I was thinking that, too. He would have been done with motorcade intersection duty by then, and he covered the intersection by Sheetz.
Too bad we don’t have radio transcripts that late.
1 Like
Something tells me that’s not the video you meant to post. 
I watched the video in question a day or two ago but can’t remember where I saw it and had no reason to capture the link.
1 Like
That is the video I intended to post…
But perhaps I misunderstood who the “CEO” in question is? Are we talking the CEO of AGR?
4 Likes
Thank you, and I’m glad you’re getting some benefit from that information. It’s been my experience, and especially so with many who are investigating this event, that only truth-seekers really care to check their biases or consider the fallibility of human error. You are a truth-seeker, that’s readily apparent in how you approach your research. I highly respect that in you.
2 Likes
Interesting. It’s a different video now. Anyways, yes, that’s the eccentric looking CEO, Henry Dimmick Jr.
Edit: Now it links to yet a different video. TikTok embeds appear to do weird things. I’m not on that site, so don’t know what they are doing, but the embed appears to be scrolling through videos.
3 Likes
Noted!
It displayed correctly when I first posted, and displayed correctly again after I refreshed the page…But it was showing a video of a birthday party before the refresh. 
5 Likes
Same here, not sure why it did that but I had some weird ear video going on at first. It’s the hore/horse lady for me now though.
2 Likes
Let me try this. I clicked directly on the video in TikTok and used the Share feature. Unfortunately, this site did not allow me to post it.
If memory serves, this site doesn’t allow direct posting of videos, which might be why posting links to a TikTok site works, but not the specific video.
One more try using the Embed code.
@derek_alex88 5 minutes before the shooter on the building behind opened fire, and attempted to assassinate the former President. #trump #trumprally #assassinationattempt #butlerpa #donaldtrump #trump2024 #elitesrockstar #rockymountainhorse ♬ original sound - derek_alex88
I guess that’s just for the account. I give! 
3 Likes
Yeah, unfortunately downloading the actual files would be the only way I know to play them in VLC.
I have not yet figured out some of these options, so I imagine it could be possible to use VLC to view something not locally sourced, but I don’t quite know.
3 Likes
Hello again! I’ve been busy reading all the SS interviews but wanted to check back in here. And I can’t help but reply to this and repeat that ABC and CNN did not report anything about door 13 and I think you rely far too heavily on the words “THE building” which I don’t think proves what you think it does (even if we accept the reporting as being accurate).
I can’t help but be a bit cheeky and reference your “Investigator Biases” and suggest you might be assuming that anything contradicting the door 13 theory must be wrong (like the AAR, and the author confusing the 2 events which might not be 2 events). It seems like an axiom.
We don’t need to rehash all that but I couldn’t help myself. But I am curious if you have found any new evidence to back up the door 13 theory. Apologies if it’s above somewhere.
Hopefully I should have a 2 hour documentary finished soon. Currently I don’t specify which door it was because I don’t know for sure.
2 Likes
Clicking on “original sound - derek_alex88” took me to the proper video.
If I ever need to post a TikTok video again I’ll be sure to note the workaround. 
3 Likes
You give me far too little credit. It seems to me that you didn’t read the previous revision of the Door 9 & 13 Events analysis. If not, don’t bother, I’m in the process of doing a much deeper dive on Door 13, since my previous revision did not have the benefit of the radio transcripts and congressional investigation reports. I will return your cheekiness and suggest it might be above your reading level though.
If, after reading my new revision, you still have questions about my analysis and any associated inferences, I will gladly respond to your questions and comments. The one stipulation is that you must reference the specific slide and point you have questions or comments on, and if you want to refute it provide contradictory evidence. None of this surface level, assumption based, contradictory evidence-lacking criticism you typically provide. I will not respond to those anymore. It’s past time that we debate this at the same level of logic and reason.
Good day.
2 Likes
That shouldn’t be necessary. The folks at TikTok should make their links more friendly to sites other than TikTok. But thanks, that would help others, I’m sure.
BTW, I did find something in that video that fit in with my current project, if only tangentially. It helped me understand what appears to be two people sitting on the retaining wall, as captured in the WTAE4 video of Crooks walking along the south wall of AGR 6. I call the Crooks dress-alike (though with a white hat) “Decoy Boy.” though I’m not seeing him as much of a decoy or distractor as I did before, the more I analyze the footage of him.
2 Likes
That guy reminds me of this guy, who I’m sure you saw in the bodycam video we were talking about earlier.
2 Likes
I don’t think I was rude or deserved that response. I read all the analysis and all of your comments at the time and there was no hard evidence in any of it. I asked if there was anything new. Your emotional response further confirms to me that you are irrationally hitched to this shaky position. You think people who disagree are not intelligent. I won’t upset you by challenging you again
1 Like
Perhaps I should apologize, but I couldn’t help myself. I do respond better when offered clear evidence that my inferences are wrong, however.
1 Like
I couldn’t help myself from rehashing things you never responded to. You couldn’t help yourself from being a dick So It's Back To First Principles - #4814 by chris-nolan
1 Like
If you want to flesh this all out after I finish my current analysis, I’m open to it provided you omit the name calling, and speak in a respectful manner, such as avoiding the accusatory and inflammatory phrase “you assume that.” I go to great lengths to state as clearly as possible in my work whether I’m making an inference, an assumption, or stating a speculation. I also often use the words or phrases “likely,” “more or less likely,” “almost certainly,” etc. When I’ve responded to you in the past, I’m pretty sure I’ve tried to avoid such language, although I do slip up on occasion, and simply explained my reasoning. When you assume that I’m assuming, you diminish those efforts of mine to be honest, straight forward, and well-reasoned. If you want to know why I didn’t respond to that post, that is likely the reason.
1 Like
VegasPatriot, are you suggesting that the FBI added gunshots to Dayve’s audio? If so, why would the FBI add gunshots?
1 Like