Is this the bullitt that whizzing past Trump head. A photographer claimed to have captured it at a fast speed.
If it is, i believe John Goodman/Crowdsource the truth did a podcast with the photographer about it. I was not subscribed to his channel to watch it. Goodman mentioned in a trailer, i think the argument was over the shutter speed?
I watched Jason Goodman’s interview of Doug, and there were no arguments.
Sony A1 shutter speeds are 1/8000 for its mechanical shutter, or 1/32000 for its electtronic shutter.
Jason questioned the timestamps of Doug’s camera images.
Mainstream media knew the assassination attempt was real, and they wanted pictures of Trump’s head being shot off, on live TV.
There is certainly a difference in knowing it to be real and in knowing of it to happen in advance, which is what your statements sound to me to be implying. Are you alleging that certain media personnel knew of it in advance? If so, which ones in particular? And is that advanced knowledge tied to the planning of the assassination attempt in any way? Or did they just happen upon a lucky tip somehow? Either way is suspicious, they either helped plan it or knew about it in enough time to do something to prevent it and didn’t, which is implicating…
Yes, but I’m certainly not going to name anyone on an internet forum board.
So I’ll just post my beliefs that rival politicians suspected an assassination attempt, and mainstream became aware of those suspicions, and Butler had security holes.
Media reacted by hoping for a photo opportunity.
The only damage was done to Copenhaver, Dutch, and Comperatore(and in that order).
Trump obviously was scared, but not damaged.
Also, he said, “I either got hit by the world’s biggest mosquito, or I got shot”, and it wasn’t a mosquito.
So then, for what reason would a ‘rival’ political opponent suspect an assassination attempt? Does that imply involvement? Co-conspiracy?
For the same reasons, sometimes called ‘inside information’, that Joe Biden guessed, correctly, in February 2022, that ‘there will be no Nord Stream’.
And it doesn’t imply involvement, nor co-conspiracy…it just implies knowledge of ‘secret’ information…
If as a candidate for president, you have “secret” information that your opponent is to be assassinated, and you do nothing to act on that information or prevent it, then yes you are absolutely involved in the conspiracy of the assassination. The “secret” information is the whole conspiracy.
Well then there aren’t enough courtrooms in the world to deal with all the guilty people in this case, and the most suspcicious person, rumored to be ‘talking’, wasn’t a ‘presidential candidate.’
On youtube, so many podcasters, April, May, June warned of assassination that I told a friend, by phone, that ‘Trump will be assassinated.’
I’m not understanding. I thought you alleged a rival politician suspected the attempt, then leading to mainstream media’s knowledge of it. So then which non-presidential candidate that is also a rival politician was preemptively talking about Trump’s assassination? Truly I am curious, and would love to have some idea as to which avenue this ‘secret’ information traveled…
media, especially youtube casters 1 year ago, warned of assassination. Maybe mainstream are aware of youtube, and they beieved some of those suggestions!
I’m certainly not naming that person. I listened to a rumor that seemed believable, and the rumor suggested assassination ‘knowledge’, without stating it.
You’ll have to find it/them yourself.
I’ll change the subject to j13: on j15, a podcaster(with inside information) that I watched most days said ‘the snipers thought they were under fire’. I never let that go!
I emailed him and showed him Cullen’s video of the railshot going the wrong direction. The podcaster saw it…asked me, “where’s the proof?”
OK, I give up. He may know he’d already “said too much”, and I don’t want to get him into any more trouble.
…so I’m supposed to provide your evidence for you? How could I possibly know what you think is evidence that supports your claims? If it is based on your own personal emails I could not possibly even have access to it. And what would lead you to believe this podcaster has ‘inside’ information that others do not? Skepticism aside, you aren’t providing anything to work with.
You’re supposed to provide nothing for me.
my claims? If you’ve read any of my posts, you know I believe in multiple shooters, and at least one shot that became ‘visual’, and that Hercules2 heard ‘endless’ suppressed shots in 1.6 seconds of endlessness, and that the ‘endless’ shots were between himself and his never-interviewed partner with red bracelet on left wrist.
His career before youtube, and
I’m not
Is this your full time job?
Who’s paying you, and how much?
Thanks for all the answers. I think there’s a lot of good investigation done here and because of it I found some videos from the day that I would have never found out just by myself.
I will join the conversation with this screenshot:
My questions concerning the screenshot are:
Source: https://youtu.be/4zCHe6CyvaU?si=INe5bp6UDfu4Y3LF&t=32
Several people saw someone, even with gun. What did they see - marzipan? (Sorry, I have no time to find the marzipan reference Bud Spencer film.) Is it possible all the “out of fence” attendees were part of imperial philharmonic orchestra?
If I were a detective, I would check the Jon Malis video at first place - with the other video evidences he walks back with backpack.
Good work. But there is no reference when TMC arrived at magnetometers with rangefinder. State poliice hasn’t been notified? No sense to use a rangefinder inside the security area - but they should had to watch the individual when he left the controlled zone.
Or blackmailed.
And that photo was taken at the right moment - not before and not after. It is very unlikely, however possible. But there are a lot of incredibly unlikely things.
Why did CNN livestream that rally? There are two plausible explanations. Either they wanted to show live execution, or they wanted someone do the big reset I mentioned yesterday. (Biden debate was organized by CNN at evening late hours for old Joe.)
I have only logical inference that it would had been very risky. But people commit risky things from time to time. Either they take the risk or just not aware.
But experts still say: no plan survives the very first moment of the real action. (Bonaparte never made batle plans in advance.)
Mumbo jumbo. It has too long trace on the photo. But we could check the shutter speed again.
Very plausible. But why didn’t they use a professional shooter?
Military experts say: at least one year training is needed for a military sniper, and no peeling potatoes meanwhile. TMC had his training only at weekends.
Thomas’ fater called the police he was worried about his son. And he told the officers two thelevision had informed him about the shooter. We cannot check those phonecalls. We cannot ask the producers how on Earth they got the name.
I think we cannot go further. That would be only speculation.
By the way:
meme
By the way, I DO suggest the U.S. keep away from WW3. Europe has only 500 nuclear warheads and proud americans have a great chanche to survive. It is not a secret information.
(Well, there is a subtle problem - the carrier submarines.)
Well, sometimes I’m just guessing what they wanted to mean - by some phrases.
I have always been suspicious the Mainstream media knew about the assassination attempt beforehand. One mainstream video i watched, made it to obvious. The cameraman kept zooming in and out getting close up of trump at the podium and his head. The footage cut off before the shots were fired. I believe they have the footage of the shooter in the tree.
