This is the VERY whitewashed description of it. You might want to put on a COVID mask and go to a bookstore to buy a physical copy of Edward Snowden’s book to read a little more about it, if you are wary. Oh yeah, put a pebble in your shoe to throw off your stride. Personally, I know I’m on some low level lists, along with 50 million other people.
The US government knows damn well that when I have tried to get people to avoid the COVID vaccine, I only motivated people to take it, because they thought I was a nut. So they probably don’t view me as dangerous.
I get a feel that this is David Tedeski, describing a meeting with Nicol before Kuss calls out “There’s someone on the roof”::
BTPD-Patrol-3
Starting on page 20:
In his Task Force interview, Nicol stated that he went to Door 9, not Door 13, after seeing Crooks run between the building, as I had initially inferred. I haven’t gotten back to my timeline analysis yet, but it appeared to me that it was before the vehicles we know of pulling into the AGR east lot. If memory serves, Tedeski is the one I couldn’t nail down an arrival time or parking spot for. This testimony sounds like he drove around the building, but I may have misunderstood. Does it sound that way to you?
Here are the latest revisions to these Investigation Tools. The Recognition Tools have rally ID’s for the CAT #1 team that @redranamber and I recently worked through. The research Tools have the new Task Force evidence added, along with another Bodycam/Radio Log timeline from @redranamber. They have been updated in the shared file browser.
I have to say, it sounds to me like he means the East lot, like door 9. Then he circled back around to the West side before returning East once Kuss spotted Crooks on the roof.
Sorry, my memory didn’t serve me. It was Vensel I couldn’t nail down. Anyways, Nicol’s testimony sounds like it was before most of the LEO vehicles showed up in the east lot. Tedeski came in from the north, so he could have driven around the building and finally parked there at 18:09:26. Unfortunately, Dave Stewart’s videos don’t include that time period. His 6:10 pm video starts when Tedeski pulls up and parks.
It sounds to me like Tedeski headed back north in the east lot, not on the grass around the south side of AGR 6, which I doubt he would have done given the crowds at the time. I’m just not sure how to interpret “the building” here. “That’s when I went back around the front of the building.”
I think here we should consider the front of the building possibly as that near the road, AGR6 where the shooting took place being the back of the building (at least for in this context!). I agree, it does sound as if he headed North in the East lot to circle West, and he would not have driven across the South grassy area (at least without us catching it on video! ).
SS agents thought the building was secured by local LEOs.
So, Greg sent the text of an individual, and he waited some agents to act. But they thought it was already ongoing by locals.
So, how do we reconcile this with Tedeski’s timing? I don’t recall seeing Tedeski’s vehicle driving north in the east lot in Kuss’ bodycam, just south.
“When he pushed open the door, the kid was nowhere to be seen. Just then two police officers pulled up outside AGR and Nicol shouted to them about where he’d last seen the suspect. The officers took off on foot in opposite directions around the sprawling AGR complex.”
But as Vegas already pointed out, we don’t seem to have video corroboration of his activities in this lot before then. At least not that our Eagle Eyes have uncovered yet!
@vegaspatriot , thank you for the updates on the tools! Phenomenal work as usual! I must say though, the PSP is severely underrepresented in our recog/ID efforts! Might I make a suggestion that we try to identify and incorporate what we can for them?
Also, in yet another direction, I believe this is an Allegheny County PD vehicle, yes? This is present as Blasko comes up on foot from the water tower, I wonder whom this may belong to. Am I correct in understanding ACPD is a separate entity from AC Sheriffs?
I currently have it being a Jackson County cruiser, Murcko’s. (Note the white going up the side of the passenger door on the rear end side.) As for the Alpha Romeo, I have to go back and revisit that again based on Nicol’s and Murcko’s testimony.
As for the PSP slides, I’m currently revising my “Timeline Analysis - ESU Armor & Response” and getting ID’s of the ESU teams and who arrived where and when. Then I really want to get back to my original 3 timeline analyses: Crooks’ Offsite Travels, Crooks on AGR property (which my Door 13 Event analysis was part of and I will now remove and go back to the original analysis), and Crooks on the AGR Roof. The latter 2 analyses will involve the LEO actions as well. Those have taken a back seat to the Investigation Tools for month’s now, and that’s what I got into this for.
If you want to put your findings together, I don’t mind capturing them, I just don’t want to put the time in searching for them is all. Besides, you’re the whiz kid on that aspect of it.
I’ve got the PSP slide ready, and just need links for Tanner and the other guy. Out of respect to the PSP, and to avoid any potential legal issues, I won’t post ID’s of the PSP undercover officers.
Tanner I haven’t an actual link to, only nametag proof on camera so far.
Miller I have a facebook link to, but I can’t 100% say it is definitively him. Facebook
Clearly, they are not the same, Tanner has short sleeves whilst this other guy (who does look a lot like Miller but I can’t seem to catch a name) has long sleeves.
Sorry I don’t have more to contribute on this thing I went and opened my mouth about, I just found it odd we had so much on every other agency and so very little on the PSP, and where this was supposed to be an operation between fed, state, county, and local, we’re lacking a state presence in a lot of our analyses (cam, radio, etc).
).
I must say though, the PSP is severely underrepresented in our recog/ID efforts! Might I make a suggestion that we try to identify and incorporate what we can for them?
