Oh, those people are in Cullen’s model.
Unfortunately the FBI did NOT reveal the photos of the railings. And very likely Wray’s FBI destroyed some evidences.
We can download it:
It is, however, not necessary to stay together at the same place. The spotter could be easily inside the crowd, anywhere.
Once there was an interview with a sniper. He is able to stay unnnoticed at a place, not only hours but for days.
++
Great observation. Apparently he looks at the vents.
Let me tell you something about my experience. It is dangerous to rely on a liaison/contact person - even in business cases. Once or twice I paid the price of that overtrust.
(Additionally, there is an old joke. The detective cannot speak spanish, he calls an interpreter and asks the arresty about the hidden money. “I shot you in the head if you don’t tell me where it is.” He answers, but the interpreter replies “he says he is not afraid of death”.)
1 Like
Actually he saw a guy, arrived by car. (Allegedly the CEO’s Alpha Romeo?)
Later in the testimony he was sure about seen Crooks, but he have had pants on that time.
So at that moment Crooks should had to drive the following vehicles: an Alpha, a white van, an Elantra/Sonata, and yet a bike. (Only the Death Star is missing from this list.)
In his testimony also mentioned there was a pre-arranged family event (perhaps a birtday party).
So, the person Woods observed was, most probaby, not Crooks but the CEO. And he apparently had pants and boots. (But I’m not fully convinced about the boots guy.)
I have exhausted 7 possible consecutive posts, therefore I must add further comments to this one.
Amazing that Cullen left that ridiculous model, apparently unchanged.
But Cullen has claimed that he has a type of brain disorder.
I imagined his pink line trajectory much closer to the northeast edge of the TV screen.
And TOB leans West to watch TV just before the rail impact.
His forearm may have been safe, with or without the last second lean to West.
ctrl-F search no longer works on Part 1 
Can I dowload the entire “Part 1” topic?
Woods testimony says: he went back to the building and discussed the problem in person. But neither Nicol nor Murcko remembered that.
However, Wood’s car disappeared from the parking lot.
Someone (a red shirt big guy as I recall) told Vensel: someone was looking out of the window. Which window was it?
(Well, it was almost 30 years ago I heard gunshots. I was 10 yards away from entrance when an officer accidentally discharged his weapon twice into the sand box. He forgot to remove the magazine before. A plain clothed cop.)
Later those radio channels were patched together. But only afterwards.
@aaronmckeon @cmartenson
Ctrl-F does not work on “Part 1” I cannot search for former posts. Can you do something?
CTRL-F will open up a search box for the current topic, pictured below. If it isn’t, try refreshing the browser.
You can clear the “in this topic” tag to open up the search to other topics. You can also click the icon on the far-right to open up advanced options.
Pressing CTRL+F a second time will open up your browser’s native page search function.
Wow, @kincses-zsolt, I can see you’re incredibly well-informed, and I’ve also noticed that you’ve been here since the very beginning—just like @sonjax6. You were actively involved in the @vegaspatriot recognition tools report as well.
Congratulations on your perseverance and your commitment to seeking the truth! 
1 Like
I don’t entirely agree with that, as one of the spotter’s key responsibilities is to determine the distance between the shooter and the target using a rangefinder — meaning they need to be positioned relatively close to each other. The window theory seems like a simple assumption, considering there’s likely not enough space for both individuals near the vents. A more plausible explanation for the unusual amount of activity captured on Stewart’s video could be that it was the spotter generating all that movement.
According to the text message, he’s gone: “Guys, I’m out. Be safe.”
However, Wood’s testimony states that he returned to the building and discussed the problem in person.
He doesn’t appear in any body cam footage, which is highly suspicious.
Was he really gone? Was he actually there? Or was he positioned in the vent during the shooting?
When reduced to just two frames, you can clearly see the bullet strike Trump’s ear, followed by debris from the corner of the bleachers. This two-frame sequence confirms that the first shot hits his ear then impacting the bleachers.
Did you use frames from my video?
If ‘yes’, I just looked at ~36 frames and saw no ‘debris’ where you’re claiming debris.
Would you like to admit that you’ve added debris, for your own purposes?
Also, could ‘adding debris’ be considered obstruction of justice?
(also, you remembered to crop Copenhaver’s arm out of your debris)
Woods and Murcko are both from BuC.
Allegedly the Alpha belongs to Dimmic jr.
He had pants on. How about boots?
But no long hair here.
new video - formerly long hair guy not seen
Agr Holiday Video 2024
203 views Dec 23, 2024
Murcko testified:
look at the roadside parking cars
same spot
Well, I take back what I said about James Copenhaver being hit by the first audible shot. I forgot about the video he himself had taken:
If he was hit by the first shot, the bullet would have had to come from along the line of the big vent pipes, a little higher than what’s directly behind Mr. Trump’s head in that picture. We’ve seen from various videos that Mr. Copenhaver didn’t move to the right or left, or sit down once Trump took the stage.
Another important still is from Mr. Comperatore, at about the time of the first shot:
The thing to note is that Mr. Copenhaver is in front of the left part of the jumbotron cover when viewed from Mr. Comperatore’s position.
The photos I use to try to trace the origin of bullets are these:
NTD, also known as Epoch Times. ABC Go has a slightly lower resolution version of this, but, when I compared the photos side by side, I could see that this one is superior The uncropped version is 3653 by 2435 pixels:
USAToday has this:
The resolution is 3200 by 1801. Again, the south bleachers are somewhat obscured.
The one is use the most is from TV station WHYY:
The best resolution I found is 1600 by 1067. The first version I found had more pixels, but it was just scaled up from this one, and so was blurrier. You should be able to see some of the ribs on the AGR 6 roof fairly clearly on this one.
Another good resource is from ABC Go, from the Southwest:
Dimensions should be 3072 by 1728.
Peak Prosperity has downsized the bigger photos. They should be findable still online.
With models, a slightly misplaced stand, podium or building can throw everything off. A low res photo can allow one to use fat lines, or misplace the line by a pixel or two and come to bad conclusions. (I came to a wrong conclusion with Copenhaver by putting him too close to the end of the bleachers).
My view now? I don’t know where any bullets came from. Literally. A shot from “Crooks” would’t hit Mr. Trump and then either Mr. Copenhaver or the back railing - it would go almost exactly halfway in between, and wind could only deflect a bullet about 7 inches of that line. The middle window to Trump’s ear would end up a little closer to Mr. Copenhaver’s arm, but still too far west.
If you assume the first bullet came from the eastern vent, clipped Mr. Trump’s ear, then hit the south bleacher railing, that bullet would have passed within a foot of Mr. Comperatore. He and the people around him would have felt the change in pressure as well as heard the crack of the bullet, and most would have hit the deck. But there is a video showing the area Mr. Comperatore was in, and they don’t duck any faster than other groups of people fairly close in. Mr. Comperatore seems to have not even flinched for the first few shots.
This raises a question in my mind - why on NO ONE’S phone do we hear the sound of the shots direct to the phone as well as what came over the PA system?
As for flamecensors’ Baldy, Dayve sees him along these line of sights at minute mark 2:50 and 4:54 in his most commonly referenced video:
Someone sitting at one of those positions on either roof would not be in a position to hit Mr. Trump’s ear and then hit Mr. Copenhaver.
1 Like
I agree, but I think Baldy was on AGR4, and he lines up well with Copenhaver from your favorite WHYY map, and others.
I think the error is that Fox’s view was from a camera owner other than Copenhaver.
I think Fox just made an innocent mistake, and got phones and/or videos mixed up.
Fox would never lie to us!
Also, if I show any bald man pictures to Dayve he replies…with an animated GIF, or an emoji.
1 Like
Those timestamps aren’t familiar to me.
Dayve’s Baldy views begin with what I’m calling the first shot at the stage.
Baldy may have been lurking with just his upper head and eyes exposed, in the preceding minute.
I’m also claiming that Baldy’s face was captured in 16 Driscoll frames, on AGR4.