it is impossible that crooks was the mastermind of this whole operation…
some time ago, I explained the Swiss cheese model in a different forum topic:
the more layers in the Swiss cheese model, the more unlikely it is that things happened by accident or have not been orchestrated carefully…
shooting from the hip, I see a cheese model with at least 17 layers, and the holes in these different layers were aligned perfectly to make this happen
if you want to get some background about the preparation of “lone gunman” attacks, you can listen to what Colonel Fletcher Prouty informs you about on, e.g., Telegram: Contact @FreedomDoc1
given what this Colonel says, you will be able to identify why and who on this forum does their utmost best to push people into a certain direction, and how they do it…
also note that he reports on what happened in the sixties, seventies and eighties…
the technological means and psychologic manipulation techniques of today are much more advanced than what he reports on…
in random order:
- crooks was used as a puppet
- the security services had been crippled intentionally leading up to this event
- the media had been tipped off to make sure they would cover the event live
- the evidence has been removed as fast as the fast buriers of information could get on site
- by now, finding interesting information online regarding the first attack has been made almost by means of the subsequent attacks…
the Babylon Bee summarizes it very clearly: FBI Tries To Distract From Old Trump Assassination Attempt With New Trump Assassination Attempt | Babylon Bee
very true, and if you look at who is pushing that idea, things get much clearer…
I think crooks put his backpack near/behind the air conditioning unit he jumped onto to get access to the roof. Grey Hughues Investigates analysed the bodycam footage of crooks walking on the AGR roofs, and it is very clear that he swings the backpack from one roof to another
I do not believe there ever was a rangefinder.
people believe that he carried that rangefinder in his trousers’ pocket, but this device has never been shown to exist. seeing is believing, and seeing an outline of something in his trousers’ pocket does not imply that something is a rangefinder…
the most obvious place where it would have made sense that he used that rangefinder was on that roof, and there is no trace of that rangefinder anywhere…
there are also other things that are missing from that roof:
- the content of that backpack
- crooks’ wallet
- the rifle shown on the roof had a magazine, where the evidence photo shows the rifle without a magazine, so, where is it, and what did it contain?
- the ammunition box(es)
I only believe what can be corroborated with high resolution footage (video/photo) which is (preferably) as old as possible.
none of the reports and testimonies are to be trusted at face value, only those things that come with supporting high resolution footage is to be considered…