So It's Back To First Principles (Part 1)

The media will show respect for Corey and his family, and say nice things about him. It is to be expected. However, i have been on other forum websites, and other people who know Corey are telling different stories about him. That he has learning difficulties. If this is true, this will answer some of my questions to another investigation i am working on.

I am still working on the investigation with Corey. All the evidence i have so far is that Corey was involved in a gun fight involving 2 other people. The gun went off, and Corey was killed. m

I appreciate your points.
Absolutely a coverup LHO was a patsy (as he claimed) and “crooks” was set up to take return fire (if he wasn’t silenced by assassin(s).

Evidence got lost

Nope (you all chase too many rabbit holes)
:wink:

You can’t ID anything in that shot, keep trying.

:wink:

It`s no surprise to me. My investigation is all based on independent evidence anyway.

I think everyone on this forum, myself included, deserve to win the nobel peace prize discovering the truth.

OK, i believe you, thousands wouldn`t.

It was Private investigators (historian, reporters) that dogged the JFK event. Some got close to the truth, a few probably hit it on the head.

On j13 Many of the perpetrators are caught on video.

At the risk of sounding guilty, too many willing to believe a lie and can be led down rabbit holes. People will see what they want to see.

Occam’s Razor

I agree, we have been led down some rabbit holes, and there are more to come. Also, reports are coming in now of more people around the rally wearing face masks. Don`t have enough information at the moment why.
m

Wrong, YOU can’t ID anything in those 117 photos(117 cropped 100x100pixel selections, centered the best I could, on the nose of a guy with his right arm and fist raised above his head)
Can you ‘ID’ anything interesting(…cheeseburger, soccer ball, Samsung phone…) in this photo?

Yes, i agree, one big cover up.

There were terrorists at the rally, at least one in every stand, and around the AGR building. It looks like they got past security using face masks. Don`t know how they got past the dogs???

A small bomb did go off in the AGR car park. The other 2 bombs in the bleachers stands were quickly defused by the bomb squad quickly climbing over the side fence. How did they know where they were???

I don`t have enough evidence. I believe there was a plan to try to assassinate Trump by allowing these terrorists in and try to blow up the stage and podium. Then order was given to stand down.

Keep an open mind. these sick bastards were prepared to do anything.

proves nothing, keep trying.

:wink:

It is a tricky business, these assassination plots. Perpetrators want to get away with it, no links back.
The more actors on the stage (complexity) the more can (will) go wrong.

Accom’s Razor

It is obvious this was NOT a lone wolf. It was a plot, many were involved (a few at rally). Just like JFK.

How many is only speculation. USSS left door open, FBI was clean up. Key people “looked” the other way.
Communication network (key) was broken (on purpose) so that confusion reigns.

My opinion.

1 Like

I claimed no proof.
I asked if you saw anything interesting.
You failed to answer.
You tell me to try, with no attempts of your own.
You need to keep trying, to do nothing.

That’s what I am best at!!

and triggering narcissists.
:wink:

1 Like

Psychology majors are pathetic, and useless.

This is VERY interesting. An ATF guy told the site counterpart (tentatively ID’d as Dana Dubray) to rearrange part of the perimeter so that the crowd could see Mr. Trump coming in and leaving - and potentially overwhelm the secret service team.

He claimed to be acting in an official capacity, but supposedly there was no ATF guy there. I wonder if he was in a gray suit, like the guy that asked for pictures from the police on the roof of AGR 6? In the senate testimony it’s revealed he refused to identify himself but Ms. Dubray did what she was asked anyway.

Page 134

Q Well, let’s start with the Senate interview then. In your Senate interview, you say you spoke with an ATF agent. Do you remember having that conversation?
A Yes.
Q And he told you he was from ATF?
A Yes.
Q Were you aware until that – up until that moment, you were not aware that ATF had a presence there, right?
A Correct. And I was told that they didn’t and that he was just attending and that he was just, like, somebody attending.

Q So he was presenting himself as being there in his official capacity?
A I’m sorry?
Q He was presenting himself as being there in his official capacity?
A He was just – he just was somebody that was – I didn’t know who he was. That’s why I asked. I was like, “Who are you?”

page 135
Q But he was talking about there’s an issue?
A Yeah, yeah. Right. He was acting as if he was part of the plan. Yes. Absolutely.
Q Okay. The issues with the bike rack, was that something that you had been aware of prior to that? Were there actual issues?
A So there was, like – the bike rack was part of the perimeter of the crowd containment, and during the advance planning, I had said to “You want all these people to see the motorcade coming through and making that turn to get into the tent?” And he said yes. It’s not something that I typically would like. So that happened.
And what was brought to my attention is people at this point are, like, hanging. They’re, like – I mean, people falling out left and right. They’re hanging over. People were exhausted. They’d been there all day. So they just thought that the bike rack might fall over. And so now I’m thinking, oh, this is going to be a problem if everybody starts charging the motorcade as they come.
So that’s when I just looked around and grabbed as many PSP officers as I could that were standing around and then said, “Let’s come up with this plan.” And there was a fire truck. I had the fire truck move to block as much line of sight as possible for the crowd. But, in the end, nothing happened.

Coming up next - senate testimony

2 Likes

P.95
Q (HSGAC Minority) Okay. Did you have knowledge of any other federal agencies?
A So I was made aware at some point that there was an ATF agent, but I did not know that he was coming to the site, so I had no idea who coordinated that or why he was on site.
Q And when did you find that out?
A I found that out probably around 4 o’clock p.m. that day.
Q And how did you find out?

P. 96
A I believe he was one of – there was a few people that were – that were saying, you know, hey, we’re concerned about this bike rack this bike rack that was like on, on the outer on the – like that the staff put for, to keep the crowd contained. And he was concerned that people, it might fall over, that people might, you know, be able to, to get, you know, get over it. And so then he kind of brought it to my attention.
I was like, “Well, who are you?”
Q Oh, so it was the ATF agent that brought it to your attention?
A Yes.
Q Do you recall his name?
A No. I was like, “Who are you?” He said, “ATF.”
Q And did he, like, have identifying – was he in plain clothes?
A Yeah. He was in plain clothes.
Q Did he show you his credential?
A No.
Q So he just came up to you and said, “I’m an ATF agent?”
A Well, he was talking to me about, you know, he just was acting like part of the plan. And I was just, “Well, who are you?” And he just said, “I’m ATF.”

p. 97
A And then I just, I didn’t ask any further questions. I mean, at that point I was just like, okay. I don’t know.
Q Did you talk to anyone else about that, either that day or later?
A I may have said to someone else, like, did you like – why was ATF – I may have said to somebody else, like, “Did you know ATF was coming?” Or, you know, but I don’t know.
Q So you still don’t know?
A I still don’t know why ATF was there or who asked them to be there or what their role was.

1 Like