(By the way: Panama Canal is the American Donbass. Not exactly the same situation but very similar. Given to semeone else - and taken back. Ukraine was a poor federal state inside soviet union - which would needed continuous financial support from the federation. So inside the soviet union it was rational to put some russian industrial counties to Ukraine, instead of permanent monetary suppert. There live about 8 million russians - which become ukrainien citizen.)
OK, I’m just learning about which videos play, or not, in different systems.
Can you at least see the images of Baldy?
I don’t know all the 117 frames, but here are 3 of them.
I don’t understand it either, but I also had trouble visualizing stereoisomers in Chemistry class.
Maybe that type of artistic skill is innate, or maybe it can be developed.
But, it’s beyond belief that Dayve could have used Photoshop skills to distort the roofs in ~1800 to 2000 frames!
I certainly wouldn’t know how to do that.
But, I can certainly understand this:
“that shot that hit the President’s ear…hit the man in the black pants and the white shirt.”
Conclusion: you’ve all been looking at the wrong roof location for NINE MONTHS!
As far as I know, all of you may continue to look at the wrong location 9,000,000 years from now, wherever you all are…then.
Don’t worry about that - it is just some abstraction. (Heisenberg had a figure in his book what he had learnt at that time. There were hooks and anchors. And he was thinking about that it had been only symbols. (We don’t know what the “final reality” might be. Our recent understanding is that individual particles do not exist, they are just apparent vibrations in a continuous energy field. There is a speach from David Tong.) By the way, at the high scool I refused to accept the cerificate of honor on chemistry - defied.)
@sonjax6 Hercules testified they had seen LEOs with side arms drawn.
#https://youtu.be/pe1U9O3Fm18?t=63
There is a problem: I could see only the PSP trooper with his gun in his hand - but he most possibly might be concealed by those trees.
It’s hard to see where the corner of the 2 story building is on the picture you referenced, but I think it’s between the middle two vent pipes. The roof is ragged looking on the south face, but smooth on the east face.
Detective Collins pulls his sidearm 13 seconds before shots ring out.
On Collins’ bodycam, it’s hard to tell, but the guy with the red shirt and black shorts appears to be acting like a plainclothes cop - pulling a gun while checking out the west window on AGR building 6 just a few seconds before shots start. I do NOT see him in any videos after this though, so that’s perplexing.
In the last few seconds before shots start there’s a trio of guys that break from that fence group and start to sweep the AGR building. The guy with a red shirt and black shorts actually looks like he’s a in firing position after he gets past the west window:
As far as the pictures in post 8185, I can’t really make any conclusions without knowing what video they are from, and what part of the pictures they are from.
As far as post 8190, they reference Dayve Stewart’s video at around shot 6, which is around 4:59 in his video that runs 9:27.
Here’s one detail from 4:49 frame 10:
Not say that makes it impossible, but just keep in mind that the distance is almost 4 times as much as for “Crooks” so a face would be 4 times smaller from side to side as “Crooks” was, if Dayve didn’t zoom in or out.
A minute and a half after shots are done, at 6:29 in the video, the gaps are still there.
If Baldy is questioned, and if he squeals, won’t much of the plot be revealed?
Also, Dayve has captured Baldy’s ‘shot 1’ in at least TEN frames. Then Dayve, knowingly or not, has plastered text banners over Baldy’s position…where ‘shot 2’ may have been captured.
No, I think the tree is just in the BACKGROUND.
Baldy is on the roof…multiple frames, with muzzle flash.
At least 1 frame shows Crooks’ head and Baldy’s head, so you can compare sizes, to judge distance.
Crook is stretching his neck up in that one.
The End
PS do you know how to extract frames from Dayve’s video?
On 9/11/2001 we saw two 110 story skyscrapers largely TURN INTO DUST. Rescue workers were walking around at ground level on the site immediately afterward - that shouldn’t happen. The weapon that could do this is unknown to this day.
We apparently saw two planes (made of thin aluminum) cut through buildings with reinforced concrete floors like a hot knife through butter. Not even the wingtips were sheared off to fall to the pavement below. That shouldn’t happen. A lot of people think that planes were inserted into videos, but why would the planes look crude, lacking the airline logos and sunlight reflections, and why would they “lose” their wings when they were near smoke?" And why did the video from a news helicopter (e.g. from above) not have the plane “inserted” - it only showed a ball approaching the south tower? No - that all speaks to holographic technology.
Compared to THAT feat of holography, throwing up a shield on a window in 2024 would be child’s play.
Similarly, self healing glass EXISTS, there are videos showing it in action. It wouldn’t have to be active on the whole window, it could be just a small section of the window, which could be visually one piece but made of mostly of more conventional glass and some self healing glass.
Remember, we HEARD glass breaking sounds on Dayve’s video for the first three shots.
This was the attempted assassination of the possible leader of the free world, there would be a lot of money available for this.
OK, I’ll re-listen, but I think no one was shooting through window glass.
Here’s Baldy, above the red text ‘R’, and Crooks, above the red text ‘) V’. Crooks is stretching his neck up.
Edit: 4 consecutive frames showing Baldy firing shot 1, with muzzle flash…What’s the ‘thing’ in front of him? Body protection? Gun support(foam tripod?)
Please, pass me some of your shrooms… I see 5 frames showing nothing like what you are describing… Where are you dreaming of seeing ‘muzzle flash’ here?
The mass of a Boeing 767 varies depending on the model and how it’s configured (passengers, cargo, fuel). Here are some ballpark numbers:
Empty mass: ~88,000 kg (194,000 lbs)
Maximum takeoff weight (MTOW): ~186,880 kg (412,000 lbs)
For impact force calculations, we usually need to define a scenario, because force depends on how quickly the velocity changes — which means the deceleration or impact duration matters a lot.
Basic Concept: Force = Change in Momentum / Time
Newton’s second law in this context becomes:
F=m⋅ΔvΔtF = \frac{m \cdot \Delta v}{\Delta t}
Where:
FF = force in newtons (N)
mm = mass in kg
Δv\Delta v = change in velocity (i.e., impact speed in m/s)
Δt\Delta t = time taken to come to rest (s)
Example Scenarios
Let’s say a Boeing 767 with a mass of 160,000 kg crashes into a barrier and comes to a stop in different durations.
Scenario 1: Impact at 150 m/s (~540 km/h, ~335 mph)
Time to stop:
0.1 seconds → Sudden crash
1.0 second → Slower deceleration (like crash barriers, crumple zones)
No, instead, ask another idiot question, like “might [you] inquire why [I] don’t expand 1.3 seconds of audio, to match 45.6 seconds of video?”
Or, if you can think of a dumber question, go for it.
I’m not sure ‘what’ we’re ‘at’, but I hope that ‘it’, whatever it is, is ‘non contact’…because I certainly wouldn’t want to ‘catch’ something infectious.
That’s a better question.
Answer, because that man should be identified, and surrender to authorities for questioning, answers to which could identify the organizers of the conspiracy.
Basic Concept: Force = Change in Momentum / Time
Example Scenarios