So It's Back To First Principles

We only know that shots hit the right stand.
We don’t know whether the shots were intended to hit Trump.

Any actor could have easily faked that.

The timing doesn’t play a major role.

As long as Trump grabs his ear at some point during the first shots, the closest timed shot supposedly could have injured his ear.
It then doesn’t matter where that bullet goes afterward.

The second shooter knew exactly where Trump would stand and where he had to aim to create an imaginary trajectory that matched Crook’s point of view.
Very high accuracy was not necessary because no independent persons were allowed to investigate the crime scene anyway.

Trump had moved his head down about 4 inches when the third shot was heard.
That was not fast. A professional sniper should have hit him.

Real shots were fired, but we don’t know if Trump was really targeted.

I was thinking more along the lines of manipulating the accuracy so that Crooks would never have hit the intended target.

Or a manipulation that would have prevented him from being able to shoot at all.

Maybe, I think it’s more likely that the first 3 shots came from inside (building 6 or the two two-story buildings).

@rough_country_gypsy filmed the roof of the rear two-story building with his drone. If your theory is correct, there should be traces there.

Please show me photos in which you have circled these tracks.

Any rational person would seek protection if they were being shot at.

I can understand that Trump supporters see something special in him. All fanatics do.
For me, he is a normal person who also has a survival instinct.

Where is this white reflection in this photo?

Why should I trust low-resolution images rather than high-resolution images?

Even untrained people should have gotten Trump and themselves to safety based on their survival instincts. Human behavior that contradicts one’s survival instinct must either have been trained, or they knew there was no threat, or they were all very stupid, almost mentally handicapped.

Is there video footage of this?

All we know is that there was a liquid that looked like blood on his ear.

There would have been enough time to apply blood to his ear, about 40 seconds.
No one would have been able to see it because of the dog pile.

He could have simply taken a photo of his ear with the blood removed and published it.

But then perhaps everyone would have seen that there was nothing to see.

I am not a supporter of the Democrats.
But you seem to have chosen a side.
If you are a supporter of one side, you will never be able to see the big picture clearly.
Divide and rule. A tried and tested method that still works well.

1 Like