 20.75" which is slightly longer than the AR-15 A2 sight radius.
1 Like
Agreed. I’m not settled with Crooks acting alone, especially considering the rapid fire from the second set is pro level shooting. I dunno. I guess sometimes we leave sleeping dogs lay.
I concur, but have a question regarding the SS not allowing a local counter-sniper on the roof of building 6. It was in the handwritten operational plan (AGR Location 10S3), and a whistleblower allegedly stated they left that post due to the heat. Did I miss evidence stating they prohibited counter-sniprs on the roofs?
2 Likes
Early on there was a report that the Local’s CP team wanted to put one of their people in the US-SS Command Post as a relay between the Local’s Command Post and the US-SS CP and the request was turned down. I’ve watched so many videos, that I don’t remember which is which. But I remember bullet points from different videos.
3 Likes
So here is a scenarios for discussion please.
Because of the known bullet trajectories and all camera angles I have seen. It seem to me the only place a 2nd Shooter could have been (if there was one) is roughly 12 to 24 feet behind Crooks on the same roof, using a similar AR15 and ammunition as Crooks, although with a stand or rest of some kind and a high end scope. The plan was for the 2nd Shooter to only take the first shot, a kill shot. Then bug out and leave it to Crooks to take the fame and glory for ‘saving democracy’. But the first shot missed, the plan falls apart and the 2nd Shooter takes two more shots, that also missed Trump but hit a spectator and so decides it’s time to call it. The 2nd Shooter then makes off to the ladder behind the tree for a quick getaway. Crooks not knowing how to improvise in the heat of the moment goes into Far Cry mode kneels up and lets off 5 rapid fire shots. On seeing this and with concern for more civilian casualties the 2nd Shooter on there way out, pulls out a suppressed handgun and pops two in the back of Crooks head from 40 to 50 feet away. Then a short moment later after descending the ladder radios in to USSS that they are ‘clear’ and the southern USSS team in full view of everyone takes the last totem shot into a predetermined safe target.
For this to be plausible I have made the following assumptions:
- The ladder behind the tree was already there.
- Crooks had been groomed into thinking he was going to be revered as a hero after the death of Trump.
- Shot/shots 9 is when Crooks dies.
- Crooks did not act alone, and the help he had came from the USSS or other government agencies and not some other unknown vigilante.
- The 2nd Shooter is allowed to hide in the alcove behind the tree, or to enter AGR building 6 through door 9
- We take into account the actual geography of the site showing that south windows of AGR building 6 are to close to the ground and obstructed by fences and people and tractors to have a clear shot at Trump.
For me the Stewert footage clearly shows the ladder was already behind the tree. This is key and I believe the only solid evidence of an inside job. What’s more if the FBI had meddled with the Stewert footage it would not clearly show that.
I’m just running this one out there for discussion as I am not fully convinced of there being a 2nd shooter although I am not ruling out that there could have been. I am however ruling out shots from the building 6 windows. This is just the only scenario I can come up with to account for the sound and timing discrepancies from the audio analysis.
What do you think?
2 Likes
What if the target wasn’t Trump? What if the purpose was a mass casualty event to end Trump rallies? Then Joe could go back to campaigning from the basement which was their strategy last time.
2 Likes
I recall reading that SS defined ESU roles to be in windows, I do not recall where. I am not sure about this one. The action plan on p.2 of Grassley’s release does indicate two ESU sniper positions at the two western windows, though “window” is not exactly specified, and none on any roof surface. So while SS may not have forbidden ESU to be on roofs, the plan seems to call them to be not on any roofs. That’s a planned security failure.
1 Like