So It's Back To First Principles (Part 1)

1 Like

I found something:

double drand() // uniform distribution, (0..1]
{
  return (rand()+1.0)/(RAND_MAX+1.0);
}
double random_normal() // normal distribution, centered on 0, std dev 1
{
  return sqrt(-2*log(drand())) * cos(2*M_PI*drand());
}

Sergi Mendiola
256 cm; 100.8"; 8’5"

Lucia Zanin
154 cm; 60.6"; 5’1"

@sonjax6
Let’s try Monte Carlo simulation


10 times 81 samples aroumd 5’10"

Somehow it does not look Gaussian distribution.

Is ‘log’ a natural log or a base 10 log?
And will the log of the LogLady(Margaret), ‘say something’ about the j13 murder/attempted murders’?
I have a 3rd ?, but I won’t ask.

You’re delirious, you see shooters everywhere, even in the folds of the metal roofs. Go get some rest and try to think about something else to save your sanity!

1 Like

Please stop, that’s too much, soon you will find shooters hidden in the insulating layer of the roofs or in camouflage clothing imitating tree leaves!

1 Like

Oh, I haven’t noticed the root. Now it is better.

Now we might fit to pixel statistics.

1 Like

Once you have found the natural logarithm, just divide it by ln(10) and you get the base-10 log. The Taylor series is quite simple to implement …

1 Like

If that is what you want to believe, then you believe that. On every platform, we always get new members who are trolls, and like to stir up trouble.

I am using the very best computers, software programmes, and i am able to see more than other people. Trust me, a lot more, i have even zoomed right into AGR 1 building window and know the identity of the shooter there OK.

I have zoomed in all over the farm show grounds, and discovered more strange things going on. All this does not get mentioned in any of Transcripts, or congressional hearings.

So, do me a favour my friend, go on another platform and cause trouble there. Twitter is a good place to start.

I look for potential shooters everywhere. If they are not, then what are these foot soldiers doing on the roof here then dipshit?

Do you remember the image i did showing the guy with the cigarette in his mouth, with smoke. I thought it would be appropriate to give him a name, “Cigarette Guy”. Not sure if this is the same guy you are referring to as “Boldy guy”.

Once I played with this function several years ago, but I remembered incorrectly like
U * ln V. Then I looked for it again and somehow I skipped the SQRT.

(That is a fundamental question to me if these series are only mathematical tricks or they are the real things - also with Fourier-series we might ask. Some teachers say the world is made by elementary waves. However they also claim there is nothing in the midle of Ptolimi’s circles. So it also seems to be a fundamenthal question.)

My estimation is there are about 2 million 18-year-old guys in the States.

@sonjax6
The plot has 1/4" resolution. Now it is an interesting question, kuz the integral should be the population. What is the resolution of the measured height? (Here we use cm and I think we’re not more precize, I cannot recall any half or quarter cm reports.)

So we should multiply the height by the width of readout resolution.
I must try it…


As I expected, the count is smaller when the resolution is higher (1/16" versus 1/4" now). Therefore we must know the resolution of statistics. I think 1" is too big, so I think they use 1/2" or 1/4". However it is only ascale factor.

It is also an interesting problem to convert the pixels into feet and inches. What if an inch is not integer multiple of pixels? (Well, I usually stuggle with same problem when converting between tonns and kNewtons or kg versus lbs. (But our customers need only a certificate of accuracy, they don’t care about these subtle problems.) Teachers didn’t tell me what to do and how, 40 years ago we used paper and pen and used two decimals for calculations.)

So my estimation is the readout is no more accurate than 2 pixels. But where the boundary begins is questionable. And the shifted histogram is slightly different.


Did the FBI pay you yesterday for Good Friday?

I suggest to read the 6th prophecy from this book.

The Celestine Prophecy

(Book #1 in the Celestine Prophecy Series)

By James Redfield

Well, I don’t think there were shooters everywhere. It is already a regiment, not just a battalion. But it doesn’t mean there weren’t any either.
Additionally I also mentioned the Poirot’s ABC-murders - to hide something among a lot similar. Not a needle but a straw in a haystack.

BTW


#https://youtu.be/9R_a9-S8e1w?t=1986

1 Like

Cheer up.
Good News: BALDY LIVES!
I was concerned that Baldy may have stayed on the roof to fire the 4,5,6,7,8 but…no! Dayve photographed Max preparing to fire, and firing. I think this is pre-shots, and firing #4 and #5.
Please thank Dayve(I mean ‘Brian’…when you chat with him on X dot com. Have you found ‘Brian’ yet?


I think the smoke and muzzle flash are as the cop runs east past the picnic table, but don’t quote me on that exact time.
The muzzle flash is 25 frames after the ‘ready’ frame, so 0.833 second after.

An actress rushed to her mom - when she was a little girl. “People said things behind my back.” Her mother replied: “They said things intentionally behind your back so you wouldn’t hear.”

Please no escalation. :wink:

Maybe you will find something among the lot of possibly false traces.
We shouldn’t exclude something just because we don’t like it.

I might try Math.round() in javascript, and I hope I remembered the function correctly.
Also, the only calculus I can remember right now is: the integral of dT/t is the natural log of T, which is 2.303 times the base 10 log of T.
I’ll try to remember more, later.

1 Like

Here’s some grainy pixelated pictures that almost certainly do have somebody in them. And unless I missed something, nobody has collected anything like the series before.

As it turns out, this video is the John Malis video, the guy who gets “a picture” of Crooks turning toward the people on the west side of the AGR building. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lk9dN06ilVE

He got Crooks (or “Crooks”) in quite a few shots. Also note that at the end when he gets a shot of him dead, “Crooks” seems to have slid down roof of the building a ways, based on the trees in the background.
The first (or only) number in the name refers to the time, and if there is a Fr and a second number, it refers to the frame of that second of the video.

1 Like

The detail I have pulled at the 32 second mark is before the “kill” shot so I don’t know why “Crooks” isn’t visible on the roof.

Are you saying that you can’t see anyone in the 2 pictures I just posted?
And just one other note:
The bullet that hit Trump’s ear hit Copenhaver’s arm, so what does Crooks have to do with the shooting?
Nothing.
He wasn’t the shooter.

Baldy, THE PRO, fired 1,2,3
then got off the roof and Max fired 4,5,6,7,8

And these guys were in the ‘smoking’ section.
Does it look as if someone is smoking?(not sure if that’s Max)
(I scaled it larger by 1.5, I think)
One other note: Dayve wasn’t aiming his phone near Crooks. He was aiming his phone at the sound of the first 3 shots, which became close to the sound of the fast 5 shots…and this, finally, explains what no one can say:
“Bullet 1 hit DJT and Copenhaver”
Dayve found the alignment right away, because he was there, and he heard it.
Mallis: who knows where he was, but Dayve gets the prize.
Here are 4 consecutive frames, untouched, unzoomed, unanything…

MaxSmoking




1 Like

I’m coming to conclusion “Crooks” fired no shots, but probably for different reasons than you. I’m thinking the 8 audible shots came from the center window of the AGR building 6 (with the help of self healing glass and a hologram to give the appearance of an intact window - those both DO exist). The difference in sounds would be accounted for by someone bringing a rifle closer to the window, or perhaps using a different rifle.

I was already starting to think that Crooks fired no shots, based largely on the fact that any bullets aimed downward would have hit a lot of bystanders. There were no gaps in any of those stands before shots were fired, it would have been impossible to miss people if you shot downward in that general direction.

I recently saw an older X post from John Cullen pointing out that “Crooks” would have had a very awkward firing position. The podium was about 25 degrees to the right of the lane alignment on the top of the roof, and if he was laying down to shoot, he wouldn’t have been able to have his right arm extending over to the next lane. With the pistol grip more than a foot in front of the buttstock, he’d have a last minute contortion problem to solve.

Mr. Dutch and Mr. Copenhaver were hit by a sniper in the trees, by suppressed bullets that passed between the Hercules 2 team, as one of them stated in testimony to congress. Why do I say this? None of the wounds they described entered from the left side. Their left sides were facing the podium at the time the first three audible shots were fired.